喀斯特常绿落叶阔叶林个体死亡对空间格局及种间关联性的影响

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202210.002

应用生态学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (10): 2679-2686.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202210.002

喀斯特常绿落叶阔叶林个体死亡对空间格局及种间关联性的影响

鲁梦珍^1,2,3, 曾馥平^1,2,3, 宋同清^1,2, 彭晚霞^1,2, 苏樑^1,2, 刘坤平^1,2, 谭卫宁⁴, 杜虎^1,2*

¹中国科学院亚热带农业生态研究所亚热带农业生态过程重点实验室, 长沙 410125;
²中国科学院环江喀斯特生态系统观测研究站, 广西喀斯特生态过程与服务重点实验室, 广西环江 547100;
³中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
⁴广西木论国家级自然保护区管理中心, 广西环江 547100

收稿日期:2022-03-04 修回日期:2022-04-29 出版日期:2022-10-15 发布日期:2023-04-15
通讯作者: * E-mail: hudu@isa.ac.cn
作者简介:鲁梦珍, 女, 1996年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事群落生态学研究。E-mail: lmz102919@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(42071073,31971487)、广西重点研发计划项目(桂科AB17129009)、中国科学院青年创新促进会项目(2021366)和河池市特聘专家项目资助。

Effects of tree mortality on the spatial patterns and interspecific associations of individuals in karst evergreen deciduous broad-leaved mixed forests

LU Meng-zhen^1,2,3, ZENG Fu-ping^1,2,3, SONG Tong-qing^1,2, PENG Wan-xia^1,2, SU Liang^1,2, LIU Kun-ping^1,2, TAN Wei-ning⁴, DU Hu^1,2*

¹Key Laboratory of Agro-ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410125, China;
²Guangxi Key Laboratory of Karst Ecological Processes and Services, Huanjiang Observation and Research Station of Karst Ecosystem, Huanjiang 547100, Guangxi, China;
³University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
⁴Management Center for Guangxi Mulun National Nature Reserve, Huanjiang 547100, Guangxi, China

Received:2022-03-04 Revised:2022-04-29 Online:2022-10-15 Published:2023-04-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 树木死亡作为森林生态系统中一个重要的生态学过程,研究其如何影响物种的空间分布格局及种间关联性,可以为揭示树木死亡机制及群落动态变化规律提供重要参考。本研究根据木论25 hm²喀斯特常绿落叶阔叶林动态监测样地两次木本植物调查数据,采用点格局分析方法,分析了树木死亡前后空间格局和种间关系的变化。结果表明: 样地内个体死亡前后主要表现为聚集分布,但死亡后聚集分布的物种比例较死亡前略微下降,小尺度上呈现随机分布的物种比例有所增加,个体的死亡呈非随机性死亡。在物种水平上,13个优势种的死树和活树之间在0～30 m各尺度上呈显著正关联,表明样地内优势物种个体之间种内和种间竞争作用不激烈;树木死亡前后种间关联性主要为正关联,且大部分物种种间关系在死亡前后并未发生变化,表明群落已发展到相对稳定的阶段;死亡后,在1～30 m尺度上表现为正关联的物种对比例有所增加,负关联和无关联的物种对在大部分尺度上有所减少,说明个体死亡发生后,各个物种之间的竞争压力在一定程度上有所缓解。

关键词: 树木死亡, 点格局分析, 空间格局, 种间关联, 喀斯特生态系统

Abstract: Tree mortality is an important ecological process in forests. It is crucial to understand how tree mortality affects spatial patterns and interspecific associations for revealing the mechanisms of tree mortality and community dynamics. We employed the correlation method of spatial point pattern analysis to analyse the variations in spatial patterns and interspecific relations before and after mortality using data obtained from two surveys of a 25 hm² plot in the Mulun National Natural Reserve, China. The results showed that most species had an aggregated distribution both pre- and post-mortality. The proportion of species with aggregated distribution reduced slightly post-mortality compared with that for pre-mortality. Increases in the number of species with random distribution at small scale indicated that tree death was not random. At the species level, there were significant positive associations between dead and live trees of the 13 common species at different levels of 0-30 m range, suggesting weak intraspecific and interspecific competition among dominant species. Pre- and post-mortality interspecific associations were mostly positive, which remained stable during the period of two surveys for most species, indicating that the community had reached a rather stable stage. Following tree mortality, the number of species with positive associations increased at 1-30 m scales, whereas the number of species with negative and no associations decreased at most scales. These results indicated that the pressure of interspecific competition was relieved to some extent after individual death.

Key words: tree mortality, spatial point pattern analysis, spatial pattern, interspecific association, karst ecosystem

鲁梦珍, 曾馥平, 宋同清, 彭晚霞, 苏樑, 刘坤平, 谭卫宁, 杜虎. 喀斯特常绿落叶阔叶林个体死亡对空间格局及种间关联性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(10): 2679-2686.

LU Meng-zhen, ZENG Fu-ping, SONG Tong-qing, PENG Wan-xia, SU Liang, LIU Kun-ping, TAN Wei-ning, DU Hu. Effects of tree mortality on the spatial patterns and interspecific associations of individuals in karst evergreen deciduous broad-leaved mixed forests[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(10): 2679-2686.

参考文献

[1] 缪宁, 刘世荣, 史作民, 等. 青藏高原东缘林线杜鹃-岷江冷杉原始林的空间格局. 生态学报, 2011, 31(1): 1-9
[2] 刘妍妍, 金光泽. 小兴安岭阔叶红松林粗木质残体空间分布的点格局分析. 生态学报, 2010, 30(22): 6072-6081
[3] 范娟, 赵秀海, 汪金松, 等. 江西九连山亚热带常绿阔叶林优势种空间分布格局. 生态学报, 2012, 32(9): 2729-2737
[4] 马芳, 王顺忠, 冯金朝, 等. 北京东灵山暖温带落叶阔叶林枯立木与活立木空间分布格局. 生态学报, 2018, 38(16): 2766-2778
[5] McDonald RI, Peet RK, Urban DL. Spatial pattern of Quercus regeneration limitation and Acer rubrum invasion in a Piedmont forest. Journal of Vegetation Science, 2003, 14: 441-450
[6] Wang XG, Wiegand T, Hao ZQ, et al. Species associations in an old-growth temperate forest in north-eastern China. Journal of Ecology, 2010, 98: 674-686
[7] 杨文松, 容丽, 叶天木, 等. 黔中喀斯特次生林优势物种空间分布格局及关联性. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(5): 1215-1222
[8] 韦博良, 袁志良, 牛帅, 等. 河南省宝天曼锐齿槲栎林树木死亡对空间格局及种间相关性的影响. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(4): 430-438
[9] Domke GM, Woodall CW, Smith JE. Accounting for density reduction and structural loss in standing dead trees: Implications for forest biomass and carbon stock estimates in the United States. Carbon Balance & Management, 2011, 6: 57-62
[10] 王利伟, 李步杭, 叶吉, 等. 长白山阔叶红松林树木短期死亡动态. 生物多样性, 2011, 19(2): 260-270
[11] 郭屹立, 王斌, 向悟生, 等. 桂西南喀斯特季节性雨林枯立木的空间格局及生境关联性分析. 广西植物, 2016, 36(2): 154-161
[12] Metcalf CJE, Horvitz CC, Tuljapurkar S, et al. A time to grow and a time to die: A new way to analyze the dynamics of size, light, age, and death of tropical trees. Ecology, 2009, 90: 2766-2778
[13] 卢志军, 刘福玲, 吴浩, 等. 八大公山常绿落叶阔叶混交林枯立木物种组成、大小级与分布格局. 生物多样性, 2015, 23(2): 167-173
[14] 徐嘉, 费世民, 何亚平, 等. 川西南山地云南松过熟林上层枯立木和活立木竞争强度研究. 四川林业科技, 2007, 28(6): 1-8
[15] 郭柯, 刘长成, 董鸣. 我国西南喀斯特植物生态适应性与石漠化治理. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(10): 991-999
[16] Liu L, Zeng FP, Song TQ, et al. Stand structure and abiotic factors modulate karst forest biomass in Southwest China. Forests, 2020, 11: 443
[17] 张芳, 杜虎, 曾馥平, 等. 喀斯特峰丛洼地原生林群落更新动态. 生态学报, 2019, 39(22): 8516-8525
[18] 陈惠君, 杜虎, 宋同清, 等. 木论喀斯特常绿落叶阔叶混交林群丛数量分类及稳定性. 生物多样性, 2019, 27(10): 1056-1068
[19] Du H, Hu F, Zeng FP, et al. Spatial distribution of tree species in evergreen-deciduous broadleaf karst forests in southwest China. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7: 15664
[20] 郭屹立, 王斌, 向悟生, 等. 弄岗北热带喀斯特季节性雨林15 hm²样地木本物萌生特征. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(4): 955-961
[21] 池森, 王从军, 黎庆菊, 等. 喀斯特次生林幼树更新空间分布格局及种间关联性. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(12): 3989-3996
[22] Lu MZ, Du H, Song TQ, et al. Effects of density dependence in an evergreen-deciduous broadleaf karst forest in southwest China. Forest Ecology and Management, 2021, 490: 119142
[23] He FL, Duncan RP. Density-dependent effects on tree survival in an old-growth Douglas fir forest. Journal of Ecology, 2000, 88: 676-688
[24] Zhang J, Zhang H, Sun IF, et al. Density dependence on tree survival in an old-growth temperate forest in northeastern China. Annals of Forest Science, 2009, 66: 204-213
[25] 李林, 伍婵翠, 莫德清, 等. 季风常绿阔叶林建群种的死亡动态格局. 西南林业大学学报: 自然科学, 2014, 34(6): 29-34
[26] Wiegand T, Gunatilleke S, Gunatilleke N. Species associations in a heterogeneous Sri Lankan dipterocarp forest. The American Naturalist, 2007, 170: E77-E95
[27] Raventós J, Wiegand T, De Luis M. Evidence for the spatial segregation hypothesis: A test with nine-year survivorship data in a Mediterranean shrubland. Ecology, 2010, 91: 2110-2120
[28] Bin Y, Lian J, Wang Z, et al. Tree mortality and recruitment in a subtropical broadleaved monsoon forest in South China. Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 2011, 23: 57-66
[29] 侯红亚, 王立海. 小兴安岭阔叶红松林物种组成及主要种群的空间分布格局. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(11): 3043-3049
[30] 王斌, 向悟生, 丁涛, 等. 弄岗喀斯特季节性雨林枯立木多度的空间分布及影响因子. 科学通报, 2014, 59(35): 3479-3490
[31] Lutz JA, Larson AJ, Furniss TJ, et al. Spatially nonrandom tree mortality and ingrowth maintain equilibrium pattern in an old-growth Pseudotsuga-Tsuga forest. Eco-logy, 2014, 95: 2047-2054
[32] Petritan IC, Marzano R, Petritan AM, et al. Overstory succession in a mixed Quercus petraea-Fagus sylvatica old growth forest revealed through the spatial pattern of competition and mortality. Forest Ecology and Management, 2014, 326: 9-17
[33] Gray L, He F. Spatial point-pattern analysis for detecting density-dependent competition in a boreal chronosequence of Alberta. Forest Ecology and Management, 2009, 259: 98-106
[34] 林玥, 任坚毅, 岳明. 太白山红桦种群结构与空间分析. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(6): 1335-1345
[35] 李建民, 谢芳, 陈存及, 等. 光皮桦天然林群落优势种群的种间联结性研究. 应用生态学报, 2001, 12(2): 168-170
[36] 杨兆静, 张钦弟, 李豪, 等. 山西五鹿山自然保护区暴马丁香群落木本植物种间联结性分析. 植物科学学报, 2013, 31(1): 42-48
[37] 张忠华, 胡刚, 倪健. 茂兰喀斯特森林群落的种间分离特征. 生态学报, 2010, 30(9): 2235-2245
[38] 农友, 郑路, 贾宏炎, 等. 广西大青山次生林的群落特征及主要乔木种群的空间分布格局. 生物多样性, 2015, 23(3): 321-331

喀斯特常绿落叶阔叶林个体死亡对空间格局及种间关联性的影响

Effects of tree mortality on the spatial patterns and interspecific associations of individuals in karst evergreen deciduous broad-leaved mixed forests

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	谢卓洪, 雷敏, 刘利杰, 莫燕卿, 战国强, 刘萍. 珠三角城市群景观生态格局评价与优化 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2481-2488.
[2]	连子文, 杜虎, 谷俊锟, 曾馥平, 彭晚霞, 尹力初, 隆庆之, 刘坤平, 孙瑞, 谭卫宁. 喀斯特常绿落叶阔叶林土壤有效中微量元素空间异质性 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(4): 955-961.
[3]	金银丽, 周冬梅, 周凡, 杨静, 朱小燕, 马静, 张军. 疏勒河流域生态安全网络构建及优化 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(4): 1063-1072.
[4]	杜箫宇, 吕飞南, 王春雨, 宇振荣. 基于MSPA-Conefor-MCR的县域尺度生态网络构建——以延庆区为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(4): 1073-1082.
[5]	马彩虹, 刘园园, 杨航, 李聪慧, 杨中华. 宁夏灵武市“生态-经济”双网格局演变及互作关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(11): 3095-3104.
[6]	潘卫涛, 岳邦瑞, 姚龙杰, 薛建锋, 李军峰. 耦合风险与服务的市域生态安全格局构建——以陕西省咸阳市为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(1): 178-186.
[7]	杨文松, 容丽, 叶天木, 王梦洁, 李璇, 王琪, 李婷婷, 曾珍. 黔中喀斯特次生林优势物种空间分布格局及关联性 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(5): 1215-1222.
[8]	闫明, 刘青青, 刘志萍, 奚为民. 干旱和林分因子对树木死亡的影响——以美国德克萨斯州东部国家森林为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(11): 2897-2906.
[9]	周朵朵, 闫海冰, 李璟, 陈颂, 杨秀清. 关帝山云杉次生林活立木和枯立木的数量特征与分布格局 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(9): 3061-3069.
[10]	汪沐阳, 张楚婕, 宓春荣, 韩雷, 李美玲, 徐文轩, 杨维康. 气候变化对中国马可波罗盘羊适宜生境的潜在影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(9): 3127-3135.
[11]	沈钦炜, 林美玲, 莫惠萍, 黄宇斌, 胡欣雨, 魏凌伟, 郑郁善, 陆东芳. 佛山市生态网络构建及优化 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(9): 3288-3298.
[12]	崔玉华, 韩有志, 张梦弢, 杨秀清, 赵占合. 不同干扰强度下针阔混交林树种空间格局及种间关联性 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(6): 2053-2060.
[13]	何洁, 严友进, 易兴松, 王勇, 戴全厚. 喀斯特地区土壤异质性及其与植物相互作用 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(6): 2249-2258.
[14]	何侃, 林涛, 吴建芳, 随梦飞, 刘恋, 丁国昌. 基于空间优先级的福州市中心城区绿色基础设施网络构建 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(4): 1424-1432.
[15]	宋家鹏, 陈松林. 基于生态系统服务簇的福州市生态系统服务格局 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(3): 1045-1053.