应用生态学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 1633-1642.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202105.029
张城1, 李晶1*, 周自翔2, 刘宪锋1
收稿日期:
2021-01-01
接受日期:
2021-02-23
出版日期:
2021-05-15
发布日期:
2021-11-15
通讯作者:
*E-mail: lijing@snnu.edu.cn
作者简介:
张城,男,1993年生,博士研究生。主要从事生态系统服务流动研究。E-mail:615964461@qq.com
基金资助:
ZHANG Cheng1, LI Jing1*, ZHOU Zi-xiang2, LIU Xian-feng1
Received:
2021-01-01
Accepted:
2021-02-23
Online:
2021-05-15
Published:
2021-11-15
Contact:
*E-mail: lijing@snnu.edu.cn
Supported by:
摘要: 生态系统服务级联效应(ESC)将生态系统服务各组成部分与社会价值联系起来,构建了自然科学到社会科学跨学科研究的桥梁,可以帮助决策者更好地将生态系统服务概念融入到决策制定中。本文梳理了生态系统服务级联效应的概念,回顾了级联效应的研究进展。从理论角度看,ESC的理论研究主要集中在如何准确定义各成分及各成分间的因果关系,提高ESC模型的实用性与适用性,以及如何有效连接利益相关者与生态系统服务结构。从应用角度看,ESC在生态系统服务制图、生态系统服务评估及政策制定发挥了巨大作用。当前研究在指标筛选和互馈机制上仍存在较大不确定性。建议未来应从以下几个方面加强研究:更加关注生态系统服务结构过程及分类标准,通过多模型融合和区域调查来弥补ESC对反馈机制描述的不足,结合区域特征为人地耦合和可持续发展提供科学指导。
张城, 李晶, 周自翔, 刘宪锋. 生态系统服务级联效应研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(5): 1633-1642.
ZHANG Cheng, LI Jing, ZHOU Zi-xiang, LIU Xian-feng. Research progress on the cascade effect of ecosystem service.[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(5): 1633-1642.
[1] Costanza R, D'Arge R, De Groot R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 1997, 387: 253 [2] Haines-Young R, Potschin M. The links between biodiversity, ecosystem service and human well-being/ Raffaelli D, Frid C, eds. Ecosystem Ecology: A New Synthesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010: 235-268 [3] Groot RS, Alkemade R, Braat L, et al. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity, 2010, 7: 260-272 [4] Sukhdev P, Wittmer H, Schröter-Schlaack C, et al. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB. Malta: Progress Press, 2010 [5] Potschin MB, Haines-Young RH. Ecosystem services: Exploring a geographical perspective. Progress in Physical Geography, 2011, 35: 575-594 [6] Heink U, Jax K. Going upstream: How the purpose of a conceptual framework for ecosystem services determines its structure. Ecological Economics, 2019, 156: 264-271 [7] Spangenberg JH, Haaren CV, Settele J. The ecosystem service cascade: Further developing the metaphor. Integrating societal processes to accommodate social processes and planning, and the case of bioenergy. Ecological Economics, 2014, 104: 22-32 [8] Van BT, Verburg PH, Espinosa M, et al. European agricultural landscapes, common agricultural policy and ecosystem services: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2013, 1: 309-325 [9] Tolvanen H, Rönkä M, Vihervaara P, et al. Spatial information in ecosystem service assessment: Data applicability in the cascade model context. Journal of Land Use Science, 2014, 11: 350-367 [10] 李双成, 王珏, 朱文博, 等.基于空间与区域视角的生态系统服务地理学框架. 地理学报, 2014, 69(11): 1628-1639 [Li S-C, Wang Y, Zhu W-B, et al. Research framework of ecosystem services geography from spatial and regional perspectives. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(11): 1628-1639] [11] Demestihas C, Plénet D, Génard M, et al. A simulation study of synergies and tradeoffs between multiple ecosystem services in apple orchards. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019, 236: 1-16 [12] Brauman KA, Daily GC, Duarte TK, et al. The nature and value of ecosystem services: An overview highlighting hydrologic services. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2007, 32: 67-98 [13] Bell MD, Phelan J, Blett TF, et al. A framework to quantify the strength of ecological links between an environmental stressor and final ecosystem services. Ecosphere, 2017, 8: e01806 [14] Bruins RJ, Canfield TJ, Duke C, et al. Using ecological production functions to link ecological processes to ecosystem services. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 2017, 13: 52-61 [15] Wei H, Fan W, Wang X, et al. Integrating supply and social demand in ecosystem services assessment: A review. Ecosystem Services, 2017, 25: 15-27 [16] Schröter M, Stumpf KH, Loos J, et al. Refocusing ecosystem services towards sustainability. Ecosystem Ser-vices, 2017, 25: 35-43 [17] Primmer E, Jokinen P, Blicharska M, et al. Governance of ecosystem services: A framework for empirical analysis. Ecosystem Services, 2015, 16: 158-166 [18] Riegels N, Lynggaard-Jensen A, Jensen JK, et al. Making the ecosystem services approach operational: A case study application to the Aarhus River, Denmark. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 707: 135836 [19] Small N, Munday M, Durance I. The challenge of valuing ecosystem services that have no material benefits. Global Environmental Change, 2017, 44: 57-67 [20] Martín-López B, Gómez-Baggethun E, García-Llorente M, et al. Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment. Ecological Indicators, 2014, 37: 220-228 [21] 刘宇, 赵亮. 基于过程-效应-功能-服务级联机制的森林减沙服务传输研究.长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(4): 883-892 [Liu Y, Zhao L. Assessing soil loss control and sediment reduction services of forest following process-effect-function-service cascade framework. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2019, 28(4): 883-892] [22] 李双成. 生态系统服务研究思辨. 景观设计学, 2019, 7(1): 82-87 [Li S-C. Reflections on ecosystem service research. Landscape Architecture Frontiers, 2019, 7(1): 82-87] [23] Wang Y, He C, Wang L, et al. Framework for valuating urban wetland park ecosystem services based on the cascade approach. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 2019, 28: e01806 [24] Barot S, Abbadie L, Auclerc A, et al. Urban ecology, stakeholders and the future of ecology. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 667: 475-484 [25] Müller F, Burkhard B. The indicator side of ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 2012, 1: 26-30 [26] Spangenberg JH, Görg C, Truong DT, et al. Provision of ecosystem services is determined by human agency, not ecosystem functions. Four case studies. International Journal of Biodiversity Science Ecosystem Services & Mana-gement, 2014, 10: 40-53 [27] Elinor O. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 2009, 5939: 419-422 [28] Mastrangelo ME, Weyland F, Herrera LP, et al. Ecosystem services research in contrasting socio-ecological contexts of Argentina: Critical assessment and future directions. Ecosystem Services, 2015, 16: 63-73 [29] Fedele G, Locatelli B, Djoudi H. Mechanisms mediating the contribution of ecosystem services to human well-being and resilience. Ecosystem Services, 2017, 28: 43-54 [30] McDonnell MJ, Pickett STA. Ecosystem structure and function along urban-rural gradients: An unexploited opportunity for ecology. Ecology, 1990, 71: 1232-1237 [31] 杨红, 刘广平. 长江口生态系统服务功能价值评估. 海洋环境科学, 2008, 27(6): 624-628 [Yang H, Liu G-P. Valuation of ecosystem services in Yangtze River Estuary. Marine Environmental Science, 2008, 27(6): 624-628] [32] Biest KVD, Vrebos D, Staes J, et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of land-use based ecosystem service assessments for different thematic resolutions. Journal of Environmental Management, 2015, 156: 41-51 [33] 徐建英, 王清, 魏建瑛. 卧龙自然保护区生态系统服务福祉贡献评估: 当地居民的视角. 生态学报, 2018, 38(20): 7348-7358 [Xu J-Y, Wang Q, Wei J-Y. Assessment of the contribution to human well-being by ecosystem services in Wolong Natural Reserve from the perspective of local communities. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(20): 7348-758] [34] Johnston RJ, Russell M. An operational structure for clarity in ecosystem service values. Ecological Econo-mics, 2011, 70: 2243-2249 [35] Obst C, Hein L, Edens B. National accounting and the valuation of ecosystem assets and their services. Environmental & Resource Economics, 2016, 64: 1-23 [36] 谢高地, 鲁春霞, 成升魁. 全球生态系统服务价值评估研究进展. 资源科学, 2001, 23(6): 5-9 [Xie G-D, Lu C-X, Cheng S-K. Progress in evaluating the global ecosystem services. Resources Science, 2001, 23(6): 5-9] [37] Nahuelhual L, Laterra P, Villarino S, et al. Mapping of ecosystem services: Missing links between purposes and procedures. Ecosystem Services, 2015, 13: 162-172 [38] Haines-Young R, Potschin M, Cheshire D. Defining and Identifying Environmental Limits for Sustainable Develo-pment: A Scoping Study. Nottingham: Centre for Environmental Management, University of Nottingham, 2006 [39] La Notte A, D'amato D, Mkinen H, et al. Ecosystem services classification: A systems ecology perspective of the cascade framework. Ecological Indicators, 2017, 74: 392-402 [40] Kandziora M, Burkhard B, Mueller F. Interactions of ecosystem properties, ecosystem integrity and ecosystem service indicators: A theoretical matrix exercise. Ecologi-cal Indicators, 2013, 28: 54-78 [41] Saarikoski H, Jax K, Harrison PA, et al. Exploring operational ecosystem service definitions: The case of boreal forests. Ecosystem Services, 2015, 14: 144-157 [42] Luederitz C, Brink E, Gralla F, et al. A review of urban ecosystem services: Six key challenges for future research. Ecosystem Services, 2015, 14: 98-112 [43] Boerema A, Rebelo AJ, Bodi MB, et al. Are ecosystem services adequately quantified? Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 54: 358-370 [44] Shah A, Garg A. Urban commons service generation, delivery, and management: A conceptual framework. Ecological Economics, 2017, 135: 280-287 [45] Van Oudenhoven APE, Petz K, Alkemade R, et al. Framework for systematic indicator selection to assess effects of land management on ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators, 2012, 21: 110-122 [46] Potschin-Young M, Haines-Young R, Görg C, et al. Understanding the role of conceptual frameworks: Reading the ecosystem service cascade. Ecosystem Services, 2018, 29: 428-440 [47] Heink U, Hauck J, Jax K, et al. Requirements for the selection of ecosystem service indicators: The case of MAES indicators. Ecological Indicators, 2016, 61: 18-26 [48] 何浩, 潘耀忠, 朱文泉, 等. 中国陆地生态系统服务价值测量. 应用生态学报, 2005, 16(6): 1122-1127 [He H, Pan Y-Z, Zhu W-Q, et al. Measurement of terrestrial ecosystem service value in China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2005, 16(6): 1122-1127] [49] Maes J, Egoh B, Willemen L, et al. Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union. Ecosystem Services, 2012, 1: 31-39 [50] Basnou C, Baró F, Langemeyer J, et al. Advancing the green infrastructure approach in the Province of Barcelona: Integrating biodiversity, ecosystem functions and services into landscape planning. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2020, 55: 126797 [51] Liquete C, Zulian G, Delgado I, et al. Assessment of coastal protection as an ecosystem service in Europe. Ecological Indicators, 2013, 30: 205-217 [52] Mononen L, Auvinen AP, Ahokumpu AL, et al. National ecosystem service indicators: Measures of social-ecological sustainability. Ecological Indicators, 2016, 61: 27-37 [53] Inácio M, Mika K, Kalinauskas M, et al. Mapping wild seafood potential, supply, flow and demand in Lithuania. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 718: 137356 [54] Hale RL, Cook EM, Beltrán BJ. Cultural ecosystem services provided by rivers across diverse social-ecological landscapes: A social media analysis. Ecological Indicators, 2019, 107: 105580 [55] Baba CK, Hack J. Economic valuation of ecosystem services for the sustainable management of agropastoral dams: A case study of the Sakabansi dam, northern Benin. Ecological Indicators, 2019, 107: 105648 [56] Martinez-Harms MJ, Bryan BA, Balvanera P, et al. Making decisions for managing ecosystem services. Biological Conservation, 2015, 184: 229-238 [57] Lavorel S, Locatelli B, Colloff MJ, et al. Co-producing ecosystem services for adapting to climate change. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, 2020, 375: 20190119 [58] Ryan RM, Deci EL. On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on Hedonic and Eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 2001, 52: 141-166 [59] Van Wensem J, Calow P, Dollacker A, et al. Identi-fying and assessing the application of ecosystem services approaches in environmental policies and decision making. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 2017, 13: 41-51 [60] De Groot RS, Wilson MA, Boumans RMJ. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 2002, 41: 393-408 [61] Anzaldua G, Gerner NV, Lago M, et al. Getting into the water with the ecosystem services approach: The DESSIN ESS evaluation framework. Ecosystem Services, 2018, 30: 318-326 [62] Jax K, Furman E, Saarikoski H, et al. Handling a messy world: Lessons learned when trying to make the ecosystem services concept operational. Ecosystem Services, 2018, 29: 415-427 [63] Liu W, Yan Y, Wang D, et al. Integrate carbon dynamics models for assessing the impact of land use intervention on carbon sequestration ecosystem service. Ecological Indicators, 2018, 91: 268-277 [64] Zhang Y, Singh S, Bakshi BR. Accounting for ecosystem services in life cycle assessment, Part I: A critical review. Environmental Science & Technology, 2010, 44: 2232-2242 [65] Bare JC. Recommendation for land use impact assessment: First steps into framework, theory, and implementation. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2011, 13: 7-18 [66] 郑秀君, 胡彬. 我国生命周期评价(LCA)文献综述及国外最新研究进展. 科技进步与对策, 2013, 30(6): 155-160 [Zheng X-J, Hu B. Domestic literature review and the latest overseas research progress of life cycle assessment. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2013, 30(6): 155-160] [67] Kandziora M, Burkhard B, Muller F. Mapping provisioning ecosystem services at the local scale using data of varying spatial and temporal resolution. Ecosystem Services, 2013, 4: 47-59 [68] Kelble CR, Loomis DK, Lovelace S, et al. The EBM-DPSER conceptual model: Integrating ecosystem ser-vices into the DPSIR framework. PLoS One, 2013, 8(1): e70766 [69] Svarstad H, Petersen LK, Rothman D, et al. Discursive biases of the environmental research framework DPSIR. Land Use Policy, 2008, 25: 110-125 [70] Potschin M. Land use and the state of the natural environment. Land Use Policy, 2009, 26: s170-s177 [71] Turner RK, Lorenaoni I, Beaumount N, et al. Coastal management for sustainable development: Analysing environmental and socio-economic. Geographical Journal, 1998, 164: 269-281 [72] 张继权, 伊坤朋, Tani H, 等. 基于DPSIR的吉林省白山市生态安全评价. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(1): 189-195 [Zhang J-Q, Yi K-P, Tani H, et al. Ecological security assessment of Baishan City in Jilin Province based on DPSIR. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011, 22(1): 189-195] [73] 于伯华, 吕昌河. 基于DPSIR模型的农业土地资源持续利用评价. 农业工程学报, 2008, 24(9): 53-58 [Yu B-H, Lyu C-H. Assessment of sustainable use of agricultural land resources based on DPSIR Framework. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2008, 24(9): 53-58] [74] Nassl M, Löffler J. Ecosystem services in coupled social-ecological systems: Closing the cycle of service provision and societal feedback. Ambio, 2015, 44: 737-749 [75] Gerner NV, Nafo I, Winking C, et al. Large-scale river restoration pays off: A case study of ecosystem service valuation for the Emscher restoration generation project. Ecosystem Services, 2018, 30: 327-338 [76] Hou Y, Zhou S, Burkhard B, et al. Socioeconomic influences on biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being: A quantitative application of the DPSIR model in Jiangsu, China. Science of the Total Environment, 2014, 490: 1012-1028 [77] Rugani B, Souza DMD, Weidema BP, et al. Towards integrating the ecosystem services cascade framework within the life cycle assessment (LCA) cause-effect methodology. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 690: 1284-1298 [78] Verones F, Bare JC, Bulle C, et al. LCIA framework and cross-cutting issues guidance within the UNEP-SETAC Life Cycle Initiative. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 161: 957-967 [79] De Souza DM, Lopes GR, Hansson J, et al. Ecosystem services in life cycle assessment: A synthesis of knowledge and recommendations for biofuels. Ecosystem Ser-vices, 2018, 30: 200-210 [80] Pavan ALR, Ometto AR. Ecosystem services in life cycle assessment: A novel conceptual framework for soil. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 643: 1337-1347 [81] Dick J, Turkelboom F, Woods H, et al. Stakeholders' perspectives on the operationalisation of the ecosystem service concept: Results from 27 case studies. Ecosystem Services, 2018, 29: 552-565 [82] Apitz, Sabine E. Ecosystem services and environmental decision making: Seeking order in complexity. Integrated Environmental Assessment & Management, 2013, 9: 214-230 [83] Horcea-Milcu AI, Leventon J, Hanspach J, et al. Disaggregated contributions of ecosystem services to human well-being: A case study from Eastern Europe. Regional Environmental Change, 2016, 16: 1779-1791 |
[1] | 梁华秋, 沈梦晗, 邵明, 姚朋. 基于生态系统服务供需的临沂市固碳生态网络构建 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(3): 759-768. |
[2] | 梁仕豪, 李文, 高宇, 刘保住. 吉林省生态系统服务价值与景观生态风险关联性及其空间分异 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(3): 769-779. |
[3] | 路昌, 蔡雪芹, 郝灿书, 刘玉珍, 王之语, 马亚男. 黄河三角洲高效生态经济区生态系统服务权衡协同关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(2): 457-468. |
[4] | 于海霞, 王禹骁. 东江流域生态系统服务价值的时空演变及空间分异机制 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2498-2506. |
[5] | 祁育汀, 张平, 刘雷, 马雪楠, 王欢, 赵娟. 关中平原城市群土地利用结构多情景优化和生态系统服务价值预测 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2507-2517. |
[6] | 熊昕莹, 孟梅. 基于生态系统服务供需关系及空间流动的新疆生态管理分区与优化策略 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(8): 2237-2248. |
[7] | 巴晓博, 隋鑫, 刘鸣达, 解宏图, 梁超, 鲍雪莲. 东北黑土区覆盖作物-玉米间作保护性耕作的生态系统服务价值 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1883-1891. |
[8] | 陈红莲, 李瑞, 张玉珊, 吴清林, 袁江, 高家勇. 赤水河流域不同地貌区生态系统健康对比 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1912-1922. |
[9] | 张自正, 张蕾, 孙桂英, 刘俊祥. 清江流域生态系统服务权衡时空效应及驱动因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(4): 1051-1062. |
[10] | 孟欣宇, 吴远翔. 城市生态系统服务供需簇与生态功能管控——以齐齐哈尔市中心城区为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(12): 3393-3403. |
[11] | 郝嘉元, 智烈慧, 李晓文, 董世魁, 李巍. 青藏高原土地利用格局和生态系统服务的时空演变特征及关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(11): 3053-3063. |
[12] | 邓钰栎, 王丹, 许涵. 双尺度下广东韶关市生态系统服务及其权衡/协同关系及社会生态驱动因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(11): 3073-3084. |
[13] | 谈旭, 王承武. 伊犁河谷生态系统服务价值时空演变及其驱动因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10): 2747-2756. |
[14] | 王彬宇, 王玲, 陈俊辰, 戚琦, 贺淑钰, 杨梓琪, 李兆华, 李昆. 四湖流域生态功能分区及其影响因素识别 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10): 2757-2766. |
[15] | 谭昭昭, 陈毓遒, 丁憬枫, 刘梦迪, 王浩, 王江. 浙江东部沿海城市土地利用模拟及生态系统服务价值评估 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10): 2777-2787. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||