Accumulation of microbial necromass carbon and their contribution to soil organic carbon in different vegetation types on the Loess Plateau, Northwest China

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202401.014

Abstract

Abstract: Microbial necromass carbon (MNC) is an important contributor to soil organic carbon (SOC). Soil carbon storage has increased significantly since the return of farmland to forestland (grassland) on the Loess Plateau. However, the contribution of MNC to SOC accumulation in different vegetation types and the influence factors remain unclear. Herein, we used the biomarker (amino sugar) technique to determine the MNC content and analyzed the influencing factors in 0-5 cm and 5-20 cm soil layers of natural grassland, shrubland (Caragana microphylla), and forestland (Quercus liaodongensis) in the Loess Plateau. The results showed that: 1) the soil pH decreased significantly from grassland to shrubland and then to forestland within the same soil layer. However, the SOC, total nitrogen (TN), microbial biomass carbon (MBC), and microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN) contents showed a reverse trend, with forestland displaying the highest values followed by shrubland and then grassland. The 0-5 cm had significantly higher values than the 5-20 cm depth. 2) The MNC contents varied 0.69-16.41 g·kg^-1 in the two soil horizons of the three vegetation types. There were significant increases in the contents of bacterial necromass carbon (BNC), fungal necromass carbon (FNC), and MNC in the 0-5 cm soil from grassland, shrubland to forestland. The contents of MBC were 1.9 times higher in forestland than in shrubland, and 3.2 times higher in shrubland than in grassland. In the 5-20 cm soil layer, the contents of FNC and MBC were significantly higher in the forestland than in the shrubland and grassland. The FNC content was significantly higher than that of the BNC, ranging from 1.16 to 9.83 times greater than the BNC. 3) The contribution of MNC to SOC was 0.6 and 0.7 times higher in shrubland and forestland than in grassland, respectively, with FNC accounting for 15.2%-42.7%, and BNC accounting for 1.4%-7.4%. 4) pH, TN, MBC, and MBN were important factors that influenced MNC accumulation. In summary, the variation in vegetation type altered soil nutrients, microbial activity, and soil pH, resulting in forestland and shrubland being more beneficial to the formation and accumulation of MNC, which was dominated by fungi, compared to grassland.

Key words: vegetation type, soil organic carbon, microbial necromass, influencing factor

SHEN Jikai, HUANG Yimei, HUANG Qian, XU Fengjing. Accumulation of microbial necromass carbon and their contribution to soil organic carbon in different vegetation types on the Loess Plateau, Northwest China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2024, 35(1): 124-132.

References

[1] Davidson EA, Janssens IA. Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change. Nature, 2006, 440: 165-173
[2] Lehmann J, Kleber M. The contentious nature of soil organic matter. Nature, 2015, 528: 60-68
[3] Ma T, Zhu SS, Wang ZH, et al. Divergent accumulation of microbial necromass and plant lignin components in grassland soils. Nature Communications, 2018, 9: 3480
[4] Miltner A, Bombach P, Schmidt-Brücken B, et al. SOM genesis: Microbial biomass as a significant source. Biogeochemistry, 2011, 111: 41-55
[5] Liang C, Amelung W, Lehmann J, et al. Quantitative assessment of microbial necromass contribution to soil organic matter. Global Change Biology, 2019, 25: 3578-3590
[6] Wang BR, An SS, Liang C, et al. Microbial necromass as the source of soil organic carbon in global ecosystems. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2021, 162: 108422
[7] Prommer J, Walker TWN, Wanek W, et al. Increased microbial growth, biomass, and turnover drive soil organic carbon accumulation at higher plant diversity. Global Change Biology, 2019, 26: 669-681
[8] Yang Y, Dou YX, Wang BR, et al. Increasing contribution of microbial residues to soil organic carbon in grassland restoration chronosequence. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2022, 170: 108688
[9] Khan KS, Mack R, Castillo X, et al. Microbial biomass, fungal and bacterial residues, and their relationships to the soil organic matter C/N/P/S ratios. Geoderma, 2016, 271: 115-123
[10] Zhang ML, Che RX, Cheng ZB, et al. Decades of reforestation significantly change microbial necromass, glomalin, and their contributions to soil organic carbon. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2023, 346: 108362
[11] Cao YF, Ding JZ, Li J, et al. Necromass-derived soil organic carbon and its drivers at the global scale. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2023, 181: 109025
[12] He M, Fang K, Chen LY, et al. Depth-dependent dri-vers of soil microbial necromass carbon across Tibetan alpine grasslands. Global Change Biology, 2021, 28: 936-949
[13] Liang C, Schimel JP, Jastrow JD. The importance of anabolism in microbial control over soil carbon storage. Nature Microbiology, 2017, 2: 17105
[14] 易志刚, 蚁伟民, 周丽霞, 等. 鼎湖山主要植被类型土壤微生物生物量研究. 生态环境, 2005, 14(5): 727-729
[15] 井艳丽, 刘世荣, 殷有, 等. 赤杨对辽东落叶松人工林土壤氨基糖积累的影响. 生态学报, 2018, 38(8): 2838-2845
[16] 薛志婧, 屈婷婷, 刘春晖, 等. 培养条件下枯落物分解过程中微生物残体对土壤有机碳形成的贡献. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1845-1852
[17] Ni XY, Liao S, Tan SY, et al. A quantitative assessment of amino sugars in soil profiles. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2020, 143: 107762
[18] Soares M, Rousk J. Microbial growth and carbon use efficiency in soil: Links to fungal-bacterial dominance, SOC-quality and stoichiometry. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2019, 131: 195-205
[19] 邓蕾, 刘玉林, 李继伟, 等. 植被恢复的土壤固碳效应: 动态与驱动机制. 水土保持学报, 2023, 37(2): 1-10
[20] 李宗善, 杨磊, 王国梁, 等. 黄土高原水土流失治理现状、问题及对策. 生态学报, 2019, 39(20): 7398-7409
[21] 王帅, 傅伯杰, 武旭同, 等. 黄土高原社会-生态系统变化及其可持续性. 资源科学, 2020, 42(1): 96-103
[22] 许云飞. 实施大规模国土绿化行动全国森林覆盖率2020年将达到23.04%. 国土绿化, 2018(1): 7-8
[23] Feng XM, Fu BJ, Piao SL, et al. Revegetation in China's Loess Plateau is approaching sustainable water resource limits. Nature Climate Change, 2016, 6: 1019-1022
[24] Feng XM, Li JX, Cheng W, et al. Evaluation of AMSR-E retrieval by detecting soil moisture decrease following massive dryland re-vegetation in the Loess Plateau, China. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2017, 196: 253-264
[25] Liu Z, Sun YF, Zhang YQ, et al. Metagenomic and ¹³C tracing evidence for autotrophic atmospheric carbon absorption in a semiarid desert. Soil Biology and Bioche-mistry, 2018, 125: 156-166
[26] Zhao K, Kong WD, Wang F, et al. Desert and steppe soils exhibit lower autotrophic microbial abundance but higher atmospheric CO₂ fixation capacity than meadow soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2018, 127: 230-238
[27] Zhang NL, Liu WX, Yang HJ, et al. Soil microbial responses to warming and increased precipitation and their implications for ecosystem C cycling. Oecologia, 2013, 173: 1125-1142
[28] Zhang XD, Amelung W. Gas chromatographic determination of muramic acid, glucosamine, mannosamine, and galactosamine in soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1996, 28: 1201-1206
[29] Joergensen RG. Amino sugars as specific indices for fungal and bacterial residues in soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2018, 54: 559-568
[30] 邵鹏帅, 解宏图, 鲍雪莲, 等. 森林次生演替过程中有机质层和矿质层土壤微生物残体的变化. 土壤学报, 2021, 58(4): 1050-1059
[31] Zhu XF, Jackson RD, Delucia EH, et al. The soil microbial carbon pump: From conceptual insights to empirical assessments. Global Change Biology, 2020, 26: 6032-6039
[32] Shao PS, Liang C, Lynch L, et al. Reforestation acce-lerates soil organic carbon accumulation: Evidence from microbial biomarkers. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2019, 131: 182-190
[33] Lauer F, Kösters R, Du Preez CC, et al. Microbial residues as indicators of soil restoration in South African secondary pastures. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2011, 43: 787-794
[34] Feng XJ, Wang SM. Plant influences on soil microbial carbon pump efficiency. Global Change Biology, 2023, 29: 3854-3856
[35] Shao S, Zhao Y, Zhang W, et al. Linkage of microbial residue dynamics with soil organic carbon accumulation during subtropical forest succession. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2017, 114: 114-120
[36] Huang Y, Liang C, Duan XW, et al. Variation of microbial residue contribution to soil organic carbon sequestration following land use change in a subtropical karst region. Geoderma, 2019, 353: 340-346
[37] Bailey VL, Smith JL, Bolton H. Fungal-to-bacterial ra-tios in soils investigated for enhanced C sequestration. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2002, 34: 997-1007
[38] He LY, Rodrigues JLM, Soudzilovskaia NA, et al. Global biogeography of fungal and bacterial biomass carbon in topsoil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2020, 151: 108024
[39] Lopez-Mondejar R, Brabcova V, Stursova M, et al. Decomposer food web in a deciduous forest shows high share of generalist microorganisms and importance of microbial biomass recycling. ISME Journal, 2018, 12: 1768-1778
[40] Deng SH, Zheng XD, Chen XB, et al. Divergent mine-ralization of hydrophilic and hydrophobic organic substrates and their priming effect in soils depending on their preferential utilization by bacteria and fungi. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2020, 57: 65-76
[41] Xia YH, Chen XB, Zheng XD, et al. Preferential uptake of hydrophilic and hydrophobic compounds by bacteria and fungi in upland and paddy soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2020, 148: 107879
[42] Schweigert M, Herrmann S, Miltner A, et al. Fate of ectomycorrhizal fungal biomass in a soil bioreactor system and its contribution to soil organic matter formation. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2015, 88: 120-127
[43] Vidal A, Klöffel T, Guigue J, et al. Visualizing the transfer of organic matter from decaying plant residues to soil mineral surfaces controlled by microorganisms. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2021, 160: 108347
[44] Adamczyk B, Sietio OM, Biasi C, et al. Interaction between tannins and fungal necromass stabilizes fungal residues in boreal forest soils. New Phytologist, 2019, 223: 16-21
[45] 柴晓虹, 吴永华, 钟芳. 不同降雨量下人工重建林土壤性状及微生物特性比较. 中国沙漠, 2014, 34(6): 1576-1583
[46] Wang BR, Huang YM, Li N, et al. Initial soil formation by biocrusts: Nitrogen demand and clay protection control microbial necromass accrual and recycling. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2022, 167: 108607
[47] 于颖超, 张心昱, 戴晓琴, 等. 亚热带红壤区森林土壤剖面微生物残体碳分布及影响因素. 生态学报, 2022, 42(3): 1108-1117
[48] 陈章和, 张宏达, 王伯荪, 等. 广东黑石顶常绿阔叶林生物量及其分配的研究. 植物生态学与地植物学学报, 1993, 17(4): 289-298
[49] Angst G, Mueller KE, Nierop KGJ, et al. Plant- or microbial-derived? A review on the molecular composition of stabilized soil organic matter. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2021, 156: 108189
[50] Whalen ED, Grandy AS, Sokol NW, et al. Clarifying the evidence for microbial- and plant-derived soil orga-nic matter, and the path toward a more quantitative understanding. Global Change Biology, 2022, 28: 7167-7185
[51] Liang C, Zhang XD, Balser TC. Net microbial amino sugar accumulation process in soil as influenced by different plant material inputs. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2007, 44: 1-7
[52] Wilpiszeski RL, Aufrecht JA, Retterer ST, et al. Soil aggregate microbial communities: Towards understan-ding microbiome interactions at biologically relevant scales. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2019, 85: e00324-19
[53] 张一鸣, 黄咸雨, 谢树成. 微生物磷脂脂肪酸单体碳同位素示踪碳循环过程. 第四纪研究, 2021, 41(4): 877-892
[54] 李响, 何红波, 张威, 等. 外源无机氮素形态对土壤氨基糖动态的影响. 应用生态学报, 2012, 23(5): 1153-1158
[55] Zhang W, Cui YH, Lu XK, et al. High nitrogen deposition decreases the contribution of fungal residues to soil carbon pools in a tropical forest ecosystem. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2016, 97: 211-214
[56] Cui J, Zhu ZK, Xu XL, et al. Carbon and nitrogen recycling from microbial necromass to cope with C:N stoichiometric imbalance by priming. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2020, 142: 107720
[57] Cui YX, Wang X, Zhang XC, et al. Soil moisture mediates microbial carbon and phosphorus metabolism during vegetation succession in a semiarid region. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2020, 147: 107814