长期免耕和秸秆覆盖量对黑土碳氮含量及碳氮循环相关酶活性的影响

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202403.012

应用生态学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 695-704.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202403.012

长期免耕和秸秆覆盖量对黑土碳氮含量及碳氮循环相关酶活性的影响

于洋^1,3, 张常仁², 杨雅丽^1,4, 徐欣^1,3, 吕付泽^1,3, 郑甜甜^1,4, 解宏图^1,4, 鲍雪莲^1,4*

¹中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所, 沈阳 110016;
²辽宁师范大学地理科学学院, 辽宁大连 116029;
³中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
⁴辽宁省现代保护性耕作与生态农业重点实验室, 沈阳 110016

收稿日期:2023-09-17 修回日期:2024-01-19 出版日期:2024-03-18 发布日期:2024-06-18
通讯作者: *E-mail: baoxl@iae.ac.cn
作者简介:于洋, 男, 1999年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事土壤生物与生物化学研究。E-mail: yuyang221@mails.ucas.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(U22A20610,41977048)、黑土地保护与利用科技创新工程专项(XDA28090100)、辽宁省揭榜挂帅项目(2021JH1/10400039-2)和沈阳市科学技术计划项目(22-317-2-06)

Effects of long-term no-tillage and different stover mulching amounts on soil carbon and nitrogen contents and enzyme activities of carbon and nitrogen cycle in Mollisols

YU Yang^1,3, ZHANG Changren², YANG Yali^1,4, XU Xin^1,3, LYU Fuze^1,3, ZHENG Tiantian^1,4, XIE Hongtu^1,4, BAO Xuelian^1,4*

¹Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China;
²School of Geographical Science, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029, Liaoning, China;
³University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
⁴Key Laboratory of Conservation Tillage and Ecological Agriculture, Liaoning Province, Shenyang 110016, China

Received:2023-09-17 Revised:2024-01-19 Online:2024-03-18 Published:2024-06-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究免耕条件下不同秸秆覆盖量对黑土碳氮含量及酶活性的影响,寻找既能满足土壤碳氮积累需求,又能使经济效益最大化的秸秆覆盖量,本研究依托始建于2007年的东北黑土区保护性耕作长期定位试验平台,于2020年5月春播前对传统耕作(对照,CT)、免耕+无秸秆覆盖(NT₀)、免耕+33%秸秆覆盖(NT₃₃)、免耕+67%秸秆覆盖(NT₆₇)和免耕+100%秸秆覆盖(NT₁₀₀)处理下土壤碳氮含量、土壤酶活性及经济效益进行分析。结果表明:1)与CT相比,NT₀的土壤有机碳(SOC)和总氮(TN)含量没有显著变化,但提高了土壤有机质抗分解性,降低了可溶性有机氮(DON)和铵态氮等可利用养分含量。与NT₀相比,免耕秸秆覆盖显著增加了0～10 cm土层SOC含量,且随着覆盖量的增加而增加,此外NT₆₇和NT₁₀₀还显著提高了SOC储量,有机质积累效果好。不同秸秆覆盖量对0～10 cm土层土壤氮的影响不同,NT₃₃显著提高了DON含量及其占TN的比例;NT₆₇显著提高了DON含量;NT₁₀₀显著提高了TN含量。2)与CT相比,NT₀显著降低了0～10 cm土层过氧化物酶(POD)活性。与NT₀相比,NT₃₃显著提高了0～10 cm土层β-葡萄糖苷酶(βG)、纤维二糖酶(CB)、β-N-乙酰氨基葡萄糖苷酶(NAG)、多酚氧化酶(PPO)和POD活性,NT₆₇仅提高了CB、NAG和POD活性,但二者均缓解了微生物养分氮限制;NT₁₀₀则显著提高了10～20 cm土层PPO活性。3)NT₃₃的秸秆碳转化效率显著高于NT₁₀₀,其经济收益也最高。综上,免耕33%秸秆覆盖处理既能促进养分循环,提高秸秆利用效率,提升黑土质量,又能最大限度保证农民收入,是本试验条件下的最佳组合。

关键词: 保护性耕作, 秸秆覆盖量, 土壤碳氮, 土壤酶

Abstract: To understand the effects of different stover mulching amounts in no-tillage on soil carbon and nitrogen contents and enzyme activities, finding a stover mulching amount which can meet the requirement of soil carbon and nitrogen accumulation while maximizing economic benefits, we conducted a long-term conservation tillage field experiment since 2007 in Mollisols area of Northeast China. We analyzed soil carbon and nitrogen contents, enzyme activities and economic benefits under conventional tillage (Control, CT), no-tillage without stover mulching (NT₀), no-tillage with 33% stover mulching (NT₃₃), no-tillage with 67% stover mulching (NT₆₇), and no-tillage with 100% stover mulching (NT₁₀₀) before planting in May 2020. The results showed that compared with CT, NT₀ did not affect soil organic carbon (SOC) and total nitrogen (TN) contents, but increased soil organic carbon recalcitrance and decreased the availability of dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) and ammonium nitrogen. Compared with NT₀, no-tillage with stover mulching significantly increased SOC contents in 0-10 cm layer and increased with the amounts of stover. In addition, NT₆₇ and NT₁₀₀ significantly increased SOC stocks, facilitating the accumulation of soil organic matter. The effects of different stover mulching amounts on soil nitrogen content in 0-10 cm layer were different. Specifically, NT₃₃ increased DON content and DON/TN, NT₆₇ increased DON content, while NT₁₀₀ increased TN content. Compared with CT, NT₀ decreased peroxidase (POD) activity in 0-10 cm layer. Compared with NT₀, NT₃₃ increased β-glucosidase (βG), cellobiase (CB), 1,4-β-N-acetylglucosaminidase (NAG), polyphenol oxidase (PPO) and POD activities, while NT₆₇ only increased CB, NAG and POD activities in 0-10 cm soil layer, both alleviated microbial nutrient limitation. NT₁₀₀ increased PPO activity in 10-20 cm layer. NT₃₃ increased carbon conversion efficiency of stover compared with NT₁₀₀, and had the highest economic benefit. In all, no-tillage with 33% stover mulching was the optimal strategy, which could promote nutrient circulation, boost stover utilization efficiency, improve the quality of Mollisols, and maximize guaranteed income.

Key words: conservation tillage, stover mulching amount, soil carbon and nitrogen, soil enzyme

于洋, 张常仁, 杨雅丽, 徐欣, 吕付泽, 郑甜甜, 解宏图, 鲍雪莲. 长期免耕和秸秆覆盖量对黑土碳氮含量及碳氮循环相关酶活性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(3): 695-704.

YU Yang, ZHANG Changren, YANG Yali, XU Xin, LYU Fuze, ZHENG Tiantian, XIE Hongtu, BAO Xuelian. Effects of long-term no-tillage and different stover mulching amounts on soil carbon and nitrogen contents and enzyme activities of carbon and nitrogen cycle in Mollisols[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2024, 35(3): 695-704.

参考文献

[1] 中国科学院. 东北黑土地白皮书(2020) [EB/OL]. (2021-07-09) [2024-01-08]. https://www.cas.cn/yw/202107/t20210709_4797892.shtml
[2] Liu W, Wei Y, Deng P, et al. Conservation tillage increases surface soil organic carbon stock by altering fungal communities and enzyme activity. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30: 80901-80915
[3] Zhang B, He HB, Bai Z, et al. The effects of conservation tillage on the characteristics of soil microorganisms and the activities of soil enzymes. Journal of Soil Science, 2010, 41: 230-236
[4] 敖曼, 张旭东, 关义新. 东北黑土保护性耕作技术的研究与实践. 中国科学院院刊, 2021, 36(10): 1203-1215
[5] Bernoux M, Cerri C, Neto M, et al. Cropping systems, carbon sequestration and erosion in Brazil: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2009, 26: 1-8
[6] Scopel E, Triomphe B, Affholder F, et al. Conservation agriculture cropping systems in temperate and tropical conditions, performances and impacts: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2013, 33: 113-130
[7] Kahlon M, Lal R, Ann-Varughese M. Twenty two years of tillage and mulching impacts on soil physical characteristics and carbon sequestration in Central Ohio. Soil and Tillage Research, 2013, 126: 151-158
[8] Zhang HH, Yan CR, Zhang YQ, et al. Effect of no tillage on carbon sequestration and carbon balance in farming ecosystem in dryland area of northern China. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2015, 31: 240-247
[9] Flackson T, Francis R, Johan L, et al. Effects of long-term (42 years) tillage sequence on soil chemical characteristics in a dryland farming system. Soil and Tillage Research, 2021, 212: 105064
[10] 张常仁, 杨雅丽, 程全国, 等. 不同耕作模式对东北黑土微生物群落结构和酶活性的影响. 土壤与作物, 2020, 9(4): 335-347
[11] Olson K, Lang J, Ebelhar S. Soil organic carbon changes after 12 years of no-tillage and tillage of Grantsburg soils in southern Illinois. Soil and Tillage Research, 2005, 81: 217-225
[12] Deng XZ, Han JZ, Wang XB, et al. Effect of no-tillage and crop residue return on soil organic carbon dynamics of cropland in China. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2010, 6: 22-28
[13] 李宇航, 谷思玉, 何婉莹, 等. 保护性耕作对黑土有机碳组分和玉米产量的影响. 土壤通报, 2023, 54(2): 336-345
[14] 宋霄君, 吴会军, 武雪萍, 等. 长期保护性耕作可提高表层土壤碳氮含量和根际土壤酶活性. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24(6): 1588-1597
[15] 贾凤梅, 张淑花, 魏雅冬. 不同耕作方式下玉米农田土壤养分及土壤微生物活性变化. 水土保持研究, 2018, 25(5): 112-117
[16] Pu C, Kan ZR, Liu P, et al. Residue management induced changes in soil organic carbon and total nitrogen under different tillage practices in the North China Plain. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2019, 18: 1337-1347
[17] Chen HH, Dai ZM, Veach A, et al. Global meta-analyses show that conservation tillage practices promote soil fungal and bacterial biomass. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2020, 293: 106841
[18] 苏淑芳, 于清军, 刘亚军, 等. 秸秆覆盖免耕对土壤氨基糖在团聚体粒级中分布的影响. 土壤通报, 2017, 48(2): 365-371
[19] Song WC, Wang J, Hou L. Effects of frequency and amount of stover mulching on soil nitrogen and the microbial functional guilds of the endosphere and rhizosphere. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2022, 13: 976154
[20] Kuypers M, Marchant H, Kartal B. The microbial nitrogen-cycling network. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2018, 16: 263-276
[21] Chen HH, Liu Y, Lu LP, et al. Effects of no-tillage and stover mulching on the transformation and utilization of chemical fertilizer N in Northeast China. Soil and Tillage Research, 2021, 213: 105131
[22] 郭孟洁, 李建业, 李健宇, 等. 实施16年保护性耕作下黑土土壤结构功能变化特征. 农业工程学报, 2021, 37(22): 108-118
[23] Zhou M, Xiao Y, Zhang XY, et al. Fifteen years of conservation tillage increases soil aggregate stability by altering the contents and chemical composition of organic carbon fractions in Mollisols. Land Degradation and Development, 2022, 33: 2932-2944
[24] 吕付泽, 杨雅丽, 鲍雪莲, 等. 免耕不同秸秆覆盖量对黑土微生物群落及其残留物的影响. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(4): 903-912
[25] Song XJ, Li JY, Liu XT, et al. Altered microbial resource limitation regulates soil organic carbon sequestration based on ecoenzyme stoichiometry under long-term tillage systems. Land Degradation and Development, 2022, 33: 2795-2808
[26] Sharma-Poudyal D, Schlatter D, Yin C, et al. Long-term no-till: A major driver of fungal communities in dryland wheat cropping systems. PLoS One, 2017, 12: e0184611
[27] 高洪军, 彭畅, 张秀芝, 等. 秸秆还田量对黑土区土壤及团聚体有机碳变化特征和固碳效率的影响. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(22): 4613-4622
[28] 贺美, 王立刚, 王迎春, 等. 黑土活性有机碳库与土壤酶活性对玉米秸秆还田的响应. 农业环境科学学报, 2018, 37(9): 1942-1951
[29] Zhang XQ, Qian YL, Cao CF. Effects of straw mulching on maize photosynthetic characteristics and rhizosphere soil micro-ecological environment. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 2015, 75: 481-487
[30] 刘东海, 乔艳, 李晓, 等. 紫色土区不同秸秆还田量对土壤酶活性的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2022(7): 107-113
[31] 董秀, 张燕, Tito M, 等. 长期保护性耕作对黄土高原旱作农田土壤碳含量及转化酶活性的影响. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(5): 907-919
[32] 徐忠山, 刘景辉, 逯晓萍, 等. 秸秆颗粒还田对黑土土壤酶活性及细菌群落的影响. 生态学报, 2019, 39(12): 4347-4355
[33] Lehman R, Ducey T, Jin V, et al. Soil microbial community response to corn stover harvesting under rain-fed, no-till conditions at multiple US locations. Bioenergy Research, 2014, 7: 540-550
[34] Turmel M, Speratti A, Baudron F, et al. Crop residue management and soil health: A systems analysis. Agricultural Systems, 2015, 134: 6-16
[35] 鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2000
[36] DeForest J. The influence of time, storage temperature, and substrate age on potential soil enzyme activity in acidic forest soils using MUB-linked substrates and L-DOPA. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2009, 41: 1180-1186
[37] Sinsabaugh R, Hill B, Shah J. Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry of microbial organic nutrient acquisition in soil and sediment. Nature, 2009, 462: 795-798
[38] Li X, Wang H, Gan SH, et al. Eco-stoichiometric alterations in paddy soil ecosystem driven by phosphorus application. PLoS One, 2013, 8: e0061141
[39] Sinsabaugh R, Shah J. Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry of recalcitrant organic matter decomposition: The growth rate hypothesis in reverse. Biogeochemistry, 2011, 102: 31-43
[40] Oksanen J, Kindt R, Legendre P, et al. The vegan package. Community Ecology Package, 2007, 10: 719
[41] Luo ZK, Wang E, Sun OJ. Can no-tillage stimulate carbon sequestration in agricultural soils? A meta-analysis of paired experiments. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2010, 139: 224-231
[42] Liu X, Dong WY, Jia SH, et al. Transformations of N derived from straw under long-term conventional and no-tillage soils: A N-15 labelling study. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 786: 147428
[43] Allison S, Vitousek P. Responses of extracellular enzymes to simple and complex nutrient inputs. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2005, 37: 937-944
[44] Moorhead D, Lashermes G, Sinsabaugh R. A theoretical model of C- and N-acquiring exoenzyme activities, which balances microbial demands during decomposition. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2012, 53: 133-141
[45] Sinsabaugh R. Phenol oxidase, peroxidase and organic matter dynamics of soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2010, 42: 391-404
[46] Luo L, Meng H, Gu JD. Microbial extracellular enzymes in biogeochemical cycling of ecosystems. Journal of Environmental Management, 2017, 197: 539-549
[47] Liang GP, Wu HJ, Houssou A, et al. Soil respiration, glomalin content, and enzymatic activity response to straw application in a wheat-maize rotation system. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2018, 18: 697-707
[48] Fan W, Wu JG, Ahmed S, et al. Short-term effects of different straw returning methods on the soil physicochemical properties and quality index in dryland farming in NE China. Sustainability, 2020, 12: 12072631
[49] Li SL, Cui YX, Xia ZQ, et al. The mechanism of the dose effect of straw on soil respiration: Evidence from enzymatic stoichiometry and functional genes. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2022, 168: 108636
[50] Allison S, Weintraub M, Gartner T, et al. Evolutionary-economic principles as regulators of soil enzyme production and ecosystem function. Soil Enzymology, 2011, 22: 229-243
[51] Yang YL, Bao XL, Xie HT, et al. Frequent stover mulching builds healthy soil and sustainable agriculture in Mollisols. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2022, 326: 107815
[52] Huang TT, Yang N, Lu C, et al. Soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, available nutrients, and yield under different straw returning methods. Soil and Tillage Research, 2021, 214: 105171
[53] Fan W, Wu JG. Short-term effects of returning granulated straw on soil microbial community and organic carbon fractions in dryland farming. Journal of Microbiology, 2020, 58: 657-667

长期免耕和秸秆覆盖量对黑土碳氮含量及碳氮循环相关酶活性的影响

Effects of long-term no-tillage and different stover mulching amounts on soil carbon and nitrogen contents and enzyme activities of carbon and nitrogen cycle in Mollisols

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	代泽成, 刘月秀, 党宁, 王志瑞, 蔡江平, 张玉革, 宋永波, 李慧, 姜勇. 长期氮水添加对温带草原土壤化学性质和微生物学特性的短期遗留效应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1834-1844.
[2]	隋鹏祥, 罗洋, 郑洪兵, 李瑞平, 王浩, 袁野, 郑金玉, 刘武仁. 长期耕作对农田黑土团聚体和有机碳稳定性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1853-1861.
[3]	巴晓博, 隋鑫, 刘鸣达, 解宏图, 梁超, 鲍雪莲. 东北黑土区覆盖作物-玉米间作保护性耕作的生态系统服务价值 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1883-1891.
[4]	王世佳, 郭亚芬, 崔晓阳. 大兴安岭地区林下土壤酶活性对冻融交替的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(5): 1211-1217.
[5]	曹尤淞, 张晨晖, 肖波, 孙福海. 黑土区农田藻藓两类结皮发育对土壤团聚体稳定性和击溅侵蚀的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(4): 892-902.
[6]	吕付泽, 杨雅丽, 鲍雪莲, 张常仁, 郑甜甜, 何红波, 张旭东, 解宏图. 免耕不同秸秆覆盖量对黑土微生物群落及其残留物的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(4): 903-912.
[7]	王鹏, 温明霞, 金龙飞, 刘烽, 陆麒, 曹明奡, 黄贝, 吴韶辉. 不同施肥处理对柑橘根围土壤质量及丛枝菌根定殖的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10): 2805-2812.
[8]	张晨晖, 肖波, 李胜龙, 王彦峰, 曹尤淞. 东北黑土区农田生物结皮的特征及其对表层土壤崩解的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1773-1782.
[9]	杨淑娜, 高志远, 奚昕琰, 王莉, 殷益明, 姚莹, 贾惠娟. 芽孢杆菌菌肥和菌剂对连作条件下桃幼树生长和土壤环境的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(2): 423-430.
[10]	李佳乐, 梁泳怡, 刘文杰, 杨秋, 徐文娴, 汤水荣, 王晶晶. 有机肥替代化学氮肥对橡胶幼苗生长和土壤环境的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(2): 431-438.
[11]	魏晗梅, 郑粉莉, 赵苗苗, 王婧, 焦健宇, 王雪松. CO₂浓度升高、增温和冬小麦种植对土壤酶活性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(11): 2971-2978.
[12]	马龙, 王书停, 史雷, 张然, 王楷, 郑伟, 李紫燕, 翟丙年. 有机肥配施氮肥对西北旱地冬小麦产量、品质及土壤生物学特性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(10): 2718-2724.
[13]	万红云, 陈林, 庞丹波, 马进鹏, 陈高路, 李学斌. 贺兰山不同海拔土壤酶活性及其化学计量特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(9): 3045-3052.
[14]	隋鑫, 霍海南, 鲍雪莲, 何红波, 张旭东, 梁超, 解宏图. 覆盖作物的种植现状及其对下茬作物生长和土壤环境影响的研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(8): 2666-2674.
[15]	杨雅丽, 马雪松, 解宏图, 鲍雪莲, 梁超, 朱雪峰, 何红波, 张旭东. 保护性耕作对土壤微生物群落及其介导的碳循环功能的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(8): 2675-2684.