白云岩坡地土壤流失空间分布特征及关键影响因子

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202302.023

应用生态学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (2): 377-386.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202302.023

白云岩坡地土壤流失空间分布特征及关键影响因子

蒙清梅^1,2,3, 付智勇^2,3, 邓羽松^1,2,3*, 陈洪松^2,3

¹广西大学林学院, 南宁 530004;
²中国科学院亚热带农业生态研究所亚热带农业生态过程重点实验室, 长沙 410125;
³中国科学院环江喀斯特生态系统观测研究站, 广西环江 547100

收稿日期:2022-04-16 接受日期:2022-11-23 出版日期:2023-02-15 发布日期:2023-08-15
通讯作者: *E-mail: denny2018@gxu.edu.cn
作者简介:蒙清梅, 女, 1998年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事山坡水文和土壤侵蚀研究。E-mail: 1641673381@qq.com
基金资助:
广西自然科学基金项目(2020GXNSFAA297242)和国家自然科学基金项目(42077077, U21A20189, 41671287)

Spatial variations and the key driving factors of soil losses on dolomite slopes

MENG Qingmei^1,2,3, FU Zhiyong^2,3, DENG Yusong^1,2,3*, CHEN Hongsong^2,3

¹College of Forestry, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China;
²Key Laboratory of Agro-ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410125, China;
³Guangxi Key laboratory of Karst Ecological Processes and Services, Huanjiang Observation and Research Station of Karst Ecosystem, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Huanjiang 547100, Guangxi, China

Received:2022-04-16 Accepted:2022-11-23 Online:2023-02-15 Published:2023-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究选择典型白云岩坡地,在上、中、下坡各设置3个土壤流失监测微区(投影长2 m、宽1.2 m),连续观测2个水文年(2020—2021年),分析土壤流失量的动态变化及其关键影响因子。结果表明: 白云岩坡地不同坡位的土壤流失量依次为下坡半淋溶土(386 g·m^-2·a^-1)>中坡始成土(77 g·m^-2·a^-1)>上坡新成土(48 g·m^-2·a^-1)。沿坡向下,土壤流失量与土壤表层含水量、降雨量的正相关关系逐渐增加,而与最大30 min雨强的正相关性逐渐降低;影响上、中、下坡土壤流失的气象因子分别为最大30 min雨强、降雨量、平均雨强和表层土壤含水量。上坡土壤侵蚀过程主要由雨滴击溅及超渗产流驱动,而下坡主要由蓄满产流驱动。土壤剖面细土体积占比是控制白云岩坡地土壤流失的关键因子,其解释率达到93.7%。下坡是白云岩坡地土壤流失的关键部位,石漠化治理应基于不同坡位的侵蚀发生机理,因地制宜布设防控措施。

关键词: 地形序列, 土链, 石灰土, 白云岩, 土壤剖面, 产流机制, 水蚀过程

Abstract: We selected a typical dolomite slope and set up three micro-plots (projection length was 2 m, width was 1.2 m) on the upper, middle, and lower slopes to analyze the variations of soil losses and the key influencing factors during two hydrological years (2020-2021). The results showed that soil losses at different slope positions on dolomite slopes followed an order of semi-alfisol in lower slopes (386 g·m^-2·a^-1) > inceptisol in middle slopes (77 g·m^-2·a^-1) > entisol in upper slopes (48 g·m^-2·a^-1). Downward along the slope, the positive correlation gradually increased between soil losses and surface soil water content, as well as rainfall, while it gradually decreased with the maximum 30 min rainfall intensity. The meteorological factors affecting soil erosion on the upper, middle and lower slopes were the maximum 30 min rainfall intensity, precipitation, average rainfall intensity and surface soil water content, respectively. Soil erosion processes on upper slopes were mainly driven by raindrop splash erosion and infiltration-excess runoff, while that on lower slopes were mainly driven by saturation-excess runoff. The volume ratio of fine soil in the soil profile was the key factor of soil losses on dolomite slopes, with an explanation rate of 93.7%. The lower slope was the key site of soil erosion in the dolomite slopes. Subsequent rock desertification management should be based on the erosion mechanism of different slope positions, while control measures should be arranged according to local conditions.

Key words: toposequence, catena, calcareous soil, dolomite, soil profile, runoff generation mechanism, water erosion process

蒙清梅, 付智勇, 邓羽松, 陈洪松. 白云岩坡地土壤流失空间分布特征及关键影响因子[J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(2): 377-386.

MENG Qingmei, FU Zhiyong, DENG Yusong, CHEN Hongsong. Spatial variations and the key driving factors of soil losses on dolomite slopes[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(2): 377-386.

参考文献

[1] 中华人民共和国中央人民政府. 2018年新闻办就第三次石漠化监测成果有关情况举行发布会[EB/OL]. (2018-12-13) [2022-03-30]. https://www.gov.cn/
[2] 马丽芳. 中国地质图集. 北京: 地质出版社, 2002
[3] 蒋忠诚, 李先琨, 胡宝清. 广西岩溶山区石漠化及其综合治理研究. 北京: 科学出版社, 2011
[4] Bucher K, Grapes R. Metamorphism of Dolomites and Limestones. Berlin: Springer, 2011: 225-255
[5] 孙承兴, 王世杰, 周德全, 等. 碳酸盐岩差异性风化成土特征及其对石漠化形成的影响. 矿物学报, 2002, 22(4): 308-314
[6] Jiang ZC, Lian YQ, Qin XQ. Rocky desertification in Southwest China: Impacts, causes, and restoration. Earth-Science Reviews, 2014, 132: 1-12
[7] 王世杰, 李阳兵. 喀斯特石漠化研究存在的问题与发展趋势. 地球科学进展, 2007, 22(6): 573-582
[8] 吴协保. 继续推进岩溶地区石漠化综合治理二期工程的现实意义. 中国岩溶, 2016, 35(5): 469-475
[9] 陈龙跃, 张雨, 汪权方, 等. 鄂渝喀斯特山区土壤侵蚀特征及主影响因子识别分析. 湖北大学学报:自然科学版, 2020, 42(2): 172-178
[10] 谢波, 杨广斌, 杨情琴, 等. 黔中喀斯特地区岩性与土壤侵蚀空间分异研究 [EB/OL]. (2022-01-01) [2022-10-10]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/43.1542.N.20210415.1553.002.html
[11] 闫伟. 亚热带白云岩喀斯特区不同土地利用下成土速率与土壤侵蚀特征模拟研究. 硕士论文. 贵阳: 贵州师范大学, 2021
[12] Dai QH, Peng XD, Yang Z, et al. Runoff and erosion processes on bare slopes in the Karst Rocky Desertification Area. Catena, 2017, 152: 218-226
[13] 刘华清. 喀斯特区基岩起伏和岩溶管道形态对水土流失过程的影响. 硕士论文. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2020
[14] Blume HP, Brümmer G, Fleige H, et al. Soil Development and Soil Classification. Berlin: Springer, 2016: 285-389
[15] Peng J, Wu XL, Ni SM, et al. Investigating intra-aggregate microstructure characteristics and influencing factors of six soil types along a climatic gradient. Catena, 2022, 210: 105867
[16] Lin H. Linking principles of soil formation and flow regimes. Journal of Hydrology, 2010, 393: 3-19
[17] Li XY, Lin H, Gerke HH. Frontiers in hydropedology: Interdisciplinary research from soil architecture to the critical zone. Vadose Zone Journal, 2018, 17: 180045
[18] Ritchie JC, Nearing MA, Nichols MH, et al. Patterns of soil erosion and redeposition on lucky hills watershed, walnut gulch experimental watershed, Arizona. Catena, 2005, 61: 122-130
[19] Zhang J, Wang S, Fu ZY, et al. Soil thickness controls the rainfall-runoff relationship at the karst hillslope critical zone in southwest China. Journal of Hydrology, 2022, 609: 127779
[20] 刘金涛, 冯德锃, 陈喜, 等. 应用Péclet数解析山坡结构特征的水文效应. 水科学进展, 2012, 23(1): 1-6
[21] Fu ZY, Li ZX, Cai CF, et al. Linking soil thickness and plot-scale hydrological processes on the sloping lands in the Three Gorges Area of China: A hydropedo-logical approach. Hydrological Processes, 2012, 26: 2248-2263
[22] Baldwin D, Naithani KJ, Lin H. Combined soil-terrain stratification for characterizing catchment-scale soil moisture variation. Geoderma, 2017, 285: 260-269
[23] Meng QM, Wang S, Fu ZY, et al. Soil types determine vegetation communities along a toposequence in a dolomite peak-cluster depression catchment. Plant and Soil, 2022, 475: 5-22
[24] 张君, 付智勇, 陈洪松, 等. 西南喀斯特白云岩坡地土壤-表层岩溶带结构及水文特征. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(6): 2107-2118
[25] 张兴, 王克林, 付智勇, 等. 桂西北白云岩坡地典型土体构型石灰土水文特征. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(7): 2186-2196
[26] Feng T, Chen HS, Polyakow VO, et al. Soil erosion rates in two karst peak-cluster depression basins of northwest Guangxi, China: Comparison of the RUSLE model with ¹³⁷Cs measurements. Geomorphology, 2016, 253: 217-224
[27] Morgan RPC. Soil Erosion and Conservation. 3rd Ed. Massachusetts: Blackwell Pub, 2005
[28] 付智勇, 陈洪松, 王克林, 等. 一种适宜高异质性喀斯特坡地的微型土壤水文监测系统. 中国, CN201310424726.3. 2013-12-18
[29] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析. 第3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000
[30] Baillie IC. Soil survey staff 1999, Soil taxonomy. Soil Use and Management, 2001, 17: 57-60
[31] Ditzler CA. Soil Properties and Classification (Soil Taxo-nomy), the Soils of the USA. New York: Springer, 2017: 29-41
[32] Li XY, Contreras S, Solé-Benet A, et al. Controls of infiltration-runoff processes in Mediterranean karst rangelands in SE Spain. Catena, 2011, 86: 98-109
[33] Wang S, Fu ZY, Chen HS, et al. Mechanisms of surface and subsurface runoff generation in subtropical soil-epikarst systems: Implications of rainfall simulation experiments on karst slope. Journal of Hydrology, 2020, 580: 124370
[34] Dunne T. Field studies of hillslope flow processes// Kirkby MJ, ed. Hillslope Hydrology. London: Wiley, 1978: 227-293
[35] Zheng FL, Huang CH, Norton LD. Vertical hydraulic gradient and run-on water and sediment effects on erosion processes and sediment regimes. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2000, 64: 4-11
[36] 杨伟. 典型红壤团聚体力稳性及其与坡面侵蚀的关系. 博士论文. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2013
[37] 杨玲, 贺秀斌, 鲍玉海, 等. 水库消落带不同海拔狗牙根草地土壤可蚀性研究. 水土保持研究, 2021, 28(5): 1-6
[38] Wang S, Yan Y, Fu ZY, et al. Rainfall-runoff characteristics and their threshold behaviors on a karst hillslope in a peak-cluster depression region. Journal of Hydro-logy, 2022, 605: 127370
[39] Peng T, Wang SJ. Effects of land use, land cover and rainfall regimes on the surface runoff and soil loss on karst slopes in southwest China. Catena, 2012, 90: 53-62
[40] Weiler M, Mcdonnell JJ, Tromp-Van Meerveld I, et al. Subsurface stormflow// Anderson MG, ed. Encyclopedia of Hydrological Sciences. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2005: 1719-1732
[41] Cerdà A. Effects of rock fragment on soil infiltration, inter-rill runoff and erosion. European Journal of Soil Science, 2001, 52: 1-10
[42] Wang XY, Li ZX, Cai CF, et al. Effects of rock fragment cover on hydrological response and soil loss from Regosols in a semi-humid environment in South-West China. Geomorphology, 2012, 151-152: 234-242
[43] Dadkhah M, Gifford GF. Influence of vegetation, rock cover, and trampling on infiltration rates and sediment production. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2010, 16: 979-986
[44] Fu ZY, Li ZX, Cai CF, et al. Soil thickness effect on hydrological and erosion characteristics under sloping lands: A hydropedological perspective. Geoderma, 2011, 167-168: 41-53

白云岩坡地土壤流失空间分布特征及关键影响因子

Spatial variations and the key driving factors of soil losses on dolomite slopes

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张羽涵, 李瑶, 周玥, 陈圆佳, 安韶山. 宁南山区不同恢复年限柠条林土壤养分及有机碳组分变化特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(3): 639-647.
[2]	张羽涵, 李瑶, 周玥, 刘春晖, 安韶山. 宁南山区不同恢复年限柠条林地土壤微生物残体碳沿剖面分布特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(1): 161-168.
[3]	任倩茹, 毛晓雅, 齐晓君, 刘晋仙, 贾彤, 吴铁航, 柴宝峰. 芦芽山华北落叶松林不同深度土壤原生动物群落分布格局及驱动机制 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(5): 1395-1403.
[4]	丁爽, 魏圣钊, 陈真亮, 邵婧, 段逢瑞, 严禹, 段兴武. 中国西南典型森林土壤微生物在不同土壤深度下的变化特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(3): 614-622.
[5]	罗舒玉, 邓羽松, 陈洪松, 王金悦, 廖达兰. 干湿交替条件下喀斯特峰丛洼地土壤裂隙发育规律 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(2): 387-395.
[6]	陈淼, 刘顺, 许格希, 史作民. 土壤剖面碳氮稳定同位素自然丰度的垂直分布模式及其影响机制 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(6): 1919-1927.
[7]	董琴, 李启权, 王昌全, 李冰, 徐强, 李萌, 黎国阳, 张露心. 成都平原不同土地利用方式对土壤剖面钾素分布的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(4): 1389-1396.
[8]	张兴, 王克林, 付智勇, 陈洪松, 张伟, 史志华. 桂西北白云岩坡地典型土体构型石灰土水文特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(7): 2186-2196.
[9]	贾金田, 付智勇, 陈洪松, 王克林, 周卫军. 喀斯特坡地基岩起伏对土壤剖面水分格局的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(6): 1708-1714.
[10]	郝翔翔1,2,韩晓增1**,李禄军1,邹文秀1,陆欣春1,乔云发1. 土地利用方式对黑土剖面有机碳分布及碳储量的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(4): 965-972.
[11]	严格,葛振鸣,张利权**. 崇明东滩湿地不同盐沼植物群落土壤碳储量分布 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(1): 85-91.
[12]	李林海1,2,邱莉萍3**,梦梦4. 黄土高原沟壑区土壤酶活性对植被恢复的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2012, 23(12): 3355-3360.
[13]	沈菊培,张丽梅,贺纪正. 几种农田土壤中古菌、泉古菌和细菌的数量分布特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(11): 2996-3002.
[14]	刘平丽,张啸林,熊正琴,黄太庆,丁敏,王金阳. 不同水旱轮作体系稻田土壤剖面N₂O的分布特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(09): 2363-2369.
[15]	耿增超,姜林,李珊珊,佘雕,侯磊. 祁连山中段土壤有机碳和氮素的剖面分布 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(03): 665-672.