
应用生态学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (11): 3199-3207.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202411.025
胡尚春1,2*, 阙菁1, 刘佳慧1
收稿日期:2024-06-03
修回日期:2024-09-05
出版日期:2024-11-18
发布日期:2025-05-18
通讯作者:
*E-mail: noblespring@outlook.com
作者简介:胡尚春, 男, 1984年生, 副教授。主要从事城市再野化研究。E-mail: noblespring@outlook.com
基金资助:HU Shangchun1,2*, QUE Jing1, LIU Jiahui1
Received:2024-06-03
Revised:2024-09-05
Online:2024-11-18
Published:2025-05-18
摘要: 植被碳汇研究多关注大尺度自然植被,少数研究关注城市人工绿地碳汇,且鲜有研究总结城市荒野的碳汇功能,而城市荒野是探索城市生态系统碳增汇与生物多样性的协同提升的潜在研究方向。本文对现有文献进行分析总结,从植被和土壤两方面比较了城市荒野与城市人工绿地的单位面积碳储量。城市荒野比人工绿地在植被层面的单位面积碳储量上有显著优势。不同类型城市荒野中,林地/湿地区在植被和土壤层面的单位面积碳储量均显著高于废弃或闲置的棕地区及工商业住宅区的人工绿地,而与公园休闲区的人工绿地差别不显著。为提高城市碳储量,应适当保护城市荒野,尤其是林地/湿地,并开展人工绿地再野化。未来可进一步探索城市荒野与人工绿地在植被特征和土壤性质方面的区别,深化对城市荒野不同类型地块碳储量的研究。
胡尚春, 阙菁, 刘佳慧. 城市荒野与人工绿地碳储量比较[J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(11): 3199-3207.
HU Shangchun, QUE Jing, LIU Jiahui. Comparison of carbon storage between urban wilderness and artificial greenspaces.[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2024, 35(11): 3199-3207.
| [1] 万斯·G·马丁, 梅拉尼·希尔. 城市野境: 比“城市荒野”更准确的措辞. 景观设计学, 2021, 9(1): 80-91 [2] Dudley N. Guidelines for Applying Protected Area Mana-gement Categories. Gland, Switzerland: International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), 2008: 14-17 [3] 邵钰涵, 徐欣瑜, 袁嘉. 城市荒野景观: 内涵与价值审视. 景观设计学, 2021, 9(1): 14-25 [4] Pearsall M, Lucas S. Vacant land: The new urban green? Cities, 2014, 40: 121-123 [5] 袁嘉. 城市荒野: 夹缝中的自然与机遇. 景观设计学, 2021, 9(1): 10-13 [6] 英戈·科瓦里克. 与荒野共生: 城市绿地的发展前景. 景观设计学, 2021, 9(1): 92-103 [7] 袁嘉, 欧桦杰, 金晓东, 等. 城市荒野生态研究概述. 生态学报, 2023, 43(4): 1703-1713 [8] Cervelli EW, Lundholm JT, Du X. Spontaneous urban vegetation and habitat heterogeneity in Xi’an, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2013, 120: 25-33 [9] Sikorska D, Ciężkowski W, Babanczyk P, et al. Inten-ded wilderness as a nature-based solution: Status, identification and management of urban spontaneous vegetation in cities. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2021, 62: 127155 [10] Toffolo C, Gentili R, Banfi E, et al. Urban plant assemblages by land use type in Milan: Floristic, ecological and functional diversities and refugium role of railway areas. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2021, 62: 127175 [11] Preston PD. The Potential Contribution of Brownfield Ecosystem Services to Urban Resilience. PhD Thesis. Manchester, UK: Manchester Metropolitan University, 2021 [12] Kowarik I. Urban wilderness: Supply, demand, and access. Urban Forestry Urban Greening, 2018, 29: 336-347 [13] Threlfall CG, Kendal D. The distinct ecological and social roles that wild spaces play in urban ecosystems. Urban Forestry Urban Greening, 2018, 29: 348-356 [14] 牛铜钢, 刘为. 双碳战略背景下城市生态系统的碳汇功能与生物多样性可以兼得. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(8): 205-210 [15] Chen Y, Nijhuis S, van Dorst M. Visitors’ perceptions of urban wilderness: A case study of Jiangyangfan Ecological Park in Hangzhou, China. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2024, 95: 128319 [16] Cheng XL, Cubino JP, Balfour K, et al. Drivers of spontaneous and cultivated species diversity in the tropical city of Zhanjiang, China. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2022, 67: 127428 [17] McKinney ML, Kowarik I, Kendal D. The contribution of wild urban ecosystems to liveable cities. Urban Fores-try & Urban Greening, 2018, 29: 334-335 [18] Preston PD, Dunk RM, Smith GR, et al. Not all brownfields are equal: A typological assessment reveals hidden green space in the city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2023, 229: 104590 [19] Gonzalez M, Ladet S, Deconchat M, et al. Relative contribution of edge and interior zones to patch size effect on species richness: An example for woody plants. Forest Ecology and Management, 2010, 259: 266-274 [20] Angold PG, Sadler JP, Hill MO, et al. Biodiversity in urban habitat patches. Science of the Total Environment, 2006, 360: 196-204 [21] Bonthoux S, Brun M, Di Pietro F, et al. How can wastelands promote biodiversity in cities? A review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2014, 132: 79-88 [22] Zefferman EP, McKinney ML, Cianciolo T, et al. Knoxville’s urban wilderness: Moving toward sustainable multifunctional management. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2018, 29: 357-366 [23] Steudel B, Hallmann C, Lorenz M, et al. Contrasting biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships in phylogenetic and functional diversity. New Phytologist, 2016, 212: 409-420 [24] Riley CB, Herms DA, Gardiner MM. Exotic trees contribute to urban forest diversity and ecosystem services in inner-city Cleveland, OH. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2018, 29: 367-376 [25] Onandia G, Schittko C, Ryo M, et al. Ecosystem functioning in urban grasslands: The role of biodiversity, plant invasions and urbanization. PLoS One, 2019, 14(11): e0225438 [26] Kuemmerle T, Hostert P, Radeloff VC, et al. Cross-border comparison of post-socialist farmland abandonment in the Carpathians. Ecosystems, 2008, 11: 614-628 [27] Shen Y, Yu SX, Lian JY, et al. Tree aboveground carbon storage correlates with environmental gradients and functional diversity in a tropical forest. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6: 25304 [28] Huang Y, Chen Y, Castro-Izaguirre N, et al. Impacts of species richness on productivity in a large-scale subtro-pical forest experiment. Science, 2018, 362: 80-83 [29] Mori AS. Biodiversity and ecosystem services in forests: Management and restoration founded on ecological theory. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 54: 7-11 [30] Laforest-Lapointe I, Paquette A, Messier C, et al. Leaf bacterial diversity mediates plant diversity and ecosystem function relationships. Nature, 2017, 546: 145-147 [31] 文志, 郑华, 欧阳志云. 生物多样性与生态系统服务关系研究进展. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(1): 340-348 [32] Smukler SM, Sánchez-Moreno S, Fonte SJ, et al. Biodiversity and multiple ecosystem functions in an organic farmscape. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2010, 139: 80-97 [33] Venail P, Gross K, Oakley TH, et al. Species richness, but not phylogenetic diversity, influences community biomass production and temporal stability in a re-examination of 16 grassland biodiversity studies. Functional Ecology, 2015, 29: 615-626 [34] Conti G, Díaz S. Plant functional diversity and carbon storage: An empirical test in semi-arid forest ecosystems. Journal of Ecology, 2013, 101: 18-28 [35] Cadotte MW, Cavender-Bares J, Tilman D, et al. Using phylogenetic, functional and trait diversity to understand patterns of plant community productivity. PLoS One, 2009, 4(5): e5695 [36] Schittko C, Onandia G, Bernard-Verdier M, et al. Biodiversity maintains soil multifunctionality and soil organic carbon in novel urban ecosystems. Journal of Ecology, 2022, 110: 916-934 [37] Sikorska D, Ŀaszkiewicz E, Krauze K, et al. The role of informal green spaces in reducing inequalities in urban green space availability to children and seniors. Environmental Science and Policy, 2020, 108: 144-154 [38] Müller A, Bøcher PK, Fischer C, et al. ‘Wild’ in the city context: Do relative wild areas offer opportunities for urban biodiversity? Landscape and Urban Planning, 2018, 170: 256-265 [39] Escobedo F, Varela S, Zhao M, et al. Analyzing the efficacy of subtropical urban forests in offsetting carbon emissions from cities. Environmental Science and Policy, 2010, 13: 362-372 [40] Reddy KR, Chirakkara RA. Green and sustainable remedial strategy for contaminated site: Case study. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2013, 31: 1653-1661 [41] Kim G. Assessing urban forest structure, ecosystem services, and economic benefits on vacant land. Sustai-nability, 2016, 8: 679 [42] Kim G, Miller PA, Nowak DJ. Assessing urban vacant land ecosystem services: Urban vacant land as green infrastructure in the City of Roanoke, Virginia. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2015, 14: 519-526 [43] Luo S, Patuano A. Multiple ecosystem services of informal green spaces: A literature review. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2023, 81: 127849 [44] Anderson EC, Minor ES. Vacant lots: An underexplored resource for ecological and social benefits in cities. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2017, 21: 146-152 [45] Strohbach MW, Arnold E, Haase D, et al. The carbon footprint of urban green space: A life cycle approach. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2012, 104: 220-229 [46] Nicese FP, Colangelo G, Comolli R, et al. Estimating CO2 balance through the life cycle assessment prism: A case study in an urban park. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2020, 57: 126869 [47] Wastian L, Unterweger PA, Betz O. Influence of the reduction of urban lawn mowing on wild bee diversity (Hymenoptera, Apoidea). Journal of Hymenoptera Research, 2016, 49: 51-63 [48] Strohbach MW, Haase D. Above-ground carbon storage by urban trees in Leipzig, Germany: Analysis of patterns in a European city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2011, 104: 95-104 [49] Richter S, Haase D, Thestorf K, et al. Carbon pools of Berlin, Germany: Organic carbon in soils and above-ground in trees. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2020, 54: 126777 [50] Dorendorf J, Eschenbach A, Schmidt K, et al. Both tree and soil carbon need to be quantified for carbon assessments of cities. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2015, 14: 447-455 [51] Sun YM, Li H, Lei S, et al. Redevelopment of urban brownfield sites in China: Motivation, history, policies and improved management. Eco-Environment & Health, 2022, 1: 63-72 [52] Canedoli C, Ferrè C, El Khair DA, et al. Soil organic carbon stock in different urban land uses: High stock evidence in urban parks. Urban Ecosystems, 2020, 23: 159-171 [53] Pouyat RV, Yesilonis ID, Nowak DJ. Carbon storage by urban soils in the United States. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2006, 35: 1566-1575 [54] Dhyani S, Singh A, Gujre N, et al. Quantifying tree carbon stock in historically conserved Seminary Hills urban forest of Nagpur, India. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41: 193-203 [55] Woldegerima T, Yeshitela K, Lindley S. Ecosystem services assessment of the urban forests of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Urban Ecosystems, 2017, 20: 683-699 [56] Yu HY, Kim SH, Kim JG. Carbon sequestration potential in montane wetlands of Korea. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2022, 37: e02166 [57] Chen J, Wang DQ, Li YJ, et al. The carbon stock and sequestration rate in tidal flats from coastal China. Glo-bal Biogeochemical Cycles, 2020, 34: e2020GB006772 [58] 韩继刚, 李刚, 张维维, 等. 城市绿地土壤健康质量问题与对策. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(1): 268-276 [59] Jorgensen A, Tylecote M. Ambivalent landscapes: Wilderness in the urban interstices. Landscape Research, 2007, 32: 443-462 [60] Elsa CA, Emily SM. Assessing social and biophysical drivers of spontaneous plant diversity and structure in urban vacant lots. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 653: 1272-1281 [61] Danford RS, Strohbach MW, Warren PS, et al. Active greening or rewilding the city: How does the intention behind small pockets of urban green affect use? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2018, 29: 377-383 [62] Chen J, Kinoshita T, Li H, et al. Toward green equity: An extensive study on urban form and green space equity for shrinking cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2023, 90: 104395 [63] Rupprecht CD, Byrne JA. Informal urban green-space: Comparison of quantity and characteristics in Brisbane, Australia and Sapporo, Japan. PLoS One, 2014, 9(6): e99784 [64] Burkholder S. The new ecology of vacancy: Rethinking land use in shrinking cities. Sustainability, 2012, 4: 1154-1172 [65] McPhearson T, Kremer P, Hamstead ZA. Mapping ecosystem services in New York City: Applying a social-ecological approach in urban vacant land. Ecosystem Services, 2013, 5: 11-26 [66] Navarro LM, Pereira HM. Rewilding abandoned landscapes in Europe. Ecosystems, 2012, 15: 900-912 [67] Kowarik I, Hiller A, Planchuelo G, et al. Emerging urban forests: Opportunities for promoting the wild side of the urban green infrastructure. Sustainability, 2019, 11: 6318 [68] Trentanovi G, Campagnaro T, Kowarik I, et al. Integrating spontaneous urban woodlands into the green infrastructure: Unexploited opportunities for urban regeneration. Land Use Policy, 2021, 102: 105221 [69] Khadanga SS, Jayakumar S. Tree diversity and carbon sequestration potential of an urban forest patch of Pondicherry, India. Journal of Tree Sciences, 2018, 37: 58-71 [70] Ostertag R, Warman L, Cordell S, et al. Using plant functional traits to restore Hawaiian rainforest. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 52: 805-809 [71] Trentanovi G, von der Lippe M, Sitzia T, et al. Biotic homogenization at the community scale: Disentangling the roles of urbanization and plant invasion. Diversity and Distributions, 2013, 19: 738-748 [72] Simberloff D, Ricciardi A. Foreword to chapter eight//Elton CS, ed. The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2020: 193-200 [73] 钱蕾西, 王晞月, 王向荣. 城市自然的再认知: 典型城市荒野空间的识别特征及应对策略. 中国园林, 2022, 38(8): 16-23 [74] Venn S, Kotze DJ. Benign neglect enhances urban habitat heterogeneity: Responses of vegetation and carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) to the cessation of mowing of park lawns. European Journal of Entomology, 2014, 111: 703-714 [75] Kissling M, Hegetschweiler KT, Rusterholz HP, et al. Short-term and long-term effects of human trampling on above-ground vegetation, soil density, soil organic matter and soil microbial processes in suburban beech forests. Applied Soil Ecology, 2009, 42: 303-314 [76] Capowiez Y, Cadoux S, Bouchand P, et al. Experimental evidence for the role of earthworms in compacted soil regeneration based on field observations and results from a semi-field experiment. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2009, 41: 711-717 [77] 陈媛, 史蒂芬·奈豪斯, 马修·范·道斯特. 城市荒野景观及其营造策略: 以荷兰实践为例. 中国园林, 2022, 38(8): 24-29 [78] 王向荣. 城市荒野与城市生境. 风景园林, 2019, 26(1): 4-5 |
| [1] | 杨盈盈, 杨天宇, 郭邵华, 刘芳妤, 曹兵, 杨君珑, 徐雪蕾. 宁夏罗山不同植被类型地上-地下生态化学计量特征及异速生长关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(8): 2509-2518. |
| [2] | 张娟, 邓蕾, 王文龙. 黄土高原草地封育过程中土壤有机碳稳定性及其影响因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(7): 2157-2168. |
| [3] | 毕旭, 史凯龙, 付勇勇, 赵若宁, 李建, 南箔, 李波. 干旱区山盆系统碳储量时空变化及驱动机制: 以新疆富蕴县为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(6): 1763-1774. |
| [4] | 侯伟, 李伟光, 王斌, 吕润. 海南热带雨林国家公园植被覆盖度的时空演变及对台风扰动的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(6): 1775-1784. |
| [5] | 欧阳文峰, 高丽倩, 赵允格, 孙会, 王鹏. 基于结构方程模型的灌-草-生物结皮立体结构量化 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(6): 1897-1906. |
| [6] | 闵雪, 吴叶礼, 丁国栋. 北方林草交错带不同恢复类型植被-土壤碳氮磷化学计量及其驱动因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(5): 1488-1496. |
| [7] | 李芳芳, 侯振安, 张夏然, 周兆婷, 李华俊, 姜艳. 农田“干播湿出”前后绿洲-荒漠过渡带植被稳定性变化 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(5): 1506-1514. |
| [8] | 李路丹, 刘琰琰, 冯浩鹏, 康平, 沈园, 秦文霜, Klaus Schaefer, 袁登攀. 2001—2020年中国不同干湿区植被固碳能力时空变化及影响因子 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(5): 1559-1569. |
| [9] | 冯娟, 买吾拉夏·木巴热克, 刘卫平. 玛纳斯河流域植被生态质量变化及驱动力 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(4): 1134-1140. |
| [10] | 刘宇蒙, 贾炜玮, 赵子鹏, 李泽霖. 基于SGAM模型的小兴安岭地区林下植被碳密度空间分布格局 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(4): 1153-1164. |
| [11] | 安文举, 李旭, 郭强, 刘立峰, 李王成, 马波, 刘昶, 郝姗姗. 基于PLUS-InVEST模型预测2033年陕北多沙粗沙区碳储量及经济价值 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(4): 1165-1174. |
| [12] | 刘一丹, 黄海广, 李晓兰, 李雪华. 毛乌素沙地归一化植被指数时空演变及其驱动力:以内蒙古乌审旗为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(3): 805-813. |
| [13] | 王昊然, 刘明智, 蒋日进, 肖泽宇, 申家荣, 赵芃, 印瑞, 李鹏飞, 宋建辉. 舟山群岛潮滩沉积物碳储量空间动态 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(3): 907-916. |
| [14] | 高子延, 卓玛曲措, 周平, 邓旺秋, 旺姆, 岳海梅, 李挺. 南岭旱季典型植被土壤微生物多样性及其影响因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(2): 464-476. |
| [15] | 冯汉华, 颜文杰, 王旭, 罗勇, 徐期瑚, 郑全胜, 熊育久. 基于种-面积关系认识石漠化地区植被组成与多样性 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(2): 477-484. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
辽公网安备21010302000574号
辽ICP备05000862号-2
版权所有 © 《应用生态学报》编辑部