秦岭优势乔木锐齿槲栎的空间分布格局及种内关联

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202208.002

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究锐齿槲栎种群的空间分布特征及关联性,本研究以秦岭皇冠暖温性落叶阔叶林25 hm²森林样地内优势树种锐齿槲栎为对象,采用成对相关函数g(r)对其空间格局及其种内关联性进行了研究。结果表明: 锐齿槲栎径级结构呈“双峰”型,幼树(1 cm≤胸径DBH＜5 cm)个体数较多,种群呈增长型结构,更新良好;中树(15 cm≤DBH＜25 cm)比大树(25 cm≤DBH＜35 cm)、老树(DBH≥35 cm)的个体数略多,但远少于幼树和小树(5 cm≤DBH＜15 cm)。锐齿槲栎空间分布具有明显的海拔依赖性,主要分布在中高海拔地区。完全空间随机零模型分析表明,各径级个体在＜60 m的大尺度范围聚集分布。使用异质泊松模型剔除生境异质性分析表明,各径级的个体转变为大尺度的随机分布,表明树种的分布明显受到生境变化的影响。在＜40 m的小尺度范围内,径级差距小的个体间的空间关联性为正关联,径级差距大的个体间的空间关联性转变为负关联和无关联;在＞40 m的大尺度范围内,大径级个体间的空间关联性为正关联,而幼树和其他径级个体间的空间关联性为负关联或无关联。锐齿槲栎自身生物学特性和环境异质性是种群空间格局形成的重要原因。

关键词: 锐齿槲栎, 径级结构, 空间分布格局, 种内关联性

Abstract: To explore the spatial distribution and intraspecific correlation of Quercus aliena var. acutiserrata, a domi-nant tree species in a 25 hm² plot of warm temperate deciduous broadleaved forest in Qinling Mountains, the pair-correlation function g(r) was used to study the spatial pattern and intraspecific association. The results showed that the diameter class structure of Q. aliena var. acutiserrata was bimodal, with a large proportion of young trees (1 cm≤DBH＜5 cm), indicating an increase population structure with good capability of regeneration. The abundance of middle trees (15 cm≤DBH＜25 cm) was slightly more than that of big trees (25 cm≤DBH＜35 cm) and old trees (DBH≥35 cm), but far less than that of young trees and small trees. The spatial distribution of Q. aliena var. acuteserrata was obviously altitude dependent, which mainly distributed in the middle and high altitude areas. Results of complete spatial randomness (CSR) model analysis showed that young trees, small trees, adult trees, big trees, and old trees were aggregated in the large scale (＜60 m). Heterogeneous Poisson (HP) model was used to eliminate habitat heterogeneity. The results of HP model showed that the individual aggregation degree of each diameter class decreased, indicating that the distribution was affected by habitat heterogeneity. At the small scale (＜40 m), spatial correlation was positively correlated between individuals with small diameter gap, whereas the spatial correlation was negative correlation and no correlation between individuals with large diameter gap. At large scale (>40 m), the spatial correlation was positively correlated between large-diameter individuals, but negatively correlated and unrelated between saplings and other diameter individuals. Our results indicated that biological cha-racteristics of Q. aliena var. acutiserrata and habitat heterogeneity were important drivers for the formation of population spatial pattern.

Key words: Quercus aliena var. acutiserrata, diameter class structure, spatial distribution pattern, intraspecific association

邱婧, 韩安霞, 何春梅, 尹秋龙, 贾仕宏, 罗颖, 李晨璐, 郝占庆. 秦岭优势乔木锐齿槲栎的空间分布格局及种内关联[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(8): 2035-2042.

QIU Jing, HAN An-xia, HE Chun-mei, YIN Qiu-long, JIA Shi-hong, LUO Ying, LI Chen-lu, HAO Zhan-qing. Spatial distribution pattern and intraspecific association of dominant species Quercus aliena var. acu-tiserrata in Qinling Mountains, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(8): 2035-2042.

参考文献

[1] 吴盼, 彭希强, 杨树仁, 等. 山东省滨海湿地柽柳种群的空间分布格局及其关联性. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(9): 817-824
[2] 拓锋, 刘贤德, 刘润红, 等. 祁连山大野口流域青海云杉种群空间格局及其关联性. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(11): 1172-1183
[3] 何春梅, 刘润清, 杨治春, 等. 秦岭皇冠暖温性落叶阔叶林物种组成与群落结构. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(8): 2737-2744
[4] 吴昊, 张明霞, 王得祥. 秦岭南坡油松-锐齿槲栎混交林群落不同层次多样性特征及环境解释. 西北植物学报, 2013, 33(10): 2086-2094
[5] 张宋智, 刘文桢, 郭小龙, 等. 秦岭西段锐齿栎群落林木个体大小分布特征及物种多样性. 林业科学研究, 2010, 23(1): 65-70
[6] 尉文, 闫琰, 刘晓云, 等. 太白山锐齿栎林群落结构特征. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(6): 1923-1932
[7] 彭舜磊, 齐光, 张志录, 等. 短柄枹栎林优势种群空间结构分析. 森林与环境学报, 2020, 40(4): 363-368
[8] Shi H, Xie F, Zhou Q, et al. Effects of topography on tree community structure in a deciduous broad-leaved forest in North-central China. Forests, 2019, 10: 53
[9] 吴昊. 基于生态位分化的秦岭松栎混交林建群种共存机制. 植物分类与资源学报, 2015, 37(6): 828-836
[10] 任学敏, 朱雅, 陈兆进, 等. 太白山锐齿槲栎林乔木更新特征及其影响因子. 林业科学, 2019, 55(1): 11-21
[11] 李立, 陈建华, 任海保, 等. 古田山常绿阔叶林优势树种甜槠和木荷的空间格局分析. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(3): 241-252
[12] Kang HB, Zheng YY, Liu ST, et al. Population structure and spatial pattern of predominant tree species in a pine-oak mosaic mixed forest in the Qinling Mountains, China. Journal of Plant Interactions, 2017, 12: 78-86
[13] Zhou Q, Shi H, Shu X, et al. Spatial distribution and interspecific associations in a deciduous broad-leaved forest in North-central China. Journal of Vegetation Science, 2019, 30: 1153-1163
[14] 祝燕, 白帆, 刘海丰, 等. 北京暖温带次生林种群分布格局与种间空间关联性. 生物多样性, 2011, 19(2): 252-259
[15] Veblen TT, Schlegel AFM. Tree regeneration strategies in a lowland Nothofagus-dominated forest in south-central Chile. Journal of Biogeography, 1979, 6: 329-340
[16] Shimada T. Nutrient compositions of acorns and horse chestnuts in relation to seed-hoarding. Ecological Research, 2001, 16: 803-808
[17] 薛文艳, 杨斌, 张文辉, 等. 桥山林区麻栎种群不同发育阶段空间格局及关联性. 生态学报, 2017, 37(10): 3375-3384
[18] 尤海舟, 刘兴良, 缪宁, 等. 川滇高山栎种群不同海拔空间格局的尺度效应及个体间空间关联. 生态学报, 2010, 30(15): 4004-4011
[19] 田慧霞, 李钧敏, 毕润成, 等. 山西太岳山白桦种群结构和空间分布格局. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(1): 1-10
[20] 张晓红, 张会儒, 卢军, 等. 长白山蒙古栎次生林群落结构特征及优势树种空间分布格局. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(5): 1571-1579
[21] 张文辉, 卢志军, 李景侠, 等. 陕西不同林区栓皮栎种群空间分布格局及动态的比较研究. 西北植物学报, 2002, 22(3): 476-483
[22] 吴邦利, 龙翠玲, 秦随涛. 茂兰喀斯特森林不同地形部位青冈种群结构与分布格局研究. 广西植物, 2018, 38(1): 48-56
[23] Luo ZR, Mi XC, Chen XR, et al. Density dependence is not very prevalent in a heterogeneous subtropical forest. Oikos, 2012, 121: 1239-1250
[24] Diggle P. Binary mosaics and the spatial pattern of heather. Biometrics, 1981, 37: 531-539
[25] Omelko A, Ukhvatkina O, Zhmerenetsky A, et al. From young to adult trees: How spatial patterns of plants with different life strategies change during age development in an old-growth Korean pine-broadleaved forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 2018, 411: 46-66
[26] 王中磊, 高贤明. 锐齿槲栎林的天然更新——坚果、幼苗库和径级结构. 生态学报, 2005, 25(5): 986-993
[27] Condit R, Ashton PS, Baker P. Spatial patterns in the distribution of tropical tree species. Science, 2000, 288: 1414-1418
[28] Omelko A, Ukhvatkina O, Zhmerenetsky A. Distur-bance history and natural regeneration of an old-growth Korean pine-broadleaved forest in the Sikhote-Alin Mountain range, Southeastern Russia. Forest Ecology and Management, 2016, 360: 221-234
[29] 刘润红, 常斌, 荣春艳, 等. 漓江河岸带枫杨群落主要木本植物种群生态位. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(1): 3917-3920
[30] 杨洪晓, 张金屯, 吴波, 等. 毛乌素沙地油蒿种群点格局分析. 植物生态学报, 2006, 30(4): 563-570
[31] Hubbell SP. Neutral theory and the evolution of ecological equivalence. Ecology, 2006, 87: 1387-1398
[32] 王慧杰, 常顺利, 张毓涛, 等. 天山雪岭云杉森林群落的密度制约效应. 生物多样性, 2016, 24(3): 252-261
[33] Shields JM, Jenkins MA, Saunders MR, et al. Age distribution and spatial patterning of an invasive shrub in secondary hardwood forests. Forest Science, 2014, 60: 830-840
[34] Brooker RW, Maestre FT, Callaway RM, et al. Facilitation in plant communities: The past, the present, and the future. Journal of Ecology, 2008, 96: 18-34
[35] 涂洪润, 李娇凤, 刘润红, 等. 桂林岩溶石山檵木种群空间格局及其关联性. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(8): 2621-2630
[36] Stephan G, Thorsten W, Kerstin W, et al. Heterogeneity influences spatial patterns and demographics in forest stands. Journal of Ecology, 2008, 96: 807-820
[37] Pagès JP, Pache G, Joud D, et al. Direct and indirect effects of shade on four forest tree seedlings in the French Alps. Ecology, 2003, 84: 2741-2750