农户生计与生态系统服务关系的区域差异及驱动机制——以密云水库上游流域为例

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202111.013

应用生态学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (11): 3872-3882.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202111.013

• 生态系统服务与生态产品价值核算专栏 • 上一篇下一篇

农户生计与生态系统服务关系的区域差异及驱动机制——以密云水库上游流域为例

王凤春^1,2,3,郑华^4*,张薇^1,2,王慧^1,2,彭文佳⁴

¹河北水利电力学院水利工程学院, 河北沧州 061001;
²沧州市遥感与智慧水利技术创新中心, 河北沧州 061001;
³河北省数据中心相变热管理技术创新中心, 河北沧州 061001;
⁴中国科学院生态环境研究中心城市与区域生态国家重点实验室, 北京 100085

出版日期:2021-11-15 发布日期:2022-05-15
通讯作者: *E-mail: zhenghua@rcees.ac.cn
作者简介:王凤春, 女, 1981年生, 博士, 副教授。主要从事生态系统服务评估与优化管理研究。E-mail:wangfengchun813@163.com
基金资助:
本文由河北省省级科技计划软科学研究专项(20557682D)、国家自然科学基金项目(41871217)和河北水利电力学院博士基金项目(SYBJ1902)资助

Regional differences and the driving mechanism of relationships between rural household livelihood and ecosystem services:A case study in upstream watershed of Miyun Reservoir, China

WANG Feng-chun^1,2,3, ZHENG Hua^4*, ZHANG Wei^1,2, WANG Hui^1,2, PENG Wen-jia⁴

¹Department of Hydraulic Engineering, Hebei University of Water Resources and Electric Engineering, Cangzhou 061001, Hebei, China;
²Cangzhou Technology Innovation Center of Remote Sensing and Smart Water, Cangzhou 061001, Hebei, China;
³Hebei Technology Innovation Center of Phase Change Thermal Management of Data Center, Cangzhou 061001, Hebei, China;
⁴State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Aca-demy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China

Online:2021-11-15 Published:2022-05-15
Supported by:
This work was supported by the Hebei Provincial Science and Technology Plan, Soft Science Research (20557682D), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41871217) and the Doctoral Scientific Research Foundation of Hebei University of Water Resources and Electric Engineering (SYBJ1902).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 深入揭示生态系统与农户福祉之间的关系,对实现农户差异化管理及区域可持续发展具有重要意义。本研究以密云水库上游流域(包括北京市和河北省的部分区域)为研究区域,基于1754份农户调查问卷数据,通过统计计量方法对比分析了流域内北京市、河北省农户福祉水平(以家庭总收入表示)与生态系统服务依赖性(以生态系统依赖性指数表示)的关系。结果表明: 流域内京冀农户生计与生态系统的互作模式均可分为4类,但京冀两地不同模式占比差异较大。北京农户样本中,占比最高的是高福祉-低依赖模式(33.9%),农户人均年收入显著高于河北农户,农户的各项生计资本也较河北省农户高;河北农户中,不提倡的低福祉-高依赖模式仍占比39.1%,对提升农户福祉水平至关重要的人力资本素质、社会资本、金融资本等均显著低于北京农户;河北农户主要依赖农业生产收入(41.2%),对土地的开发利用程度显著较高;相对于北京农户,河北农户的自然资源条件、人力资本素质对农户生计的影响更加显著。保持适当家庭规模、不断提高劳动力教育水平、提高低收入家庭的生态补偿标准是形成农户与生态系统良好互动关系(高福祉-低依赖型)的关键因素。

关键词: 生态系统服务, 农户生计, 农户福祉, 区域可持续发展

Abstract: It is of great significance to link ecosystem and rural household welfare, with the aim to develop different strategies of rural household livelihood management and regional sustainable deve-lopment. Based on 1754 questionnaires of rural households in Beijing and Hebei within the upstream watershed of Miyun Reservoir, we analyzed the relationships between rural household welfare (defined by total income per rural household) and ecosystem reliance (expressed by an index of dependence on ecosystem services) by statistical and econometric methods. The relationships between rural household welfare and ecosystem reliance could be classified into four types, but with significant differences between Beijing and Hebei within the watershed. The rural household type of high welfare and low dependence had the highest proportion (33.9%) in Beijing. The average annual income and livelihood capitals of rural households in Beijing was significantly higher than that of Hebei Province. In Hebei Province, the dominant type was low welfare and high dependency (39.1%) that was the least popular one. The quality of human capital quality, social capital, and financial capital, which were crucial to human well-being, were significantly lower than that of Beijing households. The income of rural households in Hebei mainly depended on agricultural production (41.2%), which led to higher land utilization intensity. The natural resource and human capital quality significantly influenced rural household livelihood in Hebei. Maintaining suitable family size and age structure, improving education and skill levels, and strengthening payment for ecosystem services within low welfare households would be the key to form a good relationship between ecosystems and household welfare (the type of high welfare and low dependency).

Key words: ecosystem services, household livelihood, household welfare, regional sustainable development.

王凤春,郑华,张薇,王慧,彭文佳. 农户生计与生态系统服务关系的区域差异及驱动机制——以密云水库上游流域为例[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(11): 3872-3882.

WANG Feng-chun, ZHENG Hua, ZHANG Wei, WANG Hui, PENG Wen-jia. Regional differences and the driving mechanism of relationships between rural household livelihood and ecosystem services:A case study in upstream watershed of Miyun Reservoir, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(11): 3872-3882.

参考文献 44

[1]	李惠梅, 张安录. 生态环境保护与福祉. 生态学报, 2013, 33(3): 825-833 [Li H-M, Zhang A-L. Ecological compensation boosted ecological protection and human well-being improvement. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(3): 825-833]
[2]	Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington DC: Island Press, 2005: 49-70
[3]	江波, 蔡金洲, 杨梦斐, 等. 基于供需耦合机制的流域水生态系统管理. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(10): 3156-3162 [Jiang B, Cai J-Z, Yang M-F, et al. Watershed ecosystem management of river and lake based on supply and demand coupling mechanism. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2018, 37(10): 3156-3162]
[4]	Daily GC, Polasky S, Goldstein J, et al. Ecosystem services in decision making: Time to deliver. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2009, 7: 21-28
[5]	何仁伟, 刘邵权, 陈国阶, 等. 中国农户可持续生计研究进展及趋向. 地理科学进展. 2013, 32(4): 657-670 [He R-W, Liu S-Q, Chen G-J, et al. Research progress and tendency of sustainable livelihoods for pea-sant household in China. Progress in Geography, 2013, 32(4): 657-670]
[6]	Zheng H, Robinson BE, Liang YC, et al. Benefits, costs, and livelihood implications of a regional payment for ecosystem service program. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013, 110: 16681-16686
[7]	Huber FK, Morlok M, Weckerle CS, et al. Livelihood strategies in Shaxi, Southwest China: Conceptualizing mountain-valley interactions as a human-environment system. Sustainability, 2015, 7: 3204-3229
[8]	Wang FC, Zheng H, Wang XK, et al. Classification of the relationship between household welfare and ecosystem reliance in the Miyun Reservoir Watershed, China. Sustainability, 2017, 9: 2290-2305
[9]	徐建英, 孔明, 刘新新, 等. 生计资本对农户再参与退耕还林意愿的影响——以卧龙自然保护区为例. 生态学报, 2017, 37(18): 6205-6215 [Xu J-Y, Kong M, Liu X-X, et al. The effect of livelihood capital on the willingness of farmers to re-enroll in the Grain for Green Program: A case study in Wolong Nature Reserve. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(18): 6205-6215]
[10]	张超正, 陈丹玲, 杨钢桥, 等. 生计资本对农户生态系统服务依赖度的影响, 西南大学学报:自然科学版, 2021, 43(1): 142-152 [Zhang C-Z, Chen D-L, Yang G-Q, et al. Impacts of livelihoods capital on far-mers'dependence on ecosystem services. Journal of Southwest University: Natural Science, 2021, 43(1): 142-152]
[11]	赵雪雁. 不同生计方式农户的环境影响——以甘南高原为例. 地理科学, 2013, 33(5): 545-552 [Zhao X-Y. Environmental impact of different livelihood strategies of farmers: A case of the Gannan Plateau. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2013, 33(5): 545-552]
[12]	李聪, 康博纬, 李萍, 等. 易地移民搬迁对农户生态系统服务依赖度的影响. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2017, 27(11): 115-123 [Li C, Kang B-W, Li P, et al. Impacts of relocation and settlement program on rural households'dependence on ecosystem. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2017, 27(11): 115-123]
[13]	Ali A, Rahut DB. Forest-based livelihoods, income and poverty: Empirical evidence from the Himalayan region of rural Pakistan. Journal of Rural Studies, 2018, 57: 44-54
[14]	王蓉, 赵雪雁, 刘江华, 等. 重点生态功能区农户生计对环境资源的依赖性——以甘南高原为例, 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(2): 554-562 [Wang R, Zhao X-Y, Liu J-H, et al. Dependence of farmers'livelihoods on environmental resource in key ecological function area: A case study of Gannan Plateau, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(2): 554-562]
[15]	肖玉, 谢高地, 鲁春霞, 等. 基于供需关系的生态系统服务空间流动研究进展. 生态学报, 2016, 36(10): 3096-3102 [Xiao Y, Xie G-D, Lu C-X, et al. Involvement of ecosystem service flows in human wellbeing based on the relationship between supply and demand. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(10): 3096-3102]
[16]	Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S, et al. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecological Indicators, 2012, 21: 17-29
[17]	Wei H, Fan W, Wang X, et al. Integrating supply and social demand in ecosystem services assessment: A review. Ecosystem Services, 2017, 25: 15-27
[18]	Ouyang ZY, Song CS, Zheng H, et al. Using gross ecosystem product (GEP) to value nature in decision making. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020, 117: 14593-14601
[19]	Robinson B, Zheng H, Peng WJ. Disaggregating livelihood dependence on ecosystem services to inform land management. Ecosystem Services, 2019, 36: 100902
[20]	Pennington DN, Dalzell B, Nelson E, et al. Cost-effective land use planning: Optimizing land use and land management patterns to maximize social benefits. Ecological Economics, 2017, 139: 75-90
[21]	河北省发展和改革委员会. 关于印发《河北省张承地区生态保护和修复实施方案》的通知[EB/OL]. (2016-09-29) [2021-06-23]. http://info.hebei.gov.cn//eportal/ui?pageId=6806152&articleKey=6668248zc&columnId=6806589 [Hebei Development and Reform Commission. Circular on the Issuance of the Implementation Plan for Ecological Protection and Restoration in the Zhang-Cheng area of Hebei Province. [EB/OL]. (2016-09-29) [2021-06-23]. http://info.hebei.gov.cn//eportal/ui?pageId=6806152-&articleKey=6668248zc&columnId=6806589]
[22]	郑华, 李屹峰, 欧阳志云, 等. 生态系统服务功能管理研究进展. 生态学报, 2013, 33(3): 702-710 [Zheng H, Li Y-F, Ouyang Z-Y, et al. Progress and perspective of ecosystem services management. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(3): 702-710]
[23]	黎洁, 李亚莉, 邰秀军, 等.可持续生计分析框架下西部贫困退耕山区农户生计状况分析. 中国农村观察, 2009, 89(5): 29-38 [Li J, Li Y-L, Tai X-J, et al. On the rural households livelihood in the western poor areas after the slopping land conversion program within the sustainable livelihood analysis framework. China Rural Survey, 2009, 89(5): 29-38]
[24]	连纲, 郭旭东, 傅伯杰, 等. 基于参与性调查的农户对退耕政策及生态环境的认知与响应. 生态学报, 2005, 25(7): 1741-1747 [Lian G, Guo X-D, Fu B-J, et al. Farmer’s perception and response towards grain-for-green program and eco-environment based on participatory rural appraisal. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2005, 25(7): 1741-1747]
[25]	王大尚, 李屹峰, 郑华, 等. 密云水库上游流域生态系统服务功能空间特征及其与居民福祉的关系. 生态学报, 2014, 34(1): 70-81 [Wang D-S, Li Y-F, Zheng H, et al. Ecosystem services'spatial characteristics and their relationships with residents'well-being in Miyun Reservoir watershed. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(1): 70-81]
[26]	张才玉. 生态系统服务与贫困的关系研究——以丰宁县为例. 博士论文. 北京: 北京大学, 2013 [Zhang C-Y. The Relationship between Ecosystem Service and Poverty in Fengning County. PhD Thesis. Beijing: Peking University, 2013]
[27]	Constanza R, Fisher B, Ali S, et al. Quality of life: An approach integrating opportunities, human needs, and subjective well-being. Ecological Economics, 2007, 61: 267-276
[28]	代光烁, 娜日苏, 董孝斌, 等. 内蒙古草原人类福祉与生态系统服务及其动态变化——以锡林郭勒草原为例. 生态学报, 2014, 34(9): 2422-2430 [Dai G-S, Na R-S, Dong X-B, et al. The dynamic change of herdsmen well-being and ecosystem services in grassland of Inner Mongolia: Take Xilinguole League as example. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(9): 2422-2430]
[29]	Yang W, Dietz T, Liu W, et al. Going beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: An index system of human dependence on ecosystem services. PLoS One, 2013, 8(5): e64581
[30]	陈秀琼. 基于旅游者角度的中国旅游区划分研究. 商业经济与管理, 2006(3): 74-70 [Chen X-Q. Categorization of tourism area in China based on tourist statistics. Business Economics and Administration, 2006(3): 74-79]
[31]	杨玉杰. CD水电公司物资采购方式与策略研究. 博士论文. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2011 [Yang Y-J. Research on Procurement Management of CD Hydropower Company. PhD Thesis. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2011]
[32]	Bridge PD, McKenzie SA. Airway resistance measured by the interrupter technique: Expiration or inspiration, mean or median? European Respiratory Journal, 2001, 17: 495-498
[33]	Leys C, Ley C, Klein O, et al. Detecting outliers: Do not use standard deviation around the mean, use absolute deviation around the median. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2013, 49: 764-766
[34]	Jansen HG, Pender J, Damon A, et al. Policies for sustainable development in the hillside areas of Honduras: A quantitative livelihoods approach. Agricultural Economics, 2006, 34: 141-153
[35]	杨莉, 甄霖, 潘影, 等. 生态系统服务供给-消费研究: 黄河流域案例. 干旱区资源与环境, 2012, 26(3): 131-138 [Yang L, Zhen L, Pan Y, et al. Ecosystem services supply and consumption: A case in Yellow River watershed, China. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2012, 26(3): 131-138]
[36]	Daw T, Brown K, Rosendo S, et al. Applying the ecosystem services concept to poverty alleviation: The need to disaggregate human well-being. Environmental Conservation, 2011, 38: 370-379
[37]	Huang J, Wu Y, Rozelle S. Moving off the farm and intensi-fying agricultural production in Shandong: A case study of rural labor market linkages in China. Agricultural Economics, 2009, 40: 203-218
[38]	李屹峰, 罗跃初, 刘纲, 等. 土地利用变化对生态系统服务功能的影响——以密云水库流域为例. 生态学报, 2013, 33(3): 726-736 [Li Y-F, Luo Y-C, Liu G, et al. Effects of land use change on ecosystem ser-vices: A case study in Miyun Reservior watershed. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(3): 726-736]
[39]	Angelsen A, Jagger P, Babigumira R, et al. Environmental income and rural livelihoods: A global-comparative analysis. World Development, 2014, 64: 12-28
[40]	Fang YP, Fan J, Shen MY, et al. Sensitivity of livelihood strategy to livelihood capital in mountain areas: Empirical analysis based on different settlements in the upper reaches of the Minjiang River, China. Ecological Indicator, 2014, 38: 225-235
[41]	王会, 赵亚文, 温亚利. 基于要素报酬的农户自然资源依赖度评价研究:以云南省六个自然保护区为例. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2017, 27(12): 146-156 [Wang H, Zhao Y-W, Wen Y-L. Evaluation on the dependence of rural households on the natural resources based on factor returns: A case study on six natural reserves in Yunnan Province. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2017, 27(12): 146-156]
[42]	Bremer LL, Farley KA, Lopez-Carr D, et al. Conservation and livelihood outcomes of payment for ecosystem services in the Ecuadorian Andes: What is the potential for “win-win”? Ecosystem Services, 2014, 8: 148-165
[43]	Soltani A, Angelsen A, Eid T, et al. Poverty, sustainability, and household livelihood strategies in Zagros, Iran. Ecological Economics, 2012, 79: 60-70
[44]	王凤春, 郑华, 王效科, 等. 北京与密云水库上游地区水生态合作机制研究. 生态经济, 2017, 33(8): 164-168 [Wang F-C, Zheng H, Wang X-K, et al. Study on the water ecological cooperation mechanism between Beijing and the upper watershed of Miyun reservoir. Ecological Economy, 2017, 33(8): 164-168]

农户生计与生态系统服务关系的区域差异及驱动机制——以密云水库上游流域为例

Regional differences and the driving mechanism of relationships between rural household livelihood and ecosystem services:A case study in upstream watershed of Miyun Reservoir, China

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 44

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	梁华秋, 沈梦晗, 邵明, 姚朋. 基于生态系统服务供需的临沂市固碳生态网络构建 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(3): 759-768.
[2]	梁仕豪, 李文, 高宇, 刘保住. 吉林省生态系统服务价值与景观生态风险关联性及其空间分异 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(3): 769-779.
[3]	路昌, 蔡雪芹, 郝灿书, 刘玉珍, 王之语, 马亚男. 黄河三角洲高效生态经济区生态系统服务权衡协同关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(2): 457-468.
[4]	于海霞, 王禹骁. 东江流域生态系统服务价值的时空演变及空间分异机制 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2498-2506.
[5]	祁育汀, 张平, 刘雷, 马雪楠, 王欢, 赵娟. 关中平原城市群土地利用结构多情景优化和生态系统服务价值预测 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2507-2517.
[6]	熊昕莹, 孟梅. 基于生态系统服务供需关系及空间流动的新疆生态管理分区与优化策略 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(8): 2237-2248.
[7]	巴晓博, 隋鑫, 刘鸣达, 解宏图, 梁超, 鲍雪莲. 东北黑土区覆盖作物-玉米间作保护性耕作的生态系统服务价值 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1883-1891.
[8]	陈红莲, 李瑞, 张玉珊, 吴清林, 袁江, 高家勇. 赤水河流域不同地貌区生态系统健康对比 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1912-1922.
[9]	张自正, 张蕾, 孙桂英, 刘俊祥. 清江流域生态系统服务权衡时空效应及驱动因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(4): 1051-1062.
[10]	孟欣宇, 吴远翔. 城市生态系统服务供需簇与生态功能管控——以齐齐哈尔市中心城区为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(12): 3393-3403.
[11]	郝嘉元, 智烈慧, 李晓文, 董世魁, 李巍. 青藏高原土地利用格局和生态系统服务的时空演变特征及关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(11): 3053-3063.
[12]	邓钰栎, 王丹, 许涵. 双尺度下广东韶关市生态系统服务及其权衡/协同关系及社会生态驱动因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(11): 3073-3084.
[13]	谈旭, 王承武. 伊犁河谷生态系统服务价值时空演变及其驱动因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10): 2747-2756.
[14]	王彬宇, 王玲, 陈俊辰, 戚琦, 贺淑钰, 杨梓琪, 李兆华, 李昆. 四湖流域生态功能分区及其影响因素识别 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10): 2757-2766.
[15]	谭昭昭, 陈毓遒, 丁憬枫, 刘梦迪, 王浩, 王江. 浙江东部沿海城市土地利用模拟及生态系统服务价值评估 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10): 2777-2787.