放牧对草原植物功能性状影响研究进展

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202202.023

应用生态学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 569-576.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202202.023

• • 上一篇

放牧对草原植物功能性状影响研究进展

王晓芳^1,2,3, 马红彬^4,5*, 刘杰^1,2,3, 苗海涛^1,2,3, 沈艳^4,5, 周瑶^4,5, 马静利^4,5

¹兰州大学草地农业科技学院, 兰州 730020;
²草地农业生态系统国家重点实验室草地微生物中心, 兰州 730020;
³西部生态安全省部共建创新中心, 兰州 730020;
⁴宁夏大学农学院, 银川 750021;
⁵宁夏大学西北退化生态系统恢复与重建教育部重点实验室培育基地, 银川 750021

收稿日期:2021-08-09 修回日期:2021-11-10 出版日期:2022-02-15 发布日期:2022-08-15
通讯作者: *E-mail: ma_hb@nxu.edu.cn
作者简介:王晓芳, 女, 1993年生, 博士研究生。主要从事草地生态、资源与环境研究。E-mail: wangxf19@lzu.edu.com
基金资助:
宁夏回族自治区对外合作项目(2018BFH03009)、国家自然科学基金项目(32060406)、宁夏科技创新领军人才培养项目(KJT2018003)、中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(lzujbky-2021-ey03,lzujbky-2021-kb12)和甘肃省级引导科技创新发展专项资金项目(2019ZX-06)资助。

Research advances on the effects of grazing on plant functional traits in grassland

WANG Xiao-fang¹^,2,3, MA Hong-bin^4,5*, LIU Jie^1,2,3, MIAO Hai-tao^1,2,3, SHEN Yan^4,5, ZHOU Yao^4,5, MA Jing-li^4,5

¹College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou 730020, China;
²State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems Center for Grassland Microbiome, Lanzhou 730020, China;
³Collaborative Innovation Center for Western Ecological Safety, Lanzhou 730020, China;
⁴College of Agriculture, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China;
⁵Breeding Base of Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Restoration and Reconstruction, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China

Received:2021-08-09 Revised:2021-11-10 Online:2022-02-15 Published:2022-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 植物功能性状的表达和植被环境适应性相关,植物功能性状之间的权衡变化体现了植物在放牧胁迫下资源的重新整合和获取。本文总结了放牧干扰下植物功能性状表达的差异性,着重将放牧干扰与植物功能性状相结合,介绍了植物功能性状的变异来源是植物遗传特征与环境过滤相互协调的结果,归纳了放牧对植物营养性状、繁殖性状的影响,以及植物可以通过调整生存和繁殖策略以适应放牧干扰。本文集中于放牧对植物种群、群落和生态系统的影响。不同放牧干扰下植物功能性状的表达具有差异性,因此植物功能性状可作为解释种群生长和繁殖、群落构建过程和生态系统功能的指标。为使植物功能性状的研究更好地服务于草地生态环境,可依据植物功能性状筛选合理的草地抗牧物种;依据草地植物种群的生活史特征,制定科学的放牧机制;以植株为整体综合考虑植物功能性状变化,提出放牧研究中植物功能性状的发展方向。

关键词: 放牧, 草原植物, 功能性状

Abstract: Plant functional traits is connected with vegetation adaptability to the environment. The trade-off between plant functional traits reflects resource reintegration and acquisition under grazing pressures. We summarized the differences of plant functional traits under grazing disturbance, focused on the linkages between grazing disturbance and plant functional traits. We introduced that the variation of plant functional traits resulted from the coordination between plant genetic characteristics and environmental filtration, summarized the effects of grazing on nutritional and reproductive traits, and noted that plants could use survival and reproductive strategies to adapt to the grazing disturbance. We mainly focused on the effects of grazing on plant population, community and ecosystem. The expression of plant functional traits was different under grazing disturbance. Therefore, plant functional traits could be used as indicators to explain population growth and reproduction, community assembly, and ecosystem function. In order to better serve the ecological environment of grassland with plant functional traits, reasonable grazing resis-tant species could be screened according to plant functional traits. Based on life history characteristics of grassland plant population, the scientific grazing mechanism should be formulated, and the responses of plant functional traits and resource allocation to grazing disturbance should be conducted from the perspective of individual-based level in the future.

Key words: grazing, grassland plant, functional trait

王晓芳, 马红彬, 刘杰, 苗海涛, 沈艳, 周瑶, 马静利. 放牧对草原植物功能性状影响研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(2): 569-576.

WANG Xiao-fang, MA Hong-bin, LIU Jie, MIAO Hai-tao, SHEN Yan, ZHOU Yao, MA Jing-li. Research advances on the effects of grazing on plant functional traits in grassland[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(2): 569-576.

参考文献

[1] Kraft NJB, Godoy O, Levine JM. Plant functional traits and the multidimensional nature of species coexistence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015, 112: 797-802
[2] Li XL, Png GK, Li YH, et al. Leaf plasticity contri-butes to plant anti-herbivore defenses and indicates selective foraging: Implications for sustainable grazing. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 122, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107273
[3] 韩涛涛, 唐玄, 任海, 等. 群落/生态系统功能多样性研究方法及展望. 生态学报, 2021, 41(8): 3286-3295
[4] Funk JL, Larson JE, Ames GM, et al. Revisiting the Holy Grail: Using plant functional traits to understand ecological processes. Biological Reviews, 2017, 92: 1156-1173
[5] Lavorel S, Grigulis K, Lamarque P, et al. Using plant functional traits to understand the landscape distribution of multiple ecosystem services. Journal of Ecology, 2011, 99: 135-147
[6] Wang C, Jian SG, Ren H, et al. A web-based software platform for restoration-oriented species selection based on plant functional traits. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 2021, 9: 570154, https://doi: 10.3389/fevo.2021.570454
[7] Feizabadi MF, Tahmasebi P, Broujeni EA, et al. Functional diversity, functional composition and functional β diversity drive aboveground biomass across different bioclimatic rangelands. Basic and Applied Ecology, 2021, 52: 68-81
[8] Cantarel AAM, Allard V, Andrieu B, et al. Plant functional trait variability and trait syndromes among wheat varieties: The footprint of artificial selection. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2021, 72: 1166-1180
[9] Wood SA, Karp DS, DeClerrck F, et al. Functional traits in agriculture: Agrobiodiversity and ecosystem services. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 2015, 30: 531-539
[10] Helm J, Dutoit T, Saatkamp A, et al. Recovery of Medi-terranean steppe vegetation after cultivation: Legacy effects on plant composition, soil properties and functional traits. Applied Vegetation Science, 2019, 22: 71-84
[11] Mason NWH, Orwin K, Lambie S, et al. Leaf econo-mics spectrum-productivity relationships in intensively grazed pastures depend on dominant species identity. Ecology and Evolution, 2016, 6: 3079-3091
[12] Diaz S, Lavorel S, Mclntyre S, et al. Plant trait responses to grazing: A global synthesis. Global Change Bio-logy, 2007, 13: 313-341
[13] Sitters J, Cherif M, Egelkraut D, et al. Long-term heavy reindeer grazing promotes plant phosphorus limitation in arctic tundra. Functional Ecology, 2019, 33: 1233-1242
[14] Ramula S, Paige KN, Lennartsson T, et al. Overcompensation: A 30-year perspective. Ecology, 2019, 100: e02667, https:// doi: 10.1002/ecy.2667
[15] Zhang LL, Zhu ZH, Li YN, et al. Overall grazing tole-rance index (overall GTI) is not an ideal predictor for describing a single-species tolerance to grazing. Ecology and Evolution, 2019, 9: 4087-4102
[16] Archibald S, Hempson GP, Lehmann C. A unified framework for plant life-history strategies shaped by fire and herbivory. New Phytologist, 2019, 224: 1490-1503
[17] 赵娜, 赵新全, 赵亮, 等. 植物功能性状对放牧干扰的响应. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(7): 1916-1926
[18] Zirbel CR, Bassett T, Grman E, et al. Plant functional traits and environmental conditions shape community assembly and ecosystem functioning during restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 54: 1070-1079
[19] Orwin KH, Mason NWH, Jordan OM, et al. Season and dominant species effects on plant trait-ecosystem function relationships in intensively grazed grassland. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 55: 236-245
[20] 何念鹏, 刘聪聪, 张佳慧, 等. 植物性状研究的机遇与挑战: 从器官到群落. 生态学报, 2018, 38(19): 6787-6796
[21] 孟婷婷, 倪健, 王国宏. 植物功能性状与环境和生态系统功能. 植物生态学报, 2007, 31(1): 150-165
[22] Liu CC, Li Y, Yan P, et al. How to improve the predictions of plant functional traits on ecosystem functioning? Frontiers in Plant Science, 2021, 12: 622260
[23] Bonin C, Flores J, Lal R, et al. Root characteristics of perennial warm-season grasslands managed for grazing and biomass production. Agronomy, 2013, 3: 508-523
[24] Liu ZY, Zhang Z, Zhang TY, et al. Heavy grazing effects on stem elongation and internode allometry: Insights from a natural pasture grass. Grass and Forage Science, 2019, 74: 427-436
[25] Abalos D, Groenigen JWV, Deyn GBD, What plant functional traits can reduce nitrous oxide emissions from intensively managed grasslands? Global Change Biology, 2018, 24: e248-e258
[26] Fischer FM, Bonnet OJF, Cezimbra IM, et al. Long-term effects of grazing intensity on strategies and spatial components of functional diversity in subtropical grassland. Applied Vegetation Science, 2019, 22: 39-47
[27] Lin DM, Yang SF, Dou PP, et al. A plant economics spectrum of litter decomposition among coexisting fern species in a sub-tropical forest. Annals of Botany, 2020, 125: 145-155
[28] Kelly R, Healy K, Anand M, et al. Climatic and evolutionary contexts are required to infer plant life history strategies from functional traits at a global scale. Ecology Letters, 2021, 24: 970-983
[29] Webb CT, Hoeting JA, Ames GM, et al. A structured and dynamic framework to advance traits-based theory and prediction in ecology. Ecology Letters, 2010, 13: 267-283
[30] Midolo G, Kuss P, Wellstein C. Land use and water availability drive community-level plant functional diversity of grasslands along a temperature gradient in the Swiss Alps. Science of the Total Environmental, 2021, 764: 142888
[31] Bongers FJ, Bernhard S, Walter D, et al. Genetic richness affects trait variation but not community productivity in a tree diversity experiment. New Phytologist, 2020, 227: 744-756
[32] Carr GD. Monograph of the Hawaiian Madiinae (Aste-raceae): Argyroxiphium, Dubautia and Wilkesia. Allertonia, 1985, 4: 1-123
[33] Perring MP, Bernhardt-Romermann M, Baeten L, et al. Global environmental change effects on plant community composition trajectories depend upon management legacies. Global Change Biology, 2018, 24: 1722-1740
[34] Wehn S, Taugourdeau S, Johansen L, et al. Effects of abandonment on plant diversity in semi-natural grasslands along soil and climate gradients. Journal of Vegetation Science, 2017, 28: 838-847
[35] Freitag M, Kamp J, Dara A, et al. Post-Soviet shifts in grazing and fire regimes changed the functional plant community composition on the Eurasian steppe. Global Change Biology, 2021, 27: 388-401
[36] Ribeiro PC, Souza ML, Muller LAC, et al. Climatic drivers of leaf traits and genetic divergence in the tree Annona crassiflora: A broad spatial survey in the Brazi-lian savannas. Global Change Biology, 2016, 22: 3789-3803
[37] Khasanova A, Lovell JT, Bonnette J, et al. The genetic architecture of shoot and root trait divergence between mesic and xeric ecotypes of a perennial grass. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2019, 10: 1-10
[38] Fajardo A, Siefert A. Phenological variation of leaf functional traits within species. Oecologia, 2016, 180: 951-959
[39] Garcia-Cervigon AI, García-Lopez MA, Piston N, et al. Co-ordination between xylem anatomy, plant architecture and leaf functional traits in response to abiotic and biotic drivers in a nurse cushion plant. Annals of Botany, 2021, 127: 919-929
[40] Ameztegui A, Paquette A, Shipley B, et al. Shade tole-rance and the functional trait: Demography relationship in temperate and boreal forests. Functional Ecology, 2017, 31: 821-830
[41] Midolo G, De Frenne P, Holzel N, et al. Global patterns of intraspecific leaf trait responses to elevation. Global Change Biology, 2019, 25: 2485-2498
[42] Reich PB, Rich RL, Lu XJ, et al. Biogeographic variation in evergreen conifer needle longevity and impacts on boreal forest carbon cycle projections. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014, 111: 13703-13708
[43] Verheijen LM, Aerts R, Brovkin V, et al. Inclusion of ecologically based trait variation in plant functional types reduces the projected land carbon sink in an earth system model. Global Change Biology, 2015, 21: 3074-3086
[44] Angassa A. Effects of grazing intensity and bush encroachment on herbaceous species and rangeland condition in Southern Ethiopia. Land Degradation & Deve-lopment, 2014, 25: 438-451
[45] Maire V, Wright IJ, Prentice IC, et al. Global effects of soil and climate on leaf photosynthetic traits and rates. Global Ecology & Biogeography, 2015, 24: 706-717
[46] Siefert A, Fridley JD, Ritchie ME. Community functio-nal responses to soil and climate at multiple spatial scales: When does intraspecific variation matter? PLoS One, 2014, 9(10): e111189
[47] Weng ES, Farrior CE, Dybzinski R, et al. Predicting vegetation type through physiological and environmental interactions with leaf traits: Evergreen and deciduous forests in an earth system modeling framework. Global Change Biology, 2017, 23: 2482-2498
[48] Liu M, Gong JR, Li Y, et al. Growth-defense trade-off regulated by hormones in grass plants growing under different grazing intensities. Physiologia Plantarum, 2019, 166: 553-569
[49] Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, et al. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature, 2004, 428: 821-827
[50] Ye RH, Liu GF, Chang H, et al. Response of plant traits of Stipa breviflora to grazing intensity and fluctuation in annual precipitation in a desert steppe, northern China. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2020, 24: e01237
[51] Shen H, Dong SK, Li S, et al. Grazing enhances plant photosynthetic capacity by altering soil nitrogen in alpine grasslands on the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2019, 280: 161-168
[52] Niu KC, He JS, Lechowicz MJ. Grazing-induced shifts in community functional composition and soil nutrient availability in Tibetan alpine meadows. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 53: 1554-1564
[53] Bardgett RD, Mommer L, De Vries FT, et al. Going underground: Root traits as drivers of ecosystem processes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2014, 29: 692-699
[54] Smith SW, Woodin SJ, Pakeman RJ, et al. Root traits predict decomposition across a landscape-scale grazing experiment. New Phytologist, 2014, 203: 851-862
[55] Sidhu SS, George S, Rowland DL, et al. Cattle grazing affects peanut root characteristics in a Bahia grass-based crop rotation system. Peanut Science, 2018, 45: 75-81
[56] Zhang ZH, Gong JR, Wang B, et al. Regrowth strategies of Leymus chinensis in response to different grazing intensities. Ecological Applications, 2020, 30, doi: 10.1002/eap.2113
[57] Damhoureyeh SA, Hartnett DC. Variation in grazing tole-rance among three tallgrass prairie plant species. American Journal of Botany, 2002, 89: 1634-1643
[58] Garnier E, Fayolle A, Navas ML, et al. Plant demographic and functional responses to management intensification: A long-term study in a Mediterranean rangeland. Journal of Ecology, 2018, 106: 1363-1376
[59] Piqueray J, Ferroni L, Delescaille LM, et al. Response of plant functional traits during the restoration of calca-reous grasslands from forest stands. Ecological Indicators, 2015, 48: 408-416
[60] Liu ZY, Zhang Z, Zhang TY, et al. Heavy grazing effects on stem elongation and internode allometry insights from a natural pasture grass. Grass and Forage Science, 2019, 74: 427-436
[61] Firn J, Schutz M, Nguyen H, et al. Herbivores sculpt leaf traits differently in grasslands depending on life form and land-use histories. Ecology, 2017, 98: 239-252
[62] 江小雷, 张卫国. 功能多样性及其研究方法. 生态学报, 2010, 30(10): 2766-2773
[63] Pakeman RJ, Fielding DA. A functional assessment of the impact of changing grazing management of upland grassland mosaics. Applied Vegetation Science, 2020, 23: 539-550
[64] Msadek J, Tlili A, Moumni M, et al. Community diversity, functional traits and adaptation of Stipa tenacissima L. under different grazing regimes in a North African arid montane rangeland. African Journal of Range & Forage Science, 2021, 38: 122-129
[65] Fedrigo JK, Ataide PF, Azambuja J, et al. Temporary grazing exclusion promotes rapid recovery of species richness and productivity in a long-term overgrazed Campos grassland. Restoration Ecology, 2018, 26: 677-685
[66] Garcia CAM, Schellberg J, Ewert F, et al. Response of community-aggregated plant functional traits along gra-zing gradients: Insights from African semi-arid grasslands. Applied Vegetation Science, 2014, 17: 470-481
[67] Ferreira PMA, Andrade BO, Podgaiski LR, et al. Long-term ecological research in southern Brazil grasslands: Effects of grazing exclusion and deferred grazing on plant and arthropod communities. PLoS One, 2020, 15(1): e0227706
[68] Liu ZY, Baoyin TGT, Duan JJ, et al. Nutrient characteristics in relation to plant size of a perennial grass under grazing exclusion in degraded grassland. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2018, 9: 295
[69] Zhang JH, Huang YM, Chen HY, et al. Response of plant functional traits at species and community levels to grazing exclusion on Inner Mongolian steppe, China. Rangeland Journal, 2018, 40: 179-189
[70] Dong K, Hao G, Yang N, et al. Community assembly mechanisms and succession processes significantly differ among treatments during the restoration of Stipa grandis-Leymus chinensis communities. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9: 16289
[71] Bruelheid H, Dengler J, Purschke O, et al. Global trait-environment relationships of plant communities. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2018, 2: 1906-1917
[72] Salgado-Luarte C, Escobedo VM, Stotz GC, et al. Goat grazing reduces diversity and leads to functional, taxonomic, and phylogenetic homogenization in an arid shrubland. Land Degradation & Development, 2019, 30: 178-189
[73] Jaschke Y, Heberling G, Wesche K, et al. Environmental controls override grazing effects on plant functional traits in Tibetan rangelands. Functional Ecology, 2020, 34: 747-760
[74] Carmona CP, De Bello F, Mason NWH, et al. Traits without borders: Integrating functional diversity across scales. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2016, 31: 382-394
[75] Zhang H, Chen HYH, Lian JY, et al. Using functional trait diversity patterns to disentangle the scale-dependent ecological processes in a subtropical forest. Functional Ecology, 2018, 32: 1379-1389
[76] Zuo XA, Zhang J, Lv P, et al. Effects of plant functio-nal diversity induced by grazing and soil properties on above- and belowground biomass in a semiarid grassland. Ecological Indicators, 2018, 93: 555-561
[77] Volf M, Redmond C, Alber AJ, et al. Effects of long- and short-term management on the functional structure of meadows through species turnover and intraspecific trait variability. Oecologia, 2016, 180: 941-950
[78] Jessen MT, Kaarlejarvi E, Olofsson J, et al. Mammalian herbivory shapes intraspecific trait responses to warmer climate and nutrient enrichment. Global Change Bio-logy, 2020, 26: 6742-6752
[79] 张中华, 周华坤, 赵新全, 等. 青藏高原高寒草地生物多样性与生态系统功能的关系. 生物多样性, 2018, 26(2): 111-129
[80] Wang JW, Wang DL, Li CQ, et al. Feces nitrogen release induced by different large herbivores in a dry grassland. Ecological Applications, 2018, 28: 201-211
[81] Fan F, Liang CZ, Tang YK, et al. Effects and relationships of grazing intensity on multiple ecosystem services in the Inner Mongolian steppe. Science of the Total Environmental, 2019, 675: 642-650
[82] Vecchio MC, Golluscio RA, Rodríguez AM, et al. Improvement of saline-sodic grassland soils properties by rotational grazing in Argentina. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 2018, 71: 807-814
[83] 杨勇, 刘爱军, 李兰花, 等. 不同干扰方式对内蒙古典型草原植物物种组成和功能群特征的影响. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(3): 794-802
[84] Sasaki T, Okubo S, Okayasu T, et al. Two-phase functional redundancy in plant communities along a grazing gradient in Mongolian rangelands. Ecology, 2009, 90: 2598-2608
[85] He NP, Liu CC, Piao SL, et al. Ecosystem traits lin-king functional traits to macroecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2019, 34: 200-210
[86] Ford H, Healey JR, Markesteijn L, et al. How does grazing management influence the functional diversity of oak woodland ecosystems? A plant trait approach. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2018, 258: 154-161
[87] Chillo V, Ojeda RA, Capmourteres V, et al. Functional diversity loss with increasing livestock grazing intensity in drylands: The mechanisms and their consequences depend on the taxa. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 54: 986-996
[88] 吴思雨, 宝音陶格涛, 许宏斌, 等. 放牧强度对内蒙古典型草原糙隐子草功能性状的影响. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(2): 392-398
[89] Niu KC, Zhang ST, Zhao BB, et al. Linking grazing response of species abundance to functional traits in the Tibetan alpine meadow. Plant and Soil, 2010, 330: 215-223

放牧对草原植物功能性状影响研究进展

Research advances on the effects of grazing on plant functional traits in grassland

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张文志, 陈俊彤, 杨立学, 邢宏运, 于均屹, 黄波, 董慧. 红松引种至大兴安岭后根系适应策略及其环境驱动因子 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(8): 2556-2564.
[2]	陈明忆, 崔昭东, 王建羽, 武文宇, 马雨桐, 梁佳文, 倪红伟, 钟海秀. 长期氮添加下小叶章叶片表型可塑性与整合度的适应性特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(8): 2595-2604.
[3]	冯琴, 董世魁, 丁文利, 杨珏婕, 鱼小军, 马春晖, 赫凤彩, 魏向宇. 放牧方式与强度对高寒草原根际土壤磷组分的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(6): 1871-1878.
[4]	刘万新, 蔡江平, 付佳琳, 冯雪, 李慧, 吕林有, 姜勇, 张玉革. 不同草地植物叶功能性状对沙化的响应及适应策略 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(8): 2379-2387.
[5]	何念鹏, 闫镤, 郭泓伯. 基于植物群落性状预测生态系统初级生产力:理论基础与研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(7): 1941-1951.
[6]	陈瑞鑫, 简婷怡, 林勇明, 王英姿, 洪滔. 闽江河口秋茄异龄叶性状及其叶经济谱 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(5): 1330-1338.
[7]	李梦妮, 蒋勇军, 程钰瑞, 吴泽, 贺秋芳, 李佳彬, 赵春峰, 钱凤. 岩溶区不同石漠化生境优势木本植物叶片功能性状变异及适应策略 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(3): 762-770.
[8]	单伟强, 房帅, 尹进, 任静, 蔺菲, 毛子昆, 郝占庆, 王绪高. 东北温带针阔混交林不同演替阶段树木种群动态及其与功能性状的关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(9): 2501-2510.
[9]	吴佳芯, 李邵宇, 韩国栋. 不同放牧强度下荒漠草原土壤化学计量失衡与微生物碳利用效率的联系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(8): 2108-2118.
[10]	林晓瑜, 万晓华, 贾辉, 黄志群, 邹秉章, 王思荣. 亚热带21个树种人工林功能性状与凋落物养分归还特征的关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(6): 1455-1462.
[11]	陈淼, 刘顺, 许格希, 陈健, 邢红爽, 李非凡, 张淼淼, 曹向文, 史作民. 青藏高原东缘不同植被类型下草本植物叶片碳氮稳定同位素差异及其驱动因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(4): 877-885.
[12]	孙新, 谢致敬, 乔志宏, 高梅香, 殷睿, 常亮, 吴东辉, 刘满强, 朱永官. 基于功能性状的土壤动物群落生态学研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(4): 1150-1158.
[13]	邢红爽, 冯秋红, 史作民, 刘顺, 许格希, 陈健, 巩闪闪. 青藏高原东缘川滇高山栎和西南花楸叶片性状对海拔的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(3): 606-614.
[14]	杨颜萌, 张家兴, 李亚茹, 马靖然, 王铎, 靳占才, 谢路路, 邓娇娇, 叶吉, 于大炮, 王庆伟. 光质对黄芩生长与生理生化特征的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(2): 424-430.
[15]	魏庐潞, 徐婷婷, 马周娟, 张隆安, 王子钰, 马飞. 同质园环境下不同种源鬼箭锦鸡儿根叶功能性状差异 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(11): 3005-3014.