北京典型生态系统森林体验指数的时间变化

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202507.029

应用生态学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (7): 2183-2191.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202507.029

北京典型生态系统森林体验指数的时间变化

罗涵^1,2, 孙艳丽³, 田赟^1,2*, 赵洪贤^1,2, 陈文婧⁴, 李廷山⁵, 张恒^1,2, 刘康龙^1,2, 李品静^1,2, 齐建东⁶, 查天山^1,2

¹北京林业大学水土保持学院, 北京 100083;
²北京林业大学水土保持国家林业和草原局重点实验室, 北京 100083;
³北京市园林绿化规划和资源监测中心(北京市林业碳汇与国际合作事务中心), 北京 101118;
⁴南京工业职业技术大学艺术设计学院, 南京 210007;
⁵中铁科学研究院集团有限公司, 成都 610032;
⁶北京林业大学信息学院, 北京 100083

收稿日期:2024-12-14 接受日期:2025-05-14 出版日期:2025-07-18 发布日期:2026-01-18
通讯作者: *E-mail: tianyun@bjfu.edu.cn
作者简介:罗涵, 女, 2001年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事生态系统服务功能研究。E-mail: luohan0219@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(42442706)和北京园林绿化生态系统监测网络新建站数据管理项目(GJH-2024-015)

Temporal variation of the forest experience index in typical ecosystems of Beijing, China

LUO Han^1,2, SUN Yanli³, TIAN Yun^1,2*, ZHAO Hongxian^1,2, CHEN Wenjing⁴, LI Tingshan⁵, ZHANG Heng^1,2, LIU Kanglong^1,2, LI Pinjing^1,2, QI Jiandong⁶, ZHA Tianshan^1,2

¹School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China;
²Key Laboratory of State Forestry and Grassland Administration on Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China;
³Beijing Forestry and Parks Planning and Resource Monitoring Center (Beijing Forestry Carbon and International Cooperation Affairs Center), Beijing 101118, China;
⁴School of Art and Design, Nanjing Institute of Industry Technology, Nanjing 210007, China;
⁵China Railway Academy Group Co., Ltd., Chengdu 610032, China;
⁶School of Information, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2024-12-14 Accepted:2025-05-14 Online:2025-07-18 Published:2026-01-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 探究生态系统功能与人类之间的关系对于促进人类健康和福祉具有重要意义。目前,公众在不同生态系统中的绿色体验感缺乏系统的量化指标,尤其缺乏人在不同生态系统中绿色体验感受差异的量化指标,使得人对绿色游憩的科学选择有限。基于《森林体验指数评价技术规范(DB11/T 2029—2022)》,结合北京10个典型生态监测站点原位实时连续监测数据,通过舒适度、健康度和调节度3个维度,分析北京市典型森林、湿地和城市绿地生态系统的森林体验指数(FEI)在日、月和季节尺度的变化规律,探明不同生态系统类型间FEI不同时间尺度的异同。结果表明: 湿地生态系统的FEI值最高,其次是森林和城市绿地生态系统。在日尺度上,研究区FEI在7:00—9:00和16:00—19:00出现峰值,且从春季到冬季,上午时段FEI峰值的时间点向后位移,由春季7:00到冬季9:00,下午时段向前位移,由春夏季的18:00—19:00提前到秋冬季的16:00—17:00。在月尺度上,3—10月,湿地生态系统FEI的月均值最高,其他月份3种生态系统FEI值相差较小。舒适度和调节度在3—9月呈增大趋势,10月—次年2月减小;舒适度、调节度和健康度的最大月均值分别在9月、7月和7月,最小月均值分别在12月、12月和3月。不考虑气象预警的情况下,FEI的季节均值在夏季最高,其次是秋季和春季,冬季最低;舒适度、健康度和调节度在夏季和秋季一般高于春季和冬季。FEI在不同时间尺度的变化与生态系统的调节功能密切相关。研究结果可为公众绿色游憩提供科学参考,也可为提升北京花园城市建设和生态系统服务功能评价提供基础数据。

关键词: 森林体验指数, 生态系统服务, 舒适度, 健康度, 调节度

Abstract: Exploring the relationship between ecosystem functions and humans is of great significance for promoting human health and well-being. Systematic quantitative indicators for the public’s green experience in different ecosystems are in shortage. The quantitative indicators for the differences in green experience perception among people in different ecosystems are unavailable, which limit scientific decision-making for green recreation. Based on Technical Specification and Assessment on Forest Experience Index (DB11/T 2029-2022), combined with in-situ real-time continuous monitoring data from 10 ecological monitoring stations in Beijing, we analyzed the changes in forest experience index (FEI) of forest, wetland, and urban green space ecosystems at daily, monthly, and seasonal scales from three dimensions: comfort, health, and regulation. We further explored the similarities and differences in FEI at different time scales among different ecosystem types. The results showed that wetland ecosystem maintained the highest FEI value, followed by forest and urban green space ecosystems. At the daily scale, the FEI peaked at 7:00-9:00 and 16:00-19:00 in the study area. From spring to winter, the morning peak showed progressive delay from 7:00 in spring to 9:00 in winter, while the afternoon peak showed gradual advancement from 18:00-19:00 in spring and summer to 16:00-17:00 in autumn and winter. At the month scale, wetland had the highest mean FEI value from March to October. All the three ecosystem types showed less difference in other months. The comfort and regulatory degree increased from March to September and decreased from October to February. The maximum monthly mean values for comfort, health, and regulatory degree were in September, July, and July, respectively, while their minima were in December, March and December, respectively. Excluding meteorological warnings, the seasonal mean FEI value was highest in summer, followed by autumn and spring, and lowest in winter. Comfort, health, and regulatory degree were generally higher in summer and autumn than in spring and winter. The variation patterns of the FEI at different temporal scales had strong linkages with the regulation function of ecosystems. Our results could inform scientific recommendations for public recreation, as well as provide basic data for the enhancement of Beijing’s Garden City construction and the assessment of ecosystem services.

Key words: forest experience index, ecosystem service, comfort degree, health degree, regulatory degree

罗涵, 孙艳丽, 田赟, 赵洪贤, 陈文婧, 李廷山, 张恒, 刘康龙, 李品静, 齐建东, 查天山. 北京典型生态系统森林体验指数的时间变化[J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(7): 2183-2191.

LUO Han, SUN Yanli, TIAN Yun, ZHAO Hongxian, CHEN Wenjing, LI Tingshan, ZHANG Heng, LIU Kanglong, LI Pinjing, QI Jiandong, ZHA Tianshan. Temporal variation of the forest experience index in typical ecosystems of Beijing, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2025, 36(7): 2183-2191.

参考文献

[1] Zhang BT, Feng Q, Lu ZX, et al. Ecosystem service value and ecological compensation in Qilian Mountain National Park: Implications for ecological conservation strategies. Ecological Indicators, 2024, 167: 112661
[2] Lapointe M, Gurney GG, Coulthard S, et al. Ecosystem services, well-being benefits and urbanization associations in a Small Island Developing State. People and Nature, 2021, 3: 391-404
[3] 谢高地, 张彩霞, 张昌顺, 等. 中国生态系统服务的价值. 资源科学, 2015, 37(9): 1740-1746
[4] 张剑飞, 阳文锐, 李晶晶, 等. 北京市生态系统服务价值时空变化与驱动力研究. 生态学报, 2025, 45(1): 306-318
[5] Zhou B, Huang MC, Li CL, et al. Leisure constraint and mental health: The case of park users in Ningbo, China. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 2022, 39: 100562
[6] 杜万光, 王成, 王茜, 等. 北京香山公园主要植被类型的夏季环境效应评价. 林业科学, 2018, 54(4): 155-164
[7] Haase D, Gaeva D. Allotments for all? Social-environmental values of urban gardens for gardeners and the public in cities: The example of Berlin, Germany. People and Nature, 2023, 5: 1207-1219
[8] Schindler M, Le Texier M, Caruso G. How far do people travel to use urban green space? A comparison of three European cities. Applied Geography, 2022, 141: 102673
[9] Li CL. Quality of life: The perspective of urban park recreation in three Asian cities. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 2020, 29: 100260
[10] 刘畅, 徐宁, 宋靖达, 等. 城市森林公园游人热舒适感受与空间选择. 生态学报, 2017, 37(10): 3561-3569
[11] Terjung WH. Physiologic climates of the conterminous United States: A bioclimatic classification based on man. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1966, 56: 141-179
[12] Gagge AP, Stolwijk JAJ, Nishi Y. An effective temperature scale based on a simple model of human physiological regulatory response. ASHRAE Transactions, 1971, 77: 247-262
[13] Höppe P. The physiological equivalent temperature: A universal index for the biometeorological assessment of the thermal environment. International Journal of Biometeorology, 1999, 43: 71-75
[14] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 人居环境气候舒适度评价GB/T 27963—2011. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2011
[15] 陆鼎煌, 崔森, 李重和. 北京城市绿化夏季小气候条件对人体的适宜度. 林业气象论文集. 北京: 气象出版社, 1984: 144-152
[16] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 气候宜居指数GB/T 42072—2022. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2022
[17] 古琳, 王成, 王艳英, 等. 惠山国家森林公园游憩林小气候与人体舒适度变化规律. 林业科学, 2019, 55(6): 150-159
[18] 刘洛甫, 张伟. 城市湿地的小气候调节功能及其空间梯度效应. 西南大学学报:自然科学版, 2024, 46(4): 133-142
[19] 周迪, 冯祯, 刘仪, 等. 人居环境舒适度研究进展. 环境生态学, 2023, 5(8): 65-74
[20] 律江, 李新宇, 段敏杰, 等. 顺义滨河森林公园林内小气候及人体舒适度效应分析. 科学技术与工程, 2024, 24(17): 7066-7072
[21] 王忠贵. 森林康养对人体健康促进作用浅析. 现代园艺, 2020, 43(1): 106-109
[22] Semeraro T, Gatto E, Buccolieri R, et al. Changes in olive urban forests infected by Xylella fastidiosa: Impact on microclimate and social health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019, 16: 2642
[23] Mao QZ, Hu CJ, Guo QH, et al. How does vegetation landscape structure of urban green spaces affect cultural ecosystem services at multiscale: Based on PLS-SEM model. Forests, 2023, 14: 1401
[24] Jeanjean APR, Monks PS, Leigh RJ. Modelling the effectiveness of urban trees and grass on PM_2.5 reduction via dispersion and deposition at a city scale. Atmosphe-ric Environment, 2016, 147: 1-10
[25] 崔丽娟, 康晓明, 赵欣胜, 等. 北京典型城市湿地小气候效应时空变化特征. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(1): 212-218
[26] Jones H, Black TA, Jassal RS, et al. Water balance, surface conductance and water use efficiency of two young hybrid-poplar plantations in Canada’s aspen parkland. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2017, 246: 256-271
[27] 李鑫豪. 北京松山天然落叶阔叶林生态系统水热通量时间变化特征. 硕士论文. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2020
[28] 北京市统计局. 2022年北京市生态服务价值监测公报. 北京: 北京市统计局, 2023
[29] 北京市市场监督管理局. 森林体验指数评价技术规范DB11/T 2029—2022. 北京: 北京市市场监督管理局, 2022
[30] Ma JY, Zha TS, Jia X, et al. Energy and water vapor exchange over a young plantation in northern China. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2019, 263: 334-345
[31] Reichstein M, Falge E, Baldocchi D, et al. On the se-paration of net ecosystem exchange into assimilation and ecosystem respiration: Review and improved algorithm. Global Change Biology, 2005, 11: 1424-1439
[32] 北京市市场监督管理局. 园林绿化生态系统监测网络建设规范DB11/T 1989—2022. 北京: 北京市市场监督管理局, 2022
[33] 邓晔也, 王春连. 城市湿地公园使用者评价的影响因素及其行为偏好: 以宜昌运河公园为例. 生态学报, 2019, 39(16): 5988-6000
[34] 张志永, 叶兵, 杨军, 等. 杭州市城市森林生态保健功能动态变化监测. 西北林学院学报, 2014, 29(5): 31-36
[35] 张彪, Majid AMANI-BENI, 史芸婷, 等. 北京奥林匹克公园夏季绿地小气候及人体环境舒适度效应分析. 生态科学, 2018, 37(5): 77-86
[36] 蔡益杭, 张明如, 张建国. 浙江青山湖绿道小气候要素与游人游憩行为的关系探析. 生态科学, 2023, 42(4): 154-162
[37] Wang JZ, Yang YQ, Jiang XF, et al. Influence of meteo-rological conditions on the negative oxygen ion characteristics of well-known tourist resorts in China. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 819: 152021
[38] 曹云, 孙应龙, 吴门新. 近50年京津冀气候舒适度的区域时空特征分析. 生态学报, 2019, 39(20): 7567-7582
[39] 覃云斌, 信忠保, 易扬, 等. 京津风沙源治理工程区沙尘暴时空变化及其与植被恢复关系. 农业工程学报, 2012, 28(24): 196-204
[40] 孙杰, 徐梦佳, 刘冬, 等. 长江三角洲地区生态系统气候调节服务价值空间变化影响机制分析. 生态与农村环境学报, 2024, 40(9): 1121-1133
[41] Li YP, Guo X, Wang TL, et al. Characteristics of atmospheric small ions and their application to assessment of air quality in a typical semi-arid city of northwest China. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 2015, 15: 865-874
[42] 段敏杰, 王月容, 刘晶. 北京紫竹院公园绿地生态保健功能综合评价. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(7): 1973-1983
[43] Ouyang W, Guo BB, Cai GQ, et al. The washing effect of precipitation on particulate matter and the pollution dynamics of rainwater in downtown Beijing. Science of the Total Environment, 2015, 505: 306-314
[44] 刘星, 黄虹, 左嘉, 等. 夏季降雨对大气污染物的清除影响. 环境污染与防治, 2016, 38(3): 20-24
[45] 阿芸, 张金青, 张海娟, 等. 植物吸附大气颗粒物的影响因素及响应机制的研究进展. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(7): 2013-2024
[46] 郭元喜, 刘保献, 李云婷, 等. 2018—2022年北京市PM_2.5污染过程时空、气象及传输特征. 环境科学, 2025, 46(3): 1265-1274

北京典型生态系统森林体验指数的时间变化

Temporal variation of the forest experience index in typical ecosystems of Beijing, China

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	余璇子, 李久林, 储金龙. 基于功能区识别的安徽省生态系统服务权衡协同关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(6): 1616-1626.
[2]	杨柯柯, 陈文波, 熊秋林, 高蓓杰. 2000—2020年赣南地区人类活动对生态系统服务的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(6): 1627-1638.
[3]	肖长江, 刘涛, 李鑫, 徐雪莲, 刘春英, 卢雅薇. 鄱阳湖流域生态系统服务权衡/协同关系对土地利用变化的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(6): 1639-1650.
[4]	练雨晨, 刘迪, 崔立晗, 徐敏, 郑盛. 基于生态系统服务供需平衡的呼和浩特市生态管理分区 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(6): 1651-1660.
[5]	王语馨, 郑颖, 高永, 刘艳萍, 杨振奇, 张子萱. 鄂尔多斯市典型生态系统服务时空演变特征及权衡/协同关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(6): 1661-1670.
[6]	董文卓, 苏维词, 勾容, 周恒阳, 刘东岳. 生态系统服务和生态系统健康视角下的贵州省生态风险时空演变 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(4): 1211-1221.
[7]	张耀文, 戴琼瑶, 叶观琼. 沿海蓝色福祉概念、边界与权衡 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(4): 1272-1280.
[8]	钟发明, 陈竹安. 多尺度下人为干扰对长江中游城市群生态系统服务供需的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(1): 271-283.
[9]	陶宇, 欧维新, 孙晓. 生态系统服务供需关系评估的几点思考 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(9): 2423-2431.
[10]	陈小平, 邓亚宇, 徐若凡, 李萱, 马航, 武小钢, 黄春波. 基于生态系统服务供需的太原市生态管理分区 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(7): 1925-1934.
[11]	周晓艳, 王海军, 黄欣, 石方钰, 程必立. 广佛都市圈生态系统服务权衡协同对城镇空间多维扩张的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(7): 1935-1943.
[12]	丁康, 王嘉, 于淼, 李帅, 孟宇飞, 李运远. 邯郸市矿业废弃地的生态修复关键区识别: 基于生态功能与空间的重要性 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(6): 1671-1680.
[13]	何国钰, 张蕾, 雷锡琼, 孙远洋, 万玉雯, 熊海玲. 基于生态系统服务供需簇的武汉都市圈生态风险评估及影响因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(5): 1347-1358.
[14]	杨黎敏, 王坤鹏, 易家林, 郭杰, 欧名豪. 耦合生态系统服务的社会生态风险分析框架 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(5): 1419-1425.
[15]	梁华秋, 沈梦晗, 邵明, 姚朋. 基于生态系统服务供需的临沂市固碳生态网络构建 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(3): 759-768.