欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1): 223-234.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202601.022

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

青藏高原年楚河流域生态管理重要区识别及保护策略

郑锐滨1,2, 刘一鸣2, 徐婷婷1, 李雪怡1, 朱娟1, 吴锋2, 曾辉1,2*   

  1. 1深港产学研基地(北京大学香港科技大学深圳研修院), 广东深圳 518000;
    2北京大学深圳研究生院城市规划与设计学院, 广东深圳 518000
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-29 修回日期:2025-11-07 发布日期:2026-07-18
  • 通讯作者: *E-mail: zengh@pkusz.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:郑锐滨, 男, 1990年生, 学士。主要从事生态保护、流域生态修复研究。E-mail: 254743138@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    日喀则市年楚河流域山水林田湖草冰沙一体化保护和修复工程项目

Identification of critical ecological management zones and conservation strategies in the Nyangchu River Basin, Tibetan Plateau, China

ZHENG Ruibin1,2, LIU Yiming2, XU Tingting1, LI Xueyi1, ZHU Juan1, WU Feng2, ZENG Hui1,2*   

  1. 1PKU-HKUST Shenzhen-Hong Kong Institution, Shenzhen 518000, Guangdong, China;
    2School of Urban Planning and Design, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen 518000, Guangdong, China
  • Received:2025-05-29 Revised:2025-11-07 Published:2026-07-18

摘要: 青藏高原地区是全球生态安全屏障、全国重要生态脆弱区,流域尺度的生态区划及保护策略研究有助于制定精准的系统管控措施,对生态系统科学管理和区域人与自然和谐发展至关重要。本研究提出了 “生态服务/敏感性综合分区-生态保护重要区域识别-重点类型区簇分析策略研究”的复合分析框架,以人地矛盾突出的年楚河流域为研究对象,系统分析流域生态管理重要区的数量结构及空间格局特征,针对关键保护区域利用簇分析进行主导因子结构类型分析和管控策略研究。结果表明: 研究区生态系统综合服务重要区和极重要区分别占流域面积的2/3和13.7%,极重要区集中分布于海拔较低的河谷、山地及河道两侧。研究区综合生态敏感性程度较高,敏感区和极敏感区的面积占比分别为88.3%和11.5%,极敏感区在上游高海拔高寒地区连片分布、在中下游海拔相对较低的河谷地区线性分布。研究区生态保护重要程度较高,极重要、重要区的面积占比99.9%,其中,极重要区面积占比23.7%,集中在上游形成两个斑块大且连通性好的独立网络状结构和在中下游干流沿线呈小型斑块或条带状分布。冻融侵蚀、防风固沙、土地沙化及水源涵养是影响生态保护极重要区空间分异的关键因子。年楚河流域生态管理工作可以分成3种情形:白朗土地沙化管理区应以土地沙化问题控制为主,实施“封禁保育-工程固沙-植被重建”协同治理策略;中下游干流沿线生态管理区需重点维系防风固沙和生物多样性保护功能,采用土地利用效率提升与“三区三线”空间管控协同的策略;上游高海拔生态管理区应开展冻融侵蚀风险防控及水源涵养功能维系工作,采取监测保护与自然恢复结合的联动策略。流域适宜发展河谷特色农业与低干扰生态旅游,建立基于水源涵养量与碳汇增量的生态补偿机制。

关键词: 年楚河流域, 生态系统服务, 生态敏感性, 生态管理, 簇分析, 青藏高原

Abstract: The Qinghai-Tibet Plateau region is a global ecological security barrier and a nationally important ecologically fragile zone. Research on ecological zoning and conservation strategies at the watershed scale is essential for formulating precise systematic management measures, which are crucial for the scientific ecosystem management and the harmonious development of humans and nature. We proposed a composite analytical framework of “comprehensive zoning of ecological services/sensitivity-identification of key ecological conservation areas-strategic research on key type areas via cluster analysis”. Taking the Nyangchu River Basin, an area with prominent human-land conflict, as the research object, we systematically analyzed the quantitative structure and spatial pattern of key areas for ecological management. For key conservation areas, we used cluster analysis to analyze the structural types of dominant factors and research management strategies. The results showed that areas of comprehensive ecological service importance and critical in the study area accounted for approximately two-thirds and 13.7% of the basin, respectively, with the critical areas concentrated in the lower-altitude river valleys, mountains, and along both sides of the river channels. The comprehensive ecological sensitivity was relatively high, with sensitive and extremely sensitive areas accounting for 88.3% and 11.5%, respectively. The extremely sensitive areas were distributed contiguously in the high-altitude alpine regions of the upper reaches and linearly in the relatively lower-altitude valley areas of the middle and lower reaches. The degree of importance for ecological conservation was high, with critical and important areas accounting for 99.9%. The critical areas of ecological conservation accounted for 23.7%, concentrating in the upper reaches to form two independent network structures with large patches and good connectivity, and distributed as small patches or strips along the mainstream in the middle and lower reaches. The freeze-thaw erosion, windbreak and sand fixation, land desertification, and water conservation were the key factors driving the spatial differentiation of critical ecological conservation areas. Ecological management work in the Nyangchu River Basin could be divided into the following three scenarios. The Bailang Land Desertification Management Area should focus on controlling land desertification issues, implementing a coordinated governance strategy of “closure for conservation-engineering sand fixation-vegetation restoration”. The ecological management area along the mainstream in the middle and lower reaches needed to focus on maintaining windbreak and sand fixation functions and biodiversity conservation, adopting a strategy coordinated between land use efficiency improvement and “Three Zones and Three Lines” spatial control. The high-altitude ecological management area in the upper reaches should prevent freeze-thaw erosion risk and maintain water conservation functions, adopting a linkage strategy combining monitoring, protection, and natural restoration. The basin should be suitable for developing characteristic valley agriculture and low-interference ecotourism, establishing an ecological compensation mechanism based on water conservation capa-city and carbon sink increment.

Key words: Nyangchu River Basin, ecosystem service, ecological sensitivity, ecological management, cluster analysis, Qinghai-Tibet Plateau