欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是

应用生态学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 325-336.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202602.021

• 生态系统服务与区域可持续专栏 • 上一篇    下一篇

神农架国家公园生态系统服务协同关系变化的多情景模拟

郑彬彬1,2, 曾杰1,2*, 崔欣雨3, 李江风3, 杨猛1,2, 杨天1,2   

  1. 1中国地质大学(武汉)区域生态过程与环境演变湖北省重点实验室, 武汉 430074;
    2中国地质大学(武汉)地理与信息工程学院, 武汉 430074;
    3中国地质大学(武汉)公共管理学院, 武汉 430074
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-03 接受日期:2025-11-24 出版日期:2026-02-18 发布日期:2026-08-18
  • 通讯作者: * E-mail: zengjie@cug.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:郑彬彬, 女, 2001年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事人类活动演化及其生态环境效应研究。E-mail: bbz@cug.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(42571363)、神农架国家公园本底资源综合调查研究项目(SNJNP2023011)、神农架金丝猴保育生物学湖北省重点实验室开放课题基金(SNJGKL2023011)和中国地质大学(武汉)教学实验室开放资金(SKJ2024181)

Multi-scenario simulation of synergistic dynamics in ecosystem services within Shennongjia National Park

ZHENG Binbin1,2, ZENG Jie1,2*, CUI Xinyu3, LI Jiangfeng3, YANG Meng1,2, YANG Tian1,2   

  1. 1Hubei Key Laboratory of Regional Ecology and Environmental Change, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan 430074, China;
    2School of Geography and Information Engineering, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan 430074, China;
    3School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan 430074, China
  • Received:2025-05-03 Accepted:2025-11-24 Online:2026-02-18 Published:2026-08-18

摘要: 理解当前和未来国家公园生态系统服务间的权衡/协同关系和变化趋势,是推进国家公园生态系统整体性保护和科学管理的重要基础。本研究以神农架国家公园为研究对象,耦合PLUS和InVEST模型,基于自然发展、生态保护和旅游发展3种情景,模拟评估2030和2050年的土地利用和生态系统服务变化。结合Spearman相关分析和K-means聚类,识别生态系统服务间权衡/协同关系,划定生态系统服务簇功能结构,探测其未来变化特征。结果表明: 2020—2050年,不同生态系统服务呈现差异化演变特征。其中,游憩服务整体保持稳定;产水量、土壤保持和生境质量呈下降趋势,且在旅游发展情景下降幅最显著,分别减少359769.00 mm、28388.70 t 和 0.11;碳储存服务仅在生态保护情景下显著增长,增量达102096.71 t。不同情景下的生态系统服务间关系以协同为主且变化显著;在自然发展和旅游发展情景下,权衡关系减弱而协同关系增强,碳储存与产水量从权衡关系转变为协同;在生态保护情景下,权衡/协同关系基本不变。基于不同生态系统服务权衡/协同关系的K-means聚类,本研究提取出严格保护型、科教游憩型、社区生活型和生态保育型4种生态系统服务簇,不同情景下生态系统服务簇的格局变化较小、分布相对稳定。基于不同服务簇分布格局及内部特征提出了相应的生态管理策略,旨在为国家公园的生态系统整体性保护提供科学依据。

关键词: 生态系统服务, 多情景模拟, 权衡/协同, K-means聚类分析, 神农架国家公园

Abstract: Understanding the trade-offs, synergies, and dynamics among ecosystem services (ESs) under both current and future conditions is crucial foundation for promoting holistic ecosystem conservation and scientific management of national park. Using the PLUS and InVEST models, we assessed land use and ES changes of Shennongjia National Park in 2030 and 2050 under three scenarios: Natural development, ecological conservation, and tourism development. We used Spearman correlation analysis and K-means clustering to identify trade-offs and synergies among ESs, delineate the functional structure of ES bundles, and examine their dynamics. The results showed that different ESs exhibited distinct evolutionary trends from 2020 to 2050. Recreational services remained relatively stable overall. Water yield, soil conservation, and habitat quality showed declining trends, with the most significant reductions under the tourism development scenario by 359769.00 mm, 28388.70 t, and 0.11, respectively. Carbon storage increased significantly only under the ecological conservation scenario, with a gain of 102096.71 t. Relationships among ESs under different scenarios were predominantly synergistic and showed notable changes. Under the natural development and tourism development scenarios, trade-offs weakened while synergies strengthened. The relationship between carbon storage and water yield shifted from trade-off to synergy. Under the ecological conservation scenario, trade-offs and synergies remained largely unchanged. Based on K-means clustering of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies, four distinct types of ES bundles were identified: strict protection, science education and recreation, community livelihood, and ecological restoration. The spatial patterns of ES bundles showed minimal variation and remained relatively stable across different scenarios. Based on the distribution patterns and internal characteristics of different ES bundles, we proposed corresponding ecological management strategies to provide a scientific basis for the holistic conservation of national park ecosystems.

Key words: ecosystem service, multi-scenario simulation, trade-offs/synergies, K-means clustering analysis, Shennongjia National Park