城市生态用地分类及其规划的一般原则

应用生态学报 ›› 2005, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (10): 2003-2006.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇

城市生态用地分类及其规划的一般原则

邓小文^1,2, 孙贻超³, 韩士杰¹

1. 中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所, 沈阳 110016;
2. 中国科学院研究生院, 北京 100039;
3. 天津市环境保护科学研究院, 天津 100196

收稿日期:2004-12-22 修回日期:2005-04-05 出版日期:2005-10-15 发布日期:2005-10-15
通讯作者: 孙贻超,E-mail:dxwpp@163.com
基金资助:
国家高技术发展计划(863)项目(2002AA648010)和天津市规划与国土资源局资助项目.

General principles of urban ecological land classification and planning

DENG Xiaowen^1,2, SUN Yichao³, HAN Shijie ¹

1. Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China;
2. Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China;
3. Tianjin Academy of Environmental Sciences, Tianjin 100196, China

Received:2004-12-22 Revised:2005-04-05 Online:2005-10-15 Published:2005-10-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 城市生态用地的规划布局是城市规划的难点之一,也是急待解决的问题.本文根据城市生态系统的特点,给出了城市生态用地定义,指出城市生态用地同时具有自然属性和社会属性,依据这个特点,将城市生态用地划分为服务型生态用地和功能型生态用地两大类型,并结合具体的城市生态规划对各种类型的生态用地规划进行了定性分析.

关键词: 城市生态用地, 功能型生态用地, 服务型生态用地, 生态系统服务

Abstract: Urban ecological land planning is a difficult and urgent task in city layout.This paper presented the definition of urban ecological land,and according the definition,divided the urban ecological land into two groups,i.e.,ecological land for service,and ecological land for functioning.Based on the principles of city layout,some measures to plan these two urban ecological land groups were proposed.

Key words: Urban ecological land, Ecological land for functioning, Ecological land for service, Ecosystem service

中图分类号:

F301.23

邓小文, 孙贻超, 韩士杰. 城市生态用地分类及其规划的一般原则[J]. 应用生态学报, 2005, 16(10): 2003-2006.

DENG Xiaowen, SUN Yichao, HAN Shijie . General principles of urban ecological land classification and planning[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2005, 16(10): 2003-2006.

参考文献

[1] Arora K, Mickelson SK, Baker JL, et al. 1996. Herbicide retention by vegetative buffer strips from runoff under natural rainfall. Trans ASAE, 39(6) :2155～2162
[2] Brode JM, Bury RB. 1984. The importance of riparian systems to amphibians and reptiles, In: Warner RE, Hendrix KM, eds. California Riparian Systems: Ecology, Conservation and Management.Berkeley, CA: University of California. 30～36
[3] Cao J-F(曹建丰), Xu D-L(许德林). 2004. A study on the coordination between land utilization planning and urban planning. Planners (规划师), 20 (6) : 80～82 (in Chinese)
[4] Chen J-Q(陈吉泉). 1996. Riparian vegetation characteristics and their functions in ecosystem and landscapes. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 7(4) :439～448(in Chinese)
[5] Chen W-B(陈文波), Xiao D-N(肖笃宁), Li X-Z(李秀珍). 2002.Classification, application and creation of landscape indices. Chin J Appl Ecol(应用生态学报), 13(1): 121～125(in Chinese)
[6] Coyne MS, Gilfillen RA, Rhodes RW, et al. 1995. Soil and fecal coliform Trapping by grass filter strips during simulate drain. J Soil Water Conser, 50(4) :405～408
[7] Dan C-L(但承龙), Li W(厉伟). 2001. An exploration on sustainable land use planning. Ecol Econ (生态经济), 11: 60～61 (in Chinese)
[8] Daniels RB, Gilliam JW. 1996. Sediment and chemical load Reduction by grass and riparian filters. Soil Sci Soc Amer J, 60:246～251
[9] Deng H-B(邓红兵), Wang Q-C(王青春), Wang Q-L(王庆礼), et al. 2001. On riparian forest buffers and riparian management. Chin J Appl Ecol(应用生态学报), 12(6) :951～954(in Chinese)
[10] Dillaha TA, Sherrard JH, Lee D, et al. 1988. Evaluation of vegetative filter strips as a best management practice for feed lots. J Water Poll Control Fed, 60(7): 1231～1238
[11] Edwards ED, Huryn AD. 1996. Effect of riparian land use on contributions of terrestrial invertebrates to streams. Hydrobiologia,337:151～159
[12] Fu B-J(傅伯杰), Chen L-X(陈利项), Ma K-M(马克明), et al.2001.The Theory and Application of Landscape Ecology. Beijing:Science Press. (in Chinese)
[13] Gomez DM, Anthony RG. 1996. Amphibian and reptile abundance in riparian and upslope areas of five forest types in western Oregon.Northwest Sci, 79(2) : 109～119
[14] Hanson GC, Groffman PM, Gold AJ. 1994. Denitrification in riparian wetlands receiving high and low groundwater nitrate inputs. J Environ Qual, 23:917～922
[15] Hubbard RK, Lowrance RR. 1994. Riparian forest buffer system research at the Coastal Plain Experimental Station, Tifton, Georgia.Water Air Soil Poll, 77:409～432
[16] Jin W-B(金卫斌), Hu B-M (胡秉民). 2003. Discussion on several indices assessing landscape dispersion. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 14(2) :314～316(in Chinese)
[17] Keller CME, Robbins CS, Hatfield JS. 1993. Avian communities in riparian forests of different widths in Maryland and Delaware. Wetlands, 13(2): 137～144
[18] Li F(李峰), Wang R-S(王如松). 2004. Research advance in ecosystem service of unban green space. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 15(3) :527～531 (in Chinese)
[19] Magette WL, Brinsfield RB, Palmer RE, et al. 1989. Nutrient and sediment removal by vegetated filter strips. Trans ASAE, 32(2):663～667
[20] Mander U, Kuusemets V, Lohmus K, et al. 1997. Efficiency and dimensioning of riparian buffer zones in agricultural catchments.Ecol Eng, 8:299～324
[21] Muscutt AD, Harris GL, Bailey SW, et al. 1993. Buffer zones to improve water quality:A review of their potential use in UK agriculture. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 45: 59～77
[22] Osborne LL, Kovacic DA. 1993. Riparian vegetated buffer strips in water-quality restoration and stream management. Freshwater Biol, 29:243～258
[23] Peterjohn WT, Correll DL. 1984. Nutrient dynamics in an agricultural watershed:Observations on the role of a riparian forest. Ecology, 65(5): 1466～1475
[24] Spackman SC, Hughes JW. 1995. Assessment of minimum corridor width for biological conservation: Species richness and distribution along mid-order streams in Vermont, USA. Biol Cons, 71:325～332
[25] Tan M-H(谈明洪), Li X-B(李秀彬), Lü C-H(吕昌河). 2003. An analysis of driving forces of urban land expansion in China. Econ Geogr(经济地理), 23(5) :635～639(in Chinese)
[26] Xiao D-N(肖笃宁), Li X-W(李晓文). 1998. On the target and principles of landscape planning. Chin J Ecol (生态学杂志), 17(3): 46～52 (in Chinese)
[27] Vought LBM, Dahl J, Pedersen CL, et al. 1994. Nutrient retention in riparian ecotones. Ambio, 23 (6): 343～348
[28] Young RA, Huntrods T, Anderson W. 1980. Effectiveness of vegetated buffer strips in controlling pollution from feedlot runoff. J Environ Qual, 9(3) :483～487
[29] Yue J(岳健), Zhang X-M(张雪梅).2003. A discussion on the classification of land use in China. Arid Land Geogr (干旱区地理), 26(1): 78～88(in Chinese)
[30] Zhang H-Q(张红旗), Wang L-X(王立新),Jia B-Q(贾宝全).2004. A conception of ecological land use and its function classification in arid area in Northwest China. Chin J Eco-Agric (中国生态农业学报), 12(2) :5～8(in Chinese)

城市生态用地分类及其规划的一般原则

General principles of urban ecological land classification and planning

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	于海霞, 王禹骁. 东江流域生态系统服务价值的时空演变及空间分异机制 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2498-2506.
[2]	祁育汀, 张平, 刘雷, 马雪楠, 王欢, 赵娟. 关中平原城市群土地利用结构多情景优化和生态系统服务价值预测 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2507-2517.
[3]	熊昕莹, 孟梅. 基于生态系统服务供需关系及空间流动的新疆生态管理分区与优化策略 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(8): 2237-2248.
[4]	巴晓博, 隋鑫, 刘鸣达, 解宏图, 梁超, 鲍雪莲. 东北黑土区覆盖作物-玉米间作保护性耕作的生态系统服务价值 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1883-1891.
[5]	陈红莲, 李瑞, 张玉珊, 吴清林, 袁江, 高家勇. 赤水河流域不同地貌区生态系统健康对比 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1912-1922.
[6]	张自正, 张蕾, 孙桂英, 刘俊祥. 清江流域生态系统服务权衡时空效应及驱动因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(4): 1051-1062.
[7]	郝嘉元, 智烈慧, 李晓文, 董世魁, 李巍. 青藏高原土地利用格局和生态系统服务的时空演变特征及关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(11): 3053-3063.
[8]	邓钰栎, 王丹, 许涵. 双尺度下广东韶关市生态系统服务及其权衡/协同关系及社会生态驱动因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(11): 3073-3084.
[9]	谈旭, 王承武. 伊犁河谷生态系统服务价值时空演变及其驱动因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10): 2747-2756.
[10]	王彬宇, 王玲, 陈俊辰, 戚琦, 贺淑钰, 杨梓琪, 李兆华, 李昆. 四湖流域生态功能分区及其影响因素识别 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10): 2757-2766.
[11]	谭昭昭, 陈毓遒, 丁憬枫, 刘梦迪, 王浩, 王江. 浙江东部沿海城市土地利用模拟及生态系统服务价值评估 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10): 2777-2787.
[12]	潘卫涛, 岳邦瑞, 姚龙杰, 薛建锋, 李军峰. 耦合风险与服务的市域生态安全格局构建——以陕西省咸阳市为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(1): 178-186.
[13]	赵宇豪, 罗宇航, 易腾云, 王振宇, 王娜, 吴健生. 基于生态系统服务供需匹配的深圳市生态安全格局构建 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(9): 2475-2484.
[14]	王茜, 穆琪, 罗漫雅, 赵永华, 杨舒媛, 张磊, 瞿植. 秦岭生态系统服务协同与权衡的时空异质性 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(8): 2057-2067.
[15]	黄卓男, 陈颖彪, 吴志峰. 珠三角城市群地表热环境与生态系统服务价值解耦的时空特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1993-2000.