欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 365-375.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202502.030

• 黄河流域生态保护和高质量发展专栏 • 上一篇    下一篇

黄河三角洲“三生空间”多情景模拟及生态环境效应

朱亚杰, 栗云召*, 唐紫微, 刘言智, 闫畅, 白云逸, 周迪, 王书文   

  1. 鲁东大学滨海生态高等研究院, 山东烟台 264025
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-31 接受日期:2024-12-26 出版日期:2025-02-18 发布日期:2025-08-18
  • 通讯作者: *E-mail: liyunzhao007@163.com
  • 作者简介:朱亚杰, 男, 2000年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事土地利用变化与景观生态安全研究。E-mail: 13930080239@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金-山东联合基金项目(U2006215)和鲁东大学研究生创新项目(IPGS2024-073)

Simulation of multiple scenarios and ecological environment effects in production-living-ecology space of the Yellow River Delta.

ZHU Yajie, LI Yunzhao*, TANG Ziwei, LIU Yanzhi, YAN Chang, BAI Yunyi, ZHOU Di, WANG Shuwen   

  1. Institute for Advanced Study of Coastal Ecology, Ludong University, Yantai 264025, Shandong, China
  • Received:2024-10-31 Accepted:2024-12-26 Online:2025-02-18 Published:2025-08-18

摘要: 探究未来多情景下“三生空间”及生态环境效应演变对于协调国土空间规划、改善环境质量等具有重要价值。本研究基于2000、2010及2020年黄河三角洲高效生态经济区土地利用数据,通过生态环境质量、生态贡献度分析该区“三生空间”和生态环境质量分布,结合PLUS模型预测自然发展(NDS)、生态保护(EPS)及城镇发展(UDS)情景下2030、2040和2050年的“三生空间”分布,并分析生态环境质量指数和生态贡献度。结果表明: 2000—2020年,研究区生态空间面积减少1413.3 km2,生产空间和生活空间分别增加277.5和1136.4 km2,整体生态环境质量指数由0.3218下降到0.3041,又上升到0.3060,处于中等水平。2030—2050年,3种情景下生态环境质量均呈缓慢上升趋势,EPS情景的生态环境质量指数最高(平均值为0.3092),UDS最低(平均值为0.3082)。中等生态环境质量区的分布最广,高质量区集中在山地,低质量区集中在城镇生活用地。农业生产用地转向水域、农业生产用地转向城镇生活用地分别是引起生态环境质量提升和下降的最主要转换类型。

关键词: 生产-生活-生态空间, 多情景模拟, PLUS, 黄河三角洲高效生态经济区, 生态环境效应

Abstract: Exploring the evolution of production-living-ecology space and their ecological environmental effects under multiple future scenarios is of great significance for coordinating territorial spatial planning and improving environmental quality. Based on land use data from the Yellow River Delta efficient ecological economic zone in 2000, 2010, and 2020, we analyzed the distribution of production-living-ecology space and ecological environment quality. Using the PLUS model, we projected the distribution of production-living-ecology space in 2030, 2040, and 2050 under the scenarios of natural development (NDS), ecological protection (EPS), and urban development (UDS), and analyzed the ecological environment quality index and ecological contribution. The results showed that from 2000 to 2020, the area of ecological space in the study area decreased by 1413.3 km2, while production and living spaces increased by 277.5 and 1136.4 km2, respectively. The overall ecological environment qua-lity index declined from 0.3218 to 0.3041, before rising slightly to 0.3060, remaining at a moderate level. Model projections suggested that from 2030 to 2050, the ecological environment quality under all three scenarios would show a slow upward trend, with the EPS scenario having the highest ecological environment quality index (average value of 0.3092) and the UDS scenario the lowest (average value of 0.3082). Areas with moderate ecological environment quality were the most widespread, while high-quality areas were concentrated in mountainous regions, and low-quality areas were concentrated in urban living spaces. The transition from agricultural production land to water bodies contributed most to the improvement of ecological environment quality, while the conversion of agricultural production land to urban living land was the primary cause for the decline of quality.

Key words: production-living-ecology space; multi scenario simulation; PLUS; Yellow River Delta Efficient Ecological Economic Zone; ecological environment effect