欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是

应用生态学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 751-757.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202603.006

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

干旱等级对东北地区落叶松人工林最大密度线的影响

董灵波, 张能能, 刘兆刚*   

  1. 东北林业大学林学院森林生态系统可持续经营教育部重点实验室, 哈尔滨 150040
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-04 接受日期:2026-01-30 出版日期:2026-03-18 发布日期:2026-09-18
  • 通讯作者: *E-mail: lzg19700602@163.com
  • 作者简介:董灵波, 男, 1988年生, 博士,教授。主要从事森林可持续经营研究。E-mail: farrell0503@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(32471856)

Effects of aridity level on the maximum density lines of Larix spp. plantations in Northeast China

DONG Lingbo, ZHANG Nengneng, LIU Zhaogang*   

  1. Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Sustainable Management of Forest Ecosystems, College of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
  • Received:2025-12-04 Accepted:2026-01-30 Online:2026-03-18 Published:2026-09-18

摘要: 以我国第七次全国森林资源清查的东北地区389块落叶松人工林数据为基础,采用德马顿干旱指数(MAI)量化其干旱状况,并将其划分为5个等级,即Ⅰ级∈(0, 40]、Ⅱ级∈(40, 50]、Ⅲ级∈(50, 60]、Ⅳ级∈(60, 70]和Ⅴ级∈(70, ∞),采用分位数回归建立不同干旱等级下落叶松人工林的最大密度线模型,模拟干旱等级对林分最大密度、林分蓄积和林分碳汇量的影响,为该地区落叶松人工林的精准经营提供依据。结果表明:当不考虑干旱等级时,该地区落叶松人工林最大密度线的斜率为-1.421,高于Reineke的推荐值(-1.605);当考虑干旱等级时,其斜率整体随着MAI值的增加而增加,且不同生长阶段的落叶松人工林最大密度对MAI的响应也存在显著差异。其中,当林分平均胸径<12 cm时,林分最大密度承载力随着MAI值的增加而降低,超过该阈值时,林分最大密度承载力则随着MAI值的增加而增加。当林分平均胸径达到40 cm时,干旱Ⅰ级的最大林分密度(144 株·hm-2)显著小于不分级,林分蓄积和碳汇量分别减少137.76 m3·hm-2和55.68 t·hm-2,而干旱Ⅱ~Ⅴ级的最大林分密度显著增加80~211株·hm-2,林分蓄积和碳汇量分别增加91.84~242.23 m3·hm-2和37.12~97.91 t·hm-2。干旱状况会显著影响东北地区落叶松人工林的最大密度承载力,建议根据各地区的MAI值和不同生长阶段制定合理的林分密度控制表,以实现林分蓄积和碳汇效益的最大化。

关键词: 干旱指数, 人工林, 最大密度线, 落叶松, 分位数回归

Abstract: Based on data from 389 plots of Larix spp. plantations in Northeast China collected from the Seventh National Forest Inventory of China, we used the De Martonne aridity index (MAI) to quantify aridity conditions, and classified the aridity levels into five categories: Ⅰ ∈ (0, 40], Ⅱ ∈ (40, 50], Ⅲ ∈ (50, 60], Ⅳ ∈ (60, 70], and Ⅴ ∈ (70, ∞). We further employed quantile regression to develop the maximum stand density line models under different aridity levels, and simulated the effects of aridity level on the maximum stand density, stand volume, and carbon sequestration, which could provide a basis for precision management of Larix plantations in the region. The results showed that when aridity levels were not considered, the maximum stand density line slope for Larix spp. plantations in the region were -1.421, higher than Reineke's recommended value (-1.605). When aridity levels were considered, the slope generally increased with increasing MAI values, and there were significant differences in the response of maximum stand density to the aridity index across different growth stages of Larix spp. plantations. When the average stand diameter was less than 12 cm, the carrying capacity of the maximum stand density decreased with increasing MAI values. However, when the average diameter exceeded this threshold, the carrying capacity increased with increasing MAI values. At an average stand diameter of 40 cm, the maximum stand density under aridity level Ⅰ (144 trees·hm-2) was significantly lower than the unclassified value, leading to a reduction in stand volume and carbon sequestration by 137.76 m3·hm-2 and 55.68 t·hm-2, respectively. In contrast, the maximum stand density under aridity levels Ⅱ to Ⅴ was significantly increased by approximately 80 to 211 trees·hm-2, with corresponding increases in stand volume and carbon sequestration by 91.84 to 242.23 m3·hm-2 and 37.12 to 97.91 t·hm-2, respectively. Aridity conditions significantly affected the maximum density carrying capacity of Larix plantations. Therefore, reasonable stand density control tables should be developed based on the MAI values and growth stages to maximize stand volume and carbon sequestration benefits.

Key words: aridity index, plantation, maximum density line, Larix spp., quantile regression