添加生化抑制剂和腐植酸的稳定性增效尿素在黄土中的施用效果

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202112.010

应用生态学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (12): 4419-4428.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202112.010

添加生化抑制剂和腐植酸的稳定性增效尿素在黄土中的施用效果

肖富容^1,2, 李东坡^1,5*, 武志杰¹, 薛妍¹, 崔磊^1,2, 张可^1,2, 李永华³, 郑野⁴

¹中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所, 沈阳 110016;
²中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
³北方华锦化学工业集团有限公司, 辽宁盘锦 124021;
⁴锦西天然气化工有限责任公司, 辽宁葫芦岛 125001;
⁵辽宁沈阳农田生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站, 沈阳 110107

收稿日期:2021-03-08 修回日期:2021-09-15 出版日期:2021-12-15 发布日期:2022-06-15
通讯作者: *E-mail: lidp@ iae.ac.cn
作者简介:肖富容, 男, 1997年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事植物营养与新型高效肥料研究。E-mail: xiaofurong0911@163.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFD0200707)资助

Application effect of high efficiency and stability urea added with biochemical inhibitors and humic acid in loess

XIAO Fu-rong^1,2, LI Dong-po^1,5*, WU Zhi-jie¹, XUE Yan¹, CUI Lei^1,2, ZHANG Ke^1,2, LI Yong-hua³, ZHENG Ye⁴

¹Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China;
²University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
³North Huajin Chemical Industries Group Corporation, Panjin 124021, Liaoning, China;
⁴Jinxi Natural Gas Chemical Co. Ltd., Huludao 125001, Liaoning, China;
⁵National Field Observation and Research Station of Shenyang Agro-ecosystems, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110107, China

Received:2021-03-08 Revised:2021-09-15 Online:2021-12-15 Published:2022-06-15
Contact: *E-mail: lidp@ iae.ac.cn
Supported by:
National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFD0200707)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用田间盆栽试验,研究生化抑制剂与生物刺激素腐植酸结合制成的高效稳定性增效尿素肥料在黄土中的氮素转化特征、增产效果和氮素肥料表观利用率,以探明其施用效果,为开发适宜黄土施用的新型增效尿素肥料提供理论依据。本研究以不施氮肥(CK)和施尿素氮肥(N)为对照,在尿素中分别添加腐植酸(F)、N-丁基硫代磷酰三胺(NBPT)、3,4-二甲基吡唑磷酸盐(DMPP)和2-氯-6-三甲基吡啶(CP),以及腐植酸与3种生化抑制剂分别组合(NBPT+F、DMPP+F、CP+F)。结果表明: 与N处理相比,F、NBPT+F、DMPP+F和CP+F处理均能显著提高玉米的产量、叶片叶绿素含量、叶面积指数和植株吸氮量,对土壤铵态氮和硝态氮含量也有显著影响。与单独施用生化抑制剂相比,添加腐植酸可提高玉米叶片叶绿素含量。与CP相比,CP+F玉米的植株吸氮量、叶绿素含量、氮肥吸收利用率均显著提高;与NBPT相比,NBPT+F硝化抑制率提高10.7%,但玉米产量、叶面积指数、植株吸氮量和氮肥利用率等均有所降低;与DMPP相比,DMPP+F显著降低了玉米产量、叶面积指数、植株吸氮量、氮肥利用率和硝化抑制率等。综合玉米产量、植株吸氮量、氮肥吸收利用率以及土壤铵态氮、硝态氮含量等指标,在黄土地区施用尿素肥料时,建议添加腐植酸和CP以提升尿素性能,从而提高产量和肥料利用率。

关键词: 生物刺激素, 脲酶抑制剂, 硝化抑制剂, 铵态氮, 硝态氮, 氮肥利用率

Abstract: We carried out pot experiment to investigate nitrogen transformation characteristics, yield increasing effect, and apparent utilization rate of nitrogen fertilizer in loess soils by combining chemi-cal inhibitor and biostimulant humic acid to investigate the application effect and provide a theoretical basis for new type highly efficient and stable urea in loess soil. In this study, blank (CK) and urea (N) were set as controls, and humic acid alone (F), N-butyl thiophosphate-triamine (NBPT), 3,4-dimethyl-pyrazolate phosphate (DMPP), 2-chloro-6-trimethyl-pyridine (CP) and humic acid were respectively combined with three biochemical inhibitors to urea. The results showed that compared with N treatment, F, NBPT+F, DMPP+F, CP+F treatments significantly increased maize yield, chlorophyll content, leaf area index and nitrogen uptake, and had obvious effects on soil available nitrogen contents. The addition of humic acid increased chlorophyll content of maize leaves in all cases compared to the application of biochemical inhibitors alone. Compared with CP treatment, CP+F treatment could significantly increase nitrogen uptake, chlorophyll content, and nitrogen adsorption efficiency of maize. Addition of humic acid with NBPT increased nitrification inhibition rate by 10.7% compared with NBPT alone, but decreased yield, leaf area index, nitrogen uptake, nitrogen use efficiency. Compared with DMPP treatment, DMPP+F treatment significantly reduced maize yield, leaf area index, nitrogen uptake, nitrogen use efficiency and nitrification inhibition rate. Considering maize yield, plant N uptake, N fertilizer uptake rate and soil ammonium N and nitrate N contents, the addition of humic acid and CP is recommended for urea application in loess areas to enhance urea performance, yield, and fertilizer utilization.

Key words: biostimulant, urease inhibitor, nitrification inhibitor, ammonium nitrogen, nitrate nitrogen, nitrogen use efficiency

肖富容, 李东坡, 武志杰, 薛妍, 崔磊, 张可, 李永华, 郑野. 添加生化抑制剂和腐植酸的稳定性增效尿素在黄土中的施用效果[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(12): 4419-4428.

XIAO Fu-rong, LI Dong-po, WU Zhi-jie, XUE Yan, CUI Lei, ZHANG Ke, LI Yong-hua, ZHENG Ye. Application effect of high efficiency and stability urea added with biochemical inhibitors and humic acid in loess[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(12): 4419-4428.

参考文献

[1] 袁亮, 赵秉强, 林治安, 等. 增值尿素对小麦产量、氮肥利用率及肥料氮在土壤剖面中分布的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 20(3): 620-628 [Yuan L, Zhao B-Q, Lin Z-A, et al. Effects of value-added urea on wheat yield and N use efficiency and the distribution of residual N in soil profiles. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2014, 20(3): 620-628]
[2] Beeckman F, Motte H, Beeckman T. Nitrification in agricultural soils: Impact, actors and mitigation. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 2018, 50: 166-173
[3] Zhu ZL, Chen DL. Nitrogen fertilizer use in China: Contributions to food production, impacts on the environment and best management strategies. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2002, 63: 117-127
[4] 武志杰, 石元亮, 李东坡, 等. 稳定性肥料发展与展望. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(6): 1614-1621 [Wu Z-J, Shi Y-L, Li D-P, et al. The development and outlook of stabilized fertilizers. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2017, 23(6): 1614-1621]
[5] Wallace AJ, Armstrong RD, Grace PR, et al. Nitrogen use efficiency of N-15 urea applied to wheat based on fertiliser timing and use of inhibitors. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2020, 116: 41-56
[6] 金何玉, 张明超, 陈光蕾, 等. 硝化抑制剂对糯玉米产量和氮肥利用率的影响. 华北农学报, 2020, 35(5): 171-177 [Jin H-Y, Zhang M-C, Chen G-L, et al. Effects of nitrification inhibitors on yield and nitrogen use efficiency of waxy corn. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2020, 35(5): 171-177]
[7] 崔磊, 李东坡, 武志杰, 等. 用于黑土的稳定性氯化铵的适宜硝化抑制剂和氮肥增效剂组合. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019, 25(12): 2178-2188 [Cui L, Li D-P, Wu Z-J, et al. Suitable combination of nitrogen-inhibitors and nitrogen synergist for production of stable ammonium chloride applied to black soil. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2019, 25(12): 2178-2188]
[8] Akiyama H, Yan XY, Yagi K. Evaluation of effectiveness of enhanced-efficiency fertilizers as mitigation options for N₂O and NO emissions from agricultural soils: Meta-analysis. Global Change Biology, 2010, 16: 1837-1846
[9] Abalos D, Jeffery S, Sanz-Cobena A, et al. Meta-analysis of the effect of urease and nitrification inhibitors on crop productivity and nitrogen use efficiency. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2014, 189: 136-144
[10] 孙志梅, 武志杰, 陈利军, 等. 硝化抑制剂的施用效果、影响因素及其评价. 应用生态学报, 2008, 19(7): 1611-1618 [Sun Z-M, Wu Z-J, Chen L-J, et al. Application effect, affecting factors, and evaluation of nitrification inhibitor: A review. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2008, 19(7): 1611-1618]
[11] 周旋, 吴良欢, 戴锋. 土壤温度和含水量互作对抑制剂抑制氮素转化效果的影响. 农业工程学报, 2017, 33(20): 106-115 [Zhou X, Wu L-H, Dai F. Inhibition effect of inhibitors on nitrogen transformation affected by interaction of soil temperature and water content. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2017, 33(20): 106-115]
[12] Neufeld JD, Knowles R. Inhibition of nitrifiers and methanotrophs from an agricultural humisol by allylsulfide and its implications for environmental studies. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1999, 65: 2461-2465
[13] Jacinthe PA, Pichtel JR. Interaction of nitrapyrin and dicyandiamide with soil humic compounds. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1992, 56: 465-470
[14] 薛妍, 武志杰, 张丽莉, 等. 土壤含水量、pH及有机质对DMPP硝化抑制效果的影响. 应用生态学报, 2012, 23(10): 2663-2669 [Xue Y, Wu Z-J, Zhang L-L, et al. Inhibitory effect of DMPP on soil nitrification as affected by soil moisture content, pH and organic matter. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2012, 23(10): 2663-2669]
[15] Vitale L, Ottaiano L, Polimeno F, et al. Effects of 3, 4-dimethylphyrazole phosphate-added nitrogen fertilizers on crop growth and N₂O emissions in southern Italy. Plant, Soil and Environment, 2013, 59: 517-523
[16] Asli S, Neumann PM. Rhizosphere humic acid interacts with root cell walls to reduce hydraulic conductivity and plant development. Plant and Soil, 2010, 336: 313-322
[17] Nardi S, Pizzeghello D, Muscolo A, et al. Physiological effects of humic substances on higher plants. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2002, 34: 1527-1536
[18] Tahir MM, Khurshid M, Khan MZ, et al. Lignite-derived humic acid effect on growth of wheat plants in different soils. Pedosphere, 2011, 21: 124-131
[19] Jindo K, Martim SA, Navarro EC, et al. Root growth promotion by humic acids from composted and non-composted urban organic wastes. Plant and Soil, 2012, 353: 209-220
[20] Liu M, Wang C, Liu X, et al. Saline-alkali soil applied with vermicompost and humic acid fertilizer improved macroaggregate microstructure to enhance salt leaching and inhibit nitrogen losses. Applied Soil Ecology, 2020, 156: 103705, doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2020.103705
[21] Yildirim E. Foliar and soil fertilization of humic acid affect productivity and quality of tomato. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B-Soil and Plant Science, 2007, 57: 182-186
[22] 庄振东, 李絮花. 腐植酸氮肥对玉米产量、氮肥利用及氮肥损失的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(5): 1232-1239 [Zhuang Z-D, Li X-H. Microbial and enzyme activity in response to humic acid in soil with a ginger crop. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2016, 22(5): 1232-1239]
[23] 方玉凤, 王晓燕, 庞荔丹, 等. 硝化抑制剂对春玉米氮素利用及土壤pH值和无机氮的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2015(6): 18-22 [Fang Y-F, Wang X-Y, Pang L-D, et al. Effects of nitrification inhibitor on nitrogen use efficiency of spring maize, soil pH and inorganic nitrogen. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2015(6): 18-22]
[24] 林江辉, 李辉信, 胡锋, 等. 干土效应对土壤生物组成及矿化与硝化作用的影响. 土壤学报, 2004, 41(6): 924-930 [Lin J-H, Li H-X, Hu F, et al. Effects of rewetting on soil biota structure and nitrogen mineralization, nitrification in air-dried red soil. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2004, 41(6): 924-930]
[25] 葛均筑, 徐莹, 袁国印, 等. 覆膜对长江中游春玉米氮肥利用效率及土壤速效氮素的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(2): 296-306 [Ge J-Z, Xu Y, Yuan G-Y, et al. Effects of film mulching on nitrogen use efficiency of spring maize and soil available nitrogen variations in the middle reaches of Yangtze River. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2016, 22(2): 296-306]
[26] 油伦成, 李东坡, 武志杰, 等. 稳定性铵态氮肥在黑土和褐土中的氮素转化特征. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(4): 1079-1087 [You L-C, Li D-P, Wu Z-J, et al. Nitrogen transformation of stable ammonium fertilizer in black soil and cinnamon soil. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(4): 1079-1087]
[27] Dawar K, Khan A, Sardar K, et al. Effects of the nitrification inhibitor nitrapyrin and mulch on N₂O emission and fertilizer use efficiency using N-15 tracing techniques. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 757: 143739, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143739
[28] 宋涛, 尹俊慧, 胡兆平, 等. 脲酶/硝化抑制剂减少农田土壤氮素损失的作用特征. 农业资源与环境学报, 2021, 38(4): 585-597 [Song T, Yin J-H, Hu Z-P, et al. Characteristics of urease/nitrification inhibitors in reducing nitrogen losses in farmland soils. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2021, 38(4): 585-597]
[29] 王雪薇, 刘涛, 褚贵新. 三种硝化抑制剂抑制土壤硝化作用比较及用量研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(1): 54-61 [Wang X-W, Liu T, Chu G-X. Inhibition of DCD, DMPP and nitrapyrin on soil nitrification and their appropriate use dosage. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2017, 23(1): 54-61]
[30] Trevisan S, Francioso O, Quaggiotti S, et al. Humic substances biological activity at the plant-soil interface from environmental aspects to molecular factors. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 2010, 5: 635-643
[31] 毕军, 夏光利, 毕研文, 等. 腐殖酸生物活性肥料对冬小麦生长及土壤微生物活性的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2005, 11(1): 99-103 [Bi J, Xia G-L, Bi Y-W, et al. Effect of humic bio-active fertilizer on winter wheat and soil microbial activity. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2005, 11(1): 99-103]
[32] 闫双堆, 刘利军, 洪坚平. 腐殖酸-尿素络合物对尿素转化及氮素释放的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2008, 16(1): 109-112 [Yan S-D, Liu L-J, Hong J-P. Effect of humic acid-urea complex on urea transformation and nitrogen release. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2008, 16(1): 109-112]
[33] Dong L, Cordova-Kreylos AL, Yang J, et al. Humic acids buffer the effects of urea on soil ammonia oxidizers and potential nitrification. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2009, 41: 1612-1621
[34] 李涛, 石元亮, 李学文, 等. NBPT在土壤中的降解及其影响因子. 生态学杂志, 2006, 25(9): 1082-1086 [Li T, Shi Y-L, Li X-W, et al. Degradation and its affecting factors of NBPT in soil. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2006, 25(9): 1082-1086]
[35] Meier IC, Finzi AC, Phillips RP. Root exudates increase N availability by stimulating microbial turnover of fast-cycling N pools. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2017, 106: 119-128
[36] 陈静, 黄占斌. 腐植酸在土壤修复中的作用. 腐植酸, 2014(4): 30-34, 65 [Chen J, Huang Z-B. Effect of humic acid on soil restoration. Humic Acid, 2014(4): 30-34, 65]
[37] 刘敏, 李絮花, 刘文博, 等. 腐植酸对番茄苗期氮素代谢的影响. 水土保持学报, 2019, 33(3): 327-331 [Liu M, Li X-H, Liu W-B, et al. Effect of humic acid on nitrogen metabolism at tomato seedling stage. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 33(3): 327-331]
[38] 代明, 胡兆平, 陈海宁, 等. 腐殖酸、DMPP复配复合肥对玉米生长的影响. 江苏农业科学, 2017, 45(22): 58-60 [Dai M, Hu Z-P, Chen H-N, et al. Effects of combined application of humic acid and DMPP fertilizer on maize growth. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 45(22): 58-60]

添加生化抑制剂和腐植酸的稳定性增效尿素在黄土中的施用效果

Application effect of high efficiency and stability urea added with biochemical inhibitors and humic acid in loess

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李长青, 纪萌, 马萌萌, 王硕, 刘欢, 孙志梅. 天然增效剂与化学抑制剂复配对小麦/玉米轮作体系产量、氮素利用及氮平衡的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2391-2397.
[2]	李佳乐, 梁泳怡, 刘文杰, 杨秋, 徐文娴, 汤水荣, 王晶晶. 有机肥替代化学氮肥对橡胶幼苗生长和土壤环境的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(2): 431-438.
[3]	杨婷, 钟全林, 李宝银, 程栋梁, 徐朝斌, 邹宇星, 张雪, 周宗哲. 短期铵态氮与硝态氮配施对刨花楠幼苗生长及叶片性状的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(1): 25-32.
[4]	陈东凯, 骆汉, 吕佼容, 张炳学, 刘顿, 谢永生. 渭北旱塬矮砧密植苹果园土壤矿质氮积累与空间分布特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(1): 97-103.
[5]	周钟昱, 张海阔, 梁佳辉, 张宝刚, 蒋文婷, 田琳琳, 李彦, 蔡延江. 太湖流域上游竹林河岸带土壤反硝化酶活性及其影响因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(9): 3070-3078.
[6]	李学红, 李东坡, 武志杰, 崔磊, 肖富容, 李永华, 郑野, 张金明. 脲酶/硝化抑制剂在黑土和褐土中对尿素氮转化的调控效果 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(4): 1352-1360.
[7]	崔磊,李东坡,武志杰,薛妍,肖富容,张可,李永华,郑野. 不同硝化抑制剂对红壤氮素硝化作用及玉米产量和氮素利用率的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(11): 3953-3960.
[8]	石鑫蕊, 任彬彬, 江琳琳, 范淑秀, 曹英丽, 马殿荣. 有机肥替代部分化肥对水稻光合速率、氮素利用率和产量的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(1): 154-162.
[9]	杨成邦, 张丽, 高艳丽, 吴娜, 陈仕东, 刘小飞, 杨智杰. 增温对湿润亚热带杉木幼林和成熟林土壤无机氮的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(9): 2849-2856.
[10]	攸越, 吴蔡楠, 钟苇杰, 侯之琳, 刘越, 都韶婷, 金崇伟. 速效氮肥配施双氰胺对减控小白菜镉积累的作用 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(9): 3093-3100.
[11]	刘朋召, 王旭敏, 宁芳, 雒文鹤, 张琦, 张元红, 李军. 减量施氮对渭北旱地春玉米产量、氮素利用及土壤硝态氮含量的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(8): 2621-2629.
[12]	高复云, 李雅颖, 姚槐应. 完全氨氧化菌的分子生态学研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(8): 2831-2840.
[13]	崔磊, 李东坡, 武志杰, 李学红, 李永华, 闫增辉, 郑野, 张金明. 高效稳定性硫酸铵氮肥在黑土中的施用效果 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(7): 2390-2398.
[14]	李明, 李朝苏, 刘淼, 吴晓丽, 魏会廷, 汤永禄, 熊涛. 耕作播种方式对稻茬小麦根系发育、土壤水分和硝态氮含量的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(5): 1425-1434.
[15]	崔政军, 刘栋, 吴兵, 剡斌, 马俊, 赵邦庆, 高玉红, 牛俊义. 水氮耦合对旱地胡麻产量形成与花后氮素积累转运的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(3): 909-918.