欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是

应用生态学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (5): 1526-1538.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202605.029

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

全生命周期视角下中国森林生态产品价值实现的滞后效率测度及区域差异

常滨丽1,2, 张俊飚1,2*, 卢泓钢1,2, 李潇潇3   

  1. 1浙江农林大学浙江省乡村振兴研究院, 杭州 311300;
    2浙江农林大学经济管理学院, 杭州 311300;
    3新疆大学经济与管理学院, 乌鲁木齐 830046)
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-09 接受日期:2026-04-03 出版日期:2026-05-18 发布日期:2026-11-18
  • 通讯作者: * E-mail: zhangjb513@126.com
  • 作者简介:常滨丽, 女, 1998年生, 博士研究生。主要从事生态产品价值实现研究。E-mail: changbinli815@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省社会科学基金重大项目(24YJRC09ZD)和浙江农林大学科研发展基金人才启动项目(2023FR015)

Measurement of lagged efficiency and its regional variations of forest ecological product value realization in China from the perspective of whole life cycle.

CHANG Binli1,2, ZHANG Junbiao1,2*, LU Honggang1,2, LI Xiaoxiao3   

  1. 1Research Academy for Research Academy for Rural Revitalization of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China;
    2College of Economics and Management, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China;
    3College of Economics and Management, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China
  • Received:2025-12-09 Accepted:2026-04-03 Online:2026-05-18 Published:2026-11-18

摘要: 构建科学系统的生态产品价值实现水平评估体系,是精准衡量“两山”理念实践成效、支撑自然资源管理决策的重要工具。本研究基于全生命周期视角,明晰森林生态产品价值实现全流程的投入产出类型,构建了森林生态产品价值实现效率评价指标体系,运用超效率SBM模型、Dagum基尼系数等方法,基于2012—2021年中国(除西藏自治区和港澳台地区外的30个省区)的面板数据,以资金、劳动力、能源、森林资源为投入变量,生态价值、经济价值、社会价值为产出变量,重点测度、分析了滞后效率(指考虑了投入产出滞后特征的效率)的演化特征与区域差异,并与当期效率(未考虑该特征的效率)进行对比。结果表明:研究期间,全国森林生态产品价值实现的滞后效率呈波动上升态势;区域层面呈现东部稳定居于高位,而中部、西部、东北追赶的空间格局;省域层面,山西、新疆、云南增速居各省区前列。北京、天津、上海、江苏、江西、山东、广东、海南、重庆、贵州和宁夏11个省区年均滞后效率大于1,其投入产出配置较为合理;其他省区年均滞后效率小于1,其投入要素存在一定冗余,林业投资完成额和林业系统从业人员冗余是导致滞后效率小于1的主要原因。各省区滞后效率差异呈缩小态势,区域间差异是滞后效率存在总体差异的主要来源。全国滞后效率总体高于当期效率,表明若不考虑投入产出的滞后特征,会在一定程度上低估森林生态产品价值实现水平;中部、西部、东北地区两类效率差异较为显著,在政策制定中应充分考量投入产出的滞后性。本研究可为四大地区差异化价值实现政策制定和区域协同发展提供实证依据。

关键词: 全生命周期, 森林生态产品, 价值实现, 滞后效率, 当期效率, 冗余

Abstract: Constructing a scientific and systematic evaluation system for the level of ecological product value realization is an important tool for accurately measuring the practical outcomes of the “Two Mountains” concept and supporting natural resource management decisions. From a whole life cycle perspective, we clarified the input and output types across the entire process of forest ecological product value realization, and constructed an efficiency eva-luation index system for forest ecological product value realization. Using the super-efficiency SBM model and the Dagum Gini coefficient, and based on panel data from 30 Chinese provinces (excluding Xizang Autonomous Region and the regions of Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan) from 2012 to 2021, with capital, labor, energy, and forest resources as input variables and ecological, economic, and social values as output variables, we analyzed regional variations of lagged efficiency (efficiency that incorporated input and output time lag as lagged efficiency), and compared it with current efficiency (efficiency without such lag). The results showed the national lagged efficiency of forest ecological product value realization exhibited a fluctuating upward trend. At the regional level, the eastern region maintained at a high and stable level, while the central, western, and northeastern regions caught up. Shanxi, Xinjiang, and Yunnan ranked among the top in growth rate. Eleven provinces achieved an average lagged efficiency greater than 1, including Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai, Jiangsu, Jiangxi, Shandong, Guangdong, Hainan, Chongqing, Guizhou, and Ningxia, indicating a relatively reasonable allocation of inputs and outputs. The remaining provinces had an average lagged efficiency below 1, indicating some redundancy in input factors. Redundancy in forestry investment completion amount and forestry system labor was the main reason for the lagged efficiency being less than 1. The lagged efficiency exhibited a downward trend, with inter-regional disparity being the main source of the overall differences in lagged efficiency. National lagged efficiency was generally higher than current efficiency, indicating that neglecting the time lags of input and output would underestimate the level of forest ecological product value realization. The differences between the two efficiency measures were significant in the central, western, and northeastern regions, which needed to fully consider input and output lag in policy formulation. The study could provide empirical evidence for differentiated value realization policies and coordinated regional development in four major regions of China.

Key words: whole life cycle, forest ecological product, value realization, lagged efficiency, current efficiency, redundancy