欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是

应用生态学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 741-750.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202603.004

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

杉木和麻栎径向生长与叶片生理对干旱的响应

李江凯1, 刘强1, 姜姜1, 郭江艳2, 刘自强1*   

  1. 1南京林业大学南方现代林业协同创新中心江苏省水土保持与生态修复重点实验室, 南京 210037;
    2句容市磨盘山林场, 江苏句容 212400
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-20 接受日期:2026-01-20 出版日期:2026-03-18 发布日期:2026-09-18
  • 通讯作者: *E-mail: liuzistrong@njfu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:李江凯, 男, 2001年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事森林水文研究。E-mail: lockthat@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省林业科技创新与推广项目(LYKJ[2023]04)和国家自然科学基金项目(42377068)

Responses of radial growth and leaf physiology to drought in Cunninghamia lanceolata and Quercus acutissima

LI Jiangkai1, LIU Qiang1, JIANG Jiang1, GUO Jiangyan2, LIU Ziqiang1*   

  1. 1Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Ecological Restoration in Jiangsu Province, Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China;
    2Mopanshan Forest Farm, Jurong 212400, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2025-10-20 Accepted:2026-01-20 Online:2026-03-18 Published:2026-09-18

摘要: 为探究气候变暖背景下我国南方丘陵区常用造林树种杉木、麻栎径向生长及其对干旱的响应,本研究以江苏省句容市磨盘山林场内的杉木、麻栎为对象,结合树轮年代学与叶片生理测定,分析两者在1968—2024年的径向生长、水分利用效率(iWUE)、1994—1995年干旱事件的生态韧性指标,以及2024年干旱下的生理策略。结果表明:1)杉木幼林阶段(1973—1981年)径向生长水平高于麻栎,标准年表指数最高达1.7,之后稳定在0.9~1.1,在成熟林阶段(2010年后)多次被麻栎反超。2)除1978年外,杉木iWUE均高于麻栎,气候响应分析显示,杉木径向生长和iWUE对气候因子的敏感度高于麻栎,且杉木iWUE与上年9—10月和当年2—6月的平均气温、上年9月和当年2—4月的平均最高气温及年均最低气温均呈显著正相关,表明杉木iWUE受气温升高的显著驱动。3)在历史干旱事件中,两者的抵抗力均<1,恢复力均>1,杉木的弹性力>1,而麻栎的弹性力<1,即杉木的生态韧性优于麻栎。4)生理监测显示,干旱下杉木通过维持低气孔导度和蒸腾速率以保持稳定的光合作用;而麻栎采用较激进的生理策略,在正午高温强光下其光合速率迅速下降。综上,杉木通过保守的水分利用策略维持了更强的水力安全与生态韧性,而麻栎的激进策略增加了干旱风险,水分利用策略是导致二者径向生长与干旱响应差异的主要因素。

关键词: 树种, 径向生长, 干旱响应, 生理策略

Abstract: Cunninghamia lanceolata and Quercus acutissima are common plantation species in the hilly regions of southern China. To understand the responses of radial growth to drought under the background of climate warming, we analyzed the radial growth and intrinsic water use efficiency (iWUE) of both species from 1968 to 2024, ecolo-gical resilience indices during the 1994-1995 drought event, and physiological strategies under the 2024 drought in Mopanshan Forest Farm, Jurong City, Jiangsu Province. Several variables related with dendrochronology and leaf physiological processes were measured. The results showed that: 1) The radial growth level of C. lanceolata was higher than that of Q. acutissima in the young forest stage (1973-1981), with the standard chronology index reaching a maximum of 1.7, after which it stabilized between 0.9 and 1.1, and was surpassed by Q. acutissima multiple times in the mature forest stage (after 2010). 2) In all the years except 1978, the iWUE of C. lanceolata was consistently higher than that of Q. acutissima. The sensitivity of radial growth and iWUE to climatic factors was higher in C. lanceolata than in Q. acutissima. The iWUE of C. lanceolata showed significant positive correlations with the mean temperature from the previous September-October and the current February-June, the mean maximum temperature from the previous September and the current February-April, as well as the annual mean minimum temperature, indicating that its iWUE was driven by rising temperature. 3) In historical drought events, the resistance of both species was less than 1 and recovery was greater than 1. The resilience of C. lanceolata was greater than 1 while that of Q. acutissima was less than 1, indicating that the ecological resilience of C. lanceolata was superior to that of Q. acutissima. 4) Under drought conditions, C. lanceolata sustained low stomatal conductance and transpiration rates to maintain stable photosynthesis, whereas Q. acutissima adopted a more aggressive physiological strategy, with photosynthetic rate declining rapidly under high temperatures and strong light at noon. In summary, C. lanceolata maintained stronger hydraulic safety and ecological resilience through a conservative water use strategy, while the aggressive strategy of Q. acutissima, increased drought risks. Water use strategy was the primary factor leading to the differences in radial growth and drought response between the two species.

Key words: tree species, radial growth, drought response, physiological strategy