欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (05): 1203-1209.

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

泾河流域县域尺度生态系统服务相互关系及影响因子

潘影1**,甄霖1,龙鑫1,2,曹晓昌1,2   

  1. 1中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 北京 100101; 2中国科学院研究生院, 北京 100049)
  • 出版日期:2012-05-18 发布日期:2012-05-18

Ecosystem service interactions and their affecting factors in Jinghe watershed at county level.

PAN Ying1, ZHEN Lin1, LONG Xin1,2, CAO Xiao-chang1,2   

  1. (1Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; 2Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
  • Online:2012-05-18 Published:2012-05-18

摘要: 以泾河流域31个县粮食供给、肉类供给、薪柴供给、水源涵养和土壤保持5项生态系统服务为研究对象,分析了县域尺度5项生态系统服务的相互关系、相互关系模式和总生态系统服务指数的空间差异,以及影响空间差异的自然环境和人为因子.结果表明: 泾河流域县域尺度5项生态系统服务之间相互关系的差异较大,粮食供给与肉类供给呈极显著正相关,与土壤保持呈极显著负相关,水源涵养与薪柴供给和土壤保持呈显著正相关.生态系统服务相互关系模式中,调节服务主导模式、供给与调节平衡模式和粮食供给主导模式的县分别为24、3和4个;不同模式的总生态系统服务指数差距较大,最大值(泾源县)与最小值(盐池县)差距5.1倍.自然环境因子中,总生态系统服务指数与降水和土壤全氮呈极显著正相关,与日照时数呈显著负相关;排除自然环境因子的差异后,耕地增加对总生态系统服务指数有负面影响,乔木林地影响甚微,灌木林地和草地有较大的正面影响.

关键词: 泾河流域, 生态系统服务, 生态系统服务相互关系, 影响因子, 县域尺度

Abstract: Taking the multiple ecosystem services (grain supply, meat supply, fuelwood supply, water resource conservation and soil retention) as test objects, this paper analyzed the interactions among these services, the interaction modes and the possible affecting factors in 31 counties of Jinghe watershed. At the county level, there existed great differences in the interactions among different pairs of the ecosystem services. The grain supply showed significant positive correlation with meat supply  but negative correlation with soil retention, whereas the water resource conservation showed significant positive correlations with fuel-wood supply  and soil retention. As for the interaction modes of the ecosystem services, 24 counties were primarily of regulation services, 3 counties were of supply and regulation services in balance, and 4 counties were primarily of grain supply. The total ecosystem service index of the interaction modes in each county varied greatly, with 5.1 times of difference between the maximum (Jingyuan County) and the minimum value (Yanchi County). The total ecosystem service index was significantly positively correlated with precipitation  and soil total nitrogen, and negatively correlated with solar hours. The increase of farmland had negative effects, while that of shrub land and grassland had great positive effects on the total ecosystem service index, but the increase of forestland had less effects.

Key words: Jinghe watershed, ecosystem service, ecosystem service interaction, affecting factor, county level.