基于电路理论的城市景观生态安全格局构建——以湖南省衡阳市为例

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202107.020

应用生态学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (7): 2555-2564.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202107.020

基于电路理论的城市景观生态安全格局构建——以湖南省衡阳市为例

李涛^1,2, 巩雅博¹, 戈健宅¹, 齐增湘^1,3, 谢水波^4*

¹南华大学建筑学院, 湖南衡阳 421000;
²中国科学院生态环境研究中心城市与区域生态国家重点实验室, 北京 100085;
³湖南省健康城市营造工程技术研究中心, 湖南衡阳 421000;
⁴南华大学土木工程学院, 湖南衡阳 421000

收稿日期:2021-01-06 修回日期:2021-04-16 出版日期:2021-07-15 发布日期:2022-01-15
通讯作者: *xiesbmr@263.net
作者简介:李涛,男,1984年生,博士,副教授,硕士研究生导师。主要从事景观生态规划、绿地系统规划方面研究。E-mail:taoli1@rcees.ac.cn
基金资助:
湖南省教育厅重点科研项目(18A245)、生态型区域-城市规划与管理衡阳市重点实验室项目(2018KJ113)和南华大学科研启动基金项目(2018XQD16)

Construction of urban landscape ecological security pattern based on circuit theory: A case study of Hengyang City, Hunan Province, China

LI Tao^1,2, GONG Ya-bo¹, GE Jian-zhai¹, QI Zeng-xiang^1,3, XIE Shui-bo^4*

¹School of Architecture, University of South China, Hengyang 421000, Hunan, China;
²State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China;
³Hunan Healthy City Construction Engineering Technology Research Center, Hengyang 421000, Hunan, China;
⁴School of Civil Engineering, University of South China, Hengyang 421000, Hunan, China

Received:2021-01-06 Revised:2021-04-16 Online:2021-07-15 Published:2022-01-15
Contact: *xiesbmr@263.net
Supported by:
Key Scientific Research Project of Education Department of Hunan Province (18A245), the Pro-ject of Hengyang Key Laboratory of the Ecological Region Urban Planning and Management (2018KJ113)，and the Research Start Fund of University of South China (2018XQD16).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 生态源地与廊道识别是生态安全格局构建的重要环节,以往研究较多关注物种迁移和扩散最优路径的选择,忽略了物种对路径选择的随机性,致使其结论未能客观地反映物种迁移和扩散过程。以衡阳市主城区为研究对象,利用InVEST模型生境质量分析模块结合Circuitscape 4.0筛选生态源地、生态廊道,继而通过Linkage Mapper评估相关生态要素重要性及连通性,构建生态安全格局并划定生态修复优先区域。结果表明: 研究区生态源地共有85处,以林地和草地为主,少量为坑塘和滩地,主要分布在蒸湘区西南部、雁峰区西部、珠晖区东北部和中南部,总面积为11.8 km²,其中,中心度大于100的生态源地有60处,占比70.6%。生态廊道有217条,潜在生态廊道有5条,主要由林地组成,其中,灌木林和疏林地比例最高,重要性较高的廊道主要分布在研究区西部,清除障碍点后,区域连通性得到明显改善,幅度最高为54.9%。根据累计电流值的提升程度,将生态修复优先区域分为3级:高级区主要涵盖4.3 km²的障碍点区域,主要分布在蒸湘区西南部、珠晖区东北部和中南部;中级区以夹点区域和中心度小于100的生态源地为主,面积为12.9 km²,主要分布在蒸湘区中部、珠晖区东北部和中南部;低级区包括51.8 km²的剩余生态源地,主要分布在珠晖区中南部。本研究通过耦合InVEST模型生境质量分析模块和电路理论构建了面向生物保护的生态安全格局,可为生物保护实践提供科学参考。

关键词: InVEST模型, 电路理论, 生态安全格局, 景观连通性

Abstract: The identification of ecological sources and corridors plays an important role in the construction of ecological security pattern. However, previous studies mainly concentrated on the optimal path selection of species migration and diffusion rather than the random path selection of the species, which makes most conclusions fail to objectively reveal the process of species migration and diffusion. Taking the downtown area of Hengyang City as an example, we selected the ecological sources and ecological corridors with the habitat quality analysis module of InVEST and Circuitscape 4.0 and evaluated the importance and connectivity of relevant ecological elements with the Linkage Mapper, with the aim to construct the ecological security pattern and delimitate the regions prior to ecological restoration. The results showed that there were 85 ecological sources dominated by woodland and grassland, together with a small number of ponds and beaches, which mainly distributed in the southwest of Zhengxiang District, the west of Yanfeng District, the northeast and south central of Zhuhui District, with a total area of 11.8 km². There were 60 ecological sources with centrality greater than 100, accounting for 70.6% of the total. There were 217 ecological corridors and five potential ecological corridors mainly composed of forest land, among which the proportion of shrubbery and sparse forest land was higher. The corridors with higher importance were mainly distributed in the west of the studied area. After removing the barriers, the regional connectivity had been significantly improved, with the highest extent of 54.9%. The priority areas of ecological restoration were classified into three levels according to the value of cumulative current, namely, the high-grade area, the middle-grade area and the low-grade area. The high-grade area covered 4.3 km² of barriers, mainly distributed in the southwest of Zhengxiang District, northeast and south central of Zhuhui District. The middle-grade area was dominated by pinch area and ecological source area with centrality less than 100, covering an area of about 12.9 km², mainly distributed in the central part of Zhengxiang District, northeast and south central of Zhuhui District. The low-level area was mainly distributed in south central of Zhuhui District, with 51.8 km² of residual ecological sources. By coupling InVEST habitat quality analysis module and circuit theory, the ecological security pattern for biological protection was constructed, which provides scientific reference for biological protection.

Key words: InVEST model, circuit theory, ecological security pattern, landscape connectivity

李涛, 巩雅博, 戈健宅, 齐增湘, 谢水波. 基于电路理论的城市景观生态安全格局构建——以湖南省衡阳市为例[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(7): 2555-2564.

LI Tao, GONG Ya-bo, GE Jian-zhai, QI Zeng-xiang, XIE Shui-bo. Construction of urban landscape ecological security pattern based on circuit theory: A case study of Hengyang City, Hunan Province, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(7): 2555-2564.

参考文献

[1] 彭建, 赵会娟, 刘焱序, 等. 区域生态安全格局构建研究进展与展望. 地理研究, 2017, 36(3): 407-419 [Peng J, Zhao H-J, Liu Y-X, et al. Research progress and prospect on regional ecological security pattern construction. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(3): 407-419]
[2] 刘世梁, 侯笑云, 尹艺洁, 等. 景观生态网络研究进展. 生态学报, 2017, 37(12): 3947-3956 [Liu S-L, Hou X-Y, Yin Y-J, et al. Research progress on landscape ecological networks. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(12): 3947-3956]
[3] 李慧, 李丽, 吴巩胜, 等. 基于电路理论的滇金丝猴生境景观连通性分析. 生态学报, 2018, 38(6): 2221-2228 [Li H, Li L, Wu G-S, et al. Analysis of the landscape-level connectivity of the Yunnan snub-nosed monkey habitat based on circuit theory. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(6): 2221-2228]
[4] 宋利利, 秦明周. 整合电路理论的生态廊道及其重要性识别. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(10): 3344-3352 [Song L-L, Qin M-Z. Identification of ecological corridors and its importance by integrating circuit theory. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(10): 3344-3352]
[5] 朱捷, 苏杰, 尹海伟, 等. 基于源地综合识别与多尺度嵌套的徐州生态网络构建. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(8): 1986-2001 [Zhu J, Su J, Yin H-W, et al. Construction of Xuzhou ecological network based on comprehensive sources identification and multi-scale nesting. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(8): 1986-2001]
[6] 刘佳, 尹海伟, 孔繁花, 等. 基于电路理论的南京城市绿色基础设施格局优化. 生态学报, 2018, 38(12): 4363-4372 [Liu J, Yin H-W, Kong F-H, et al. Structure optimization of circuit theory-based green infrastructure in Nanjing, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(12): 4363-4372]
[7] 李久林, 徐建刚, 储金龙. 基于Circuit理论的城市生态安全格局研究——以安庆市为例. 长江流域资源与环境, 2020, 29(8): 1812-1824 [Li J-L, Xu J-G, Chu J-L. Constructing the urban ecological security pattern of Anqing City by circuit theory. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2020, 29(8): 1812-1824]
[8] 史学民, 秦明周, 李斌, 等. 基于MSPA和电路理论的郑汴都市区绿色基础设施网络研究. 河南大学学报: 自然科学版, 2018, 48(6): 631-638 [Shi X-M, Qin M-Z, Li B, et al. Research on the green infrastructure network in the Zhengzhou-Kaifeng Metropolitan Area based on MSPA and circuit theory. Journal of Henan University: Natural Science, 2018, 48(6): 631-638]
[9] 倪庆琳, 丁忠义, 侯湖平, 等. 基于电路理论的生态格局识别与保护研究——以宁武县为例. 干旱区资源与环境, 2019, 33(5): 67-73 [Ni Q-L, Ding Z-Y, Hou H-P, et al. Ecological pattern recognition and protection based on circuit theory. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2019, 33(5): 67-73]
[10] 黄九明. 基于电路理论的济南市生态安全格局构建研究. 硕士论文. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2020 [Huang J-M. Study on the Space Demarcation and Control Measures of Jinan City based on the Niche Fitness Model. Master Thesis. Beijing: China University of Geosciences, Beijing, 2020]
[11] 李晟, 李涛, 彭重华, 等. 基于综合评价法的洞庭湖区绿地生态网络构建. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(8): 2687-2698 [Li S, Li T, Peng Z-H, et al. Construction of green space ecological network in Dongting Lake region with comprehensive evaluation method. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(8): 2687-2698]
[12] 张豆, 渠丽萍, 张桀滈. 基于生态供需视角的生态安全格局构建与优化——以长三角地区为例. 生态学报, 2019, 39(20): 7525-7537 [Zhang D, Qu L-P, Zhang J-H. Ecological security pattern construction method based on the perspective of ecological supply and demand: A case study of Yangtze River Delta. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(20): 7525-7537]
[13] 于亚平, 尹海伟, 孔繁花, 等. 基于MSPA的南京市绿色基础设施网络格局时空变化分析. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(6): 1608-1616 [Yu Y-P, Yin H-W, Kong F-H, et al. Analysis of the temporal and spatial pattern of the green infrastructure network in Nanjing, based on MSPA. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2016, 35(6): 1608-1616]
[14] 邱瑶, 常青, 王静. 基于MSPA的城市绿色基础设施网络规划——以深圳市为例. 中国园林, 2013, 29(5): 104-108 [Qiu Y, Chang Q, Wang J. A MSPA-based planning of urban green infrastructure network: A case of Shenzhen. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2013, 29(5): 104-108]
[15] 曹翊坤, 付梅臣, 谢苗苗, 等. 基于LSMM与MSPA的深圳市绿色景观连通性研究. 生态学报, 2015, 35(2): 526-536 [Cao Y-K, Fu M-C, Xie M-M, et al. Landscape connectivity dynamics of urban green landscape based on morphological spatial pattern analysis (MSPA) and linear spectral mixture model (LSMM) in Shenzhen. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(2): 526-536]
[16] 许峰, 尹海伟, 孔繁花, 等. 基于MSPA与最小路径方法的巴中西部新城生态网络构建. 生态学报, 2015, 35(19): 6425-6434 [Xu F, Yin H-W, Kong F-H, et al. Developing ecological networks based on MSPA and the least-cost path method: A case study in Bazhong Western New District. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(19): 6425-6434]
[17] 李国煜, 林丽群, 伍世代, 等. 生态源地识别与生态安全格局构建研究——以福建省福清市为例. 地域研究与开发, 2018, 37(3): 120-125 [Li G-Y, Lin L-Q, Wu S-D, et al. Recognition of ecological source and ecological security pattern construction: A case study of Fuqing City. Areal Research and Development, 2018, 37(3): 120-125]
[18] 蒙吉军, 王雅, 王晓东, 等. 基于最小累积阻力模型的贵阳市生态安全格局构建. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(7): 1052-1061 [Meng J-J, Wang Y, Wang X-D, et al. Construction of landscape ecological security pattern in Guiyang based on MCR model. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2016, 25(7): 1052-1061]
[19] 王琦, 付梦娣, 魏来, 等. 基于源-汇理论和最小累积阻力模型的城市生态安全格局构建——以安徽省宁国市为例. 环境科学学报, 2016, 36(12): 4546-4554 [Wang Q, Fu M-D, Wei L, et al. Urban ecological security pattern based on source-sink landscape theory and MCR model: A case study of Ningguo City, Anhui Province. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2016, 36(12): 4546-4554]
[20] McRae BH. Isolation by resistance. Evolution, 2006, 60: 1551-1561
[21] McRae BH, Beier P. Circuit theory predicts gene flow in plant and animal populations. Proceedings of the Natio-nal Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007, 104: 19885-19890
[22] McRae BH, Dickson BG, Keitt TH, et al. Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation. Ecology, 2008, 89: 2712-2724
[23] Fisher G, Velthuizen HV, Shah M, et al. Global Agroecological Assessment for Agriculture in the 21st Cen-tury: Methodology and Results. Rome: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Press, 2002
[24] Shah VB, McRae BH. Circuitscape: A tool for landscape ecology. Proceedings of the 7th Python in Science Conference, Cambridge, 2008: 62-65
[25] 庞海燕, 李咏华. 基于InVEST的生境质量分析与影响机制研究——以2000—2015年杭州市为例//中国城市规划学会. 活力城乡·美好人居——2019中国城市规划年会论文集(08城市生态规划). 重庆: 中国城市规划学会, 2019: 141-152 [Pang H-Y, Li Y-H. Study on habitat quality assessment and impact mechanism based on InVEST: Taking Hangzhou from 2000 to 2015 as an example//Urban Planning Society of China, ed. Proceedings of China Urban Planning Annual Meeting 2019 (08 Urban Ecological Planning). Chongqing: Urban Planning Society of China, 2019: 141-152]
[26] Beier P, Spencer W, Baldwin RF, et al. Best science practices for developing regional connectivity maps. Conservation Biology, 2011, 25: 879-892
[27] Shah VB. An Interactive System for Combinatorial Scientific Computing with an Emphasis on Programmer Productivity. PhD Thesis. Santa Barbara, CA, USA: University of California, 2007
[28] Dickson BG, Roemer GW, McRae BH, et al. Models of regional habitat quality and connectivity for pumas (Puma concolor) in the southwestern United States. PLoS One, 2013, 8(12): e81898
[29] 中华人民共和国自然资源部. 衡阳市土地利用总体规划(2006—2020年) [EB/OL]. (2011-07-16) [2020-10-20]. http://g.mnr.gov.cn/201808/t20180804_2159524.html [Ministry of Natural Resources of the People's Republic of China. General Land-use Planning of Hengyang (2006-2020) [EB/OL]. (2011-07-16) [2020-10-20]. http://g.mnr.gov.cn/201808/t20180804_2159524.html]
[30] 衡阳市人民政府. 衡阳统计年鉴(2019年) [EB/OL]. (2020-01-15) [2020-10-20]. https://www.hengyang.gov.cn/sjfb/sjxz/20201207/i2230197.html [People's Government of Hengyang. Statistical Yearbook of 2019 [EB/OL]. (2020-01-15) [2020-10-20]. https://www.hengyang.gov.cn/sjfb/sjxz/20201207/i2230197.html]
[31] 衡阳市人民政府. 衡阳市2019年国民经济和社会发展统计公报 [EB/OL]. (2020-03-18) [2020-10-20]. https://www.hengyang.gov.cn/sjfb/tjgb/20200318/i1848955.html [People's Government of Hengyang. Statistical Bulletin of National Economic and Social Development of Hengyang in 2019 [EB/OL]. (2020-03-18) [2020-10-20]. https://www.hengyang.gov.cn/sjfb/tjgb/20200318/i1848955.html]
[32] Spear SF, Balkenhol N, Marie JF, et al. Use of resis-tance surfaces for landscape genetic studies: Considerations for parameterization and analysis. Molecular Eco-logy, 2010, 19: 3576-3591
[33] Zeller KA, Mcgarigal K, Whiteley AR. Estimating landscape resistance to movement: A review. Landscape Ecology, 2012, 27: 777-797

基于电路理论的城市景观生态安全格局构建——以湖南省衡阳市为例

Construction of urban landscape ecological security pattern based on circuit theory: A case study of Hengyang City, Hunan Province, China

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	路昌, 蔡雪芹, 郝灿书, 刘玉珍, 王之语, 马亚男. 黄河三角洲高效生态经济区生态系统服务权衡协同关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(2): 457-468.
[2]	贾丁一, 郭荣朋, 丘伟国, 巫志龙, 林森, 胡喜生. 不同等级道路对生态网络的影响——以福州市为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(2): 489-500.
[3]	黄俊杰, 冯秀丽, 董毓伊, 张驰, 谢立建, 程俊恺, 高天宇. 基于遥感生态指数和图论知识的宁波市生态安全格局构建 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2489-2497.
[4]	马扩, 郝丽娜, 童新, 段利民, 曹文梅, 康雪儿, 刘小勇, 刘廷玺. 科尔沁沙丘-草甸相间地区生态安全格局的时空演变 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(8): 2215-2225.
[5]	徐彩瑶, 任燕, 孔凡斌. 浙江省土地利用变化对生态系统固碳服务的影响及其预测 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1610-1620.
[6]	张达, 曾坚, 艾合麦提·那麦提. 高强度开发地区鸟类自然保护地保护空缺识别——以天津市为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1621-1629.
[7]	金银丽, 周冬梅, 周凡, 杨静, 朱小燕, 马静, 张军. 疏勒河流域生态安全网络构建及优化 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(4): 1063-1072.
[8]	王想, 王春雨, 吕飞南, 陈水灵, 宇振荣. 基于PLUS-InVEST模型的区县碳储量时空格局变化与碳汇提升策略——以延庆区为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(12): 3373-3384.
[9]	郝嘉元, 智烈慧, 李晓文, 董世魁, 李巍. 青藏高原土地利用格局和生态系统服务的时空演变特征及关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(11): 3053-3063.
[10]	马彩虹, 刘园园, 杨航, 李聪慧, 杨中华. 宁夏灵武市“生态-经济”双网格局演变及互作关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(11): 3095-3104.
[11]	吴可欣, 税伟, 薛成旨, 黄云慧, 江聪. 珠江源区生境质量对土地利用变化的时空响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(1): 169-177.
[12]	潘卫涛, 岳邦瑞, 姚龙杰, 薛建锋, 李军峰. 耦合风险与服务的市域生态安全格局构建——以陕西省咸阳市为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(1): 178-186.
[13]	冯碧鸥, 岳文泽, 夏皓轩. 生态安全格局视角下的生态保护红线评估——以浙江省为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(9): 2466-2474.
[14]	赵宇豪, 罗宇航, 易腾云, 王振宇, 王娜, 吴健生. 基于生态系统服务供需匹配的深圳市生态安全格局构建 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(9): 2475-2484.
[15]	雷金睿, 陈毅青, 陈宗铸, 陈小花, 吴庭天, 李苑菱. 基于InVEST模型的海南岛三大流域生境质量时空演变 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(9): 2511-2520.