西南喀斯特区域不同植被恢复阶段土壤磷主要来源及其季节变化

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202312.016

应用生态学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (12): 3313-3321.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202312.016

西南喀斯特区域不同植被恢复阶段土壤磷主要来源及其季节变化

刘家齐^1,2, 梁燕^1,2, 肖凡³, 韩依晴¹, 胡传星¹, 韦柳红¹, 段敏^1,2*

¹广西师范大学珍稀濒危动植物生态与环境保护教育部重点实验室, 广西桂林 541006;
²广西漓江流域景观资源保育与可持续利用重点实验室, 广西桂林 541006;
³广西师范大学图书馆, 广西桂林 541006

收稿日期:2023-08-31 修回日期:2023-10-30 出版日期:2023-12-15 发布日期:2024-06-15
通讯作者: *E-mail: duanmin0517@163.com
作者简介:刘家齐, 男, 1998年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事喀斯特森林土壤磷循环研究。E-mail: 2383737420@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(42067023)、广西漓江流域景观资源保育与可持续利用重点实验室主任基金(LRCSU21Z0208)、广西研究生教育创新计划项目(YCSW2023129)和自治区级大学生创新创业训练计划项目(S202210602030)

Main sources of soil phosphorus and their seasonal changes across different vegetation restoration stages in karst region of southwest China

LIU Jiaqi^1,2, LIANG Yan^1,2, XIAO Fan³, HAN Yiqing¹, HU Chuanxing¹, WEI Liuhong¹, DUAN Min^1,2*

¹Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Ecology of Rare and Endangered Species and Environmental Protection, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541006, Guangxi, China;
²Guangxi Key Laboratory of Landscape Resources Conservation and Sustainable Utilization in Lijiang River Basin, Guilin 541006, Guangxi, China;
³Library of Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541006, Guangxi, China

Received:2023-08-31 Revised:2023-10-30 Online:2023-12-15 Published:2024-06-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 探究西南喀斯特区域不同植被恢复阶段土壤磷主要来源及其季节变化特征,有助于深入认识喀斯特区域植被恢复过程中土壤磷循环过程,为该区域石漠化治理提供科学参考。本研究以广西桂林典型喀斯特区域处于不同植被恢复阶段的生态系统为对象,设置植被恢复10年(R10)、30年(R30)和50年(R50)3个处理,开展为期1年的野外试验。在试验期间根据降水情况采集雨水,每个季节采集土壤、新鲜凋落物和植物根系样品,测定雨水全磷(TP)、土壤TP和速效磷(AP)含量以及新鲜凋落物和植物根系TP含量,结合现存凋落物磷储量和微生物生物量磷(MBP),分析不同磷来源对土壤磷输入的差异。结果表明: 土壤TP含量随植被恢复时间先增加后降低,随季节变化表现为秋季>夏季>春季>冬季;土壤AP含量在所有处理中均较低,并且夏、冬季含量高于春、秋季;土壤MBP随植被恢复时间呈增加趋势,随季节变化表现为春季>秋季>夏季>冬季。雨水全年磷输入量为0.78 kg·hm^-2,春季高于其他3个季节之和。R10、R30和R50处理新鲜凋落物全年磷输入量分别为2.42、10.64和5.03 kg·hm^-2,现存凋落物磷储量分别为1.23、5.32和3.45 kg·hm^-2,植物根系全年磷输入量分别为5.18、12.65、5.96 kg·hm^-2,均表现为R30处理最高。相关性分析表明,土壤TP含量与植物根系磷输入量呈显著正相关,而土壤AP含量与雨水磷输入量呈显著负相关。综上,西南喀斯特区域不同植被恢复阶段不同来源磷输入对土壤磷库的贡献存在差异,植物根系是土壤磷的主要来源,其次为凋落物,通过磷湿沉降进入到土壤中的磷素非常有限,土壤微生物对土壤磷库也有一定贡献。

关键词: 喀斯特区域, 植被恢复, 土壤磷来源, 雨水-凋落物-根系-土壤, 微生物生物量磷

Abstract: Investigating the main sources of soil phosphorus and their seasonal variations across different vegetation restoration stages in karst region of southwest China can deepen our understanding of soil phosphorus cycling during vegetation restoration, and provide scientific reference for the controlling of rocky desertification. Taking the typical karst ecosystems at different vegetation restoration stages in Guilin, Guangxi as the research objects, we conducted a one-year field experiment with three treatments: vegetation restoration for about 10 years (R10), 30 years (R30) and 50 years (R50). We collected rainfall based on precipitation frequency, as well as soil, fresh litter and root samples in each season to measure the concentrations of total phosphorus (TP) in rainfall, the contents of TP and available phosphorus (AP) in soil, and the contents of TP in fresh litter and roots. In combination with litter phosphorus storage and soil microbial biomass phosphorus (MBP), we analyzed the contributions of phosphorus input to soil from different phosphorus sources. The results showed that soil TP content increased initially and then decreased with vegetation restoration, with a seasonal pattern of autumn > summer > spring > winter. Soil AP content was low in all treatments, with higher levels in summer and winter than in spring and autumn. Soil MBP content increased with vegetation restoration, with a seasonal variation pattern of spring >autumn > summer > winter. The annual phosphorus input from rainfall was 0.78 kg·hm^-2 with the highest value in spring. The annual phosphorus input from fresh litter in the R10, R30, and R50 treatments was 2.42, 10.64 and 5.03 kg·hm^-2. Phosphorus storage in litter was 1.23, 5.32 and 3.45 kg·hm^-2. The annual phosphorus input from plant roots was 5.18, 12.65, and 5.96 kg·hm^-2, respectively. The highest levels of the above parameters always occurred in the R30 treatment. There was a significant positive correlation between soil TP content and plant root phosphorus input, and a significant negative correlation between soil AP content and rainfall phosphorus input. In summary, the contribution of phosphorus input from different sources to soil phosphorus pool varied across different vegetation restoration stages in the karst region of southwest China. Roots are the main source of soil phosphorus, followed by litters. Phosphorus entering the soil through wet deposition is very limited. Soil microorganisms also contribute to soil phosphorus reserve.

Key words: karst region, vegetation restoration, soil phosphorus source, rainfall-litter-root-soil, microbial biomass phosphorus

刘家齐, 梁燕, 肖凡, 韩依晴, 胡传星, 韦柳红, 段敏. 西南喀斯特区域不同植被恢复阶段土壤磷主要来源及其季节变化[J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(12): 3313-3321.

LIU Jiaqi, LIANG Yan, XIAO Fan, HAN Yiqing, HU Chuanxing, WEI Liuhong, DUAN Min. Main sources of soil phosphorus and their seasonal changes across different vegetation restoration stages in karst region of southwest China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(12): 3313-3321.

参考文献

[1] Rui YC, Wang YF, Chen CR, et al. Warming and gra-zing increase mineralization of organic P in an alpine meadow ecosystem of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China. Plant and Soil, 2012, 357: 73-87
[2] 陈美领, 陈浩, 毛庆功, 等. 氮沉降对森林土壤磷循环的影响. 生态学报, 2016, 36(16): 4965-4976
[3] Lang F, Bauhus J, Frossard E, et al. Phosphorus in forest ecosystems: New insights from an ecosystem nutrition perspective. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 2016, 179: 129-135
[4] 赵琼, 曾德慧. 陆地生态系统磷素循环及其影响因素. 植物生态学报, 2005, 29(1): 153-163
[5] 张磊, 贾淑娴, 李啸灵, 等. 亚热带米槠天然林凋落物和根系输入变化对土壤磷组分的影响. 生态学报, 2022, 42(2): 656-666
[6] Bünemann EK, Prusisz B, Ehlers K. Characterization of phosphorus forms in soil microorganisms// Bünemann EK, Oberson A, Frossard E, eds. Phosphorus in Action: Biological Processes in Soil Phosphorus Cycling. Heidelberg: Springer, 2011: 37-57
[7] 陈立新, 乔璐, 段文标, 等. 温带森林磷沉降-水系统输出-迁移动态特征及对土壤磷影响. 土壤学报, 2012, 49(3): 454-464
[8] Markaki Z, Loÿe-Pilot MD, Violaki K, et al. Variability of atmospheric deposition of dissolved nitrogen and phosphorus in the Mediterranean and possible link to the anomalous seawater N/P ratio. Marine Chemistry, 2010, 120: 187-194
[9] Chen H, Gurmesa GA, Liu L, et al. Effects of litter manipulation on litter decomposition in a successional gradients of tropical forests in southern China. PLoS One, 2014, 9: e99018
[10] Ao GKL, Feng JG, Han MG, et al. Responses of root and soil phosphatase activity to nutrient addition differ between primary and secondary tropical montane forests. Rhizosphere, 2022, 24: 100610
[11] 杜雨潭, 陈金磊, 李雷达, 等. 亚热带不同植被恢复林地凋落物层碳、氮、磷化学计量特征. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2020, 40(2): 108-119
[12] Sokol NW, Bradford MA. Microbial formation of stable soil carbon is more efficient from belowground than aboveground input. Nature Geoscience, 2019, 12: 46-53
[13] Beidler KV, Oh YE, Pritchard SG, et al. Mycorrhizal roots slow the decay of belowground litters in a temperate hardwood forest. Oecologia, 2021, 197: 743-755
[14] Long CY, Zhang Q, Chen Q, et al. Divergent controls on leaf and root litter decay linking to soil C, N, and P pools under a subtropical land-use change. Ecosystems, 2023, 26: 1209-1223
[15] Lin DG, Yu H, Lian F, et al. Quantifying the hazardous impacts of human-induced land degradation on terrestrial ecosystems: A case study of karst areas of south China. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2016, 75: 1127
[16] Yuan DX. On the Karst Ecosystem. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2001, 75: 336-338
[17] Tong X, Brandt M, Yue Y, et al. Increased vegetation growth and carbon stock in China karst via ecological engineering. Nature Sustainability, 2018, 1: 44-50
[18] Zhang X, Yue Y, Tong X, et al. Eco-engineering controls vegetation trends in southwest China karst. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 770: 145160
[19] Taboada MA, Barbosa OA, Rodríguez MB, et al. Mechanisms of aggregation in a silty loam under different simulated management regimes. Geoderma, 2004, 123: 233-244
[20] 刘淑娟, 张伟, 王克林, 等. 桂西北喀斯特峰丛洼地表层土壤养分时空分异特征. 生态学报, 2011, 31(11): 3036-3043
[21] 何铁光, 俞月凤, 蒙炎成, 等. 桂西北喀斯特区不同退化程度石灰土有机碳与养分剖面分布特征. 水土保持研究, 2019, 26(4): 13-18
[22] 刘洢杋, 杨峻晖, 刘家齐, 等. 喀斯特和非喀斯特森林植物磷含量及土壤无机磷分级特征比较. 南方农业学报, 2023, 54(1): 110-118
[23] Wu YJ, Tian X, ZhA case study of initial vegetation restoration affecting the occurrence characteristics of phosphorus in karst geomorphology in southwest China. Sustainability, 2022, 14: 12277
[24] 广西统计局. 广西统计年鉴-第八章资源与环境. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2022
[25] Pan FJ, Liang YM, Wang KL, et al. Responses of fine root functional traits to soil nutrient limitations in a karst ecosystem of southwest China. Forests, 2018, 9: 743
[26] Suhaili NS, Mhd Hatta S, James D, et al. Soils carbon stocks and litterfall fluxes from the Bornean tropical montane forests, Sabah, Malaysia. Forests, 2021, 12: 1621
[27] Cheng SD, Ke GG, Li ZB, et al. Soil available phosphorus investigated for spatial distribution and effect indicators resulting from ecological construction on the Loess Plateau, China. Sustainability, 2021, 13: 12572
[28] Huang WJ, Spohn M. Effects of long-term litter manipulation on soil carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in a temperate deciduous forest. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2015, 83: 12-18
[29] 邹佳何, 王海燕, 李成铭, 等. 长白山北坡不同林分类型细根-土壤CNP化学计量特征. 生态学杂志, 2023, http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/21.1148.Q.20230525.1641.004.html
[30] Chi GY, Zeng FP, Wang Y, et al. Phosphorus dynamics in litter-soil systems during litter decomposition in larch plantations across the chronosequence. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2022, 13: 1010458
[31] 左继超, 郑海金, 奚同行, 等. 自然降雨条件下红壤坡地磷素随径流垂向分层输出特征. 环境科学, 2017, 38(10): 4178-4186
[32] 杜有新, 潘根兴, 李恋卿, 等. 贵州中部喀斯特山地不同植被生态系统细根生态特征及养分储量. 应用生态学报, 2010, 21(8): 1926-1932
[33] Valdespino P, Romualdo R, Cadenazzi L, et al. Phosphorus cycling in primary and secondary seasonally dry tropical forests in Mexico. Annals of Forest Science, 2009, 66: 107
[34] An SS, Cheng Y, Huang YM, et al. Effects of revegetation on soil microbial biomass, enzyme activities, and nutrient cycling on the Loess Plateau in China. Restoration Ecology, 2012, 21: 600-607
[35] Ai L, Wu FZ, Fan XB, et al. Different effects of litter and root inputs on soil enzyme activities in terrestrial ecosystems. Applied Soil Ecology, 2023, 183: 104764
[36] Gao Y, He NP, Yu GR, et al. Long-term effects of different land use types on C, N, and P stoichiometry and storage in subtropical ecosystems: A case study in China. Ecological Engineering, 2014, 67: 171-181
[37] 王瑞丽, 程瑞梅, 肖文发, 等. 三峡库区马尾松人工林细根生产和周转. 应用生态学报, 2012, 23(9): 2346-2352
[38] 魏鹏, 李贤伟, 范川, 等. 华西雨屏区香樟人工林土壤表层细根生物量和碳储量. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(10): 2755-2762
[39] Chave J, Navarrete D, Almeida S, et al. Regional and seasonal patterns of litterfall in tropical South America. Biogeosciences, 2010, 7: 43-55
[40] Parsons SA, Valdez-Ramirez V, Congdon RA, et al. Contrasting patterns of litterfall seasonality and seasonal changes in litter decomposability in a tropical rainforest region. Biogeosciences, 2014, 11: 5047-5056

西南喀斯特区域不同植被恢复阶段土壤磷主要来源及其季节变化

Main sources of soil phosphorus and their seasonal changes across different vegetation restoration stages in karst region of southwest China

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张羽涵, 李瑶, 周玥, 陈圆佳, 安韶山. 宁南山区不同恢复年限柠条林土壤养分及有机碳组分变化特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(3): 639-647.
[2]	张秀颖, 蔡江平, 王聪, 江志阳, 李慧, 王正文, 姜勇, 张玉革. 不同培肥模式对辽西北沙化草地土壤改良与植被恢复的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(1): 55-61.
[3]	张羽涵, 李瑶, 周玥, 刘春晖, 安韶山. 宁南山区不同恢复年限柠条林地土壤微生物残体碳沿剖面分布特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(1): 161-168.
[4]	王茜, 赵筱青, 普军伟, 岳启发, 陈星宇, 石小倩. 滇东南喀斯特区域生态脆弱性的时空演变及其影响因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(6): 2180-2190.
[5]	王昌辉, 刘青青, 文竹梅, 王子睿, 陈艳芳, 刘博, 王正宁. 红壤侵蚀区植被恢复过程中土壤种子库变化特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(2): 417-423.
[6]	李渝, 刘彦伶, 白怡婧, 张雅蓉, 黄兴成, 张文安, 蒋太明. 黄壤稻田土壤微生物生物量碳磷对长期不同施肥的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(4): 1327-1334.
[7]	王博, 段玉玺, 王伟峰, 刘宗奇, 李晓晶, 刘源, 李少博, 郗雯. 库布齐沙漠东部不同生物结皮发育阶段土壤温室气体通量 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(3): 857-866.
[8]	李秋嘉,薛志婧,周正朝. 宁南山区植被恢复对土壤团聚体养分特征及微生物特性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(1): 137-145.
[9]	曾晓敏, 范跃新, 林开淼, 袁萍, 赵盼盼, 陈怡然, 徐建国, 陈岳民. 亚热带不同植被类型土壤磷组分特征及其影响因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(7): 2156-2162.
[10]	甄晨光, 冷平生, 刘丽娟, 窦德泉, 胡增辉. 城市污泥应用于边坡植被恢复对地表水环境的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(4): 1321-1327.
[11]	刘旭军,程小琴,田慧霞,贾小东,韩海荣. 不同间伐强度下华北落叶松人工林土壤磷组分特征及其影响因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(12): 3941-3948.
[12]	刘政, 叶晶萍, 欧阳磊, 盛菲, 刘士余. 彭冲涧小流域植被恢复的水文效应及其对年降水量响应的临界值 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(11): 3705-3711.
[13]	刘洋, 曾全超, 安韶山, 李鑫, 黄懿梅. 黄土丘陵区草本植物叶片与枯落物生态化学计量学特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(6): 1793-1800.
[14]	吴道铭, 陈晓阳, 曾曙才. 芒属植物重金属耐性及其在矿山废弃地植被恢复中的应用潜力 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(4): 1397-1406.
[15]	方瑛, 安韶山, 马任甜. 云雾山不同恢复方式下草地植物与土壤的化学计量学特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(1): 80-88.