欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是

应用生态学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (7): 2305-2316.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202607.023

• • 上一篇    下一篇

三江平原景观生态风险与生态系统服务耦合分区及多情景模拟

张家鸣1, 刘泽栋2*   

  1. 1哈尔滨师范大学经济与管理学院, 哈尔滨 150025;
    2黑龙江省科学院自然与生态研究所/联合国教科文组织国际自然与文化遗产空间技术中心哈尔滨分中心, 哈尔滨 150040
  • 收稿日期:2026-02-06 接受日期:2026-05-22 出版日期:2026-07-18 发布日期:2027-01-18
  • 通讯作者: *E-mail: lzdzrs@163.com
  • 作者简介:张家鸣, 男, 2001年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事土地利用与生态系统服务研究。E-mail: 2827310587@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    黑龙江省科学院科技成果转化专项(CGZH2026ZRYST05)资助。

Coupling zoning and multi-scenario simulation of landscape ecological risk and ecosystem services in the Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China

ZHAGN Jiaming1, LIU Zedong2*   

  1. 1School of Economics and Management, Harbin Normal University, Harbin 150025, China;
    2Institute of Nature and Ecology, Heilongjiang Academy of Sciences/Harbin Branch of UNESCO International Centre for Space Technologies in Natural and Cultural Heritage, Harbin 150040, China
  • Received:2026-02-06 Accepted:2026-05-22 Online:2026-07-18 Published:2027-01-18

摘要: 三江平原长期高强度的农业开发导致土地利用变迁,引发景观破碎化和生态系统服务退化等突出问题。为探究人类活动干扰下的生态演变规律和调控路径,本研究基于2010—2020年土地利用等多源数据,综合PLUS模型、InVEST模型及“结构+转换”双维生态风险框架,定量评估并模拟了三江平原2030年多情景(自然发展、城镇发展、耕地保护和生态保护)下的景观生态风险和生态系统服务演变,并据此划定耦合管控分区。结果表明:2010—2020年,研究区土地利用变化以耕地与生态用地的双向流转为主,景观生态风险持续攀升,生境质量和碳储量等生态系统服务供给总体下降;2030年,自然发展情景下高风险区面积较2020年激增13.7%,而生态保护情景有效遏制了生态退化,实现了生态风险防控与生态系统服务维持的最优权衡;生态风险-生态系统服务耦合分区呈现显著的空间异质性,其中,“低风险-低供给”集中分布于研究区北部,“高风险-高供给”的空间冲突格局集中分布于中东部及南部林区边缘。本研究可为黑土区生态预警及国土空间分区管控提供科学支撑。

关键词: 三江平原, PLUS模型, 景观生态风险, 生态系统服务, 生态分区管控

Abstract: Long-term high-intensity agricultural development in the Sanjiang Plain has led to land use change, triggering prominent issues such as landscape fragmentation and degradation of ecosystem services. To explore the ecological evolution laws and regulation pathways under human activity disturbance, based on multi-source data on land use from 2010 to 2020, we comprehensively utilized the PLUS model, InVEST model, and a dual-dimensional ecological risk framework of “structure+conversion” to quantitatively assess and simulate landscape ecological risk and ecosystem service evolution under multiple scenarios (natural development, urban development, farmland protection, and ecological protection) by 2030, and delineated the coupled management and control zones. The results showed that from 2010 to 2020, land use change was primarily characterized by the bidirectional transfer farmland and ecological land, with landscape ecological risks continuously rising, and overall declines in ecosystem service supply such as habitat quality and carbon storage. By 2030, the area of high-risk zone under the natural development scenario surged by 13.7% compared to 2020, while the ecological protection scenario effectively curbed ecological degradation, achieving an optimal balance between ecological risk prevention and control and ecosystem service maintenance. The ecological risk-ecosystem service coupled zones exhibited significant spatial heterogeneity, with “low risk-low supply” concentrated in the northern part of the study area, and a spatial conflict pattern of “high risk-high supply” concentrated in the central-eastern and southern forest edges. This study would provide scientific supports for ecological early warning and territorial spatial zoning and management in black soil regions.

Key words: Sanjiang Plain, PLUS model, landscape ecological risk, ecosystem service, ecological zoning control