欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (9): 2874-2884.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202509.026

• 综合评述 • 上一篇    下一篇

从约束到兼容:绿灰基础设施融合配置演进、关键问题和解决路径

朱晓青1,2, 徐振渊1, 刘成明1, 孙卓扬3*, 翁文超4, 李永贺5   

  1. 1浙江工业大学设计与建筑学院, 杭州 310023;
    2杭州国际城市学研究中心(浙江省城市治理研究中心), 杭州 311121;
    3浙江工业大学土木工程学院, 杭州 310023;
    4浙江工业大学计算机学院, 杭州 310023;
    5华东师范大学地理科学学院, 上海 200241
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-07 接受日期:2025-07-03 出版日期:2025-09-18 发布日期:2026-04-18
  • 通讯作者: *E-mail: 111123060003@zjut.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:朱晓青,男,1979年生,教授,博士生导师,研究员。主要从事人居环境科学研究。E-mail:zxq@zjut.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金项目(24FJYB035)、国家自然科学基金委员会面上项目(52278041)、浙江省社科赋能行动专项课题(2024-155)、浙江省住房和城乡建设厅标准科技专项(ZJZX-202108116)、浙江省属高校基本科研业务费专顶资金(GB202301005)和舟山市社科赋能行动专项课题(25FNXD001ZD)

From constraints to compatibility: Evolution, key issues, and solutions in integrating green and grey infrastructure planning

ZHU Xiaoqing1,2, XU Zhenyuan1, LIU Chengming1, SUN Zhuoyang3*, WENG Wenchao4, LI Yonghe5   

  1. 1School of Design and Architecture, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China;
    2Hangzhou International Urbanology Research Center (Center for Urban Governance Studies), Hangzhou 311121, China;
    3College of Civil Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China;
    4College of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China;
    5School of Geographic Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
  • Received:2025-04-07 Accepted:2025-07-03 Online:2025-09-18 Published:2026-04-18

摘要: 基础设施是实现城乡系统适应能力与生态服务功能的关键配置实体。以基础设施发展历程与观念变迁为切入点,本文系统梳理了基础设施空间配置从“灰色设施主导”“生态设施价值化”“绿色设施涌现”至“绿灰设施融合”的历史演进过程,揭示绿色、灰色单一系统在应对复杂城乡问题及可持续发展需求方面存在的系统性约束与适应性不足等矛盾,强调将社会、经济与生态过程纳入基础设施配置系统的核心逻辑。进而从理论体系割裂、价值量化缺位及治理体系障碍角度剖析基础设施空间配置中的核心症结。最后,提出了基于理论、方法、治理机制三层次的解决路径:1)构建从“系统约束”到“社会-生态兼容”的绿灰设施融合配置理论框架;2)构建绿灰设施要素识别、综合评估与决策支持系统;3)“上位调控-下行操作”的基础设施双向配置实施路径。本文可为城乡基础设施建设的可持续转型和绩效提升提供系统性配置框架和实施路径。

关键词: 基础设施, 绿灰融合, 配置演进, 系统约束, 兼容路径

Abstract: Infrastructure is a key spatial configuration entity for enhancing the adaptive capacity and ecosystem service functions of urban-rural systems. Based on the historical evolution of infrastructure development and conceptual transitions, we systematically traced the evolution of spatial infrastructure configuration: from grey infrastructure dominance, ecological infrastructure valorization and the emergence of green infrastructure to integrating green and grey infrastructure. We further revealed the contradictions of systematic constraints and insufficient adaptability of single-faceted green and grey single systems in dealing with complex urban-rural problems and sustainability demands, and emphasized the core logic of incorporating social, economic, and ecological processes into the infrastructure configuration system. Furthermore, we analyzed the core crux of infrastructure spatial configuration from the perspectives of theoretical system fragmentation, lack of value quantification, and obstacles in governance system. Finally, we proposed a solution path based on theory, method, and governance mechanism: 1) A theoretical framework and planning paradigm should be established to transfer green and grey infrastructure from “systemic constraints” to “socio-ecological compatibility”. 2) An integrated system should be constructed to identify green-grey elements, comprehensive evaluation, and decision support. 3) A bidirectional configuration mechanism characterized by top-level regulation-downward operation should be implemented. This review would provide a systematic framework and actionable pathways for advancing the sustainable transformation and performance optimization in urban-rural infrastructure systems.

Key words: infrastructure, integrating green and grey infrastructure, configuration evolution, systemic constraint, compatibility pathway