湿地土壤硫氧化-还原过程及其与其他元素的耦合作用研究进展

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202202.031

应用生态学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 560-568.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202202.031

湿地土壤硫氧化-还原过程及其与其他元素的耦合作用研究进展

毛立^1,2, 孙志高^1,2,3,4*, 陈冰冰^1,3, 胡星云^1,4, 武慧慧^1,4

¹福建师范大学湿润亚热带生态地理过程教育部重点实验室, 福州 350007;
²福建师范大学湿润亚热带山地生态国家重点实验室培育基地, 福州 350007;
³福建师范大学福建省亚热带资源与环境重点实验室, 福州 350007;
⁴福建师范大学地理研究所, 福州 350007

收稿日期:2021-04-25 修回日期:2021-11-14 出版日期:2022-02-15 发布日期:2022-08-15
通讯作者: *E-mail: zhigaosun@163.com
作者简介:毛立, 男, 1996年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事湿地生物地球化学研究。E-mail: 13012565261@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41971128)、福建省公益类科研院所重点项目(2016R1032-1)和福建师范大学地理科学学院研究生科研创新基金项目资助。

Sulfur oxidation-reduction process and its coupling effects with other elements in marsh soil: A review

MAO Li^1,2, SUN Zhi-gao^1,2,3,4*, CHEN Bing-bing^1,4, HU Xing-yun^1,4, WU Hui-hui^1,4

¹Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Humid Subtropical Eco-geographical Process, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China;
²Breeding Base of State Key Laboratory for Subtropical Mountain Ecology, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China;
³Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory for Subtropical Resources and Environment, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China;
⁴Institute of Geography, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China

Received:2021-04-25 Revised:2021-11-14 Online:2022-02-15 Published:2022-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 湿地土壤硫(S)的氧化-还原过程是硫循环的重要环节,其对于维持湿地系统的稳定与健康具有重要意义。本文综述了湿地土壤S的氧化-还原过程及影响因素,并分析了其与其他元素耦合机制的研究进展。湿地土壤S氧化-还原过程的影响因素主要涉及生物因子(植物、微生物、底栖动物及人类活动等)和非生物因子(温度、水分和粒度等物理因素及pH、盐度、有机质等化学因素),而其与其他元素的耦合作用主要涉及碳(C)、氮(N)、磷(P)等生源元素以及铁(Fe)、锰(Mn)等金属元素。鉴于当前湿地土壤S氧化-还原过程影响机制揭示不深入、耦合作用研究不均衡及生态效应探讨不充分等问题,未来应重点加强S氧化-还原过程的关键功能微生物研究,强化其与痕量元素迁移转化的耦合机理研究,重视其与其他元素耦合作用的生态效应研究。

关键词: 湿地土壤, 硫氧化-还原过程, 影响因素, 耦合作用

Abstract: Sulfur oxidation-reduction process (SORP) in marsh soil is an important link in sulfur cycle, which plays an important role in maintaining the stability and health of marsh. We summarized the SORP in marsh soil and its influencing factors, and analyzed the research progress of its coupling effects with other elements. The influencing factors of SORP in marsh soil mainly involved biotic (plants, microorganisms, zoobenthos, human activities, etc.) and abiotic factors (physical factors such as temperature, moisture and particle size, and chemical factors such as pH, salinity, organic matter, etc.). Related research on the coupling effects of SORP and other elements in marsh soil mainly involved in biogenic elements such as carbon (C), nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P), and metal elements such as iron (Fe) and manganese (Mn). Currently, the underlying mechanism of SORP was not deeply explored, the research on coupling effects was unbalance, and the ecological effects were insufficient. In the future, key functional microorganisms involved in SORP should be strengthened, the coupling mechanism between SORP and micro-elements should be enhanced, and the ecological effects produced by the coupling effects of SORP with other elements should be emphasized.

Key words: marsh soil, sulfur oxidation-reduction process, influencing factor, coupling effect

毛立, 孙志高, 陈冰冰, 胡星云, 武慧慧. 湿地土壤硫氧化-还原过程及其与其他元素的耦合作用研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(2): 560-568.

MAO Li, SUN Zhi-gao, CHEN Bing-bing, HU Xing-yun, WU Hui-hui. Sulfur oxidation-reduction process and its coupling effects with other elements in marsh soil: A review[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(2): 560-568.

参考文献

[1] 何池全, 赵魁义, 余国营, 等. 湿地生态过程研究进展. 地球科学进展, 2000, 15(2): 165-171
[2] Zak D, Hupfer M, Cabezas A, et al. Sulphate in freshwater ecosystems: A review of sources, biogeochemical cycles, ecotoxicological effects and bioremediation. Earth Science Reviews, 2021, 212: 103364, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103446
[3] Jørgensen BB, Fenchel T. The sulfur cycle of a marine sediment model system. Marine Biology, 1974, 24: 189-201
[4] Howarth RW, Teal JM. Sulfate reduction in a New England salt marsh. Limnology and Oceanography, 1979, 24: 999-1013
[5] 尹希杰, 孙治雷, 徐勇航, 等. ³⁵SO₄^2-示踪法测定九龙江河口沉积中硫酸盐还原速率. 海洋学报, 2015, 37(4): 83-93
[6] Yang XN, Huang S, Wu QH, et al. Nitrate reduction coupled with microbial oxidation of sulfide in river sediment. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2012, 12(9): 1435-1444
[7] Guo WR, Cecchetti AR, Wen Y, et al. Sulfur cycle in a wetland microcosm: Extended ³⁴S-stable isotope analysis and mass balance. Environmental Science and Techno-logy, 2020, 54: 5498-5508
[8] Sela-Adler M, Ronen Z, Herut B, et al. Co-existence of methanogenesis and sulfate reduction with common substrates in sulfate-rich estuarine sediments. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2017, 8: 00766, doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00766
[9] Mandernack KW, Lynch L, Krouse HR, et al. Sulfur cycling in wetland peat of the New Jersey Pinelands and its effect on stream water chemistry. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2000, 64: 3949-3964
[10] Zhang YL, Li J, Leng ZR, et al. The influence of root exudate flavonoids on sulfur species distribution in mangrove sediments polluted with cadmium. Wetlands, 2020, 40: 2671-2678
[11] Ferreira TO, Otero XL, Vidal-Torrado P, et al. Effects of bioturbation by root and crab activity on iron and sulfur biogeochemistry in mangrove substrate. Geoderma, 2007, 142: 36-46
[12] Koretsky CM, Haveman M, Cuellar A, et al. Influence of Spartina and Juncus on saltmarsh sediments. Ⅰ. Pore water geochemistry. Chemical Geology, 2008, 255: 87-99
[13] 张骁栋. 互花米草与蟹类扰动对崇明东滩植物种间关系及生地化循环的影响. 博士论文. 上海: 复旦大学, 2012
[14] 方安琪, 贺志理, 王成, 等. 红树林沉积物中微生物驱动硫循环研究进展. 微生物学报, 2020, 60(1): 13-25
[15] Morrisey DJ, DeWitt TH, Roper DS, et al. Variation in the depth and morphology of burrows of the mud crab Helice crassa among different types of intertidal sediment in New Zealand. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 1999, 182: 231-242
[16] Teuchies J, Singh G, Bervoets L, et al. Land use changes and metal mobility: Multi-approach study on tidal marsh restoration in a contaminated estuary. Science of the Total Environment, 2013, 449: 174-183
[17] 魏巍, 许艳丽, 宋长春, 等. 三江平原沼泽湿地开垦及恢复对土壤硫酸盐还原菌数量分布的影响. 湿地科学, 2008, 6(2): 298-303
[18] Hoppala G, Bush R, Moon E, et al. Oxidative transformation of iron monosulfides and pyrite in estuarine sediments: Implications for trace metals mobilisation. Journal of Environmental Management, 2017, 186: 158-166
[19] 陈冰冰, 孙志高, 孙文广, 等. 外源氮输入对生长季黄河口碱蓬湿地土壤无机硫形态变化特征的影响. 水土保持学报, 2018, 32(5): 277-286
[20] Beck M, Dellwig O, Liebezeit G, et al. Spatial and seasonal variations of sulphate, dissolved organic carbon, and nutrients in deep pore waters of intertidal flat sediments. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2008, 79: 307-316
[21] 吴又先, 潘淑贞, 丁昌璞. 土壤中硫的氧化还原及其生态学意义. 土壤学进展, 1993, 21(4): 9-17
[22] 童晓雨, 孙志高, 曾阿莹, 等. 闽江河口互花米草海向入侵对湿地土壤无机硫赋存形态的影响. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(1): 3518-3526
[23] 杜云鸿, 谢文霞, 杜慧娜, 等. 湿地生态系统还原性硫气体自然释放研究. 地球与环境, 2016, 44(2): 231-236
[24] Connell WE, Patrick Jr WH. Sulfate reduction in soil: Effects of redox potential and pH. Science, 1968, 159: 86-87
[25] 陈俊松, 杨渐, 蒋宏忱. 湖泊硫循环微生物研究进展. 微生物学报, 2020, 60(6): 1177-1191
[26] 林惠荣, 施积炎, 傅晓萍, 等. 硫对铅污染水稻土微生物活性及群落结构的影响. 应用生态学报, 2010, 21(7): 1829-1834
[27] Van Erk MR, Meier DV, Ferdelman T, et al. Kelp depo-sition changes mineralization pathways and microbial communities in a sandy beach. Limnology and Oceano-graphy, 2020, 65: 3066-3084
[28] Adamczyk WZ, Król M, Kobus J. Microbial oxidation of elemental sulphur in brown soil. Plant and Soil, 1975, 43: 95-100
[29] Delaune RD, Devai I, Lindau CW. Flux of reduced sulfur gases along a salinity gradient in Louisiana coastal marshes. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2002, 54: 1003-1011
[30] Tang XJ, Li LY, Wu C, et al. The response of arsenic bioavailability and microbial community in paddy soil with the application of sulfur fertilizers. Environmental Pollution, 2020, 264:114679, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114679
[31] King GM. Utilization of hydrogen, acetate, and ‘noncompetitive' substrates by methanogenic bacteria in marine sediments. Geomicrobiology Journal, 1984, 3: 275-306
[32] Weston NB, Vile MA, Neubauer SC, et al. Accelerated microbial organic matter mineralization following salt-water intrusion into tidal freshwater marsh soils. Biogeochemistry, 2011, 102: 135-151
[33] 胡敏杰, 邹芳芳, 仝川, 等. 氮、硫输入对河口湿地土壤有机碳矿化的实验研究. 环境科学学报, 2016, 36(11): 4184-4192
[34] Hausmann B, Knorr KH, Schreck K, et al. Consortia of low-abundance bacteria drive sulfate reduction-depen-dent degradation of fermentation products in peat soil microcosms. The ISME Journal, 2016, 10: 2365-2375
[35] 李金业, 陈庆锋, 尹志超, 等. 湿地甲烷厌氧氧化机制研究进展. 土壤学报, 2020, 57(6): 1353-1364
[36] Sun ZG, Jiang HH, Wang LL, et al. Seasonal and spatial variations of methane emissions from coastal marshes in the northern Yellow River estuary, China. Plant and Soil, 2013, 369: 317-333
[37] Timmers P, Suarez-Zuluaga D, Van RM, et al. Anaerobic oxidation of methane associated with sulfate reduction in a natural freshwater gas source. The ISME Journal, 2016, 10: 1400-1412
[38] Bejarano-Ortiz DI, Huerta-Ochoa S, Thalasso F, et al. Kinetic constants for biological ammonium and nitrite oxidation processes under sulfide inhibition. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2015, 177: 1665-1675
[39] Joye SB, Hollibaugh JT. Influence of sulfide inhibition of nitrification on nitrogen regeneration in sediments. Science, 1995, 270: 623-625
[40] Plummer P, Tobias C, Cady D. Nitrogen reduction pathways in estuarine sediments: Influences of organic carbon and sulfide. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeoences, 2015, 120: 1958-1972
[41] Zhu J, He Y, Zhu YH, et al. Biogeochemical sulfur cycling coupling with dissimilatory nitrate reduction processes in freshwater sediments. Environmental Reviews, 2017, 26: 121-132
[42] Rikmann E, Zekker I, Tomingas M. Sulfate-reducing anaerobic ammonium oxidation as a potential treatment method for high nitrogen-content wastewater. Biodegradation, 2012, 23: 509-524
[43] Li YY, Wang YL, Wan DJ, et al. Pilot-scale application of sulfur-limestone autotrophic denitrification biofilter for municipal tailwater treatment: Performance and microbial community structure. Bioresource Technology, 2020, 300: 122682, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122682
[44] 饶清华, 李家兵, 胡敏杰, 等. 亚热带河口潮滩湿地N₂O排放对氮硫增强输入的响应. 环境科学学报, 2018, 38(5): 2045-2054
[45] Yang JS, Liu Y, Shen Z, et al. Short-term effects of NaCl and Na₂SO₄ on nitrogen mineralization in the soil in three marshes of the Liaohe River estuary. Catena, 2021, 196: 104828, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2020.104828
[46] Wu SJ, Zhao YP, Chen YY, et al. Sulfur cycling in freshwater sediments: A cryptic driving force of iron deposition and phosphorus mobilization. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 657: 1294-1303
[47] Guan LC, Xia ZY, Jin LL, et al. Influence of sulfate reduction on fraction and regeneration of phosphorus at sediment-water interface of urban malodorous river. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28: 11540-11548
[48] Froelich PN, Klinkhammer GP, Bender ML, et al. Early oxidation of organic matter in pelagic sediments of the eastern equatorial Atlantic: Suboxic diagenesis. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1979, 43: 1075-1090
[49] Zhao YP, Wu SJ, Yu MT, et al. Seasonal iron-sulfur interactions and the stimulated phosphorus mobilization in freshwater lake sediments. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 768: 144336
[50] Dierberg FE, Debusk TA, Larson NR, et al. Effects of sulfate amendments on mineralization and phosphorus release from South Florida (USA) wetland soils under anaerobic conditions. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2011, 43: 31-45
[51] Caraco NF, Cole JJ, Likens GE. Evidence for sulphate-controlled phosphorus release from sediments of aquatic systems. Nature, 1989, 341: 316-318
[52] Temporetti P, Beamud G, Nichela D, et al. The effect of pH on phosphorus sorbed from sediments in a river with a natural pH gradient. Chemosphere, 2019, 228: 287-299
[53] Hu MJ, Peñuelas J, Sardans J, et al. Dynamics of phosphorus speciation and the phoD phosphatase gene community in the rhizosphere and bulk soil along an estua-rine freshwater-oligohaline gradient. Geoderma, 2020, 365: 114236, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114236
[54] Postma D, Jakobsen R. Redox zonation: Equilibrium constraints on the Fe(Ⅲ)/SO₄^- reduction interface. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1996, 60: 3169-3175
[55] Flynn TM, O'Loughlin EJ, Mishra B, et al. Sulfur-mediated electron shuttling during bacterial iron reduction. Science, 2014, 344: 1039-1042
[56] Koretsky CM, Moore CM, Lowe KL, et al. Seasonal oscillation of microbial iron and sulfate reduction in saltmarsh sediments (Sapelo Island, GA, USA). Biogeochemistry, 2003, 64: 179-203
[57] Šíma J, Diáková K, Holcová V. Redox processes of sulfur and manganese in a constructed wetland. Chemistry and Biodiversity, 2007, 4: 2900-2912
[58] Borch T, Kretzschmar R, Kappler A, et al. Biogeochemical redox processes and their impact on contaminant dynamics. Environmental Science and Technology, 2010, 44: 15-23
[59] Sun ZG, Li JB, He T, et al. Spatial variation and toxi-city assessment for heavy metals in sediments of interti-dal zone in a typical subtropical estuary (Min River) of China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2017, 24: 23080-23095
[60] Shi WJ, Song WJ, Zheng JL, et al. Factors and pathways regulating the release and transformation of arsenic mediated by reduction processes of dissimilated iron and sulfate. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 768: 144697, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144697
[61] 李晓, 孙志高, 李亚瑾, 等. 闽江河口湿地土壤对痕量元素吸附-解吸特征及其对pH值变化的响应. 环境科学学报, 2020, 40(5): 1807-1820

湿地土壤硫氧化-还原过程及其与其他元素的耦合作用研究进展

Sulfur oxidation-reduction process and its coupling effects with other elements in marsh soil: A review

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	申继凯, 黄懿梅, 黄倩, 徐凤璟. 黄土高原不同植被类型土壤微生物残体碳的积累及其对有机碳的贡献 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(1): 124-132.
[2]	张岁梦, 叶丽敏, 周肄智, 王晓霞, 许元科, 姜姜, 刘自强. 南方丘陵区马尾松-麻栎群落水分利用来源及其影响因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1729-1736.
[3]	邵明勤, 王剑颖, 丁红秀. 中国白鹤越冬适宜生境模拟及种群扩张驱动因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1639-1648.
[4]	张自正, 张蕾, 孙桂英, 刘俊祥. 清江流域生态系统服务权衡时空效应及驱动因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(4): 1051-1062.
[5]	赵梓琨, 田园盛, 翁学先, 李欢玮, 孙文义. 1986—2021年黄河流域地表水体面积的时空变化特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(3): 761-769.
[6]	石铁矛, 王迪, 汤煜, 李沛颖, 初亚奇. 城市生态系统碳汇固碳能力计算方法与影响因素研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(2): 555-565.
[7]	冯平, 杨妮娟, 李建柱. 滦河流域遥感生态指数改进及生态环境质量评价 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(12): 3195-3202.
[8]	管凝, 程金花, 侯芳, 曾合州, 沈子雅, 赵梦圆, 秦建淼. 西南喀斯特地区典型林分土壤优先流特征及影响因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(1): 31-38.
[9]	张文龙, 张守红, 张建军. 生物滞留系统径流与水质调控效应研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(1): 264-276.
[10]	陈娟, 胡琳玉, 卢鹏伟, 江玉梅, 张志斌, 曾庆桂, 简敏菲, 朱笃. 电子受体和光照对土壤CH₄排放相关微生物功能基因丰度的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(2): 517-526.
[11]	王明慧, 黄来明, 陈翠柏. 西藏高寒区不同土地利用方式下土壤持水能力差异及其影响因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(12): 3287-3293.
[12]	张雅琪, 陈林, 庞丹波, 何文强, 李学斌, 吴梦瑶, 曹萌豪. 土壤微生物群落对枯落物输入的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(11): 2943-2953.
[13]	曹琪琪, 肖辉杰, 刘涛, 孙景宽, 夏江宝, 王栋, 辛智鸣, 贺文君, 赵丹丹, 黄文文. 乌兰布和沙漠东北部不同耕作年限农田土壤有机碳密度及其影响因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(10): 2628-2634.
[14]	刘冉, 余新晓, 蔡强国, 孙莉英, 方海燕, 贾国栋, 和继军. 黄土丘陵沟壑区黄土坡面侵蚀过程及其影响因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(8): 2886-2894.
[15]	王茜, 赵筱青, 普军伟, 岳启发, 陈星宇, 石小倩. 滇东南喀斯特区域生态脆弱性的时空演变及其影响因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(6): 2180-2190.