欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是

应用生态学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (6): 1861-1870.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202606.001

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

氮添加与降水改变对高寒草甸生长季生态系统碳通量组分的影响

张法伟1*, 汪家鹏2, 祝景彬3, 宋成刚4, 毛绍娟5, 唐亚琳5, 李红琴6   

  1. 1中国科学院西北高原生物研究所青海海北高寒草地生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站, 西宁 810008;
    2国家开发银行青海省分行, 西宁 810008;
    3枣庄学院旅游与资源环境学院, 山东枣庄 277160;
    4青海省工程咨询中心有限责任公司, 西宁 810001;
    5青海大学生态环境工程学院, 西宁 810016;
    6洛阳师范学院生命科学学院, 河南洛阳 471934
  • 收稿日期:2026-01-22 修回日期:2026-04-27 出版日期:2026-06-18 发布日期:2026-12-18
  • 通讯作者: *E-mail: mywing963@126.com
  • 作者简介:张法伟, 男, 1981年生, 博士, 副研究员。主要从事高寒草地碳水过程与功能研究。E-mail: mywing963@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    青海省重点研发与转化计划科技国际合作专项(2024-HZ-801)、国家自然科学基金项目(32471752)和青海省2021、2022昆仑英才-拔尖人才项目

Responses of growing-season ecosystem carbon flux components to nitrogen addition and precipitation manipulation in an alpine meadow

ZHANG Fawei1*, WANG Jiapeng2, ZHU Jingbin3, SONG Chenggang4, MAO Shaojuan5, TANG Yalin5, LI Hongqin6   

  1. 1Qinghai Haibei National Field Research Station of Alpine Grassland Ecosystem, Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining 810008, China;
    2Qinghai Branch, China Development Bank, Xining 810008, China;
    3College of Tourism, Resources and Environment, Zaozhuang University, Zaozhuang 277160, Shandong, China;
    4Qinghai Engineering Consulting Center Co., Ltd., Xining 810001, China;
    5School of Ecological and Environmental Engineering, Qinghai University, Xining 810016, China;
    6College of Life Sciences, Luoyang Normal University, Luoyang 471934, Henan, China
  • Received:2026-01-22 Revised:2026-04-27 Online:2026-06-18 Published:2026-12-18

摘要: 高寒草甸是青藏高原主要的碳汇功能区,揭示其碳交换对全球变化的响应机制,是精确评估区域碳收支的关键。本研究依托在青海海北高寒草地生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站于2017年建立的氮添加(10 g·m-2·a-1)与降水改变(±50%自然降水)双因子随机区组试验平台,采用静态箱-红外气体分析仪法,测定了2025年生长季逐月的土壤呼吸、生态系统呼吸、总初级生产力(GPP)及净生态系统生产力(NEP),并结合植被生产力与土壤水热因子的监测,研究氮、水改变对高寒草甸生态系统碳通量组分的影响强度及调控路径。结果表明:氮添加处理使地上净初级生产力较对照显著增加37.8%,减雨处理使其显著降低19.0%,氮添加与降水改变的交互作用不显著;各处理间0~40 cm土层地下生物量、地下净初级生产力及生态系统净初级生产力均无显著差异。与对照相比,各处理土壤呼吸普遍呈下降趋势。除减雨处理外,其他处理的生态系统呼吸、GPP和NEP与对照相比均趋于增加,其中氮添加处理效应显著,其GPP和NEP分别显著提高33.5%与43.2%。降水改变的主效应不显著,其与氮添加的交互作用仅对GPP呈边际显著。结构方程模型和响应比相关分析表明,氮、水改变主要通过影响土壤温度而非改变植被生产力间接调控碳通量,且氮添加对生态系统呼吸、GPP和NEP的总效应(标准化路径系数β>0.56)强于降水改变(β平均为0.30)。本研究可为全球变化背景下高寒草甸碳汇功能的适应性管理提供科学依据。

关键词: 高寒草甸, 土壤呼吸, 生态系统呼吸, 总初级生产力, 净生态系统生产力

Abstract: Alpine meadow on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau is an important carbon sink. Understanding how the responses of its carbon exchange to global change drivers is essential for accurately assessing the regional carbon budget. In 2017, we conducted a field manipulation experiment at the National Field Research Station for Haibei Alpine Grassland Ecosystem in Qinghai Province, established in 2017. The experiment used a randomized complete block design with a full factorial of nitrogen addition (10 g·m-2·a-1) and precipitation manipulation (±50% of ambient rainfall). To quantify the main and interactive effects of nitrogen deposition and altered precipitation patterns on ecosystem carbon fluxes, we measured monthly soil respiration, ecosystem respiration, gross primary productivity (GPP), and net ecosystem productivity (NEP) using static chambers coupled with an infrared gas analyzer during the growing season of 2025. Key abiotic factors (soil temperature and moisture) and vegetation productivity (above- and below-ground biomass and net primary productivity) were also monitored. The results showed that nitrogen addition significantly increased aboveground net primary productivity by 37.8%, whereas the decreased precipitation treatment reduced it by 19.0%. There was no significant interaction between nitrogen addition and precipitation manipulation. In contrast, belowground biomass, belowground net primary productivity, and ecosystem net primary productivity in the 0-40 cm soil layer did not differ among treatments. Relative to that under CK, soil respiration generally showed a declining trend across all other treatments. In contrast, ecosystem respiration, GPP, and NEP tended to increase, except under the decreased precipitation treatment. Nitrogen addition significantly increased GPP and NEP by 33.5% and 43.2%, respectively. Although precipitation manipulation had no significant main effect, its interaction with nitrogen addition was marginally significant for GPP. Structural equation modeling and correlation analyses of response ratio jointly revealed that nitrogen addition and precipitation manipulation influenced carbon flux primarily through change in soil temperature, rather than through vegetation productivity. The total effects (standardized path coefficient β>0.56) of nitrogen addition on ecosystem respiration, GPP, and NEP were stronger than those of precipitation manipulation (β=0.30). This study would provide scientific evidence for adaptive management of the carbon sink function in alpine meadows under global change scenarios.

Key words: alpine meadow, soil respiration, ecosystem respiration, gross primary productivity, net ecosystem productivity