应用生态学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5): 1763-1772.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202005.031
夏雨琪1, 彭程1,2*, 熊美昱1, 袁鹏1
收稿日期:
2019-10-26
出版日期:
2020-05-15
发布日期:
2020-05-15
通讯作者:
* E-mail: cpeng@dhu.edu.cn
作者简介:
夏雨琪, 女, 1998年生, 本科生。主要从事纳米材料的环境效应研究。E-mail: 171410114@mail.dhu.edu.cn
基金资助:
XIA Yu-qi1, PENG Cheng1,2*, XIONG Mei-yu1, YUAN Peng1
Received:
2019-10-26
Online:
2020-05-15
Published:
2020-05-15
Contact:
* E-mail: cpeng@dhu.edu.cn
Supported by:
摘要: 土壤已逐渐成为金属纳米材料在环境中的主要沉积库,植物作为生态系统中的重要组成部分,在纳米材料的归趋中起着十分重要的作用。研究表明,金属纳米材料会通过改变植物蛋白质的表达影响植物的生长发育。本文阐述了多种典型金属纳米材料胁迫引起的植物蛋白质组差异表达,总结了金属纳米材料胁迫下纳米材料理化性质、植物特征和胁迫条件等因素对植物蛋白质组响应的影响,综述了植物蛋白质组对金属纳米材料胁迫的响应机制,主要涉及能量合成与代谢响应、氨基酸合成与信息传导响应、氧化应激和胁迫防御响应,并对今后的研究方向进行了展望。
夏雨琪, 彭程, 熊美昱, 袁鹏. 植物对金属纳米材料胁迫响应的蛋白质组学研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(5): 1763-1772.
XIA Yu-qi, PENG Cheng, XIONG Mei-yu, YUAN Peng. Advances in proteomic research on plant responses to metal-based nanomaterial stress[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(5): 1763-1772.
[1] Hossain Z, Mustafa G, Komatsu S. Plant responses to nanoparticle stress. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2015, 16: 26644-26653 [2] Kabir E, Kumar V, Kim KH, et al. Environmental impacts of nanomaterials. Journal of Environmental Management, 2018, 225: 261-271 [3] Keller AA, McFerran S, Lazareva A, et al. Global life cycle releases of engineered nanomaterials. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2013, 15: 1692 [4] 杨悦锁, 王晨, 袁雪梅, 等. 天然水环境中纳米银的来源、分析与转化. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(6): 2073-2082 [Yang Y-S, Wang C, Yuan X-M, et al. Silver nanoparticles in natural water environment: Source, analysis and transformation. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28(6): 2073-2082] [5] Calderon-Jimenez B, Johnson ME, Montoro Bustos AR, et al. Silver nanoparticles: Technological advances, societal impacts, and metrological challenges. Frontiers in Chemistry, 2017, 5: 6 [6] Tolaymat T, El Badawy A, Genaidy A, et al. Analysis of metallic and metal oxide nanomaterial environmental emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 143: 401-412 [7] Ghasemi Y, Peymani P, Afifi S. Quantum dot: Magic nanoparticle for imaging, detection and targeting. Acta Bio-medica: Atenei Parmensis, 2009, 80: 156-165 [8] Favero P, Souza-Parise MD, Fernandez J, et al. Surface properties of CdS nanoparticles. Brazilian Journal of Physics, 2006, 36: 1032-1034 [9] Zheng L, Hong F, Lu S, et al. Effect of nano-TiO2 on strength of naturally aged seeds and growth of spinach. Biological Trace Element Research, 2005, 104: 83-91 [10] Khan Z, Upadhyaya H. Impact of nanoparticles on abio-tic stress responses in plants: An overview// Tripathi DK, eds. Nanomaterials in Plants, Algae and Microorganisms. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier, 2019: 305-322 [11] Khot LR, Sankaran S, Maja JM, et al. Applications of nanomaterials in agricultural production and crop protection: A review. Crop Protection, 2012, 35: 64-70 [12] Yu B, Zeng J, Gong L, et al. Investigation of the photocatalytic degradation of organochlorine pesticides on a nano-TiO2 coated film. Talanta, 2007, 72: 1667-1674 [13] Balinova A, Mladenova R, Shtereva D. Solid-phase extraction on sorbents of different retention mechanisms followed by determination by gas chromatography-mass spectrometric and gas chromatography-electron capture detection of pesticide residues in crops. Journal of Chromatography A, 2007, 1150: 136-144 [14] Yao KS, Li SJ, Tzeng KC, et al. Fluorescence silica nanoprobe as a biomarker for rapid detection of plant pathogens. Advanced Materials Research, 2009, 79-82: 513-516 [15] Gottschalk F, Sonderer T, Scholz RW, et al. Modeled environmental concentrations of engineered nanomate-rials (TiO2, ZnO, Ag, CNT, fullerenes) for different regions. Environmental Science & Technology, 2009, 43: 9216-9222 [16] Ma X, Geisler-Lee J, Deng Y, et al. Interactions between engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) and plants: Phytotoxicity, uptake and accumulation. Science of the Total Environment, 2010, 408: 3053-3061 [17] 刘涛, 向垒, 余忠雄, 等. 水稻幼苗对纳米氧化铜的吸收及根系形态生理特征响应. 中国环境科学, 2015, 35(5): 1480-1486 [Liu T, Xiang L, Yu Z-X, et al. Responses of morphological and physiological characteristics in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedling roots to its uptake of CuO nanoparticles. China Environmental Science, 2015, 35(5): 1480-1486] [18] Shaw AK, Hossain Z. Impact of nano-CuO stress on rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings. Chemosphere, 2013, 93: 906-915 [19] 封文强. CuO纳米颗粒对玉米的毒性效应及其在玉米体内的吸收和转运. 硕士论文. 青岛: 中国海洋大学, 2011 [Feng W-Q. Phytotoxicity of Engineered CuO Nanoparticles and Their upwards Translocation in Maize. Master Thesis. Qingdao: Ocean University of China, 2011] [20] Atha DH, Wang H, Petersen EJ, et al. Copper oxide nanoparticle mediated DNA damage in terrestrial plant models. Environmental Science and Technology, 2012, 46: 1819-1827 [21] Buzea C, Pacheco II, Robbie K. Nanomaterials and nanoparticles: Sources and toxicity. Biointerphases, 2007, 2: MR17-MR71 [22] Thwala M, Musee N, Sikhwivhilu L, et al. The oxidative toxicity of Ag and ZnO nanoparticles towards the aquatic plant Spirodela punctuta and the role of testing media parameters. Environmental Science: Processes Impacts, 2013, 15: 1830-1843 [23] 赵桂琦, 周燕, 尹颖, 等. 纳米氧化锌暴露对沉水植物金鱼藻的毒性效应. 南京大学学报: 自然科学版, 2017, 53(5): 894-902 [Zhao G-Q, Zhou Y, Yin Y, et al. The toxic effects of zinc oxide nanoparticles exposure on submersed macrophyte Ceratophyllum demersum. Journal of Nanjing University: Natural Science, 2017, 53(5): 894-902] [24] Scherer MD, Sposito JC, Falco WF, et al. Cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of silver nanoparticles on meristematic cells of Allium cepa roots: A close analysis of particle size dependence. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 660: 459-467 [25] Sadak MS. Impact of silver nanoparticles on plant growth, some biochemical aspects, and yield of fenugreek plant (Trigonella foenum-graecum). Bulletin of the National Research Centre, 2019, 43: 38 [26] 徐江兵, 王艳玲, 罗小三, 等. 纳米Fe3O4对生菜生长及土壤细菌群落结构的影响. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(9): 3003-3010 [Xu J-B, Wang Y-L, Luo X-S, et al. Influence of Fe3O4 nanoparticles on lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) growth and soil bacterial community structure. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28(9): 3003-3010] [27] Twyman R. 王恒樑, 袁静, 刘先凯, 等, 译. 蛋白质组学原理. 北京:化学工业出版社, 2007 [Twyman R. Trans: Wang H-L, Yuan J, Liu X-K, et al. Principles of Proteomics. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2007] [28] Wang DZ, Kong LF, Li YY, et al. Environmental microbial community proteomics: Status, challenges and perspectives. International Journal of Molecular Scien-ces, 2016, 17: 1275 [29] Yan S, Tang Z, Su W, et al. Proteomic analysis of salt stress-responsive proteins in rice root. Proteomics, 2005, 5: 235-244 [30] Stefanic PP, Cvjetko P, Biba R, et al. Physiological, ultrastructural and proteomic responses of tobacco see-dlings exposed to silver nanoparticles and silver nitrate. Chemosphere, 2018, 209: 640-653 [31] Vannini C, Domingo G, Onelli E, et al. Phytotoxic and genotoxic effects of silver nanoparticles exposure on germinating wheat seedlings. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2014, 171: 1142-1148 [32] Mirzajani F, Askari H, Hamzelou S, et al. Proteomics study of silver nanoparticles toxicity on Oryza sativa L. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2014, 108: 335-339 [33] Hossain Z, Mustafa G, Sakata K, et al. Insights into the proteomic response of soybean towards Al2O3, ZnO, and Ag nanoparticles stress. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2016, 304: 291-305 [34] Yasmeen F, Raja NI, Mustafa G, et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis of post-flooding recovery in soybean root exposed to aluminum oxide nanoparticles. Journal of Proteomics, 2016, 143: 136-150 [35] Alharby HF, Metwali EM, Fuller MP, et al. Impact of application of zinc oxide nanoparticles on callus induction, plant regeneration, element content and antioxidant enzyme activity in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Mill.) under salt stress. Archives of Biological Sciences, 2016, 68: 723-735 [36] Venkatachalam P, Jayaraj M, Manikandan R, et al. Zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) alleviate heavy metal-induced toxicity in Leucaena leucocephala seedlings: A physiochemical analysis. Plant Physiology Biochemistry, 2017, 110: 59-69 [37] Majumdar S, Almeida IC, Arigi EA, et al. Environmental effects of nanoceria on seed production of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris): A proteomic analysis. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 49: 13283-13293 [38] Salehi H, Chehregani A, Lucini L, et al. Morphological, proteomic and metabolomic insight into the effect of cerium dioxide nanoparticles to Phaseolus vulgaris L. under soil or foliar application. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 616: 1540-1551 [39] Licausi F, Ohme-Takagi M, Perata P. APETALA 2/Ethylene Responsive Factor (AP 2/ERF) transcription factors: Mediators of stress responses and developmental programs. New Phytologist, 2013, 199: 639-649 [40] Mizoi J, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. AP2/ERF family transcription factors in plant abiotic stress responses. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta-Gene Regula-tory Mechanisms, 2012, 1819: 86-96 [41] Tumburu L, Andersen CP, Rygiewicz PT, et al. Mole-cular and physiological responses to titanium dioxide and cerium oxide nanoparticles in Arabidopsis. Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry, 2017, 36: 71-82 [42] Hebelstrup KH, Shah JK, Igamberdiev AU. The role of nitric oxide and hemoglobin in plant development and morphogenesis. Physiologia Plantarum, 2013, 148: 457-469 [43] Marmiroli M, Imperiale D, Pagano L, et al. The proteomic response of Arabidopsis thaliana to cadmium sulfide quantum dots, and its correlation with the transcriptomic response. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2015, 6: 1104 [44] Majumdar S, Pagano L, Wohlschlegel JA, et al. Proteomic, gene and metabolite characterization reveal the uptake and toxicity mechanisms of cadmium sulfide quantum dots in soybean plants. Environmental Science: Nano, 2019, 6: 3010-3026 [45] Mustafa G, Sakata K, Hossain Z, et al. Proteomic study on the effects of silver nanoparticles on soybean under flooding stress. Journal of Proteomics, 2015, 122: 100-118 [46] Vannini C, Domingo G, Onelli E, et al. Morphological and proteomic responses of Eruca sativa exposed to silver nanoparticles or silver nitrate. PLoS One, 2013, 8(7): e68752 [47] Mustafa G, Sakata K, Komatsu S. Proteomic analysis of flooded soybean root exposed to aluminum oxide nano-particles. Journal of Proteomics, 2015, 128: 280-297 [48] 张海, 彭程, 杨建军, 等. 金属型纳米颗粒对植物的生态毒理效应研究进展. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(3): 885-892 [Zhang H, Peng C, Yang J-J, et al. Eco-toxicological effect of metal-based nanoparticles on plants: Research progress. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2013, 24(3): 885-892] [49] Mustafa G, Komatsu S. Insights into the response of soybean mitochondrial proteins to various sizes of aluminum oxide nanoparticles under flooding stress. Journal of Proteome Research, 2016, 15: 4464-4475 [50] Pradas del Real AE, Vidal V, Carrière M, et al. Silver nanoparticles and wheat roots: A complex interplay. Environmental Science & Technology, 2017, 51: 5774-5782 [51] Rao S, Shekhawat GS. Toxicity of ZnO engineered nanoparticles and evaluation of their effect on growth, meta-bolism and tissue specific accumulation in Brassica juncea. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2014, 2: 105-114 [52] Matysik J, Alia A, Bhalu B, et al. Molecular mechanisms of quenching of reactive oxygen species by proline under stress in plants. Current Science, 2002, 82: 525-532 [53] Villiers F, Ducruix C, Hugouvieux V, et al. Investigating the plant response to cadmium exposure by proteomic and metabolomic approaches. Proteomics, 2011, 11: 1650-1663 [54] Nanjo Y, Skultety L, Ashraf Y, et al. Comparative proteomic analysis of early-stage soybean seedlings responses to flooding by using gel and gel-free techniques. Journal of Proteome Research, 2010, 9: 3989-4002 [55] 彭程. 氧化铜纳米颗粒在土壤-水稻系统中的形态转化机制研究. 博士论文. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2016 [Peng C. Transformation of Copper Oxide Nanoparticles in the System of Paddy Soil and Rice (Oryza sativa L.). PhD Thesis. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2016] [56] Ruotolo R, Maestri E, Pagano L, et al. Plant response to metal-containing engineered nanomaterials: An omics-based perspective. Environmental Science & Technology, 2018, 52: 2451-2467 [57] DalCorso G, Farinati S, Furini A. Regulatory networks of cadmium stress in plants. Plant Signaling & Beha-vior, 2010, 5: 663-667 [58] Gelli A, Higgins VJ, Blumwald E. Activation of plant plasma membrane Ca2+-permeable channels by race-specific fungal elicitors. Plant Physiology, 1997, 113: 269-279 [59] Jones AM, Assmann SM. Plants: The latest model system for G-protein research. EMBO Reports, 2004, 5: 572-578 [60] Kumbhakar DV, Datta AK, Das D, et al. Assessment of oxidative stress, antioxidant enzyme activity and cellular apoptosis in a plant based system (Nigella sativa L.; black cumin) induced by copper and cadmium sulphide nanomaterials. Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring and Management, 2019, 11: 100196 [61] Moghadam NK, Hatami M, Rezaei S, et al. Induction of plant defense machinery against nanomaterials exposure// Ghorbanpour M, eds. Advances in Phytonanotechnology. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier. 2019: 241-263 [62] Tesfaye M, Temple SJ, Allan DL, et al. Overexpression of malate dhydrogenase in transgenic alfalfa enhances organic acid synthesis and confers tolerance to aluminum. Plant Physiology, 2001, 127: 1836-1844 [63] Zhao L, Huang Y, Hu J, et al. 1H NMR and GC-MS based metabolomics reveal defense and detoxification mechanism of cucumber plant under nano-Cu stress. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016, 50: 2000-2010 [64] Shaw AK, Ghosh S, Kalaji HM, et al. Nano-CuO stress induced modulation of antioxidative defense and photosynthetic performance of syrian barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2014, 102: 37-47 [65] Tang Y, He R, Zhao J, et al. Oxidative stress-induced toxicity of CuO nanoparticles and related toxicogenomic responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Environmental Pollution, 2016, 212: 605-614 [66] Majumdar S, Peralta-Videa JR, Bandyopadhyay S, et al. Exposure of cerium oxide nanoparticles to kidney bean shows disturbance in the plant defense mechanisms. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2014, 278: 279-287 [67] Kissen R, Bones AM. Nitrile-specifier proteins involved in glucosinolate hydrolysis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2009, 284: 12057-12070 [68] Falk KL, Tokuhisa JG, Gershenzon J. The effect of sulfur nutrition on plant glucosinolate content: Physiology and molecular mechanisms. Plant Biology, 2007, 9: 573-581 [69] Gondikas AP, Morris A, Reinsch BC, et al. Cysteine-induced modifications of zero-valent silver nanomate-rials: Implications for particle surface chemistry, aggregation, dissolution, and silver speciation. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46: 7037-7045 [70] Peumans WJ, Van Damme E. Lectins as plant defense proteins. Plant Physiology, 1995, 109: 347 |
[1] | 郭葳, 王楠, 张凯悦, 宋沛沛, 马占强. Cu2O纳米颗粒对小麦幼苗快速叶绿素荧光诱导动力学特征及相关基因的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(3): 721-730. |
[2] | 郭琳琳, 王晶晶, 俎敬美, 王品苏, 杨雨洁. 微塑料对碱胁迫下菠菜种子萌发和幼苗生理特征的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2536-2544. |
[3] | 刘希港, 李楠, 季托, 周波, 魏珉, 李静, 杨凤娟. 微生物菌剂和玉米蛋白酵素对番茄叶片生理特性和产量的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(11): 3039-3044. |
[4] | 王胜利, 宋正国, 王成伟, 刘禹, 高敏苓. 聚苯乙烯与邻苯二甲酸二丁酯共存对紫叶生菜的毒性效应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(9): 3335-3340. |
[5] | 马占强, 许雁翀, 凡贞洁, 侯典云, 徐秋月. Cu2O纳米颗粒对小麦根系形态及遗传毒性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(3): 1105-1111. |
[6] | 徐超, 王明田, 杨再强, 韩玮, 郑盛华. 高温对温室草莓光合生理特性的影响及胁迫等级构建 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(1): 231-240. |
[7] | 张晨, 简敏菲, 陈宇蒙, 陈晴晴, 何旭芬, 丛明旸, 阳文静. 聚苯乙烯微塑料对黑藻生长及生理生化特征的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(1): 317-325. |
[8] | 贾邱颖, 吴晓蕾, 冀胜鑫, 褚新培, 刘慧兰, 宫彬彬, 李敬蕊, 高洪波. 盐胁迫下番茄砧木对嫁接苗生物量、氨基酸含量和活性氧代谢的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(9): 3075-3084. |
[9] | 杨雪芳, 孙鹏, 孙大生, 宋喜娥, 董淑琦, 原向阳, 郭平毅. 化感物质衍生物吡喃酮对不同谷子品种的安全性评价 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(7): 2236-2242. |
[10] | 胡伟, 向建华, 向言词, 陈燕. 氮掺杂碳纳米颗粒对稻田根际土壤细菌群落的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(11): 3842-3850. |
[11] | 汪敦飞, 郑新宇, 肖清铁, 王微, 林瑞余. 铜绿假单胞菌对镉胁迫苗期水稻根系活力及叶片生理特性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(8): 2767-2774. |
[12] | 史鲲鹏, 董双林, 周演根, 高勤峰, 孙大江. 不同倍性虹鳟幼鱼对急性温度胁迫的抗氧化响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(9): 3102-3110. |
[13] | 柳旭,陈钊,刘倩,高娅妮,周文楠,崔雪雯,王佺珍. 超声波对3种老化牧草种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(6): 1857-1866. |
[14] | 安锋,李昌珍,张婷婷,王立丰,王纪坤,谢贵水. 铝胁迫对橡胶苗生理和叶绿素荧光特性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(12): 4191-4198. |
[15] | 李艳娟, 刘博, 庄正, 尚天赦, 刘青青, 朱晨曦, 王正宁. 哈茨木霉与绿色木霉对杉木种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(9): 2961-2966. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||