Welcome to Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology! Today is Share:

Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology ›› 2023, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (12): 3313-3321.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202312.016

• Original Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Main sources of soil phosphorus and their seasonal changes across different vegetation restoration stages in karst region of southwest China

LIU Jiaqi1,2, LIANG Yan1,2, XIAO Fan3, HAN Yiqing1, HU Chuanxing1, WEI Liuhong1, DUAN Min1,2*   

  1. 1Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Ecology of Rare and Endangered Species and Environmental Protection, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541006, Guangxi, China;
    2Guangxi Key Laboratory of Landscape Resources Conservation and Sustainable Utilization in Lijiang River Basin, Guilin 541006, Guangxi, China;
    3Library of Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541006, Guangxi, China
  • Received:2023-08-31 Revised:2023-10-30 Online:2023-12-15 Published:2024-06-15

Abstract: Investigating the main sources of soil phosphorus and their seasonal variations across different vegetation restoration stages in karst region of southwest China can deepen our understanding of soil phosphorus cycling during vegetation restoration, and provide scientific reference for the controlling of rocky desertification. Taking the typical karst ecosystems at different vegetation restoration stages in Guilin, Guangxi as the research objects, we conducted a one-year field experiment with three treatments: vegetation restoration for about 10 years (R10), 30 years (R30) and 50 years (R50). We collected rainfall based on precipitation frequency, as well as soil, fresh litter and root samples in each season to measure the concentrations of total phosphorus (TP) in rainfall, the contents of TP and available phosphorus (AP) in soil, and the contents of TP in fresh litter and roots. In combination with litter phosphorus storage and soil microbial biomass phosphorus (MBP), we analyzed the contributions of phosphorus input to soil from different phosphorus sources. The results showed that soil TP content increased initially and then decreased with vegetation restoration, with a seasonal pattern of autumn > summer > spring > winter. Soil AP content was low in all treatments, with higher levels in summer and winter than in spring and autumn. Soil MBP content increased with vegetation restoration, with a seasonal variation pattern of spring >autumn > summer > winter. The annual phosphorus input from rainfall was 0.78 kg·hm-2 with the highest value in spring. The annual phosphorus input from fresh litter in the R10, R30, and R50 treatments was 2.42, 10.64 and 5.03 kg·hm-2. Phosphorus storage in litter was 1.23, 5.32 and 3.45 kg·hm-2. The annual phosphorus input from plant roots was 5.18, 12.65, and 5.96 kg·hm-2, respectively. The highest levels of the above parameters always occurred in the R30 treatment. There was a significant positive correlation between soil TP content and plant root phosphorus input, and a significant negative correlation between soil AP content and rainfall phosphorus input. In summary, the contribution of phosphorus input from different sources to soil phosphorus pool varied across different vegetation restoration stages in the karst region of southwest China. Roots are the main source of soil phosphorus, followed by litters. Phosphorus entering the soil through wet deposition is very limited. Soil microorganisms also contribute to soil phosphorus reserve.

Key words: karst region, vegetation restoration, soil phosphorus source, rainfall-litter-root-soil, microbial biomass phosphorus