毛乌素沙地旱柳生长和生理特征对遮荫的反应

应用生态学报 ›› 2003, Vol. ›› Issue (2): 175-178.

毛乌素沙地旱柳生长和生理特征对遮荫的反应

何维明, 董鸣

中国科学院植物研究所植被数量生态学开放研究实验室, 北京 100093

收稿日期:2000-12-08 修回日期:2001-04-12 出版日期:2003-02-15
通讯作者: 董鸣
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展规划资助项目(G2000018607)

Growth and physiological features of Salix matsudana on the Mu Us Sandland in response to shading

HE Weiming, DONG Ming

Laboratory of Quantitative Vegetation Ecology, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China

Received:2000-12-08 Revised:2001-04-12 Online:2003-02-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在一个控制试验中,旱柳经历了全不遮荫、部分遮荫和全部遮荫处理.比较了全不遮荫枝、全部遮荫枝、部分遮荫阳生枝(阳生枝)和部分遮荫阴生枝(阴生枝)的生长和生理特征,结果表明:阳生枝和全部遮荫枝的叶出生率和死亡率分别大于全不遮荫枝和阴生枝;遮荫处理明显影响净光合速率和夜间呼吸速率;阳生枝的分枝生物量、总枝长度、枝叶生物量和枝叶重比显著大于全不遮荫枝,而阴生枝的分枝数、分枝生物量、叶面积、叶生物量、基茎、总枝长度、枝叶生物量和枝叶重比都显著小于全部遮荫枝.

Abstract: In a pot experiment, Salix matsudana was subjected to the unshaded, partial shading and shading treatments.The growth and physiological features of its branches were compared under contrasting light environments (i.e., the branches of entirely grew under unshaded condition (Bhh), entirely grew under shading condition (Bll), grew under unshaded condition and connected to different branches under shading condition (Bhl), and grew under shading condition and connected to different branches under unshaded condition (Blh)). The results showed that the leaf natality and mortality were higher in Bhl and Bll than in Bhh and Blh, respectively. Shading had significant effects on net photosynthesis and night respiration rates of four types of branches. The branch biomass, total branch length, shoot biomass and shoot weight ratio were higher in Bhl than in Bhh, and conversely, the number of branches, branch biomass, leaf area, leaf biomass, basal diameter, total branch length, shoot biomass and shoot weight ratio were smaller in Blh than in Bll.

中图分类号:

Q948.1

何维明, 董鸣. 毛乌素沙地旱柳生长和生理特征对遮荫的反应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2003, (2): 175-178.

HE Weiming, DONG Ming . Growth and physiological features of Salix matsudana on the Mu Us Sandland in response to shading[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2003, (2): 175-178.

参考文献

[1] Aerts R.1990.Nutrient use efficiency in evergreen and deciduous species from heathland.Oecologia,84:391～397
[2] Bloom AJ, Chapin FS Ⅲ, Mooney HA. 1985. Resource limitation in plants-An economic analogy.Annu Rev Ecol Syst,16:363～392
[3] Cornelissen JHC.1995.Interactive effects of season and light environment on growth and leaf dynamics of evergreen tree seedlings in the humid subtropics. Can J Bot,74:589～598
[4] de Kroon H, Hutchings MJ.1995.Morphological plasticity in clonal plants: The foraging concept reconsidered.J Ecol,83:143～152
[5] de Kroon H, Fransen B, van Rheenen JWA,et al. 1996. High levels of inter-ramet water translocation in two rhizomatous Carex species, as quantified by deuterium labelling.Oecologia,106:73～84
[6] Dong M. 1995. Morphological responses to local light conditions in clonal herbs from contrasting habitats, and their modification due to physiological integration.Oecologia,101:282～288
[7] Editorial Broad for Flora of China(中国植物志编辑委员会). 1984. Flora of China. Vol.20(2). Beijing:Science Press.132
[8] Fowler JP. 1988. The effects of environmental heterogeneity in space and time on the regulation of populations and communities. In:Davy AJ, Hutchings MJ, Watkingson AR eds. Plant Population Ecology. Oxford: Blackwell. 36～47
[9] Harper JL.1978.The demography of plants with clonal growth. In: Freysen AH,Wouldendrop JW eds. Structure and Functioning of Plant Populations.London:North-Holland Publishing Campony.27～48
[10] Hutchings MJ, de Kroon H.1994. Foraging in plants:The role of morphological plasticity in resource acquisition.Adv Ecol Res, 25:159～238
[11] Jackson RB. 1993. The scale of nutrient heterogeneity around individual plant and its quantification with geostatistics.Ecology,74:612～614
[12] Novoplansky A, Cohen D, Sachs T.1989.Ecological implications of correlative inhibition between plant shoots.Physiol Plant,77:136～140
[13] Pearcy RW, Chazdon RL, Gross LJ,et al. 1994. Photosynthetic utilization of sunflecks: A temporally patchy resource on a time scale of second and minutes. In: Caldwell MM,Pearcy RW eds. Exploitation of Environmental Heterogeneity by Plants. New York: Acadamic Press Inc. 175～208
[14] Pearcy RW. 1999. Responses of plants to heterogeneous light environments. In:Pugnaire FI,Valladares F eds. Handbook of Functional Plant Ecology. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.270～314
[15] Sachs T, Novoplansky A.1997.What does aclonal organization suggest concerning clonal plants? In:de Kroon H, van Groenendael J eds.The Ecology and Evolution of Clonal Plants.Leiden: Backhuys Publishers.55～77
[16] SAS. 1985. SAS/STAT Guide for Personal Computer,Versions 6 Edition. Cary: SAS Institute Inc.67～78
[17] Stoll P, Schmid B.1998.Plant foraging and dynamic competition between branches of Pinus sylvestris in contrasting light environments.J Ecol,86:934～945
[18] Stuefer JF. 1994. Hight benefits of clonal integration in two stolonifereous species, in response to heterogeneous light environments.J Ecol,82:511～518
[19] Watson MA, Casper BB. 1984. Morphogenetic constraints on patterns of carbon distribution in plants.Annu Rev Ecol Syst,15:233～258
[20] Zhang X-S(张新时). 1994. The ecological background of the Mu Us sandland and the principles and optimal models for grassland management.Acta Phytoecol Sin(植物生态学报),18(1):1～16(in Chinese)