欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是

应用生态学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (9): 3169-3178.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202609.034

• • 上一篇    下一篇

全球湖泊溶解性有机碳与无机碳关系的空间差异与影响因子

张皓然1,2, 陈光杰1,2*, 王露1,2, 马欠1, 任雁1, 范雨春1,2   

  1. 1云南师范大学地理学部, 云南省高原地理过程与环境变化重点实验室, 昆明 650500;
    2西南联合研究生院, 昆明 650092
  • 收稿日期:2026-03-13 接受日期:2026-06-24 出版日期:2026-09-18 发布日期:2026-10-12
  • 通讯作者: *E-mail: guangjiechen@ynnu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:张皓然, 男, 1997年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事湖泊溶解性碳研究。E-mail: 604079684@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(42171072)和云南省西南联合研究生院科技专项(202302AP370001,202305AM070002)

Spatial variability and influencing factors of the relationship between dissolved organic carbon and inorganic carbon in global lakes.

ZHANG Haoran1,2, CHEN Guangjie1,2*, WANG Lu1,2, MA Qian1, REN Yan1, FAN Yuchun1,2   

  1. 1Yunnan Key Laboratory of Plateau Geographical Processes and Environmental Change, Faculty of Geography, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500, China;
    2Southwest United Graduate School, Kunming 650092, China
  • Received:2026-03-13 Accepted:2026-06-24 Online:2026-09-18 Published:2026-10-12

摘要: 为识别全球湖泊溶解有机碳(DOC)与溶解无机碳(DIC)关系的空间差异及其主要影响因素,本研究基于全球湖泊DOC和DIC观测数据,采用MissForest插补、分类回归树(CART)和广义加性模型(GAMs)等方法,构建“水文-营养”情景分析框架,比较不同环境条件下DOC与DIC相关关系及其影响因子。结果表明:CART模型识别出年降雨量约457 mm和总氮浓度约1.7 mg·L-1两个主要环境分割点,可将全球湖泊划分为湿润-高氮、湿润-低氮、干旱-高氮和干旱-低氮4类情景。不同情景下DOC与DIC关系存在明显差异:在湿润-高氮湖泊中,二者呈弱正相关,水温在17.5 ℃附近表现出非线性响应特征,说明富营养化背景下生物过程和水体分层可能共同影响DOC与DIC关系;在湿润-低氮湖泊中,二者相关性接近零,可能与DOC主要受流域土壤有机碳输入影响、而DIC更多受地下水补给、岩石风化和碳酸盐平衡过程控制有关;在干旱-高氮湖泊中,DOC与DIC呈显著正相关,说明蒸发浓缩和溶质同步累积可能是二者同向变化的重要原因;在干旱-低氮湖泊中,二者相关性较弱,叶绿素a浓度在15 μg·L-1附近出现响应峰值,表明有限的初级生产力可能对溶解碳组分关系产生阶段性影响。总体来看,电导率、pH、水温、土壤有机碳、降雨量和叶绿素a是不同情景下影响DOC与DIC关系的重要因子。全球湖泊DOC与DIC关系并非稳定同步变化,而是表现出明显的情景依赖性和非线性特征,应结合水文条件、营养状态及湖泊理化环境进行综合分析。

关键词: 湖泊, 溶解无机碳, 溶解有机碳, 环境分割点, 同步变化

Abstract: To identify the spatial variations in the relationship between dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) in global lakes and the major driving factors, we constructed a “hydrological-nutrient” scenario analysis framework using methods including MissForest imputation, classification and regression trees (CART), and generalized additive models (GAMs). Based on global lake DOC and DIC observational data, we compared the correlations between DOC and DIC under different environmental conditions and analyzed their driving factors. The results showed that the CART model identified two primary environmental segmentation points: an annual rainfall of approximately 457 mm and a total nitrogen concentration of about 1.7 mg·L-1. Global lakes could thus be classified into four scenarios: humid-high nitrogen, humid-low nitrogen, arid-high nitrogen, and arid-low nitrogen. There were significant differences in the relationship between DOC and DIC across these scenarios. In humid-high nitrogen lakes, a weak positive correlation was found, with water temperature near 17.5 ℃ exhibiting nonlinear response characteristics, suggesting that biological processes and water stratification may jointly influence the DOC-DIC relationship under eutrophic conditions. In humid-low nitrogen lakes, the correlation was near zero, likely due to DOC being primarily influenced by soil organic carbon inputs from the watershed, while DIC was more controlled by groundwater recharge, rock weathering, and carbonate equilibrium processes. In arid-high nitrogen lakes, DOC and DIC showed a significant positive correlation, indicating that evaporation concentration and synchronous solute accumulation may be key drivers of their co-varying trends. In arid-low nitrogen lakes, the correlation was weaker, with a response peak in chlorophyll-a concentration near 15 μg·L-1, suggesting that lower primary productivity may exert phased effects on the dissolved carbon component relationship. Overall, conductivity, pH, water temperature, soil organic carbon, rainfall, and chlorophyll-a were key factors driving the DOC-DIC relationship across different scenarios. The DOC-DIC relationship in global lakes did not exhibit stable synchronous changes but instead demonstrated clear scenario dependence and nonlinear characteristics, necessitating comprehensive analysis in conjunction with hydrological conditions, nutrient status, and lake physicochemical environments.

Key words: lake, dissolved inorganic carbon, dissolved organic carbon, environmental split point, synchronous variation