东北黑土区覆盖作物-玉米间作保护性耕作的生态系统服务价值

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202307.012

应用生态学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (7): 1883-1891.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202307.012

东北黑土区覆盖作物-玉米间作保护性耕作的生态系统服务价值

巴晓博^1,3, 隋鑫^1,4, 刘鸣达², 解宏图^1,3, 梁超^1,3, 鲍雪莲^1,3*

¹中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所, 沈阳 110016;
²沈阳农业大学, 沈阳 110866;
³辽宁省现代保护性耕作与生态农业重点实验室, 沈阳 110016; ⁴中国科学院大学, 北京 100049

收稿日期:2023-01-18 接受日期:2023-05-13 出版日期:2023-07-15 发布日期:2024-01-15
通讯作者: *E-mail: baoxl@iae.ac.cn
作者简介:巴晓博, 女, 1996年生, 硕士。主要从事覆盖作物及土壤微生物学研究。E-mail: Baxbbb@126.com
基金资助:
黑土地保护与利用科技创新工程专项(XDA28090100)、辽宁省揭榜挂帅项目(2021JH1/10400039-2)和沈阳市科学技术计划项目(21-116-3-03,21-109-3-03)

Ecosystem service value of conservation tillage with cover crop-maize intercropping in the black soil region of Northeast China

BA Xiaobo^1,3, SUI Xin^1,4, LIU Mingda², XIE Hongtu^1,3, LIANG Chao^1,3, BAO Xuelian^1,3*

¹Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China;
²Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China;
³Key Lab of Conservation Tillage and Ecological Agriculture, Liaoning Pro-vince, Shenyang 110016, China;
⁴University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2023-01-18 Accepted:2023-05-13 Online:2023-07-15 Published:2024-01-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 科学评估覆盖作物种植体系的生态系统服务价值可以为东北地区保护性耕作模式构建提供重要参考。本研究基于实证分析,以生态系统服务价值为理论基础,选取禾本科作物黑麦草、豆科作物紫花苜蓿和毛苕子作为覆盖作物分别与玉米间作,以玉米单作模式为对照,从产品供给、气体调节、养分循环和水土保持四大生态系统服务方面进行生态系统服务价值的核算。结果表明: 覆盖作物-玉米间作模式的生态系统服务价值均高于玉米单作,其中养分循环价值最高,其次是产品供给价值,占比分别为67.3%和29.3%。覆盖作物-玉米间作模式的养分循环价值均高于玉米单作模式;紫花苜蓿-玉米、毛苕子-玉米的产品供给价值显著高于黑麦草-玉米,分别增加了18.7%和21.0%;种植覆盖作物具有增加气体调节价值的潜力,但对水土保持价值的影响较小。综合生态系统服务价值,选择豆科覆盖作物-玉米间作可以获得最大效益。

关键词: 覆盖作物, 生态系统服务价值, 保护性耕作, 间作模式, 豆科作物

Abstract: Scientific evaluating ecosystem service value (ESV) of cover crop cultivation system can provide important guidance for the construction of conservation tillage pattern in Northeast China. Based on empirical analysis and the theory of ecosystem service value, we calculated the ESVs of intercropping maize with gramineous cover crop ryegrass and with leguminous cover crops, alfalfa and hairy vetch, with maize monoculture as the control. The ESVs included product supply, gas regulation, nutrient cycling, and soil and water conservation. Results showed that ESVs of cover crop-maize intercropping were higher than those of maize monoculture. Nutrient cycling value was the highest, followed by product supply value, accounting for 67.3% and 29.3% of total ESV, respectively. The nutrient cycling value of cover crop-maize intercropping was higher than that of maize monoculture. The product supply value of alfalfa-maize and hairy vetch-maize were 18.7% and 21.0% higher than that of ryegrass-maize, respectively. Cover crops had the potential to increase the value of gas regulation services, but had little impact on the value of soil and water conservation. Considering the ESVs, intercropping maize with leguminous cover crops would have the greatest benefits.

Key words: cover crop, ecosystem service value, conservation tillage, intercropping pattern, leguminous crop

巴晓博, 隋鑫, 刘鸣达, 解宏图, 梁超, 鲍雪莲. 东北黑土区覆盖作物-玉米间作保护性耕作的生态系统服务价值[J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1883-1891.

BA Xiaobo, SUI Xin, LIU Mingda, XIE Hongtu, LIANG Chao, BAO Xuelian. Ecosystem service value of conservation tillage with cover crop-maize intercropping in the black soil region of Northeast China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(7): 1883-1891.

参考文献

[1] 李保国, 刘忠, 黄峰, 等. 巩固黑土地粮仓保障国家粮食安全. 中国科学院院刊, 2021, 36(10): 1184-1193
[2] 蔡红光, 刘剑钊, 梁尧, 等. 玉米秸秆全量条带覆盖还田耕种技术模式生产实证. 玉米科学, 2022, 30(1): 115-122
[3] 杨雅丽, 马雪松, 解宏图, 等. 保护性耕作对土壤微生物群落及其介导的碳循环功能的影响. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(8): 2675-2684
[4] 隋鑫, 霍海南, 鲍雪莲, 等. 覆盖作物的种植现状及其对下茬作物生长和土壤环境影响的研究进展. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(8): 2666-2674
[5] Singh J, Ale S, DeLaune PB, et al. Modeling the impacts of cover crops and no-tillage on soil health and cotton yield in an irrigated cropping system of the Texas Rolling Plains. Field Crops Research, 2022, 87: 108661
[6] Mendis SS, Udawatta RP, Anderson SH, et al. Effects of cover crops on soil moisture dynamics of a corn cropping system. Soil Security, 2022, 8: 100072
[7] Rodriguez-Ramos JC, Scott N, Marty J, et al. Cover crops enhance resource availability for soil microorga-nisms in a pecan orchard. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2022, 337: 108049
[8] Van Eerd LL, Chahal I, Peng YJ, et al. Influence of cover crops at the four spheres: A review of ecosystem services, potential barriers, and future directions for North America. Science of the Total Environment, 2023, 858: 159990
[9] Li P, Zhang HJ, Deng JJ, et al. Cover crop by irrigation and fertilization improves soil health and maize yield: Establishing a soil health index. Applied Soil Ecology, 2023, 182: 104727
[10] 谢高地, 鲁春霞, 成升魁. 全球生态系统服务价值评估研究进展. 资源科学, 2001, 23(6): 5-9
[11] Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 1997, 387: 253-260
[12] Dardonville M, Legrand B, Clivot H, et al. Assessment of ecosystem services and natural capital dynamics in agroecosystems. Ecosystem Services, 2022, 54: 101415
[13] 李青梅, 王华玲, 张玲玲, 等. 白三叶草和鼠茅草对果园土壤微生物和线虫群落的影响差异. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(6): 1055-1067
[14] 唐海明, 肖小平, 李超, 等. 冬季覆盖作物秸秆还田对双季稻田根际土壤微生物群落功能多样性的影响. 生态学报, 2018, 38(18): 6559-6569
[15] 董红芬, 李洪, 霍成斌, 等. 覆盖作物在玉米/大豆间作模式中的效应分析. 玉米科学, 2019, 27(3): 95-101
[16] 李向东, 陈尚洪, 陈源泉, 等. 四川盆地稻田多熟高效保护性耕作模式的生态系统服务价值评估. 生态学报, 2006, 26(11): 3782-3788
[17] 李福夺, 尹昌斌. 南方稻区绿肥生态服务功能及生态价值评估研究. 中国生态农业学报, 2019, 27(2): 327-336
[18] 普燕爽, 陈建军, 祖艳群, 等. 洱海流域不同种植模式稻田生态系统服务价值评估. 农业资源与环境学报, 2022, 39(5): 958-966
[19] 周志明, 张立平, 曹卫东, 等. 冬绿肥-春玉米农田生态系统服务功能价值评估. 生态环境学报, 2016, 25(4): 597-604
[20] 任静, 李福夺, 尹昌斌, 等. 西北河西灌溉区春玉米-绿肥农田生态系统服务功能价值评估. 新疆大学学报: 自然科学版, 2022, 39(1): 59-66
[21] Daryanto S, Fu BJ, Wang LX, et al. Quantitative synthesis on the ecosystem services of cover crops. Earth-Science Reviews, 2018, 185: 357-373
[22] 李艳君. 施磷和玉米/苜蓿间作对东北农牧交错带土壤有机碳和全氮储量的影响. 硕士论文. 长春: 东北师范大学, 2021
[23] 赵伟, 郝帅, 孙泰朋, 等. 粮草间作培肥处理对黑土土壤有机碳含量的影响. 江苏农业科学, 2017, 45(7): 277-280
[24] 袁洋, 董奇琦, 贾佩岩, 等. 间作下不同肥料对玉米花生生长发育、氮代谢及产量的影响. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2022, 53(2): 129-139
[25] Li HJ, Stomph TJ, Makowski D, et al. The productive performance of intercropping. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023, 120: e2201886120
[26] 张东, 李晓赛, 陈亚恒. 怀来县农田生态系统服务价值分类评估. 水土保持研究, 2016, 23(1): 234-239
[27] 鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2000
[28] 杨弘, 何红波, 张威, 等. 秸秆还田对农田棕壤氧化亚氮排放动态的影响. 土壤通报, 2016, 47(3): 660-665
[29] 谢高地, 肖玉. 农田生态系统服务及其价值的研究进展. 中国生态农业学报, 2013, 21(6): 645-651
[30] 张林, 陈燕萍, 王婧泽, 等. 饲料油菜与牧草的优势比较研究. 耕作与栽培, 2021, 41(5): 27-31
[31] 卢秉林, 包兴国, 张久东, 等. 河西绿洲灌区玉米与绿肥间作模式对作物产量和经济效益的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2014(2): 67-71
[32] 欧阳志云, 赵同谦, 赵景柱, 等. 海南岛生态系统生态调节功能及其生态经济价值研究. 应用生态学报, 2004, 15(8): 1395-1402
[33] 盛婧, 陈留根, 朱普平. 稻麦轮作农田生态系统服务功能价值评估. 中国生态农业学报, 2008, 16(6): 1541-1545
[34] 薛达元, 包浩生, 李文华. 长白山自然保护区森林生态系统间接经济价值评估. 中国环境科学, 1999, 19(3): 247-252
[35] IPCC. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva: IPCC, 151
[36] 欧阳志云, 朱春全, 杨广斌, 等. 生态系统生产总值核算: 概念、核算方法与案例研究. 生态学报, 2013, 33(21): 6747-6761
[37] 王明亮, 刘惠芬, 王丽丽, 等. 不同覆盖作物模式对茶园土壤微生物群落功能多样性的影响. 农业资源与环境学报, 2020, 37(3): 332-339
[38] Sun BR, Peng Y, Yang HY, et al. Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)/maize (Zea mays L.) intercropping provides a feasible way to improve yield and economic incomes in farming and pastoral areas of northeast China. PLoS One, 2017, 9(10): e110556
[39] 唐艺玲, 王建武, 杨文亭. 间作对旱地CO₂和N₂O排放影响的研究进展. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(4): 1323-1330
[40] Ghimire R, Ghimire B, Mesbah AO, et al. Soil health response of cover crops in winter wheat-fallow system. Agronomy Journal, 2019, 111: 2108-2115
[41] Boselli R, Fiorini A, Santelli S, et al. Cover crops du-ring transition to no-till maintain yield and enhance soil fertility in intensive agro-ecosystems. Field Crops Research, 2020, 255: 107871
[42] Ofosu-Budu KG, Fujita K, Gamo T, et al. Dinitrogen fixation and nitrogen release from roots of soybean cultivar bragg and its mutants Nts1116 and Nts1007. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 1993, 39: 497-506
[43] Zhao YJ, Liu XJ, Tong CC, et al. Effect of root interaction on nodulation and nitrogen fixation ability of alfalfa in the simulated alfalfa/triticale intercropping in pots. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10: 4269
[44] Maltais-Landry G, Scow K, Brennan E. Soil phosphorus mobilization in the rhizosphere of cover crops has little effect on phosphorus cycling in California agricultural soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2014, 78: 255-262
[45] 包耀贤, 徐明岗, 赵志强, 等. 乌兰布和沙区绿洲农田土壤钾素特征及其对土壤性质的响应. 西北农业学报, 2011, 20(8): 168-174
[46] Blanco-Canqui H, Shapiro CA, Wortmann CS, et al. Soil organic carbon: The value to soil properties. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2013, 68: 129-134
[47] Blanco-Canqui H, Shaver TM, Lindquist JL, et al. Cover crops and ecosystem services: Insights from stu-dies in temperate soils. Agronomy Journal, 2015, 107: 2449-2474
[48] 成婧, 吴发启, 路培, 等. 玉米苜蓿间作的蓄水保土效益试验研究. 水土保持研究, 2012, 19(3): 54-57
[49] 严磊, 张中彬, 丁英志, 等. 覆盖作物根系对砂姜黑土压实的响应. 土壤学报, 2021, 58(1): 140-150

东北黑土区覆盖作物-玉米间作保护性耕作的生态系统服务价值

Ecosystem service value of conservation tillage with cover crop-maize intercropping in the black soil region of Northeast China

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	于洋, 张常仁, 杨雅丽, 徐欣, 吕付泽, 郑甜甜, 解宏图, 鲍雪莲. 长期免耕和秸秆覆盖量对黑土碳氮含量及碳氮循环相关酶活性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(3): 695-704.
[2]	梁仕豪, 李文, 高宇, 刘保住. 吉林省生态系统服务价值与景观生态风险关联性及其空间分异 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(3): 769-779.
[3]	于海霞, 王禹骁. 东江流域生态系统服务价值的时空演变及空间分异机制 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2498-2506.
[4]	祁育汀, 张平, 刘雷, 马雪楠, 王欢, 赵娟. 关中平原城市群土地利用结构多情景优化和生态系统服务价值预测 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2507-2517.
[5]	隋鹏祥, 罗洋, 郑洪兵, 李瑞平, 王浩, 袁野, 郑金玉, 刘武仁. 长期耕作对农田黑土团聚体和有机碳稳定性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1853-1861.
[6]	曹尤淞, 张晨晖, 肖波, 孙福海. 黑土区农田藻藓两类结皮发育对土壤团聚体稳定性和击溅侵蚀的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(4): 892-902.
[7]	李文慧, 林妍敏, 南雄雄, 王芳, 朱丽珍. 果树-覆盖作物可持续种植体系土壤碳氮固存及其影响因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(2): 471-480.
[8]	叶俊龙, 郭梁, 赵璐峰, 唐建军, 胡亮亮, 陈欣. 农业生态系统植物功能性状研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(11): 3144-3156.
[9]	谈旭, 王承武. 伊犁河谷生态系统服务价值时空演变及其驱动因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10): 2747-2756.
[10]	谭昭昭, 陈毓遒, 丁憬枫, 刘梦迪, 王浩, 王江. 浙江东部沿海城市土地利用模拟及生态系统服务价值评估 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10): 2777-2787.
[11]	潘卫涛, 岳邦瑞, 姚龙杰, 薛建锋, 李军峰. 耦合风险与服务的市域生态安全格局构建——以陕西省咸阳市为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(1): 178-186.
[12]	张晨晖, 肖波, 李胜龙, 王彦峰, 曹尤淞. 东北黑土区农田生物结皮的特征及其对表层土壤崩解的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1773-1782.
[13]	黄卓男, 陈颖彪, 吴志峰. 珠三角城市群地表热环境与生态系统服务价值解耦的时空特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1993-2000.
[14]	朱润苗, 陈松林. 1980—2020年福建省景观生态风险与生态系统服务价值的空间关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(6): 1599-1607.
[15]	蔡丽君, 张敬涛, 盖志佳, 刘婧琦, 郭震华, 赵桂范, 孟庆英. 东北三江平原覆盖作物种植效果 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(10): 2736-2742.