水氮互作对冬小麦农田NH3和N2O排放及产量的影响

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202405.012

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究不同灌溉施氮模式对冬小麦农田氮素气态损失的影响,以冬小麦为研究对象,在山东省长清灌溉试验站开展田间试验。试验设置了2种测墒补灌水平:80%～90%田间持水量(θ_f)(I₁)、70%～80%θ_f(I₂);3个施氮量:常规施氮240 kg·hm^-2(N₁)、减氮12.5%(N₂)和减氮25%(N₃),共6个处理。结果表明:施肥或灌溉后2～4 d内均会出现氨挥发速率和氧化亚氮排放峰,追肥期的氨挥发速率明显高于基肥期。I₂N₂处理在追肥期的氨挥发平均速率较其他处理降低10.1%～51.6%,在全生育期内氧化亚氮平均排放速率较其他处理降低了15.4%～52.2%。氨挥发速率与表层土壤pH值、铵态氮含量呈显著正相关,氧化亚氮排放速率与表层土壤硝态氮含量呈显著正相关。土壤氨挥发累积量为0.83～1.42 kg·hm^-2,氧化亚氮排放累积量为0.11～0.33 kg·hm^-2,适量减少灌水量和施氮量可以有效减少氨挥发和氧化亚氮累积排放量,其中,I₁N₃、I₂N₂处理氨挥发和氧化亚氮累积排放量显著低于其他处理。I₂N₂处理冬小麦产量最高,为5615.6 kg·hm^-2。I₂处理灌溉水利用效率均显著高于I₁处理,最大增幅达到45.2%,与N₁、N₃处理相比,N₂处理的氮肥偏生产力、氮肥农学利用效率最大增幅分别达到15.2%、31.8%。综上,以70%～80%θ_f测墒补灌且施氮量为210 kg·hm^-2可以有效提高冬小麦水氮利用效率并降低农田氮素气态损失。

关键词: 冬小麦, 水氮互作, 氨挥发, 氧化亚氮排放, 产量

Abstract: To investigate the effects of different irrigation and nitrogen application modes on nitrogen gaseous loss in winter wheat farmland, we conducted a field experiment at Changqing Irrigation Experiment Station in Shandong Province, with two irrigation levels (80%-90% θ_f(I₁) and 70%-80% θ_f(I₂)) and three nitrogen application levels (conventional nitrogen application of 240 kg·hm^-2(N₁), nitrogen reduction of 12.5% (N₂), and nitrogen reduction of 25% (N₃)). The results showed that ammonia volatilization and nitrous oxide emission rate peak appeared within 2-4 days after fertilization or irrigation. The ammonia volatilization rate during the chasing fertilizer period was significantly higher than that during the basal fertilizer period. Compared with other treatments, the ave-rage ammonia volatilization rate of I₂N₂ treatment during the chasing fertilizer period was reduced by 10.1%-51.6%, and the average nitrous oxide emission rate over the whole growth period was reduced by 15.4%-52.2%. The ammonia volatilization rate was significantly positively associated with surface soil pH value and ammonium nitrogen content, while the nitrous oxide emission rate was significantly positively associated with nitrate content in topsoil. The accumulation amount of soil ammonia volatilization and nitrous oxide emission ranged from 0.83-1.42 and 0.11-0.33 kg·hm^-2, respectively. Moderate reduction of irrigation water and nitrogen input could effectively reduce cumulative amounts of ammonia volatilization and nitrous oxide emission from winter wheat farmland. The cumulative amounts of ammonia volatilization and nitrous oxide emission under I₁N₃ and I₂N₂ treatments were signi-ficantly lower than those under other treatments. The highest winter wheat yield (5615.6 kg·hm^-2) appeared in I₂N₂ treatment. The irrigation water utilization efficiency of I₂ was significantly higher than that of I₁, with the maximum increase rate of 45.2%. Compared with N₁ and N₃ treatments, the maximum increase rate of nitrogen fertilizer productivity and agricultural utilization efficiency in N₂ reached 15.2% and 31.8%, respectively. In conclusion, the treatment with 70%-80% θ_f irrigation level and 210 kg·hm^-2 nitrogen input could effectively improve the utilization efficiency of irrigation water and nitrogen fertilization and reduce gaseous loss from winter wheat farmland.

Key words: winter wheat, water-nitrogen interaction, ammonia volatilization, nitrous oxide emission, yield

张玉娇, 庞桂斌, 余静, 张海峰, 张立志, 王昕, 董文旭, 徐征和. 水氮互作对冬小麦农田NH₃和N₂O排放及产量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 35(5): 1283-1292.

ZHANG Yujiao, PANG Guibin, YU Jing, ZHANG Haifeng, ZHANG Lizhi, WANG Xin, DONG Wenxu, XU Zhenghe. Effects of water-nitrogen interactions on NH₃ and N₂O emissions and yield in winter wheat cropland[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 35(5): 1283-1292.

参考文献

[1] Yu YL, Xue LH, Yang LZ. Winter legumes in rice crop rotations reduces nitrogen loss, and improves rice yield and soil nitrogen supply. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2014, 34: 633-640
[2] 陶小龙, 徐磊, 夏磊, 等. 农业面源污染中农田氮污染对水体的危害及防治措施. 农业灾害研究, 2022, 12(6): 161-163
[3] 张翀, 韩晓阳, 李雪倩, 等. 川中丘陵区紫色土冬小麦/夏玉米轮作氨挥发研究. 中国生态农业学报, 2015, 23(11): 1359-1366
[4] Bouwmeester RJB, Vlek PLG, Stumpe JM. Effect of environmental factors on ammonia volatilization from a urea fertilized soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1985, 49: 376-381
[5] Li B, Fan CH, Zhang H, et al. Combined effects of nitrogen fertilization and biochar on the net global warming potential, greenhouse gas intensity and net ecosystem economic budget in intensive vegetable agriculture in southeastern China. Atmospheric Environment, 2015, 100: 10-19
[6] 颉健辉, 李玲玲, 谢军红, 等. 氮肥运筹对旱作覆膜玉米产量及固碳减排效应研究. 中国土壤与肥料, 2019(6): 134-141
[7] 王磊, 董树亭, 刘鹏, 等. 水氮互作对冬小麦田氨挥发损失和产量的影响. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(6): 1919-1927
[8] 李祯, 史海滨, 李仙岳, 等. 不同水氮运筹模式对田间土壤氨挥发及春玉米籽粒产量的影响. 农业环境科学学报, 2017, 36(4): 799-807
[9] 谢勇, 荣湘民, 张玉平, 等. 控释氮肥减量施用对春玉米土壤N₂O排放和氨挥发的影响. 农业环境科学学报, 2016, 35(3): 596-603
[10] 山楠, 赵同科, 毕晓庆, 等. 不同施氮水平下小麦田氨挥发规律研究. 农业环境科学学报, 2014, 33(9): 1858-1865
[11] 卢丽兰, 甘炳春, 许明会, 等. 不同施肥与灌水量对槟榔土壤氨挥发的影响. 生态学报, 2011, 31(15): 4477-4484
[12] 孟谣, 王维华, 庞茹月, 等. 水、肥及秸秆协同管理对小麦-玉米轮作体系土壤氨挥发及作物产量的影响. 山东农业科学, 2021, 53(3): 79-85
[13] 付莉, 王贵云, 杜会英, 等. 养殖肥水施用对土壤氨挥发的影响及响应因素. 农业资源与环境学报, 2020, 37(6): 931-938
[14] 许云翔, 何莉莉, 陈金媛, 等. 生物炭对农田土壤氨挥发的影响机制研究进展. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(12): 4312-4320
[15] Qiu W, Liu J, Li B, et al. N₂O and CO₂ emissions from a dryland wheat cropping system with long-term N fertilization and their relationships with soil C, N, and bacterial community. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020, 27: 8673-8683
[16] 薛飞. 灌水下限、施氮量对设施土壤温室气体排放特征的影响. 硕士论文. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2019
[17] 高珊, 郭艳杰, 张丽娟, 等. 温室土壤不同含水量下施用DCD和DMPP对N₂O排放及NH₃挥发的影响. 河北农业大学学报, 2019, 42(4): 95-101
[18] 杨乐, 曹辉, 付媛媛, 等. 交替滴灌配施硝化抑制剂对夏玉米土壤氨挥发和土壤酶活性的影响. 灌溉排水学报, 2023, 42(4): 38-44
[19] 薛建文, 庞桂斌, 丛鑫, 等. 不同灌水和生物炭量对夏玉米农田氨挥发的影响. 节水灌溉, 2022(7): 29-35
[20] 吕金东, 张丽媛, 虞娜, 等. 水氮耦合对设施土壤N₂O和NO排放的影响. 农业环境科学学报, 2021, 40(6): 1366-1376
[21] 万伟帆, 美丽, 红梅, 等. 内蒙古阴山北麓滴灌马铃薯田氨挥发和氧化亚氮排放特征. 灌溉排水学报, 2016, 35(8): 36-41
[22] 王磊, 董树亭, 刘鹏, 等. 水氮互作对冬小麦田氨挥发损失和产量的影响. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(6): 1919-1927
[23] 曹欢欢. 旱地夏玉米-冬小麦轮作体系尿素氨挥发研究. 硕士论文. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2018
[24] 陈海潇. 不同类型土壤氨挥发特性和硝态氮累积的研究. 硕士论文. 长春: 吉林农业大学, 2015
[25] 黄佳佳, 何莉莉, 刘玉学, 等. 生物炭配施硝化/脲酶抑制剂对亚热带水稻土活性氮气体排放的影响. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(4): 1027-1036
[26] 上官宇先, 师日鹏, 李娜, 等. 垄作覆膜条件下田间氨挥发及影响因素. 环境科学, 2012, 33(6): 1987-1993
[27] Shcherbak I, Millar N, Robertson GP. Global metaana-lysis of the nonlinear response of soil nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions to fertilizer nitrogen. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014, 111: 9199-9204
[28] 雷豪杰, 李贵春, 柯华东, 等. 滴灌施肥对两种典型作物系统土壤N₂O排放的影响及其调控差异. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(4): 768-779
[29] 杜娅丹, 张倩, 崔冰晶, 等. 加气灌溉水氮互作对温室芹菜地N₂O排放的影响. 农业工程学报, 2017, 33(16): 127-134
[30] Mu ZJ, Kimura SD, Toma Y, et al. Nitric oxide fluxes from upland soils in central Hokkaido, Japan. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2008, 20: 1312-1322
[31] 翟学旭, 王振林, 戴忠民, 等. 灌溉与非灌溉条件下黄淮冬麦区不同追氮时期农田土壤氨挥发损失研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19(1): 54-64
[32] 刘阳阳, 李亚芳, 虞娜, 等. 水氮调控对设施土壤氨挥发特征的影响. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(5): 334-342
[33] 李玥, 巨晓棠. 农田氧化亚氮减排的关键是合理施氮. 农业环境科学学报, 2020, 39(4): 842-851
[34] 王喆. 不同材料生物炭对干湿交替稻田氮素气态损失的影响. 硕士论文. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2022
[35] 韩坤, 张纪涛, 上官宇先, 等. 交替灌溉条件下水氮耦合对土壤气态氮排放的影响. 环境科学, 2011, 32(6): 1557-1563
[36] 丁军军, 张薇, 李玉中, 等. 不同灌溉量对华北平原菜地N₂O排放及其来源的影响. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(7): 2269-2276
[37] 郭曾辉, 刘朋召, 雒文鹤, 等. 限水减氮对关中平原冬小麦氮素利用和氮素表观平衡的影响. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(12): 4359-4369
[38] 史辛凯, 于振文, 赵俊晔, 等. 施氮量对高产小麦光合特性、干物质积累分配与产量的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2021, 41(6): 713-721
[39] 李亚静, 郭振清, 杨敏, 等. 施氮量对强筋小麦氮素积累和氮肥农学利用效率的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2020, 40(3): 343-350
[40] Abuarab M, Mostafa E, Ibrahim M. Effect of air injection under subsurface drip irrigation on yield and water use efficiency of corn in a sandy clay loam soil. Journal of Advanced Research, 2013, 4: 493-499

水氮互作对冬小麦农田NH₃和N₂O排放及产量的影响

Effects of water-nitrogen interactions on NH₃ and N₂O emissions and yield in winter wheat cropland

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王庆源, 陈甜, 于振文, 张振, 张永丽, 石玉. 长期定位耕作模式对小麦¹³C同化物分配和籽粒产量形成的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(4): 926-932.
[2]	惠凯善, 冉庆赏, 石玉, 张振, 于振文, 张永丽. 补灌条件下施磷量对小麦不同茎蘖¹³C同化物分配及其成穗的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(4): 942-950.
[3]	吕佳佳, 初征, 李百超, 宫丽娟, 周宝才, 刘丹, 王冬妮, 姜丽霞. 东北地区水稻开花期冷涡型光-温-水复合逆境产量损失评估指标构建 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(3): 731-738.
[4]	杨颜萌, 张家兴, 李亚茹, 马靖然, 王铎, 靳占才, 谢路路, 邓娇娇, 叶吉, 于大炮, 王庆伟. 光质对黄芩生长与生理生化特征的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(2): 424-430.
[5]	马晓明, 李丹, 雷佳, 于婕, 王楠, 侯贤清, 魏娜, 李荣. 不同降水年型下耕作方式结合覆盖对旱地土壤物理性质和马铃薯产量的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(2): 447-456.
[6]	蔡洪梅, 王菲菲, 王捧娜, 唐志伟, 黄伟祥, 郑宝强, 李金才, 陈翔. 冬小麦越冬期壮苗评价方法与指标研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(2): 555-563.
[7]	李长青, 纪萌, 马萌萌, 王硕, 刘欢, 孙志梅. 天然增效剂与化学抑制剂复配对小麦/玉米轮作体系产量、氮素利用及氮平衡的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2391-2397.
[8]	郭丽娜, 卢霖, 董学瑞, 张凤路, 闫鹏, 董志强. 赤霉素、激动素和吲哚丁酸合剂对滨海盐碱区粒用高粱耐盐性和产量的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2405-2412.
[9]	朱振闯, 孙仕军, 朱淼淼, 李咚祎, 王哲, 谌入瑄, 陈伟. 地下水埋深对东北平原地下水补给及大豆生长动态的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1871-1882.
[10]	杨毅轩, 陈应枝, 唐芃, 林文, 孙敏, 高志强. 播种方式对黄淮海麦区西部冬小麦氮素利用与产量形成的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1572-1582.
[11]	张晓伟, 杨显贺, 车豪杰, 秦竞, 毕焕改, 艾希珍. 腐熟玉米秸秆对设施土壤环境及黄瓜产量和品质的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(5): 1290-1296.
[12]	孟晴晴, 吴凤灵, 宋健丽, 魏珉, 孟伦, 李静, 杨凤娟. 滴灌频次对温室长季节栽培番茄产量和养分利用效率的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(5): 1297-1304.
[13]	徐浩, 王玉雯, 罗自威, 胡文朗, 廖文强, 陈立松, 李延, 郭九信. 养分优化管理提高我国柑橘产量和品质的整合分析 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 35(5): 1301-1311.
[14]	陆欣春, 范欣欣, 邹文秀, 严君, 陈旭, 韩晓增, 邓维娜. 肥沃耕层构建对白浆土土壤肥力和玉米产量的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(4): 883-891.
[15]	娄运生, 于玉洁, 刘燕, 杨蕙琳, 周东雪. 施硅对夜间增温下南方水稻生长、产量和品质的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(4): 985-992.