氮磷共限制青藏高原高寒草甸生态系统碳吸收

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202201.004

应用生态学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (1): 51-58.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202201.004

氮磷共限制青藏高原高寒草甸生态系统碳吸收

李文宇^1,2, 张扬建^1,3,4, 沈若楠^1,2, 朱军涛^1*, 丛楠¹

¹中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 生态系统网络观测与模拟重点实验室, 拉萨高原实验站, 北京 100101;
²中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
³中国科学院青藏高原地球科学卓越创新中心, 北京 100101;
⁴中国科学院大学资源与环境学院, 北京 100049

收稿日期:2021-02-13 接受日期:2021-06-28 出版日期:2022-01-15 发布日期:2022-07-15
通讯作者: * E-mail: zhujt@igsnrr.ac.cn
作者简介:李文宇, 男, 1996年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事全球变化生态学研究。E-mail: lwy3408221996@163.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFA0604802)和国家自然科学基金项目(41991234,42077422,U20A2009)

Ecosystem carbon uptake was co-limited by nitrogen and phosphorus in alpine meadow on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau

LI Wen-yu^1,2, ZHANG Yang-jian^1,3,4, SHEN Ruo-nan^1,2, ZHU Jun-tao^1*, CONG Nan¹

¹Lhasa Plateau Ecosystem Research Station, Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;
²University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
³CAS Center for Excellence in Tibetan Plateau Earth Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;
⁴College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2021-02-13 Accepted:2021-06-28 Online:2022-01-15 Published:2022-07-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 随着人类活动加剧,青藏高原高寒草地面临外来资源输入的威胁,而外源资源输入如氮、磷、钾(N、P、K)及其交互作用如何影响高寒草地生态系统碳循环尚不明确。本研究在藏北高寒草甸进行了连续3年N、P、K元素交互的添加试验,测定群落盖度和生态系统碳交换等数据,旨在阐明资源添加对高寒草甸生态系统碳交换过程的影响。结果表明: 在植物生长季,高寒草甸生态系统总体表现为碳汇,对照下NEE均值为-13.0 μmol·m^-2·s^-1。单独添加N、P、K对生态系统净CO₂交换(NEE)、生态系统呼吸(ER)和总生态系统生产力(GEP)等碳通量组分均无显著影响;在NP、NPK组合添加下NEE显著增加了95.3%和63.9%,GEP显著增加了45.5%和33.0%,而ER没有显著改变。NP、NPK组合添加主要通过提高植物群落盖度和影响生态系统水分利用效率提高NEE和GEP,其中植物群落盖度分别提高了18.1%和21.4%。NP资源添加提高了高寒草甸生产力和自养呼吸,但同时可能导致土壤酸化,抑制异养呼吸,二者相互抵消,从而没有改变ER。对于养分匮乏的高寒草甸,单独添加N、P、K和NK、PK组合添加没有改变生态系统碳交换,而NP组合添加提高了NEE和GEP,表明高寒草甸生态系统碳吸收过程可能受到N、P等多种养分资源的共同限制。

关键词: 碳交换, 共限制, 高寒草甸, 青藏高原

Abstract: Alpine grassland is threatened by the import of chemicals, fertilizers and other external resources with increasing human activities on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. It is unclear how carbon cycle of alpine grasslands is affected by the inputs of external resources such as nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium (N, P, K) and their interactions. We conducted a 3 year experiment on the interactive addition of N, P and K with alpine grassland as the research object to clarify ecosystem carbon exchange process in response to resource addition by measuring community coverage and ecosystem carbon exchange. The results showed the alpine meadow was represented by carbon sequestration during the growing season. The mean value of net ecosystem CO₂ exchange (NEE) was -13.0 μmol·m^-2·s^-1 under the control treatment. NEE, ecosystem respiration (ER), and gross ecosystem productivity (GEP) showed no significant responses when N, P and K were added separately. NEE was significantly increased by 95.3% and 63.9%, GEP was significantly increased by 45.5% and 33.0% under the combined addition of NP and NPK, but ER remained stable. The combined addition of NP or NPK mainly increased NEE and GEP by increasing the coverage of plant communities and affecting ecosystem water use efficiency. Plant community coverage was increased by 18.1% and 21.4%, respectively. The addition of NP increased productivity and autotrophic respiration in alpine meadow. It might cause soil acidification to inhibit heterotrophic respiration, thereby did not change ER due to the two aspects canceling each other out. The addition of N, P, K alone and NK and PK did not change ecosystem carbon exchange, while the combined addition of NP increased NEE and GEP on the nutrient-deficient alpine meadows, indicating that ecosystem carbon uptake was co-limited by N and P in alpine meadow.

Key words: carbon exchange, co-limitation, alpine meadow, Qinghai-Tibet Plateau

李文宇, 张扬建, 沈若楠, 朱军涛, 丛楠. 氮磷共限制青藏高原高寒草甸生态系统碳吸收[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(1): 51-58.

LI Wen-yu, ZHANG Yang-jian, SHEN Ruo-nan, ZHU Jun-tao, CONG Nan. Ecosystem carbon uptake was co-limited by nitrogen and phosphorus in alpine meadow on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(1): 51-58.

参考文献 34

[1]	张镱锂, 李炳元, 郑度. 论青藏高原范围与面积. 地理研究, 2002, 21(1): 1-8
[2]	王荔, 曾辉, 张扬建, 等. 青藏高原土壤碳储量及其影响因素研究进展. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(11): 3506-3515
[3]	Fang JY, Liu GH, Xu SL. Soil carbon pool in China and its global significance. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 1996, 2: 249-254
[4]	Zhu J, Zhang Y, Yang X, et al. Warming alters plant phylogenetic and functional community structure. Journal of Ecology, 2020, 108, doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.13448
[5]	Zhu J, Zhang Y, Jiang L. Experimental warming drives a seasonal shift of ecosystem carbon exchange in Tibetan alpine meadow. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2017, 233: 242-249
[6]	曹广民, 张金霞. 中国嵩草草甸. 北京: 科学出版社, 2001
[7]	Liu X, Zhang Y, Han W, et al. Enhanced nitrogen depo-sition over China. Nature, 2013, 494: 459-462
[8]	Niu S, Wu MY, Han YI, et al. Nitrogen effects on net ecosystem carbon exchange in a temperate steppe. Global Change Biology, 2010, 16: 144-155
[9]	Wang Y, Jiang Q, Yang Z, et al. Effects of water and nitrogen addition on ecosystem carbon exchange in a meadow steppe. PLoS One, 2015, 10(5): 0127695
[10]	Elser JJ, Bracken MES, Cleland EE, et al. Global ana-lysis of nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of primary producers in freshwater, marine and terrestrial ecosystems. Ecology Letters, 2007, 10: 1135-1142
[11]	Hungate BA, Dukes JS, Shaw MR, et al. Atmospheric science, nitrogen and climate change. Science, 2003, 302: 1512-1513
[12]	Luo Y, Su B, Currie WS, et al. Progressive nitrogen limitation of ecosystem responses to rising atmospheric carbon dioxide. BioScience, 2004, 54: 731-739
[13]	Tian D, Niu SL. A global analysis of soil acidification caused by nitrogen addition. Environmental Research Letters, 2015, 10: 1714-1721
[14]	Guo H, Ye C, Zhang H, et al. Long-term nitrogen & phosphorus additions reduce soil microbial respiration but increase its temperature sensitivity in a Tibetan alpine meadow. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2017, 113: 26-34
[15]	Wang C, Liu D, Bai E. Decreasing soil microbial diversity is associated with decreasing microbial biomass under nitrogen addition. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2018, 120: 126-133
[16]	全国土壤普查办公室. 中国土壤分类系统. 北京: 农业出版社, 1992
[17]	武倩, 韩国栋, 王忠武, 等. 模拟增温和氮素添加对荒漠草原生态系统碳交换的影响. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(6): 1427-1434
[18]	敖小蔓, 孟倩, 徐智超, 等. 氮、磷添加对呼伦贝尔草甸草原生态系统净CO2交换的影响.草业科学, 2020, 37(8): 1428-1439
[19]	Xia J, Niu S, Wan S. Response of ecosystem carbon exchange to warming and nitrogen addition during two hydrologically contrasting growing seasons in a temperate steppe. Global Change Biology, 2009, 15: 1544-1556
[20]	孙学凯, 林力涛, 于占源, 等. 施氮对沙质草地生态系统碳交换特征的影响. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(1): 110-118
[21]	张杰琦, 李奇, 任正炜, 等. 氮素添加对青藏高原高寒草甸植物群落物种丰富度及其与地上生产力关系的影响. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(10): 1125-1131
[22]	Wan S, Xia J, Liu W, et al. Photosynthetic over-compensation under nocturnal warming enhances grassland carbon sequestration. Ecology, 2009, 90: 2700-2710
[23]	马涛, 童云峰, 刘锦霞, 等. 不同施肥处理高寒草甸植物群落物种多样性与生产力的关系. 草原与草坪, 2008(4): 34-38
[24]	Zhu J, Zhang Y, Jiang L. Experimental warming drives a seasonal shift of ecosystem carbon exchange in Tibetan alpine meadow. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2017, 233: 242-249
[25]	宗宁, 石培礼, 赵广帅, 等. 降水量变化对藏北高寒草地养分限制的影响研究. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(5): 444-455
[26]	王长庭, 王根绪, 刘伟, 等. 施肥梯度对高寒草甸群落结构功能和土壤质量的影响. 生态学报, 2013, 33(10): 3101-3113
[27]	Henry HAL, Kim MK. Responses of net ecosystem CO2 exchange and plant biomass to warming and nitrogen addition in a temperate grass-dominated system. 96th ESA Annual Convention, Melbourne, 2011
[28]	陈伏龙, 王怡璇, 吴泽斌, 等. 气候变化和人类活动对干旱区内陆河径流量的影响——以新疆玛纳斯河流域肯斯瓦特水文站为例. 干旱区研究, 2015, 32(4): 692-697
[29]	赵亮, 徐世晓, 伏玉玲, 等. 积雪对藏北高寒草甸CO2和水汽通量的影响. 草地学报, 2005, 13(3): 242-247
[30]	郑佳华, 张峰, 赵天启, 等. 氮、磷、钾施配对大针茅割草地地上生物量的影响. 中国草地学报, 2020, 42(5): 64-71
[31]	周一平, 张玉革, 马望, 等. 氮添加和干旱对呼伦贝尔草原5种植物性状的影响. 生态环境学报, 2020, 29(1): 41-48
[32]	Tian D, Niu SL. A global analysis of soil acidification caused by nitrogen addition. Environmental Research Letters, 2015, 10: 1714-1721
[33]	Zhao C, Zhu L, Liang J, et al. Effects of experimental warming and nitrogen fertilization on soil microbial communities and processes of two subalpine coniferous species in Eastern Tibetan Plateau, China. Plant and Soil, 2014, 382: 189-201
[34]	Zheng LQ, Huang FL, Reena N, et al. Physiological and transcriptome analysis of iron and phosphorus intera-ction in rice seedlings. Plant Physiology, 2009, 151: 262-274

氮磷共限制青藏高原高寒草甸生态系统碳吸收

Ecosystem carbon uptake was co-limited by nitrogen and phosphorus in alpine meadow on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 34

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王进, 周广胜, 何奇瑾, 周莉. 内蒙古克氏针茅草原净生态系统碳交换的物候特征及遥感监测 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(3): 659-668.
[2]	孙官发, 陆梅, 闪昇阳, 赵定蓉, 孙煜佳, 刘国庆, 赵旭燕, 冯峻. 短期氮沉降对纳帕海高寒退化疏花早熟禾草甸土壤呼吸干湿季变化的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(2): 390-398.
[3]	马建国, 李玉满, 王树林, 朱怀德, 姚梦凡, 王晓波. 典型黄帚橐吾型退化草地形成过程中土壤和植被特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(8): 2153-2160.
[4]	卢子欣, 杨漫, 李彬, 胡俊杰, 于海彬. 喜马拉雅山脉种子植物海拔梯度分布格局及其影响因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1787-1796.
[5]	晨阳, 李慧融, 李冬楠, 孙鹏飞, 宿江华. 锡林浩特草原净生态系统碳交换量特征及源区分布 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1509-1516.
[6]	吕晶花, 赵旭燕, 陆梅, 李聪, 杨志东, 刘攀, 陈志明, 冯峻. 氮沉降下纳帕海草甸植被与土壤变化对微生物生物量碳氮的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1525-1532.
[7]	朱荣, 杨雪, 龚浩鑫, 王志波, 陈爽, 王小春, 王瑞丽. 青藏高原东缘松科植物叶脉性状的变异 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(5): 1203-1210.
[8]	苟国花, 樊军, 王茜, 周明星, 杨学亭. 基于最小数据集的青藏高原南北部不同土地利用方式土壤质量评价 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(5): 1360-1366.
[9]	郝嘉元, 智烈慧, 李晓文, 董世魁, 李巍. 青藏高原土地利用格局和生态系统服务的时空演变特征及关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(11): 3053-3063.
[10]	孙彩彩, 董全民, 杨晓霞, 冯斌, 时光, 吕卫东. 牦牛和藏羊放牧对青藏高原高寒草甸土壤节肢动物群落的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(11): 3127-3134.
[11]	徐贺年, 王江林, 彭小梅, 任子健. 青藏高原东北部祁连圆柏径向生长对不同类型干旱的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(8): 2097-2104.
[12]	崔茜琳, 何云玲, 李宗善. 青藏高原植被水分利用效率时空变化及与气候因子的关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(6): 1525-1532.
[13]	刘杰, 汲玉河, 周广胜, 周莉, 吕晓敏, 周梦子. 2000—2020年青藏高原植被净初级生产力时空变化及其气候驱动作用 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(6): 1533-1538.
[14]	高翔, 周宇, 孟平, 裴松义, 张劲松. 辽西樟子松人工林净生态系统碳交换 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(5): 1183-1190.
[15]	刘旻霞, 张国娟, 李亮, 穆若兰, 徐璐, 于瑞新. 甘南高寒草甸海拔梯度上功能多样性与生态系统多功能的关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(5): 1291-1299.