生态系统服务供需关系评估的几点思考

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202409.039

应用生态学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (9): 2423-2431.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202409.039

生态系统服务供需关系评估的几点思考

陶宇^1,2,3, 欧维新^1,2,3*, 孙晓^4,5

¹南京农业大学土地管理学院, 南京 210095;
²农村土地资源利用与整治国家地方联合工程研究中心, 南京 210095;
³中国资源环境与发展研究院, 南京 210095;
⁴中国人民大学生态环境学院, 北京 100872;
⁵中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所, 北京 100081

收稿日期:2024-07-09 接受日期:2024-08-09 出版日期:2024-09-18 发布日期:2025-03-18
通讯作者: * E-mail: owx@njau.edu.cn
作者简介:陶宇, 男, 1988年生, 副教授。主要从事景观生态与生态系统服务研究。E-mail: taoyu@njau.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(42271304,42271106)

Some critical thinking on the integrative assessment of ecosystem service supply and demand relationships

TAO Yu^1,2,3, OU Weixin^1,2,^3*, SUN Xiao^4,5

¹College of Land Management, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China;
²National & Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Rural Land Resources Use and Consolidation, Nanjing 210095, China;
³China Resources & Environment and Development Academy, Nanjing 210095, China;
⁴School of Ecology & Environment, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China;
⁵Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China

Received:2024-07-09 Accepted:2024-08-09 Online:2024-09-18 Published:2025-03-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 过去十多年,生态系统服务供需关系研究方兴未艾。为提高生态系统服务供需关系评估的科学性及应用价值,针对当前部分研究中存在的供需概念、方法及结果的误用等问题,本文提出了生态系统服务供需关系评估中需要着重考虑的5个方面。首先,需要厘清生态系统服务供需相关概念的区别与联系,这是供需关系评估的重要前提与出发点;其次,需要结合相关环境标准或政策目标,为生态系统调节服务构建相对可靠的需求评估方法;再者,需要明确生态系统服务供需关系评估的最适空间尺度及单元,处理好可塑面积单元问题;此外,需要区分定量或定性方法分别表征生态系统服务供需的数量或匹配关系,尤其要避免采用定性方法表征供需之间的定量关系;最后,需要在供需关系评估中整合生态系统服务流,从“供-流-需”耦合视角评估区域生态系统服务的动态供需关系。

关键词: 生态系统服务需求, 供需关系, 可塑面积单元问题, 生态系统服务流

Abstract: In the past decade, research on the relationships between the supply and demand of ecosystem services has been flourishing. To address issues such as the misuse of supply and demand concepts, methods, and results in current research, we proposed five key aspects that need to be considered to enhance the scientific rigor and practical value in assessing relationships between ecosystem service supply and demand. Firstly, it is essential to clarify the distinctions and connections between the concepts related to ecosystem service supply and demand, which are crucial prerequisites and starting points for assessing their relationships. Secondly, it is necessary to integrate relevant environmental standards or policy objectives to develop reliable methods for assessing the demand for ecosystem regulating services. Furthermore, it is important to properly address the modifiable areal unit problem by determining the most appropriate spatial scale and unit for evaluating relationships between ecosystem service supply and demand. Additionally, it is crucial to differentiate between quantitative and qualitative methods for characterizing (im)balances or (mis)matches between ecosystem service supply and demand, particularly avoiding the use of qualitative methods to represent quantitative relationships between supply and demand. Lastly, it is imperative to integrate ecosystem service flows into the assessment of supply and demand relationships, and evaluate the dynamic supply and demand relationships of regional ecosystem services from a coupled “supply-flow-demand” perspective.

Key words: demand for ecosystem services, supply and demand relationships, modifiable areal unit problem, ecosystem service flow

陶宇, 欧维新, 孙晓. 生态系统服务供需关系评估的几点思考[J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(9): 2423-2431.

TAO Yu, OU Weixin, SUN Xiao. Some critical thinking on the integrative assessment of ecosystem service supply and demand relationships[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2024, 35(9): 2423-2431.

参考文献

[1] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA). Ecosystems and Human Well-being. Washington DC: Island Press, 2005
[2] Villamagna AM, Angermeier PL, Bennett EM. Capacity, pressure, demand, and flow: A conceptual framework for analyzing ecosystem service provision and delivery. Ecological Complexity, 2013, 15: 114-121
[3] Kroll F, Müller F, Haase D, et al. Rural-urban gradient analysis of ecosystem services supply and demand dynamics. Land Use Policy, 2012, 29: 521-535
[4] Wolff S, Schulp CJE, Verburg PH. Mapping ecosystem services demand: A review of current research and future perspectives. Ecological Indicators, 2015, 55: 159-171
[5] Baró F, Palomo I, Zulian G, et al. Mapping ecosystem service capacity, flow and demand for landscape and urban planning: A case study in the Barcelona metropolitan region. Land Use Policy, 2016, 57: 405-417
[6] Notte AL, Maes J, Dalmazzone S, et al. Physical and monetary ecosystem service accounts for Europe: A case study for in-stream nitrogen retention. Ecosystem Ser-vices, 2017, 23: 18-29
[7] Notte AL, Vallecillo S, Maes J. Capacity as “virtual stock” in ecosystem services accounting. Ecological Indicators, 2019, 98: 158-163
[8] Schröter M, Barton DN, Remme RP, et al. Accounting for capacity and flow of ecosystem services: A conceptual model and a case study for Telemark, Norway. Ecological Indicators, 2014, 36: 539-551
[9] Vargas L, Willemen L, Hein L. Assessing the capacity of ecosystems to supply ecosystem services using remote sensing and an ecosystem accounting approach. Environmental Management, 2019, 63: 1-15
[10] Vigl LE, Depellegrin D, Pereira P, et al. Mapping the ecosystem service delivery chain: Capacity, flow, and demand pertaining to aesthetic experiences in mountain landscapes. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 574: 422-436
[11] Schirpke U, Candiago S, Vigl LE, et al. Integrating supply, flow and demand to enhance the understanding of interactions among multiple ecosystem services. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 651: 928-941
[12] Goldenberg R, Kalantari Z, Cvetkovic V, et al. Distinction, quantification and mapping of potential and realized supply-demand of flow-dependent ecosystem services. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 593-594: 599-609
[13] Mitchell MGE, Schuster R, Jacob AL, et al. Identifying key ecosystem service providing areas to inform national-scale conservation planning. Environmental Research Letters, 2021, 16: 014038
[14] Syrbe RU, Walz U. Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services: Providing, benefiting and connecting areas and landscape metrics. Ecological Indicators, 2012, 21: 80-88
[15] Fisher B, Turner RK, Morling P. Defining and classi-fying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics, 2009, 68: 643-653
[16] 徐彩仙, 巩杰, 燕玲玲, 等. 甘肃白龙江流域土壤保持服务供需风险时空变化. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(5): 1397-1408
[17] 中华人民共和国水利部. 土壤侵蚀分类分级标准(SL 190—2007). 北京: 中华人民共和国水利部, 2008
[18] Tao Y, Li ZB, Sun X, et al. Supply and demand dynamics of hydrologic ecosystem services in the rapidly urbanizing Taihu Lake Basin of China. Applied Geography, 2023, 151: 102853
[19] Baró F, Haase D, Gómez-Baggethun E, et al. Mismatches between ecosystem services supply and demand in urban areas: A quantitative assessment in five European cities. Ecological Indicators, 2015, 55: 146-158
[20] Chen JY, Jiang B, Bai Y, et al. Quantifying ecosystem services supply and demand shortfalls and mismatches for management optimization. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 650: 1426-1439
[21] Stürck J, Schulp CJE, Verburg PH. Spatio-temporal dynamics of regulating ecosystem services in Europe: The role of past and future land use change. Applied Geography, 2015, 63: 121-135
[22] Zhang ZM, Peng J, Xu ZH, et al. Ecosystem services supply and demand response to urbanization: A case study of the Pearl River Delta, China. Ecosystem Ser-vices, 2021, 49: 101274
[23] 李潇, 吴克宁, 冯喆, 等. 基于固碳服务供需视角的河南省碳平衡研究. 生态学报, 2022, 42(23): 9627-9635
[24] 李湘儿, 胡熠娜. 基于固碳服务供需视角的区域碳平衡研究:以长三角生态绿色一体化发展示范区为例. 长江流域资源与环境, 2024, 33(1): 55-65
[25] Tao Y, Tao Q, Sun X, et al. Mapping ecosystem service supply and demand dynamics under rapid urban expansion: A case study in the Yangtze River Delta of China. Ecosystem Services, 2022, 56: 101448
[26] Schröter M, Remme RP, Hein L. How and where to map supply and demand of ecosystem services for policy-relevant outcomes? Ecological Indicators, 2012, 23: 220-221
[27] 彭建, 杨旸, 谢盼, 等. 基于生态系统服务供需的广东省绿地生态网络建设分区. 生态学报, 2017, 37(13): 4562-4572
[28] Shen J, Du SQ, Huang QX, et al. Mapping the city-scale supply and demand of ecosystem flood regulation services: A case study in Shanghai. Ecological Indicators, 2019, 106: 105544
[29] Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S, et al. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecological Indicators, 2012, 21: 17-29
[30] Li JH, Jiang HW, Bai Y, et al. Indicators for spatial-temporal comparisons of ecosystem service status between regions: A case study of the Taihu River Basin, China. Ecological Indicators, 2016, 60: 1008-1016
[31] Sun YX, Liu SL, Dong YH, et al. Spatio-temporal evolution scenarios and the coupling analysis of ecosystem services with land use change in China. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 681: 211-225
[32] Tao Y, Wang HN, Ou WX, et al. A land-cover-based approach to assessing ecosystem services supply and demand dynamics in the rapidly urbanizing Yangtze River Delta region. Land Use Policy, 2018, 72: 250-258
[33] Peng J, Wang XY, Liu YX, et al. Urbanization impact on the supply-demand budget of ecosystem services: Decoupling analysis. Ecosystem Services, 2020, 44: 101139
[34] Lyu YF, Sheng L, Wu CF. Improving land-cover-based expert matrices to quantify the dynamics of ecosystem service supply, demand, and budget: Optimization of weight distribution. Ecological Indicators, 2023, 154: 110515
[35] Bagstad KJ, Johnson GW, Voigt B, et al. Spatial dynamics of ecosystem service flows: A comprehensive approach to quantifying actual services. Ecosystem Ser-vices, 2013, 4: 117-125
[36] Bagstad KJ, Villa F, Batker D, et al. From theoretical to actual ecosystem services: Mapping beneficiaries and spatial flows in ecosystem service assessments. Ecology and Society, 2014, 19: 64

生态系统服务供需关系评估的几点思考

Some critical thinking on the integrative assessment of ecosystem service supply and demand relationships

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 8

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	熊昕莹, 孟梅. 基于生态系统服务供需关系及空间流动的新疆生态管理分区与优化策略 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(8): 2237-2248.
[2]	孟欣宇, 吴远翔. 城市生态系统服务供需簇与生态功能管控——以齐齐哈尔市中心城区为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(12): 3393-3403.
[3]	岳文泽, 侯丽, 夏皓轩, 韦静娴, 卢有朋. 基于生态系统服务供需平衡的宁夏固原生态修复分区与优化策略 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(1): 149-158.
[4]	易丹,肖善才,韩逸,欧名豪. 生态系统服务供给和需求研究评述及框架体系构建 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(11): 3942-3952.
[5]	李婧昕, 杨立, 杨蕾, 张超, 霍兆敏, 陈敏豪, 栾晓峰. 基于熵理论的城市生态系统服务流定量评估——以北京市为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(3): 987-996.
[6]	姚婧, 何兴元, 陈玮. 生态系统服务流研究方法最新进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(1): 335-342.
[7]	刘慧敏, 刘绿怡, 任嘉衍, 卞子亓, 丁圣彦. 生态系统服务流定量化研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(8): 2723-2730.
[8]	刘慧敏, 范玉龙, 丁圣彦. 生态系统服务流研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(7): 2161-2171.