食碎屑动物通过摄食更多高质量的凋落物促进混合分解效应

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202402.002

应用生态学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 501-506.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202402.002

食碎屑动物通过摄食更多高质量的凋落物促进混合分解效应

蔡肖凌, 杨光蓉, 冯莹, 沈蓉, 赵亮, 林敦梅^*

重庆大学三峡库区生态环境教育部重点实验室, 重庆 400044

收稿日期:2023-08-20 修回日期:2023-12-05 出版日期:2024-02-18 发布日期:2024-08-18
通讯作者: ^*E-mail: lindunmei@cqu.edu.cn
作者简介:蔡肖凌, 女, 1999年生, 硕士研究生. 主要从事森林凋落叶分解研究。E-mail: 790168406@qq.com
基金资助:
重庆大学中央高校基本科研业务费项目(2018CDXYCH0014)

Detritivores accelerate litter mixture decomposition effect via greater consumption of high quality litter

CAI Xiaoling, YANG Guangrong, FENG Ying, SHEN Rong, ZHAO Liang, LIN Dunmei^*

Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of the Three Gorges Reservoir Region's Eco-Environment, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China

Received:2023-08-20 Revised:2023-12-05 Online:2024-02-18 Published:2024-08-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究凋落物混合对凋落物分解速率的影响以及食碎屑动物在凋落物混合分解中的作用,利用室内微宇宙试验,研究了食碎屑动物(等足类)对化学质量差异较大的两种凋落物(香樟和白兰)混合分解的影响。结果表明: 经过100 d的分解,凋落物混合分解的平均分解率为52.1%,小于白兰凋落物的平均分解率(62.6%),显著大于香樟凋落物的平均分解率(33.6%)。添加等足类动物显著提高了凋落物的分解速率,香樟凋落物、白兰凋落物及两者混合的分解率分别提高14.4%、20.1%、22.1%。没有等足类动物参与凋落物混合分解时,混合分解效应不显著,等足类动物的参与显著促进了凋落物的混合分解效应,混合效应值为8.6%。食碎屑动物不仅提高了凋落物分解速率,还通过摄食更多化学质量更高的凋落物促进凋落物的混合分解效应。

关键词: 凋落物分解, 混合分解, 养分循环, 食碎屑动物

Abstract: To explore the mixing effect of litter decomposition and the role of detritivores, we conducted a laboratory-based microcosm experiment to study the influence of detritivores on litter mixture decomposition by using two litter species with contrasting quality, i.e., Cinnamomum camphora and Michelia × alba, and a detritivore (isopoda). After 100 days incubation, the decomposition rate of litter mixture was 52.1%, slower than that of M. alba (62.6%) and significantly faster than that of C. camphora (33.6%). The addition of isopods significantly increased litter decomposition rate, with C. camphora, M. alba, and the mixture increased by 14.4%, 20.1% and 22.1%, respectively. There was no significant mixing effect without isopods. Adding isopods significantly promoted the mixing effect of litter decomposition, with a value of the litter mixture decomposition effect of 8.6%. The detritivores increased litter decomposition rate and mixing effect through increasing consumption of litter with better quality.

Key words: litter decomposition, mixture decomposition, nutrient cycling, detritivore

蔡肖凌, 杨光蓉, 冯莹, 沈蓉, 赵亮, 林敦梅. 食碎屑动物通过摄食更多高质量的凋落物促进混合分解效应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(2): 501-506.

CAI Xiaoling, YANG Guangrong, FENG Ying, SHEN Rong, ZHAO Liang, LIN Dunmei. Detritivores accelerate litter mixture decomposition effect via greater consumption of high quality litter[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2024, 35(2): 501-506.

参考文献

[1] Cebrian J. Patterns in the fate of production in plant communities. American Naturalist, 1999, 154: 449-468
[2] Gessner MO, Swan CM, Dang CK, et al. Diversity meets decomposition. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 2010, 25: 372-380
[3] Hättenschwiler S, Tiunov AV, Scheu S. Biodiversity and litter decomposition interrestrial ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 2005, 36: 191-218
[4] Swift MJ, Heal OW, Anderson JM. Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems. Los Angeles, CA, USA: University of California Press, 1979
[5] Bradford MA, Berg B, Maynard BS, et al. Understan-ding the dominant controls on litter decomposition. Journal of Ecology, 2015, 104: 229-238
[6] Adair EC, Parton WJ, Del Grosso SJ, et al. Simple three-pool model accurately describes patterns of long-term litter decomposition in diverse climates. Global Change Biology, 2008, 14: 2636-2660
[7] Cardinale BJ, Matulich KL, Hooper DU, et al. The functional role of producer diversity in ecosystems. American Journal of Botany, 2011, 98: 572-592
[8] Hooper DU, Adair EC, Cardinale BJ, et al. A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change. Nature, 2012, 486: 105-129
[9] 徐炜, 马志远, 井新, 等. 生物多样性与生态系统多功能性: 进展与展望. 生物多样性, 2016, 24(1): 55-71
[10] van der Plas F. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in naturally assembled communities. Biological Review, 2019, 94: 1220-1245
[11] Handa IT, Aerts R, Berendse F, et al. Consequences of biodiversity loss for litter decomposition across biomes. Nature, 2014, 509: 218-221
[12] Kou L, Jiang L, Hattenschwiler S, et al. Diversity-decomposition relationships in forests worldwide. Elife, 2020, 9: e55813
[13] Gartner TB, Cardon ZG. Decomposition dynamics in mixed-species leaf litter. Oikos, 2004, 104: 230-246
[14] Porre RJ, van der Werf W, De Deyn GB, et al. Is litter decomposition enhanced in species mixtures? A meta-analysis. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2020, 145, DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107791
[15] Zhou SX, Butenschoen O, Barantal S, et al. Decomposition of leaf litter mixtures across biomes: The role of litter identity, diversity and soil fauna. Journal of Eco-logy, 2020, 108: 2283-2297
[16] Schimel JP, Hattenschwiler S. Nitrogen transfer between decomposing leaves of different N status. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2007, 39: 1428-1436
[17] 王淳, 董雪婷, 杜瑞鹏, 等. 华北落叶松与阔叶树种混合凋落叶分解过程中养分释放和酶变化. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(5): 1709-1716
[18] 杨贵森, 张志山, 赵洋, 等. 沙坡头地区凋落物分解及其对土壤微生物群落的影响. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1810-1818
[19] Hättenschwiler S, Gasser P. Soil animals alter plant litter diversity effects on decomposition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005, 102: 1519-1524
[20] Srivastava DS, Cardinale BJ, Downing AL, et al. Diversity has stronger top-down than bottom-up effects on decomposition. Ecology, 2009, 90: 1073-1083
[21] Liu J, Liu X, Song Q, et al. Synergistic effects: A common theme in mixed-species litter decomposition. New Phytologist, 2020, 227: 757-765
[22] Njoroge DM, Chen SC, Zuo J, et al. Soil fauna accele-rate litter mixture decomposition globally, especially in dry environments. Journal of Ecology, 2022, 110: 659-672
[23] Meyer WM, Ostertag R, Cowie RH. Macro-invertebrates accelerate litter decomposition and nutrient release in a Hawaiian rainforest. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2011, 43: 206-211
[24] Griffiths HM, Ashton LA, Parr CL, et al. The impact of invertebrate decomposers on plants and soil. New Phyto-logist, 2021, 231: 2142-2149
[25] Frouz J. Effects of soil macro- and mesofauna on litter decomposition and soil organic matter stabilization. Geoderma, 2018, 332: 161-172
[26] Lin DM, Dou PP, Yang GR, et al. Home-field advantage of litter decomposition differ between leaves and fine roots. New Phytologist, 2020, 227: 995-1000
[27] Graca MAS, Brlocher F, Gessner MO. Methods to Study Litter Decomposition: A Practical Guide. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Springer, 2005
[28] Zimmer M. Nutrition in terrestrial isopods (Isopoda: Oniscidea): An evolutionary-ecological approach. Biological Reviews, 2002, 77: 455-493
[29] Lin DM, Wang F, Fanin N, et al. Soil fauna promote litter decomposition but do not alter the relationship between leaf economics spectrum and litter decomposa-bility. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2019, 136, DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.107519
[30] 张雪萍, 黄初龙, 李景科. 赤子爱胜蚓对森林凋落物的分解效率. 生态学报, 2005, 25(9): 2427-2433
[31] Smedt PD, Wasof S, Weghe TV, et al. Macro-detritivore identity and biomass along with moisture availability control forest leaf litter breakdown in a field experiment. Applied Soil Ecology, 2018, 131: 47-54
[32] Vos VCA, van Ruijven J, Berg MP, et al. Macro-detritivore identity drives leaf litter diversity effects. Oikos, 2011, 120: 1092-1098
[33] 陈洪. 香樟凋落叶分解的化感作用研究. 博士论文. 四川雅安: 四川农业大学, 2016
[34] Schimel JP, Hattenschwiler S. Nitrogen transfer between decomposing leaves of different N status. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2007, 39: 1428-1436
[35] Jochum M, Barnes AD, Ott D, et al. Decreasing stoichiometric resource quality drives compensatory feeding across trophic levels in tropical litter invertebrate communities. American Naturalist, 2017, 190: 131-143
[36] 李欣阳, 张娟娟, 周建云, 等. 宁南山区人工混交林叶片-凋落物-细根生态化学计量特征. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(11): 2889-2897

食碎屑动物通过摄食更多高质量的凋落物促进混合分解效应

Detritivores accelerate litter mixture decomposition effect via greater consumption of high quality litter

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	艾灵, 吴福忠, 樊雪波, 杨静, 吴秋霞, 朱晶晶, 倪祥银. 米槠和杉木人工林土壤酶活性和酶化学计量特征对凋落物输入的短期响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(3): 631-638.
[2]	王毅焕, 靳一丹, 姜铭楷, 马书琴, 陈有超, 蔡延江. 短期氮沉降改变毛竹林凋落物和土壤有机质化学组成 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10): 2593-2600.
[3]	杨铮, 李宏庆, 翟家宁, 张丽华, 南琼. 农业废弃物养分循环利用技术模式评估模型的研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(12): 3213-3219.
[4]	杨丹荔, 罗辑, 贾龙玉, 石文博. 青藏高原东缘海螺沟冰川退缩区植被原生演替的氮磷动态 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(5): 1699-1708.
[5]	梁志伟, 红梅, 德海山, 叶贺, 张宇晨, 闫瑾, 李静. 氮沉降与降雨变化下中小型土壤动物对凋落物分解的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(12): 4279-4288.
[6]	张彩云, 赵红梅, 刘辉, 张文太, 苏延桂, 程军回, 杨卫君. 外源氮添加对温带荒漠地表凋落物分解及养分释放的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(11): 3631-3638.
[7]	蓝丽英, 杨万勤, 吴福忠, 刘育伟, 杨帆, 郭彩虹, 谌亚, 谭波. 川西亚高山森林土壤动物对杨树和箭竹凋落物分解过程中微生物群落的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(9): 2983-2991.
[8]	程春香, 郭鲲, 毛子军, 孙鹏飞, 马宏达, 王程. 土壤湿度对东北3种主要树种凋落物分解的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(7): 2251-2258.
[9]	王凯, 沈潮, 孙冰, 王潇楠, 魏东, 吕林有. 干旱胁迫对科尔沁沙地榆树幼苗C、N、P化学计量特征的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(7): 2286-2294.
[10]	武启骞, 王传宽. 季节性雪被变化对森林凋落物分解及土壤氮动态的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(7): 2422-2432.
[11]	高海燕, 红梅, 霍利霞, 叶贺, 赵巴音那木拉, 德海山. 外源氮输入和水分变化对荒漠草原凋落物分解的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(10): 3167-3174.
[12]	黎锦涛, 孙学凯, 胡亚林, 赵珊宇, 曾德慧. 干湿交替对科尔沁沙地人工林叶凋落物分解和养分释放的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(6): 1743-1752.
[13]	陈玥希, 陈蓓, 孙辉, 马丽红, 沈丹杰, 刘堰杨. 川西高海拔增温和加氮对红杉凋落物有机组分释放的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(6): 1753-1760.
[14]	马芬, 裴广廷, 马红亮, 高人, 尹云锋, 杨柳明. 凋落物中水溶性有机物和残渣对亚热带森林土壤氮素转化的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(9): 2761-2770.
[15]	杨志敏, 哈斯塔米尔, 刘新民. 放牧对内蒙古典型草原大针茅凋落物中土壤动物组成及其分解功能的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(9): 2864-2874.