
应用生态学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (9): 3053-3065.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202609.046
鲁晓燕1, 林伊元1, 龚资银1, 苏雯晓1, 王振宇1, 魏龙2, 冯建祥1*
收稿日期:2026-06-06
接受日期:2026-08-04
出版日期:2026-09-18
发布日期:2026-10-12
通讯作者:
*E-mail: fengjx23@mail.sysu.edu.cn
作者简介:鲁晓燕, 女, 1998年生, 博士研究生。主要从事红树林生物多样性研究。E-mail: luxiaoyan203@163.com
基金资助:LU Xiaoyan1, LIN Yiyuan1, GONG Ziyin1, SU Wenxiao1, WANG Zhenyu1, WEI Long2, FENG Jianxiang1*
Received:2026-06-06
Accepted:2026-08-04
Online:2026-09-18
Published:2026-10-12
摘要: 红树林湿地是连接陆地与海洋的重要生态过渡带,也是维持沿海渔业资源多样性、生态系统功能和滨海生态安全的重要生境。随着全球红树林保护与恢复工作的持续推进,红树林渔业资源保护、生物多样性维持及可持续利用已成为滨海生态学和渔业科学领域的重要研究方向。本文梳理了红树林渔业生物资源的组成特征与群落结构,解析了红树林生境对渔业资源的生态功能支撑机制,评述了传统调查与环境DNA(eDNA)、遥感监测等新兴技术的方法进展,探讨了生态养殖、资源管护等可持续利用模式的应用成效。近年来,红树林渔业资源研究已实现多个重要转变:研究内容由资源调查与产量评估逐渐拓展至生态功能与生态系统服务研究,研究尺度由单一物种和局地群落扩展至景观连通性和区域尺度生态过程,研究方法由传统生态调查发展为eDNA、遥感监测和智能识别等多技术融合监测体系,资源利用理念则由单纯资源开发逐步转向生态保护、生态修复与渔业生产协同发展。这些转变表明红树林渔业资源研究已进入以生态系统整体功能维持和可持续利用为核心的新阶段,但仍面临长期连续监测不足、生态过程与功能机制解析不深入以及保护与利用协同管理体系不完善等挑战。未来应加强多尺度长期监测与生态过程研究,推动资源保护、生态修复与社区生计协同发展,为红树林渔业资源保护与可持续利用提供科学依据。
鲁晓燕, 林伊元, 龚资银, 苏雯晓, 王振宇, 魏龙, 冯建祥. 红树林湿地的渔业生物资源多样性及可持续利用[J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(9): 3053-3065.
LU Xiaoyan, LIN Yiyuan, GONG Ziyin, SU Wenxiao, WANG Zhenyu, WEI Long, FENG Jianxiang. Fishery resource biodiversity and sustainable utilization in mangrove wetlands.[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2026, 37(9): 3053-3065.
| [1] FAO. The World’s Mangroves 2000-2020. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2023 [2] Lee SY, Primavera JH, Dahdouh-Guebas F, et al. Ecological role and services of tropical mangrove ecosystems: A reassessment. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2014, 23: 726-743 [3] Nagelkerken I, Blaber SJM, Bouillon S, et al. The habitat function of mangroves for terrestrial and marine fauna: A review. Aquatic Botany, 2008, 89: 155-185 [4] Mumby PJ, Edwards AJ, Ernesto Arias-González J, et al. Mangroves enhance the biomass of coral reef fish communities in the Caribbean. Nature, 2004, 427: 533-536 [5] Mumby PJ. Connectivity of reef fish between mangroves and coral reefs: Algorithms for the design of marine reserves at seascape scales. Biological Conservation, 2006, 128: 215-222 [6] zu Ermgassen PSE, Worthington TA, Gair JR, et al. Mangroves support an estimated annual abundance of over 700 billion juvenile fish and invertebrates. Communications Earth & Environment, 2025, 6: 299 [7] zu Ermgassen PSE, Mukherjee N, Worthington TA, et al. Fishers who rely on mangroves: Modelling and mapping the global intensity of mangrove-associated fisheries. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2020, 247: 106975 [8] Carrasquilla-Henao M, Juanes F. Mangroves enhance local fisheries catches: A global meta-analysis. Fish and Fisheries, 2017, 18: 79-93 [9] Hamilton SE, Casey D. Creation of a high spatio-temporal resolution global database of continuous mangrove forest cover for the 21st century (CGMFC-21). Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2016, 25: 729-738 [10] Richards DR, Friess DA. Rates and drivers of mangrove deforestation in Southeast Asia, 2000-2012. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016, 113: 344-349 [11] Friess DA, Rogers K, Lovelock CE, et al. The state of the world’s mangrove forests: Past, present, and future. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2019, 44: 89-115 [12] Heino J, Melo AS, Siqueira T, et al. Metacommunity organisation, spatial extent and dispersal in aquatic systems: Patterns, processes and prospects. Freshwater Biology, 2015, 60: 845-869 [13] Feng JX, Huang Q, Chen H, et al. Restoration of native mangrove wetlands can reverse diet shifts of benthic macrofauna caused by invasive cordgrass. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 55: 905-916 [14] Cavanaugh KC, Kellner JR, Forde AJ, et al. Poleward expansion of mangroves is a threshold response to decreased frequency of extreme cold events. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014, 111: 723-727 [15] Friess DA, Thompson BS, Brown B, et al. Policy challenges and approaches for the conservation of mangrove forests in Southeast Asia. Conservation Biology, 2016, 30: 933-949 [16] 吴映明, 郑培珊, 刘妮, 等. 广东红树林区鱼类物种多样性. 中山大学学报: 自然科学版, 2018, 57(5): 104-114 [17] Ikejima K, Tongnunui P, Medej T, et al. Juvenile and small fishes in a mangrove estuary in Trang Province, Thailand: Seasonal and habitat differences. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2003, 56: 447-457 [18] Sheridan P, Hays C. Are mangroves nursery habitat for transient fishes and decapods? Wetlands, 2003, 23: 449-458 [19] Ley JA, McIvor CC, Montague CL. Fishes in mangrove prop-root habitats of northeastern Florida Bay: Distinct assemblages across an estuarine gradient. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 1999, 48: 701-723 [20] Salem ME, Mercer DE. The economic value of mangroves: A meta-analysis. Sustainability, 2012, 4: 359-383 [21] Alongi DM. Present state and future of the world’s mangrove forests. Environmental Conservation, 2002, 29: 331-349 [22] Cannicci S, Burrows D, Fratini S, et al. Faunal impact on vegetation structure and ecosystem function in mangrove forests: A review. Aquatic Botany, 2008, 89: 186-200 [23] Rönnbäck P. The ecological basis for economic value of seafood production supported by mangrove ecosystems. Ecological Economics, 1999, 29: 235-252 [24] Vance DJ, Haywood M, Heales DS, et al. Distribution of juvenile penaeid prawns in mangrove forests in a tropical Australian estuary, with particular reference to Penaeus merguiensis. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 2002, 228: 165-177 [25] Kristensen E, Alongi DM. Control by fiddler crabs (Uca vocans) and plant roots (Avicennia marina) on carbon, iron, and sulfur biogeochemistry in mangrove sediment. Limnology and Oceanography, 2006, 51: 1557-1571 [26] Rinehart SA, Dybiec JM, Walker JB, et al. Effects of burrowing crabs on coastal sediments and their functions: A systematic meta-analysis. Ecosphere, 2024, 15: e4927 [27] Ma W, Wang WQ, Tang CY, et al. Zonation of mangrove flora and fauna in a subtropical estuarine wetland based on surface elevation. Ecology and Evolution, 2020, 10: 7404-7418 [28] Chen GG, Gu X, Capinha C, et al. Large-scale changes in macrobenthic biodiversity driven by mangrove afforestation. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 60: 2066-2078 [29] López-Abuchar L, Peralta-Madriz C, Soto-Navarro C, et al. Temporal changes in habitat structure and gastropod community assemblage in response to active restoration of a Central American mangrove. Frontiers in Marine Science, 2025, 12: 1563965 [30] Chacin DH, Bell SS, Stallings CD. Red mangrove (Rhizophora mangle) roots serve as additional valuable habitat for the eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica) in a subtropical estuary. Journal of Experimental Marine Bio-logy and Ecology, 2025, 583: 152083 [31] Kristensen E, Bouillon S, Dittmar T, et al. Organic carbon dynamics in mangrove ecosystems: A review. Aqua-tic Botany, 2008, 89: 201-219 [32] Cole VJ, Chick RC, Hutchings PA. A review of global fisheries for polychaete worms as a resource for recreational Fishers: Diversity, sustainability and research needs. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 2018, 28: 543-565 [33] Pombo A, Baptista T, Granada L, et al. Insight into aquaculture’s potential of marine annelid worms and ecological concerns: A review. Reviews in Aquaculture, 2020, 12: 107-121 [34] Metcalfe KN, Glasby CJ. Diversity of Polychaeta (Annelida) and other worm taxa in mangrove habitats of Darwin Harbour, northern Australia. Journal of Sea Research, 2008, 59: 70-82 [35] Miri M, Seyfabadi J, Ghodrati Shojaei M, et al. Polychaete diversity and functional trait composition in subtropical mangrove ecosystems. Diversity, 2023, 15: 998 [36] Safarik M, Redden AM, Schreider MJ. Density-dependent growth of the polychaete Diopatra aciculata. Scientia Marina, 2006, 70: 337-341 [37] Nanjo K, Kohno H, Nakamura Y, et al. Effects of mangrove structure on fish distribution patterns and predation risks. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 2014, 461: 216-225 [38] Nagelkerken I, De Schryver AM, Verweij MC, et al. Differences in root architecture influence attraction of fishes to mangroves: A field experiment mimicking roots of different length, orientation, and complexity. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 2010, 396: 27-34 [39] Wanjiru C, Nagelkerken I, Rueckert S, et al. Where to fish in the forest? Tree characteristics and contiguous seagrass features predict mangrove forest quality for fishes and crustaceans. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 60: 1340-1351 [40] Carrasquilla-Henao M, Rueda M, Juanes F. Fish habitat use in a Caribbean mangrove lagoon system. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2022, 278: 108090 [41] Lee SY. Mangrove outwelling: A review. Hydrobiologia, 1995, 295: 203-212 [42] Marguillier S, van der Velde G, Dehairs F, et al. Trophic relationships in an interlinked mangrove-seagrass ecosystem as traced by δ13C and δ15N. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 1997, 151: 115-121 [43] Abrantes K, Sheaves M. Food web structure in a near-pristine mangrove area of the Australian Wet Tropics. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2009, 82: 597-607 [44] Baker R, Abrantes K, Feller IC. Stable isotopes suggest limited role of wetland macrophyte production supporting aquatic food webs across a mangrove-salt marsh ecotone. Estuaries and Coasts, 2021, 44: 1619-1627 [45] Harada Y, Lee SY, Connolly RM, et al. Compound-specific isotope analysis of amino acids reveals dependency on grazing rather than detritivory in mangrove food webs. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 2022, 681: 13-20 [46] Nauta J, Lammers C, Lexmond R, et al. Habitat complexity drives food web structure along a dynamic mangrove coast. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2023, 196: 115597 [47] Borland HP, Gilby BL, Henderson CJ, et al. Seafloor terrain shapes the three-dimensional nursery value of mangrove and seagrass habitats. Ecosystems, 2023, 26: 442-456 [48] Henderson CJ, Gilby BL, Stone E, et al. Seascape heterogeneity modifies estuarine fish assemblages in mangrove forests. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 2021, 78: 1108-1116 [49] Xing BP, Xiang P, Chen SY, et al. Research progress on whether mangroves and seagrass beds serve as nursery habitats for coral reef fish. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 2025, 35: 789-801 [50] Cocheret de la Morinière E, Pollux BJA, Nagelkerken I, et al. Post-settlement life cycle migration patterns and habitat preference of coral reef fish that use seagrass and mangrove habitats as nurseries. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2002, 55: 309-321 [51] Dorenbosch M, van Riel MC, Nagelkerken I, et al. The relationship of reef fish densities to the proximity of mangrove and seagrass nurseries. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2004, 60: 37-48 [52] Robertson AI, Duke NC. Recruitment, growth and residence time of fishes in a tropical Australian mangrove system. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 1990, 31: 723-743 [53] Alberts-Hubatsch H, Lee SY, Meynecke JO, et al. Life-history, movement, and habitat use of Scylla serrata (Decapoda, Portunidae): Current knowledge and future challenges. Hydrobiologia, 2016, 763: 5-21 [54] 蔡立哲, 许鹏, 傅素晶, 等. 湛江高桥红树林和盐沼湿地的大型底栖动物次级生产力. 应用生态学报, 2012, 23(4): 965-971 [55] 陈顺洋, 陈光程, 陈彬, 等. 红树林湿地相手蟹科动物摄食生态研究进展. 生态学报, 2014, 34(19): 5349-5359 [56] Su WX, Lu XY, Lin ZY, et al. Comparative evaluation of fish community diversity and stability in the Zhanjiang mangrove watershed using environmental DNA and centipede net sampling. Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 2026, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-026-5439-3 [57] Ram M, Sheaves M, Waltham NJ. Restoring mangrove biodiversity: Can restored mangroves support fish assemblages comparable to natural mangroves over time? Restoration Ecology, 2025, 33: e70012 [58] Wang YM, Gao XY, Liu JK, et al. Interplay of habitat heterogeneity and sampling gear in structuring nekton communities: Insights from niche overlap and biomass spectra in a mangrove estuary. Continental Shelf Research, 2026, 297: 105629 [59] von Hammerstein H, Fett TM, Ferse SCA, et al. Individual mangrove trees provide alternative reef fish habitat on backreefs. Scientific Reports, 2024, 14: 18574 [60] Thomsen PF, Kielgast J, Iversen LL, et al. Monitoring endangered freshwater biodiversity using environmental DNA. Molecular Ecology, 2012, 21: 2565-2573 [61] Zhang GK, Chain FJJ, Abbott CL, et al. Metabarcoding using multiplexed markers increases species detection in complex zooplankton communities. Evolutionary Applications, 2018, 11: 1901-1914 [62] Zeng ZQ, He YH, Chen MT, et al. eDNA metabarcoding reveals seasonal dynamics and assembly mechanisms of native and non-native fish communities in mangrove wetlands of Southern China. Environmental Research, 2026, 289: 123360 [63] Elbrecht V, Leese F. Can DNA-based ecosystem assessments quantify species abundance? Testing primer bias and biomass: Sequence relationships with an innovative metabarcoding protocol. PLoS One, 2015, 10: e0130324 [64] Bradley M, Baker R, Nagelkerken I, et al. Context is more important than habitat type in determining use by juvenile fish. Landscape Ecology, 2019, 34: 427-442 [65] Bradley M, Dubuc A, Piggott CVH, et al. The fish-mangrove link is context dependent: Tidal regime and reef proximity determine the ecological role of tropical mangroves. Fish and Fisheries, 2024, 25: 523-541 [66] Olson JC, Lefcheck JS, Goodison MR, et al. Fish size spectra from imaging sonar reveal variation in habitat use across nearshore coastal ecosystems. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 2023, 705: 95-108 [67] Jones RE, Griffin RA, Unsworth RKF. Adaptive Resolution Imaging Sonar (ARIS) as a tool for marine fish identification. Fisheries Research, 2021, 243: 106092 [68] Gu X, Chen GG, Capinha C, et al. Automating coastal bioindicator acquisition with deep learning: Crab community monitoring for enhanced wetland management. Ecological Indicators, 2026, 182: 114577 [69] Leibold MA, Holyoak M, Mouquet N, et al. The metacommunity concept: A framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecology Letters, 2004, 7: 601-613 [70] Ruiz-Jaen MC, Aide TM. Restoration success: How is it being measured? Restoration Ecology, 2005, 13: 569-577 [71] Pielou EC. Species-diversity and pattern-diversity in the study of ecological succession. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 1966, 10: 370-383 [72] Whittaker RH. Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon, 1972, 21: 213-251 [73] Harper LM, Lefcheck JS, Whippo R, et al. Blinded by the bright: How species-poor habitats contribute to regional biodiversity across a tropical seascape. Diversity and Distributions, 2022, 28: 2272-2285 [74] Baselga A. Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2010, 19: 134-143 [75] Legendre P. Interpreting the replacement and richness difference components of beta diversity. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2014, 23: 1324-1334 [76] Costa Barrilli GH, Gomes do Vale J, Chahad-Ehlers S, et al. Spatial patterns of beta diversity in marine benthic assemblages from coastal areas of southern Brazil and their implications for conservation. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2024, 297: 108603 [77] Zhang YM, Zhang L, Kang YY, et al. Biotic homogenization increases with human intervention: Implications for mangrove wetland restoration. Ecography, 2022, 2022: ecog.05835 [78] Cannicci S, Lee SY, Bravo H, et al. A functional analysis reveals extremely low redundancy in global mangrove invertebrate fauna. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021, 118: e2016913118 [79] Petchey OL, Gaston KJ. Functional diversity: Back to basics and looking forward. Ecology Letters, 2006, 9: 741-758 [80] Bravo H, Cheng CLY, Fratini S, et al. Benthic functional diversity as a valuable tool to identify vulnerable mangrove forests. Ecological Indicators, 2025, 179: 114225 [81] Nozarpour R, Shojaei MG, Naderloo R, et al. Crustaceans functional diversity in mangroves and adjacent mudflats of the Persian Gulf and Gulf of Oman. Marine Environmental Research, 2023, 186: 105919 [82] Seary R, Spencer T, Bithell M, et al. Measuring mangrove-fishery benefits in the peam krasaop fishing community, Cambodia. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2021, 248: 106918 [83] Mirera OD. Trends in exploitation, development and management of artisanal mud crab (Scyllaserrata-Forsskal-1775) fishery and small-scale culture in Kenya: An overview. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2011, 54: 844-855 [84] Sumarga E, Rosleine D, Hutajulu GB, et al. Quantification of ecosystem services from mangrove silvofishery. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 2024, 10: 1333-1344 [85] Apriyanto A, Suwignyro RA, Ulqodry TZ, et al. The crab silvofishery system as a conservation strategy in mangrove restoration area: A case study on the coast of Banyuasin, South Sumatra. Journal of Environmental Science and Sustainable Development, 2025, 8: 48-65 [86] 徐姗楠, 陈作志, 郑杏雯, 等. 红树林种植-养殖耦合系统的养殖生态容量. 中国水产科学, 2010, 17(3): 393-403 [87] Santhanakumar J, Abdul Nazar A, Vinithkumar N, et al. Fattening of mud crab: An approach of aquasilviculture in Andaman Islands. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of India, 2010, 52: 85-88 [88] de Oliveira Costa LC, da Silva Poersch LH, Abreu PC. Biofloc removal by the oyster Crassostrea gasar as a candidate species to an Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture (IMTA) system with the marine shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquaculture, 2021, 540: 736731 [89] Rinaldy H, Iskandar J, Cahyandito MF, et al. The potential feasibility of mangrove crab (Scylla serrata) silvofishery aquaculture. Biodiversitas, 2023, 24: 3344-3354 [90] Triño AT, Rodriguez EM. Pen culture of mud crab Scylla serrata in tidal flats reforested with mangrove trees. Aquaculture, 2002, 211: 125-134 [91] Khatun MM, Kamal D, Ikejima K, et al. Comparisons of growth and economic performance among monosex and mixed-sex culture of red mud crab (Scylla olivacea Herbst, 1796) in bamboo pens in the tidal flats of mangrove forests, Bangladesh. Aquaculture Research, 2009, 40: 473-485 [92] de Souza Sampaio D, Tagliaro CH, Schneider H, et al. Oyster culture on the Amazon mangrove coast: Asymmetries and advances in an emerging sector. Reviews in Aquaculture, 2019, 11: 88-104 [93] Wang WX, Xu ZZ. Larval swimming and postlarval drifting behavior in the infaunal bivalve Sinonovacula constricta. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 1997, 148: 71-81 [94] Troell M, Joyce A, Chopin T, et al. Ecological engineering in aquaculture: Potential for integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) in marine offshore systems. Aquaculture, 2009, 297: 1-9 [95] 自然资源部国土空间生态修复司. 2025年海洋生态保护修复典型案例: 红树林里养鱼蟹:解锁人海和谐新密码-广东省湛江市红树林种植-水产养殖生态耦合保护修复案例. (2025-06-13) [2026-05-28]. https://www.pecmnr.cn/news.html?aid=5314895 [96] Xu SN, Chen ZZ, Li CH, et al. Assessing the carrying capacity of tilapia in an intertidal mangrove-based polyculture system of Pearl River Delta, China. Ecological Modelling, 2011, 222: 846-856 [97] Thompson BS, Primavera JH, Friess DA. Governance and implementation challenges for mangrove forest Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES): Empirical evidence from the Philippines. Ecosystem Services, 2017, 23: 146-155 [98] Damastuti E, de Groot R. Effectiveness of community-based mangrove management for sustainable resource use and livelihood support: A case study of four villages in Central Java, Indonesia. Journal of Environmental Management, 2017, 203: 510-521 |
| [1] | 李慧, 王法明. 当前全球红树林研究的进展与热点: 以MMM7会议为视角 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(9): 3079-3084. |
| [2] | 唐海江, 郭富城, 杨九菊, 肖东浩, 廖婷璐, 罗成科. 种植水稻对盐碱地土壤改良效果的研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(2): 591-600. |
| [3] | 曾琪, 李丹丹, 蔡泽江, 孙楠, 徐明岗. 石灰和生物炭对酸化土壤pH与微生物性质影响的Meta分析 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(1): 103-114. |
| [4] | 刘钥, 卢训令, 李婉莹, 卢开心, 余金海. 基于文献计量学的城市化对鸟类的影响研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(1): 280-294. |
| [5] | 徐龙飞, 张琰超, 孙国庆, 王志林, 司立伟, 李青霞, 高东奎, 田涛, 吴忠鑫. 北黄海庄河海上风电桩附着生物的垂直分布 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(9): 2615-2624. |
| [6] | 崔瀚文, 杨子, 赵霞, 蒋晓轩, 张安宁, 张淼, 陈书燕, 肖洒. 灌丛化和气候变暖对青藏高原高寒草甸β-土壤多功能性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(9): 2745-2752. |
| [7] | 周诗文, 李绥, 张雨阳. 基于邻域景观兼容性改进电路理论的沈阳市鸟类生境网络构建 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(8): 2515-2524. |
| [8] | 罗才红, 汪皖渝, 黄金夏, 王鹏, 马茂华, 陈吉龙, 赵存峰. 基于MaxEnt模型预测气候变化对黑颈鹤栖息地分布的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(4): 1251-1260. |
| [9] | 郭玉洁, 任志彬, 何兴元. 城市森林景观多功能性及权衡协同关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(3): 837-846. |
| [10] | 刘明倩, 张政, 王尚, 冯凯, 顾松松, 李春格, 邓晔. eDNA技术监测陆地生物多样性:技术要点、难点与进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(3): 927-942. |
| [11] | 杨佳悦, 丁国玉, 田秀君. 最大熵模型在物种生境预测中的应用研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(2): 614-624. |
| [12] | 曹宇, 邓卜洋, 王雅娟, 叶嘉洋, 苏丹, 方晓倩. 生境破碎化与生物多样性响应: 争议、归因与展望 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(2): 625-636. |
| [13] | 吕飞南, 郭炳茹, 牛新生, 宇振荣, 李红举. 国内外生态保护修复技术体系及其标准比较 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(12): 3595-3602. |
| [14] | 王玲莉, 石元亮, 石淏心, 张蕾, 武志杰, 宋玉超, 田立彬, 姜宇. 土壤改良剂对白浆土白浆层土壤物理结构及微生物群落的调控效应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(12): 3659-3667. |
| [15] | 管嘉文, 杨国福, 陈昊, 王振国, 王锡钰, 徐斌. 基于荒野保护的浙江省生态保护红线动态优化 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(1): 238-248. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
辽公网安备21010302000574号
辽ICP备05000862号-2
版权所有 © 《应用生态学报》编辑部