荒漠草原优势种群油蒿空间分布格局对封育恢复的响应

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202203.005

应用生态学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (3): 720-726.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202203.005

荒漠草原优势种群油蒿空间分布格局对封育恢复的响应

刘建康¹, 冯湘², 张克斌^2*, 刘淑琴², 刘新月²

¹宁夏大学, 西北土地退化与生态恢复国家重点实验室培育基地/西北退化生态系统恢复与重建教育部重点实验室, 银川 750021;
²北京林业大学, 水土保持国家林业局重点实验室/林业生态工程教育部工程研究中心, 北京 100083

收稿日期:2021-08-02 接受日期:2021-09-23 出版日期:2022-03-15 发布日期:2022-09-15
通讯作者: * E-mail: ctccd@126.com
作者简介:刘建康, 男, 1988年生, 博士研究生。主要从事草地退化与恢复生态学研究。E-mail: liujiankang1989@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(32001117)、宁夏自然科学基金项目(2020AAC03085)和宁夏高等学校一流学科建设项目(NXYLXK2017B06)资助。

Responses of spatial distribution pattern of the dominant population Artemisia ordosica to enclosure restoration in desert steppe.

LIU Jian-kang¹, FENG Xiang², ZHANG Ke-bin^2*, LIU Shu-qin², LIU Xin-yue²

¹Breeding Base for State Key Laboratory of Land Degradation and Ecological Restoration in Northwest China/Key Laboratory for Restoration and Reconstruction of Degraded Ecosystem in Northwest China of Ministry of Education, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China;
²Key Laboratory of State Forestry Administration on Soil and Water Conservation/Ministry of Education Engineering Research Center of Forestry Ecological Engineering, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2021-08-02 Accepted:2021-09-23 Online:2022-03-15 Published:2022-09-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 灌木对维持草原生物多样性、稳定性及生态服务功能等具有重要作用,探究封育措施对优势灌木种群的影响,可为草原恢复和抚育管理提供科学指导。本研究对荒漠草原4个封育时间(封育0、5、15、25年)的优势种群油蒿个体特征及种群空间分布格局进行研究。结果表明: 油蒿种群密度随着封育时间延长先增加后降低,封育15年时最高,为未封育样地的3.7倍;冠幅和投影面积变化趋势与密度正好相反,封育15年后分别减少了31.7%和52.3%;封育5年后个体高度减小了25.3%,之后逐步增加;半方差函数分析表明,各样地油蒿种群分布均符合高斯模型,封育初期种群空间异质性逐渐降低,封育15年后又有所增加。各样地结构比均高于0.75,而块金值相对较小,表明油蒿种群空间自相关性较高,空间分布格局受结构性因素影响较大,受随机性因素影响较小。油蒿种群呈斑块状和条带状空间分布,封育可降低种群小尺度空间变异程度,但封育25年后随着斑块分离,种群空间异质性及尺度依赖性又有所增强。恢复时间是影响荒漠草原优势种群生长及分布的关键因子,长期封育导致优势种群空间异质性增强,建议在封育15年后对草地进行适度人为干预。

关键词: 空间分布格局, 封育, 荒漠草原, 油蒿, 种群特征

Abstract: Shrubs play an important role in maintaining biodiversity, stability and ecological service in grassland. Exploring the effects of enclosure on dominant shrub population can provide scientific guidance for grassland restoration and tending management. In this study, we investigated main growth characteristics and spatial distribution pattern of Artemisia ordosica population in four enclosed grasslands with duration of 0, 5, 15, and 25 years. The results showed that population density increased first and then decreased with time extension, and peaked after enclosed for 15 years, which was 3.7 times that of unenclosed plot. The crown and projected area showed opposite responses trend to that of density, which decreased by 31.7% and 52.3% after enclosed 15 years, respectively. The height decreased by 25.3% after 5 years of enclosure, and then increased gradually. Semi-variance function analysis showed that population distribution in all grasslands conformed to Gaussian model. The spatial variation decreased gradually in the early stage of enclosure, and then increased after enclosed for 15 years. Structure ratio in each plot was higher than 0.75, but nugget was relatively small, indicating that spatial autocorrelation of population was mainly affected by structural factors rather than random factors. Spatial distribution of A. ordosica population was patchy and striped. Enclosure reduced spatial variation of population at small scale. However, spatial heterogeneity and scale dependence of population enhanced after enclosed 25 years as plaque dissociating. Our findings suggest that enclosure duration is the key factor affecting plant growth and spatial distribution of dominant population in desert steppe. Long-term fencing enhances the spatial heterogeneity of dominant population. Appropriate human intervention should be carried out after 15 years of enclosure.

Key words: spatial distribution pattern, enclosure, desert steppe, Artemisia ordosica, population characteristics

刘建康, 冯湘, 张克斌, 刘淑琴, 刘新月. 荒漠草原优势种群油蒿空间分布格局对封育恢复的响应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(3): 720-726.

LIU Jian-kang, FENG Xiang, ZHANG Ke-bin, LIU Shu-qin, LIU Xin-yue. Responses of spatial distribution pattern of the dominant population Artemisia ordosica to enclosure restoration in desert steppe.[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(3): 720-726.

参考文献 40

[1]	郭垚鑫, 康冰, 李刚, 等. 小陇山红桦次生林物种组成与立木的点格局分析. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(10): 2574-2580
[2]	Mwavu EN, Witkowski ETF. Population structure and regeneration of multiple-use tree species in a semi-deciduous African tropical rainforest, implications for primate conservation. Forest Ecology and Management, 2009, 258: 840-849
[3]	Lara-Romero C, Cruz MDL, Escribano-Avila G, et al. What causes conspecific plant aggregation? Disentangling the role of dispersal, habitat heterogeneity and plant-plant interactions. Oikos, 2016, 25: 1304-1313
[4]	Mureva A, Ward D. Spatial patterns of encroaching shrub species under different grazing regimes in a semi-arid savanna, eastern Karoo, South Africa. African Journal of Range & Forage Science, 2016, 33: 1-13
[5]	崔玉华, 韩有志, 张梦弢, 等. 不同干扰强度下针阔混交林树种空间格局及种间关联性. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(6): 2053-2060
[6]	Zhang J, Zhang Y, Fan D, et al. Effects of sand dune stabilization on the spatial pattern of Artemisia ordosica population in Mu Us Desert, Northwest China. PLoS One, 2015, 10(6): e0129728
[7]	Fraver S, D'Amato AW, Bradford JB, et al. Tree growth and competition in an old-growth Picea abies forest of boreal Sweden, influence of tree spatial patterning. Journal of Vegetation Science, 2014, 25: 374-385
[8]	Larson AJ, Churchill D. Tree spatial patterns in fire-frequent forests of western North America, including mechanisms of pattern formation and implications for designing fuel reduction and restoration treatments. Forest Ecology and Management, 2012, 267: 74-92
[9]	党晶晶, 赵成章, 董小刚, 等. 藏嵩草和矮嵩草种群空间分布格局对水分的响应. 生态学杂志, 2014, 33(7): 1734-1740
[10]	陈万杰, 薛文杰, 古琛, 等. 草地利用方式对典型草原大针茅种群空间异质性的影响. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(10): 2569-2574
[11]	张峰, 孙嘉伟, 孙宇, 等. 不同尺度下荒漠草原建群种短花针茅的空间分布对载畜率的响应. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(5): 1735-1743
[12]	丁杰, 张谱, 张和钰, 等. 天山南麓中段戈壁区膜果麻黄种群空间分异特征. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(12): 3997-4003
[13]	殷国梅, 吕世杰, 丁海君, 等. 不同载畜率对短花针茅荒漠草原建群种空间异质性的影响. 草地学报, 2017, 25(3): 486-491
[14]	李德新. 短花针茅荒漠草原动态规律及其生态稳定性. 中国草地, 1990(4): 1-5
[15]	Wang Z, Deng X, Song W, et al. What is the main cause of grassland degradation? A case study of grassland ecosystem service in the middle-south Inner Mongolia. Catena, 2017, 150: 100-107
[16]	唐庄生. 半干旱荒漠草原沙化过程中植被退化机制研究. 博士论文. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2018
[17]	冯丽, 张景光, 张志山, 等. 沙坡头人工固沙区油蒿繁殖分配的研究. 中国沙漠, 2008, 28(3): 473-477
[18]	Liu JK, Zhang KB. Spatial pattern and population structure of Artemisia ordosica shrub in a desert grassland under enclosure, Northwest China. International Journal of Environmental Research & Public Health, 2018, 15: 946
[19]	张定海, 杨丽萍, 张志山. 腾格里沙漠东南缘不同生境油蒿种群的数量动态. 中国沙漠, 2017, 37(5): 893-901
[20]	雒宇, 马莉, 靳川, 等. 毛乌素沙地油蒿光合电子传递速率生长季动态及其对环境因子的响应. 北京林业大学学报, 2021, 43(2): 54-62
[21]	She W, Zhang Y, Qin S, et al. Habitat effect on allometry of a xeric shrub (Artemisia ordosica Krasch) in the Mu Us Desert of northern China. Forests, 2015, 6: 4529-4539
[22]	刘源, 段玉玺, 王博, 等. 库布齐东段典型人工固沙林土壤水分时空变化特征. 西北林学院学报, 2021, 36(1): 1-8
[23]	张瑞红, 蔡文涛, 来利明, 等. 鄂尔多斯高原灌草群落土壤理化性质变化. 草业科学, 2018, 35(6): 1352-1360
[24]	Craine JM, Dybzinski R. Mechanisms of plant competition for nutrients, water and light. Functional Ecology, 2013, 27: 833-840
[25]	Socher SA, Prati D, Boch S, et al. Direct and productivity-mediated indirect effects of fertilization, mowing and grazing on grassland species richness. Journal of Ecology, 2012, 100: 1391-1399
[26]	叶学华, 薛建国, 谢秀芳, 等. 外部干扰对根茎型克隆植物甘草自然种群植株生长及主要药用成分含量的影响. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(9): 951-961
[27]	Li W, Cao W, Wang J, et al. Effects of grazing regime on vegetation structure, productivity, soil quality, carbon and nitrogen storage of alpine meadow on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Ecological Engineering, 2017, 98: 123-133
[28]	Grellier S, Barot S, Janeau JL, et al. Grass competition is more important than seed ingestion by livestock for Acacia recruitment in South Africa. Plant Ecology, 2012, 213: 899-908
[29]	郑伟, 于辉. 围栏封育对伊犁绢蒿种群构件生长和生物量分配的影响. 草地学报, 2013, 21(1): 42-49
[30]	冯湘, 刘宝军, 刘建康, 等. 半干旱区人工封育草地植被动态研究——以宁夏盐池县为例. 生态环境学报, 2020, 29(10): 1961-1970
[31]	Giladi I, Segoli M, Ungar ED. Shrubs and herbaceous seed flow in a semi-arid landscape, dual functioning of shrubs as trap and barrier. Journal of Ecology, 2013, 101: 97-106
[32]	张峰, 杨阳, 乔荠瑢, 等. 利用方式对大针茅草原优势种糙隐子草空间异质性的影响. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(4): 953-960
[33]	张继义, 赵哈林. 科尔沁沙地草地植被恢复演替进程中群落优势种群空间分布格局研究. 生态学杂志, 2004, 23(2): 1-6
[34]	Schouten OS, Houseman GR. Effect of soil heterogeneity and endogenous processes on plant spatial structure. Ecology, 2019, 100: e02837
[35]	郑佳华, 张峰, 赵天启, 等. 放牧和刈割对大针茅草原羊草空间异质性的影响. 西北农林科技大学学报: 自然科学版, 2020, 48(6): 10-17
[36]	Zuo X, Zhao H, Zhao X, et al. Spatial pattern and heterogeneity of soil properties in sand dunes under grazing and restoration in Horqin Sandy Land, Northern China. Soil and Tillage Research, 2008, 99: 202-212
[37]	霍光伟, 乌云娜, 雒文涛, 等. 围栏封育和自由放牧对克氏针茅草原植被空间异质性的影响. 生态学杂志, 2012, 31(1): 66-73
[38]	希吉日塔娜, 吕世杰, 卫智军, 等. 不同放牧制度下短花针茅草原主要植物种群的空间变异. 中国草地学报, 2013, 35(2): 76-82
[39]	李亚, 胡小柯, 魏怀东, 等. 腾格里沙漠南缘天然群落主要种群空间分布格局研究. 西北林学院学报, 2017, 32(2): 67-72
[40]	Getzin S, Wiegand T, Wiegand K. Heterogeneity influences spatial patterns and demographics in forest stands. Journal of Ecology, 2008, 96: 807-820

荒漠草原优势种群油蒿空间分布格局对封育恢复的响应

Responses of spatial distribution pattern of the dominant population Artemisia ordosica to enclosure restoration in desert steppe.

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 40

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李志丽, 王红梅, 赵亚楠, 周玉蓉. 荒漠草原灌丛引入过程中土壤氮矿化的季节动态及其影响因子 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(8): 2161-2170.
[2]	杨新国, 宋乃平, 陈林, 王磊. 旱区植被建设与生境旱化的生态学因果关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1713-1720.
[3]	邱婧, 韩安霞, 何春梅, 尹秋龙, 贾仕宏, 罗颖, 李晨璐, 郝占庆. 秦岭优势乔木锐齿槲栎的空间分布格局及种内关联 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(8): 2035-2042.
[4]	赖丽华, 张申增, 陆丽仪, 林坤, 吕少梁, 曾嘉维, 陈海刚, 王学锋. 2017—2020年珠江口棘头梅童鱼的种群特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(5): 1413-1419.
[5]	张彬, 赵天启, 贺启珅, 郑佳华, 赵萌莉. 放牧对短花针茅荒漠草原土壤团聚体组成及稳定性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(12): 3263-3270.
[6]	刘进娣, 马红彬, 周瑶, 马菁, 沈艳, 李建平, 崔鸿娇, 彭文栋. 轮牧时间对荒漠草原土壤种子库特性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(7): 2378-2388.
[7]	张峰, 孙嘉伟, 孙宇, 郑佳华, 乔荠瑢, 赵天启, 陈大岭, 赵萌莉. 不同尺度下荒漠草原建群种短花针茅的空间分布对载畜率的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(5): 1735-1743.
[8]	李志丽, 王红梅, 孙忠超, 马彦平, 赵亚楠, 李雪颖,. 宁夏东部荒漠草原-灌丛地转变过程土壤氮素响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(4): 1230-1240.
[9]	梁志伟, 红梅, 德海山, 叶贺, 张宇晨, 闫瑾, 李静. 氮沉降与降雨变化下中小型土壤动物对凋落物分解的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(12): 4279-4288.
[10]	郑世群, 杨皖乔, 方镇福, 郑柠, 刘金福, 林凯琴, 肖丽芳, 李霖. 极小种群植物白果蒲桃种群现状与保护评价 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(1): 103-112.
[11]	郭天斗, 于露, 孙忠超, 马彦平, 赵亚楠, 梁丹妮, 李志丽, 王红梅. 宁夏东部荒漠草原向灌丛地人为转变过程中土壤胞外酶活性响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(8): 2541-2548.
[12]	尉文, 闫琰, 刘晓云, 张硕新. 太白山锐齿栎林群落结构特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(6): 1923-1932.
[13]	王博, 段玉玺, 王伟峰, 李晓晶, 刘源, 刘宗奇. 油蒿灌丛群落浅层土壤水分对不同降雨格局的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(5): 1571-1578.
[14]	陈晓莹, 陈林, 宋乃平, 李敏岚, 吴婷, 杨新国, 王磊, 王兴. 荒漠草原两种类型土壤的水分动态对比 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(5): 1560-1570.
[15]	王军锋, 张丽华, 赵锐锋, 谢忠奎. 荒漠草原区不同生活型植物生长对降水变化的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(3): 778-786.