欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是

应用生态学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 1202-1216.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202604.025

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

闽江流域生态系统服务权衡与协同机制及空间治理路径

邹亚锋*, 李萌, 沈越, 赵恩惠, 罗锋, 吴聘奇   

  1. 福州大学环境与安全工程学院, 福州 350108
  • 收稿日期:2025-11-09 修回日期:2026-02-27 出版日期:2026-04-18 发布日期:2026-05-29
  • 通讯作者: *E-mail: T22007@fzu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:邹亚锋, 男, 1984年生, 博士, 教授。主要从事国土空间规划与土地信息系统研究。E-mail: T22007@fzu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金后期项目(24FGLB058)、福建省自然科学基金面上项目(2024J01275)和国家级大学生创新创业训练计划项目(202510386030)

Trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services and the spatial governance pathways in the Minjiang River Basin

ZOU Yafeng*, LI Meng, SHEN Yue, ZHAO Enhui, LUO Feng, WU Pinqi   

  1. College of Environment and Safety Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China
  • Received:2025-11-09 Revised:2026-02-27 Online:2026-04-18 Published:2026-05-29

摘要: 流域生态系统服务的维持和协同是实现区域生态安全和高质量发展的关键,在快速城市化背景下,其权衡关系日益复杂。本研究基于InVEST模型和游憩指数计算量化闽江流域2010—2023年产水量、碳储量、土壤保持、生境质量和游憩服务5项生态系统服务的时空变化,结合相关性分析、热点分析、地理加权回归、地理探测器、PLUS模型和DPSIR模型,揭示其权衡与协同关系及驱动机制,并通过多情景预测,提出优化治理路径。结果表明:2010—2023年间,研究区生态系统服务呈“西北高-东南低”空间格局,碳储量总体稳定在145 t·hm-2,生境质量始终高于0.81,游憩服务保持在0.76上下,三者均总体稳定但呈小幅下降趋势,而产水量和土壤保持呈显著波动变化;生态系统服务权衡与协同关系呈现“生态保护区协同强化、城镇扩展区权衡加剧”趋势。生态系统服务间相关性年际变化小,生境质量和游憩服务都与碳储量呈稳定的强协同关系,相关系数(r)达0.607~0.786,产水量与除土壤保持外的其他生态系统服务多呈弱相关(|r|多小于0.3)。地理探测器结果显示,GDP(解释力q值最高达0.285)和降水(q值最高达0.400)是产水量-生境质量的主要驱动因子,GDP、降水及距保护区距离交互影响游憩服务-生境质量关系演变,生态政策对服务协同具有正向效应;情景模拟显示,2030年生态保护情景能促进生态系统服务协同提升,而自然和经济发展情景则会加剧生态与游憩服务间的权衡冲突,凸显了主动生态调控对实现流域可持续发展的重要性。研究结果可为流域生态资源配置和高质量发展提供科学依据。

关键词: 生态系统服务, 权衡与协同, 驱动机制, 空间治理, 闽江流域

Abstract: The maintenance and synergy of ecosystem services within a river basin are fundamental to regional ecological security and high-quality development. Under the context of rapid urbanization, the trade-offs among these services have become increasingly complex. Based on the InVEST model and recreational service index calculations, we quantified the spatiotemporal variations of five types of ecosystem services (water yield, carbon storage, soil conservation, habitat quality, and recreational service) in the Minjiang River Basin from 2010 to 2023. By integrating correlation analysis, hotspot analysis, geographically weighted regression, geographical detector, PLUS model, and the DPSIR model, we analyzed the trade-offs and synergies among these services and elucidated their underlying mechanisms. Through multi-scenario prediction, we further proposed governance paths for optimization. The results showed that ecosystem services exhibited a spatial pattern of “high in the northwest and low in the southeast”. Temporally, carbon storage (generally remaining stable around 145 t·hm-2), habitat quality (consis-tently above 0.81) and recreational services (fluctuated around 0.76) were generally stable but showed a slight declining trend, while both of water yield and soil conservation showed significant fluctuation.The trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services exhibited a trend of “strengthened synergy in ecological protection areas and intensified trade-offs in urban expansion zones”.The correlations among services exhibited minimal interannual variation. There was a strong and stable synergy between carbon storage and both habitat quality and recreational service (Spearman correlation coefficient r reaching 0.607-0.786). Water yield showed weak correlations with most other services except for soil conservation (|r| mostly less than 0.3). The geographical detector results identified GDP (with a maximum explanatory capacity q-value of 0.285) and precipitation (with a maximum q-value of 0.400) as the primary driving factors of water yield-habitat quality. The interaction of these two factors with distance to protected areas drove the evolution of the recreational service-habitat quality relationship, while ecological policies had a positive effect on enhancing synergies among services. Scenario simulation revealed that the ecological conservation scenario would promote synergistic enhancement of ecosystem services by 2030, whereas the nature and economic development scenarios would intensify trade-offs and conflicts between ecological and recreational services. This highlighted the importance of proactive ecological regulation for achieving sustainable watershed development. This study would provide a scientific basis for ecological resource allocation and high-quality development in the basin.

Key words: ecosystem service, trade-offs and synergies, driving mechanism, spatial governance, Minjiang River Basin