基于生态系统服务供需匹配的深圳市生态安全格局构建

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202209.026

应用生态学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (9): 2475-2484.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202209.026

基于生态系统服务供需匹配的深圳市生态安全格局构建

赵宇豪^1,2, 罗宇航^1,2, 易腾云¹, 王振宇¹, 王娜^1,3, 吴健生^1,2*

¹北京大学深圳研究生院城市规划与设计学院, 城市人居环境科学与技术重点实验室, 广东深圳 518055;
²北京大学城市与环境学院地表过程与模拟教育部重点实验室, 北京 100871;
³深圳市规划国土房产信息中心, 广东深圳 518040

收稿日期:2021-11-08 接受日期:2022-06-21 出版日期:2022-09-15 发布日期:2023-03-15
通讯作者: * E-mail: wujs@pkusz.edu.cn
作者简介:赵宇豪, 男, 1991年生, 博士研究生。主要从事生态系统服务和生态可持续性研究。E-mail: zhaoyh2017@pku.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重点项目(42130505)资助。

Constructing an ecological security pattern in Shenzhen, China, by matching the supply and demand of ecosystem services

ZHAO Yu-hao^1,2, LUO Yu-hang^1,2, YI Teng-yun¹, WANG Zhen-yu¹, WANG Na^1,3, WU Jian-sheng^1,2*

¹Key Laboratory for Urban Habitat Environmental Science and Technology, School of Urban Planning and Design, Peking University, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong, China;
²Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China;
³Shenzhen Municipal Planning and Land Real Estate Information Center, Shenzhen 518040, Guangdong, China

Received:2021-11-08 Accepted:2022-06-21 Online:2022-09-15 Published:2023-03-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 构建基于生态系统服务供需匹配的生态安全格局对于深圳市实现中国特色社会主义先行示范区中的可持续发展先锋和民生幸福标杆的战略定位具有重要意义。选取水源供给、碳固持和游憩服务,通过InVEST模型、生态供需比、手机信令数据分析以及电路理论等方法,识别深圳市生态系统服务综合供需状态,构建耦合生态系统服务供需的生态安全格局,并探讨了不同划定界限对生态源地面积和个数的影响。结果表明: 深圳市综合生态供需比大体呈现东部充裕、西部不足的分布状态,其中,水源供给服务在数量和空间分布上均基本满足需求,碳固持服务则相反,而游憩服务虽然数量上可以满足需求,但空间分布极度不均;识别出总面积为347.62 km²的25块生态源地以及总长度为346.06 km的34条生态廊道,其中,生态源地面积呈现东多西少的分布状态,廊道长度呈现相反的分布趋势;不同的划定界限对生态源地面积和个数的影响不同,一级、二级和三级生态源地面积分别为347.62、520.84和557.58 km²,呈逐步增加趋势,源地个数分别为25、35和32个,呈现出先增后减的变化趋势;深圳市存在未纳入生态管控的重要生态斑块且生态控制线内部分斑块生态可持续性较差,可据此制定针对性的保护和管理政策。研究结果可以为深圳市生态管控单元的划定提供空间指引。

关键词: 生态可持续性, 生态系统服务, 生态供需比, 电路理论, 手机信令数据

Abstract: Constructing an ecological security pattern by matching the supply and demand of ecosystem services is of great significance for Shenzhen, China. To determine the strategic positioning of sustainable development pioneers and benchmarks for human well-being in a pilot demonstration area of socialism with Chinese characteristics, we selected water yield, carbon sequestration, and recreational services to identifiy the integrated supply and demand status of ecosystem services in Shenzhen using the InVEST model, ecological supply-demand ratio, cell phone signalling data analysis, and circuit theory. An ecological security pattern based on the matching of supply and demand of ecosystem services was constructed. We further examined the impacts of different delimitation boundaries on the area and number of ecological sources. The results showed that the comprehensive ecological supply-demand ratio in Shenzhen generally showed a distribution pattern of abundant in the east and scarce in the west. Among them, water yield services met the demand in terms of quantity and spatial distribution, but carbon sequestration services can not. Recreational services met the demand in terms of quantity, but their spatial distribution was extremely uneven. We identified 25 ecological sources covering a total area of 347.62 km² and 34 ecological corridors with a total length of 346.06 km. The ecological source area was large in the east and small in the west, while the length of the corridors showed the opposite distribution pattern. Different delineation boundaries had different effects on the area and number of ecological sources. Primary, secondary, and tertiary ecological source areas cover 347.62, 520.84, and 557.58 km², respectively, showing a gradual increasing trend, the numbers of ecological sources were 25, 35, and 32, showing an increasing then decreasing trend. In Shenzhen, there were important ecological patches that were not included in the ecological control line, and some patches within the ecological control line had poor ecological sustainability. Targeted protection and management policies could be formulated based on such pattern. The results could provide spatial guidance for the delimitation of ecological management and control units in Shenzhen.

Key words: ecological sustainability, ecosystem service, ecological supply-demand ratio, circuit theory, mobile phone signaling data

赵宇豪, 罗宇航, 易腾云, 王振宇, 王娜, 吴健生. 基于生态系统服务供需匹配的深圳市生态安全格局构建[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(9): 2475-2484.

ZHAO Yu-hao, LUO Yu-hang, YI Teng-yun, WANG Zhen-yu, WANG Na, WU Jian-sheng. Constructing an ecological security pattern in Shenzhen, China, by matching the supply and demand of ecosystem services[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(9): 2475-2484.

参考文献

[1] Su Y, Chen X, Liao J, et al. Modeling the optimal ecological security pattern for guiding the urban constructed land expansions. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2016, 19: 35-46
[2] Wang Y, Pan J. Building ecological security patterns based on ecosystem services value reconstruction in an arid inland basin: A case study in Ganzhou District, NW China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 241: 118337
[3] Dong J, Peng J, Xu Z, et al. Integrating regional and interregional approaches to identify ecological security patterns. Landscape Ecology, 2021, 36: 2151-2164
[4] 彭建, 赵会娟, 刘焱序, 等. 区域生态安全格局构建研究进展与展望. 地理研究, 2017, 36(3) : 407-419
[5] Wang C, Yu C, Chen T, et al. Can the establishment of ecological security patterns improve ecological protection? An example of Nanchang, China. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 740: 140051
[6] Zhang L, Peng J, Liu Y, et al. Coupling ecosystem services supply and human ecological demand to identify landscape ecological security pattern: A case study in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China. Urban Ecosystems, 2017, 20: 701-714
[7] Peng J, Yang Y, Liu Y, et al. Linking ecosystem ser-vices and circuit theory to identify ecological security patterns. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 644: 781-790
[8] 胡其玉, 陈松林. 基于生态系统服务供需的厦漳泉地区生态网络空间优化. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(2): 342-355
[9] 吴平, 林浩曦, 田璐. 基于生态系统服务供需的雄安新区生态安全格局构建. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2018, 14(9): 5-11
[10] 荣月静, 严岩, 王辰星, 等. 基于生态系统服务供需的雄安新区生态网络构建与优化. 生态学报, 2020, 40(20): 7197-7206
[11] 张豆, 渠丽萍, 张桀滈. 基于生态供需视角的生态安全格局构建与优化——以长三角地区为例. 生态学报, 2019, 39(20): 7525-7537
[12] Jiang H, Peng J, Dong J. et al. Linking ecological background and demand to identify ecological security patterns across the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area in China. Landscape Ecology, 2021, 36: 2135-2150
[13] Peng J, Wang X, Liu Y, et al. Urbanization impact on the supply-demand budget of ecosystem services: Decoupling analysis. Ecosystem Services, 2020, 44: 101139
[14] Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S, et al. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecological Indicators, 2012, 21: 17-29
[15] Schröter M, Barton DN, Remme RP, et al. Accounting for capacity and flow of ecosystem services: A conceptual model and a case study for Telemark, Norway. Ecological Indicators, 2014, 36: 539-551
[16] 王效科, 苏跃波, 任玉芬, 等. 城市生态系统:人与自然复合. 生态学报, 2020, 40(15): 5093-5102
[17] Castillo-Eguskitza N, Martín-López B, Onaindia M. A comprehensive assessment of ecosystem services: Integrating supply, demand and interest in the Urdaibai Biosphere Reserve. Ecological Indicators, 2018, 93: 1176-1189
[18] Cortinovis C, Geneletti D. A performance-based planning approach integrating supply and demand of urban ecosystem services. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2020, 201: 103842
[19] Haines-Young R, Potschin MB. Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) V5. 1 and Guidance on the Application of the Revised Structure [EB/OL]. (2018-12-12), [2021-10-10]. https://cices.eu/content/uploads/sites/8/2018/01/Guidance-V51-01012018.pdf.
[20] Zhao Y, Wang N, Luo Y, et al. Quantification of ecosystem services supply-demand and the impact of demographic change on cultural services in Shenzhen, China. Journal of Environmental Management, 2022, 304: 114280
[21] Luo Y, Wu J, Wang X, et al. Using stepping-stone theory to evaluate the maintenance of landscape connectivity under China’s ecological control line policy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 296: 126356
[22] Li F, Li F, Li S, et al. Deciphering the recreational use of urban parks: Experiments using multi-source big data for all Chinese cities. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 701: 134896
[23] 深圳市水务局. 2019年深圳市水资源公报 [EB/OL]. (2020-09-03) [2020-09-03]. http://swj.sz.gov.cn/attachment/0/702/702382/8057749.pdf
[24] 深圳市统计局, 国家统计局深圳调查队. 深圳统计年鉴 2020. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2020
[25] Li X, Sun W, Zhang D, et al. Evaluating water provision service at the sub-watershed scale by combining supply, demand, and spatial flow. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 127: 107745
[26] Jiang B, Bai Y, Chen J, et al. Land management to reconcile ecosystem services supply and demand mismatches: A case study in Shanghai municipality, China. Land Degradation and Development, 2020, 31: 2684-2699
[27] Chen J, Jiang B, Bai Y, et al. Quantifying ecosystem services supply and demand shortfalls and mismatches for management optimisation. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 650: 1426-1439
[28] Zhang Z, Peng J, Xu Z, et al. Ecosystem services supply and demand response to urbanization: A case study of the Pearl River Delta, China. Ecosystem Services, 2021, 49: 101274
[29] Li J, Jiang H, Bai Y, et al. Indicators for spatial-temporal comparisons of ecosystem service status between regions: A case study of the Taihu River Basin, China. Ecological Indicators, 2016, 60: 1008-1016
[30] Pan Z, He J, Liu D, et al. Ecosystem health assessment based on ecological integrity and ecosystem services demand in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 774: 144837
[31] Peng J, Zhao S, Dong J, et al. Applying ant colony algorithm to identify ecological security patterns in megacities. Environmental Modelling and Software, 2019, 117: 214-222
[32] 吴茂全, 胡蒙蒙, 汪涛, 等.基于生态安全格局与多尺度景观连通性的城市生态源地识别. 生态学报, 2019, 39(13): 4720-4731
[33] 彭建, 李慧蕾, 刘焱序, 等. 雄安新区生态安全格局识别与优化策略. 地理学报, 2018, 73(4): 701-710
[34] Gao J, Du F, Zuo L, et al. Integrating ecosystem ser-vices and rocky desertification into identification of karst ecological security pattern. Landscape Ecology, 2021, 36: 2113-2133
[35] Huang J, Hu Y, Zheng F. Research on recognition and protection of ecological security patterns based on circuit theory: A case study of Jinan City. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020, 27: 12414-12427
[36] 李涛, 巩雅博, 戈健宅, 等. 基于电路理论的城市景观生态安全格局构建——以湖南省衡阳市为例. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(7): 2555-2564
[37] Fan F, Liu Y, Chen J, et al. Scenario-based ecological security patterns to indicate landscape sustainability: A case study on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Landscape Ecology, 2021, 36: 2175-2188
[38] Peng J, Pan Y, Liu Y, et al. Linking ecological degradation risk to identify ecological security patterns in a rapidly urbanizing landscape. Habitat International, 2018, 71: 110-124
[39] Luo Y, Wu J. Linking the minimum spanning tree and edge betweenness to understand arterial corridors in an ecological network. Landscape Ecology, 2021, 36: 1549-1565
[40] Liu Z, Huang Q, Tang G. Identification of urban flight corridors for migratory birds in the coastal regions of Shenzhen city based on three-dimensional landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 2021, 36: 2043-2057
[41] 吴健生, 张理卿, 彭建, 等. 深圳市景观生态安全格局源地综合识别. 生态学报, 2013, 33(13): 4125-4133
[42] Zhang Y, Jiang Z, Li Y, et al. Construction and optimization of an urban ecological security pattern based on habitat quality assessment and the minimum cumulative resistance model in Shenzhen City, China. Forests, 2021, 12: 847
[43] 深圳市人民政府. 深圳市基本生态控制线管理规定 [EB/OL]. (2005-10-17) [2005-10-17]. http://www.sz.gov.cn/zwgk/zfxxgk/zfwj/szfl/content/post_6572284.html
[44] Zhao W, Liu Y, Daryanto S, et al. Metacoupling supply and demand for soil conservation service. Current Opi-nion in Environmental Sustainability, 2018, 33: 136-141
[45] Boyd J, Banzhaf S. What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecological Economics, 2007, 63: 616-626
[46] Finisdore J, Rhodes C, Haines-Young R, et al. The 18 benefits of using ecosystem services classification systems. Ecosystem Services, 2020, 45: 101160
[47] 陈利顶, 孙然好, 孙涛, 等. 城市群生态安全格局构建:概念辨析与理论思考. 生态学报, 2021, 41(11): 4251-4258
[48] Luo Y, Wu J, Wang X, et al. Can policy maintain habitat connectivity under landscape fragmentation? A case study of Shenzhen, China. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 715: 136829

基于生态系统服务供需匹配的深圳市生态安全格局构建

Constructing an ecological security pattern in Shenzhen, China, by matching the supply and demand of ecosystem services

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	梁华秋, 沈梦晗, 邵明, 姚朋. 基于生态系统服务供需的临沂市固碳生态网络构建 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(3): 759-768.
[2]	梁仕豪, 李文, 高宇, 刘保住. 吉林省生态系统服务价值与景观生态风险关联性及其空间分异 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(3): 769-779.
[3]	路昌, 蔡雪芹, 郝灿书, 刘玉珍, 王之语, 马亚男. 黄河三角洲高效生态经济区生态系统服务权衡协同关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(2): 457-468.
[4]	贾丁一, 郭荣朋, 丘伟国, 巫志龙, 林森, 胡喜生. 不同等级道路对生态网络的影响——以福州市为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(2): 489-500.
[5]	黄俊杰, 冯秀丽, 董毓伊, 张驰, 谢立建, 程俊恺, 高天宇. 基于遥感生态指数和图论知识的宁波市生态安全格局构建 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2489-2497.
[6]	于海霞, 王禹骁. 东江流域生态系统服务价值的时空演变及空间分异机制 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2498-2506.
[7]	祁育汀, 张平, 刘雷, 马雪楠, 王欢, 赵娟. 关中平原城市群土地利用结构多情景优化和生态系统服务价值预测 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2507-2517.
[8]	熊昕莹, 孟梅. 基于生态系统服务供需关系及空间流动的新疆生态管理分区与优化策略 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(8): 2237-2248.
[9]	巴晓博, 隋鑫, 刘鸣达, 解宏图, 梁超, 鲍雪莲. 东北黑土区覆盖作物-玉米间作保护性耕作的生态系统服务价值 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1883-1891.
[10]	陈红莲, 李瑞, 张玉珊, 吴清林, 袁江, 高家勇. 赤水河流域不同地貌区生态系统健康对比 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1912-1922.
[11]	张自正, 张蕾, 孙桂英, 刘俊祥. 清江流域生态系统服务权衡时空效应及驱动因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(4): 1051-1062.
[12]	孟欣宇, 吴远翔. 城市生态系统服务供需簇与生态功能管控——以齐齐哈尔市中心城区为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(12): 3393-3403.
[13]	郝嘉元, 智烈慧, 李晓文, 董世魁, 李巍. 青藏高原土地利用格局和生态系统服务的时空演变特征及关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(11): 3053-3063.
[14]	邓钰栎, 王丹, 许涵. 双尺度下广东韶关市生态系统服务及其权衡/协同关系及社会生态驱动因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(11): 3073-3084.
[15]	马彩虹, 刘园园, 杨航, 李聪慧, 杨中华. 宁夏灵武市“生态-经济”双网格局演变及互作关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(11): 3095-3104.