欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (6): 1534-1542.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202406.007

• • 上一篇    下一篇

单叶蔷薇种群结构与结实能力

张晓龙, 李娜, 钟浚锋, 张晨洁, 于超, 张启翔, 罗乐*   

  1. 北京林业大学园林学院/城乡生态环境北京实验室/花卉种质创新与分子育种北京市重点实验室/教育部园林环境工程研究中心/林木花卉遗传育种教育部重点实验室/国家花卉工程技术研究中心/林木资源高效生产全国重点实验室, 北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-01 接受日期:2024-04-25 出版日期:2024-06-18 发布日期:2024-12-18
  • 通讯作者: *E-mail: luolebjfu@163.com
  • 作者简介:张晓龙, 男, 1996年生, 博士研究生。主要从事园林植物资源调查与评价研究。E-mail: zxl20181224@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(32071820)、国家重点研发计划项目(2019YFD1001001)、中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(QNTD202306)和城乡人居生态环境学项目(北京高校高精尖学科建设项目)

Population structure and fruiting ability of Rosa persica

ZHANG Xiaolong, LI Na, ZHONG Junfeng, ZHANG Chenjie, YU Chao, ZHANG Qixiang, LUO Le   

  1. School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University/Beijing Laboratory of Urban and Rural Ecological Environment/Beijing Key Laboratory of Ornamental Plants Germplasm Innovation and Molecular Breeding/Engineering Research Center of Landscape Environment of Ministry of Education/Key Laboratory of Genetics and Breeding in Forest Trees and Ornamental Plants of Ministry of Education/National Engineering Research Center for Floriculture/State Key Laboratory of Efficient Production of Forest Resources, Beijing 100083, China
  • Received:2024-03-01 Accepted:2024-04-25 Online:2024-06-18 Published:2024-12-18

摘要: 以4个单叶蔷薇种群为研究对象,对年龄结构与动态、空间分布类型、结实能力3个方面进行分析,评价生存状况,探讨单叶蔷薇致危机理。结果表明: 单叶蔷薇种群第Ⅰ、Ⅵ~Ⅷ龄级个体数量较少,中间龄级个体数量较多,总体呈“中间高、两侧低”的不规则金字塔型分布。虽然4个单叶蔷薇种群整体上为增长型,但易受外部环境干扰(Vpi′>0,Pmax>0),死亡率(qx)和消失率(Kx)均在第Ⅴ龄级时达到最大值,植株数量锐减;期望寿命(ex)随龄级增加呈递减趋势,且均在第Ⅷ龄级时出现最小值,说明在此阶段植株活力最低。时间序列分析表明,未来4个单叶蔷薇种群的第Ⅰ~Ⅳ龄级个体数量缺乏,第Ⅴ~Ⅷ龄级将占主导地位,单叶蔷薇种群在未来会趋于老龄化。种群空间分布主要为聚集类型,4个种群的聚集强度大小排布为P4>P3>P1>P2。P3、P4种群植株结实能力优于P1、P2种群。百果重与株高、冠幅,种子总数量与冠幅、百果重之间呈显著正相关。

关键词: 单叶蔷薇, 年龄结构, 空间结构, 结实能力, 致危机理

Abstract: We analyzed age structure and dynamics, spatial distribution patterns, and reproductive capabilities of four Rosa persica populations in Xinjiang, to evaluate the survival status of the species and explore the reasons behind its endangerment. The results showed that the populations had fewer individuals in the youngest (Ⅰ) and oldest (Ⅵ-Ⅷ) age classes, with a predominance of middle-aged individuals, resulting in an irregular pyramid-shaped distribution, described as “high in the middle, low on both sides”. The populations were generally growing, but were susceptible to external environmental disturbances (Vpi>0, Pmax>0). The mortality rate (qx) and vanish rate (Kx) peaked at age Ⅴ, leading to a sharp decline in plant abundance. The life expectancy (ex) decreased progressively with the increases of age class, reaching its lowest at age Ⅷ, which indicated minimal vitality at this stage. A time sequence analysis predicted a future dominance of individuals at age Ⅴ-Ⅷ, suggesting an aging trend. Spatially, the four populations were predominantly clumped, with the intensity of clumping ranked from highest to lowest as P4, P3, P1, and P2. P3 and P4 exhibited better reproductive capabilities than P1 and P2. There was a significant positive correlation between hundred-fruit weight and plant height and crown width, and between total seed number and crown width and hundred-fruit weight.

Key words: Rosa persica, age structure, spatial structure, fruiting capacity, vulnerable mechanism