Effects of the timing of epibrassinolide spraying on yield and nitrogen use efficiency of wide-belt sowing wheat

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202301.041

Abstract

Abstract: In this study, we investigated the effects of epibrassinolide spraying at different growth stages on grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), and uptake efficiency (UPE) of wide-belt sowing wheat. The results showed that epibrassinolide spraying enhanced wheat grain yield by increasing the number of kernels per spike and (or) 1000-kernel weight, and improved NUE by promoting aboveground nitrogen accumulation and improving UPE. However, the magnitudes of such enhancements in yield and NUE differed among spraying times. Spraying epibrassinolide at the erecting and filling stages, jointing and filling stages, erecting, jointing, and filling stages, as well as erecting, flowering, and filling stages, produced the greatest increase in the number of kernels per spike and 1000-kernel weight, which led to substantial yield increases (12.8%-14.0%), and the greatest increase in aboveground nitrogen accumulation, which improved UPE by 16.4%-18.8%, and resulted in a significant improvement in NUE. Therefore, spraying epibrassinolide at the erecting and filling stage or jointing and filling stages could achieve high yield and NUE in wide-belt sowing wheat.

Key words: epibrassinolide, wheat, yield, nitrogen use efficiency, exogenous spraying.

WANG Jie, HUA Yi-fan, QIN Ji-yuan, HE Ming-rong, JU Zheng-chun, LYU Peng, DENG Shu-zhen, DAI Xing-long. Effects of the timing of epibrassinolide spraying on yield and nitrogen use efficiency of wide-belt sowing wheat[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(1): 99-106.

References

[1] 王一杰, 辛岭, 胡志全, 等. 我国小麦生产、消费和贸易的现状分析. 中国农业资源与区划, 2018, 39(5): 36-45
[2] 刘瑶, 张凤荣, 谢臻, 等. 耕地利用视角下全国粮食生产时空特征演变. 中国农业大学学报, 2019, 24(11): 173-182
[3] 赵莉, 何贤芳, 都斌斌, 等. 播期和品种对沿淮晚播稻茬小麦产量和产值的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2021, 41(5): 613-623
[4] Murchie EH, Burgess AJ. Casting light on the architecture of crop yield. Crop and Environment, 2022, 1: 74-85
[5] 刘津, 李春越, 邢亚薇, 等. 长期施肥对黄土旱塬农田土壤有机磷组分及小麦产量的影响. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(1): 157-164
[6] 吕广德, 王超, 靳雪梅, 等. 水氮组合对冬小麦干物质及氮素积累和产量的影响. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(8): 2593-2603
[7] 郑飞娜, 初金鹏, 张秀, 等. 播种方式与种植密度互作对大穗型小麦品种产量和氮素利用率的调控效应. 作物学报, 2020, 46(3): 423-431
[8] 肖瑞雪, 郭丽丽, 贾琦石, 等. 油菜素内酯调控植物生长发育及产量品质研究进展. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47(10): 16-21
[9] Tanveer M, Shahzad B, Sharma A, et al. 24-Epibrassinolide; an active brassinolide and its role in salt stress tolerance in plants: A review. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2018, 130: 69-79
[10] Wang SQ, Zhao HH, Zhao LM, et al. Application of brassinolide alleviates cold stress at the booting stage of rice. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2020, 19: 975-987
[11] Li SM, Zheng HX, Lin L, et al. Roles of brassinosteroids in plant growth and abiotic stress response. Plant Growth Regulation, 2021, 93: 29-38
[12] 李勇, 王红光, 李瑞奇, 等. 表油菜素内酯对冬小麦产量及氮素吸收、积累和分配的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2015, 35(2): 239-250
[13] 李勇, 王红光, 李瑞奇, 等. 表油菜素内酯对冬小麦开花后光合特性和物质生产的影响. 河北农业大学学报, 2015, 38(1): 1-7
[14] 王庆燕, 管大海, 潘海波, 等. 油菜素内酯对春玉米灌浆期叶片光合功能与产量的调控效应. 作物学报, 2015, 41(10): 1557-1563
[15] 姚佳瑜, 于吉祥, 王志琴, 等. 水稻内源油菜素甾醇对施氮量的响应及其对颖花退化的调控作用. 作物学报, 2021, 47(5): 894-903
[16] Janeczko A, Biesaga-Kościelniak J, Oklešťková J, et al. Role of 24-epibrassinolide in wheat production: Physiological effects and uptake. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 2010, 196: 311-321
[17] 刘海英, 郭天财, 朱云集, 等. 开花期喷施表油菜素内酯对豫麦49蔗糖代谢和产量的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2006, 26(1): 77-81
[18] 孙晓, 姜兴印, 姚晨涛, 等. 3种不同结构的芸苔素内酯在小麦上的应用研究. 现代农药, 2019, 18(5): 49-52
[19] 华智锐, 李小玲. 油菜素内酯对小麦幼苗抗旱性的诱导效应. 江苏农业科学, 2017, 45(1): 62-65
[20] 纪秀娥, 史留功, 胡春红, 等. 油菜素内酯对小麦、玉米种子萌发的影响. 江苏农业科学, 2014, 42(9): 88-89
[21] Zhang WY, Sheng JY, Fu LD, et al. Brassinosteroids mediate the effect of soil-drying during meiosis on spikelet degeneration in rice. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2020, 169: 103887
[22] Riboldi LB, Múrcia JAG, Araújo SHC, et al. The 24-epibrassinolide induces rice tolerance to water stress overcoming losses in grain yield. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 2018, 12: 1426-1433
[23] Yang XY, McMaster GS, Yu Q. Spatial patterns of relationship between wheat yield and yield components in China. International Journal of Plant Production, 2018, 12: 61-71
[24] 初金鹏, 朱文美, 尹立俊, 等. 宽幅播种对冬小麦‘泰农18'产量和氮素利用率的影响. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(8): 2517-2524
[25] 刘北城, 张艳艳, 戎亚思, 等. 干旱胁迫下喷施14-羟基芸苔素甾醇对冬小麦穗花发育及碳氮代谢的调控. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(6): 1004-1015
[26] 刘北城, 段剑钊, 戎亚思, 等. 外源14-羟基芸苔素甾醇对冬小麦小花成粒及生理特性的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2022, 30(7): 1143-1154
[27] 李勇. 表油菜素内酯对高产冬小麦产量形成的影响. 硕士论文. 保定: 河北农业大学, 2014
[28] Zhu YG, Chu JP, Dai XL, et al. Delayed sowing increases grain number by enhancing spike competition capacity for assimilates in winter wheat. European Journal of Agronomy, 2019, 104: 49-62
[29] 张鑫, 孔祥, 李勇, 等. 外源ABA对干旱条件下小麦冠层温度及光合同化物积累与分配的调控效应. 麦类作物学报, 2019, 39(9): 1080-1094
[30] 刘海英, 郭天财, 朱云集, 等. 开花期外施表油菜素内酯(epi-BR)对小麦籽粒淀粉积累及其关键酶活性的影响. 作物学报, 2006, 32(6): 924-930
[31] Moll RH, Kamprath EJ, Jackson WA. Analysis and interpretation of factors which contribute to efficiency of nitrogen-utilization. Agronomy Journal, 1982, 74: 562-564
[32] Dai XL, Zhou XH, Jia DY, et al. Managing the seeding rate to improve nitrogen-use efficiency of winter wheat. Field Crops Research, 2013, 154: 100-109
[33] 石玉华, 初金鹏, 尹立俊, 等. 宽幅播种提高不同播期小麦产量与氮素利用率. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(17): 127-133
[34] Dai XL, Wang YC, Dong XC, et al. Delayed sowing can increase lodging resistance while maintaining grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency in winter wheat. Crop Journal, 2017, 5: 541-552
[35] Yin LJ, Dai XL, He MR. Delayed sowing improves nitrogen utilization efficiency in winter wheat without impacting yield. Field Crops Research, 2018, 221: 90-97
[36] 孔海波, 肖丽丽, 代兴龙, 等. 地力水平和播期对冬小麦籽粒产量及氮素利用率的影响. 山东农业科学, 2014, 46(6): 35-39
[37] Sairam RK. Effects of homobrassinolide application on plant metabolism and grain yield under irrigated and moisture-stress conditions of two wheat varieties. Plant Growth Regulation, 1994, 14: 173-181
[38] Fariduddin Q, Yusuf M, Hayat S, et al. Effect of 28-homobrassinolide on antioxidant capacity and photosynthesis in Brassica juncea plants exposed to different le-vels of copper. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2009, 66: 418-424