秸秆在土壤内分解初期氮素矿化与固持的模拟测定

应用生态学报

秸秆在土壤内分解初期氮素矿化与固持的模拟测定

胡希远¹；Kuehne R.F.²

¹西北农林科技大学农学院，杨凌 712100；²Goettingen大学 Goettingen D37073,German

收稿日期:2003-11-07 修回日期:2004-03-02 出版日期:2005-02-18

Simulation of nitrogen mineralization and immobilization of crop straw during it s initial decomposition in soil

HU Xiyuan¹,Kuehne R.F²

¹Northwest Sci-Tech University of Agriculture and Forestry， Yangling 712100,China;²Goettingen University,Goettingen D37073,German

Received:2003-11-07 Revised:2004-03-02 Online:2005-02-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 利用模拟软件Modelmaker对3种作物秸秆在土壤内分解初期氮素循环转化过程进行了模拟，取得了土壤铵态氮、硝态氮、微生物氮及其¹⁵N丰度等6个变量模拟值和测定值的良好一致性.模型模拟对氮转化速率测定的结果表明，土壤微生物主要固持铵态氮，对硝态氮固持非常微弱.氮矿化主要发生于作物秸秆，腐殖质氮的矿化极其微弱.一级动力学方程对秸秆氮素矿化过程的描述优于零级动力学方程.微生物固持氮的再矿化过程落后于氮固持过程，假定再矿化不发生或认为再矿化与固持化同时进行可导致氮矿化与固持速率测定的严重误差.忽略氮硝化过程和挥发损失将导致氮矿化和固持速率的测定值偏低.净固持或净矿化的产生不仅与秸秆碳氮比有关，而且与秸秆在土壤内分解时间有关.

关键词: 水淹, 干扰, 种间关系, 关联, 协变, 松嫩草原

Abstract: The nitrogen (N) transformation of crop straw during its initial decomposition in soil was simulated by Modelmaker software.A good fit was obtained between the simulated and measured data of 6 variables,including the amount of soil ammonium N,nitrate N,microbial biomass N and their¹⁵N atom %.The simulation results indicated that the main N form immobilized by soil microbes was ammonium,while the immobilization of nitrate was very small.N mineralization occurred dominantly in crop straw but very small in humus.The N mineralization of crop straw could be better described by first order than zero order kinetics.N re-mineralization occurred later than N immobilization. The assumptions on the absence of N re-mineralization or the simultaneous presence of re-mineralization and immobilization during straw decomposition led to a serious error in calculating the gross N mineralization and immobilization; while no consideration of nitrification and volatilization losses led to a low estimation of gross N mineralization.The occurrence of net N mineralization or net N immobilization depended not only on the C/N of straw,but also on the duration of straw decomposition.

Key words: Flooding, Disturbance, Interspecific relationships, Association, Co variation, Songnen Steppe

胡希远¹；Kuehne R.F.². 秸秆在土壤内分解初期氮素矿化与固持的模拟测定[J]. 应用生态学报.

HU Xiyuan¹,Kuehne R.F². Simulation of nitrogen mineralization and immobilization of crop straw during it s initial decomposition in soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology.

[1]	刘志民, 余海滨, 汪海洋. 论沙丘植被过程的基本生态关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(1): 1-7.
[2]	林雅超, 郭小平, 李文烨, 杨帆, 罗超, 郝嘉航, 吴禹希. 煤矿排矸场对周边土壤种子库及植被分布格局的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(1): 95-101.
[3]	朱威霖, 徐超, 龙婷, 吴鑫磊, 陈杰, 梁艳君, 李景文. 基于回归保护的东北红豆杉野生种群维持的制约因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(8): 2133-2141.
[4]	马凡强, 简尊吉, 郭泉水, 秦爱丽, 裴顺祥, 张光箭, 黄吉兰, 周李萍. 不同农林废弃物混合基质对崖柏扦插育苗的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1817-1824.
[5]	王静轩, 张佳鑫, 向泽宇, 张昭臣, 习丹, 万慧霖, 彭焱松, 周赛霞. 庐山25 hm²森林样地乔木层优势种空间分布格局及关联性 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1491-1499.
[6]	孙兴悦, 张雨鉴, 秦倩倩, 白岩松, 刘艳红. 火干扰下白桦树干不同高度的树皮性状及其环境解释 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(2): 315-323.
[7]	韩成全, 王慧, 王健伟, 李富宽, 王振南, 胡希怡, 杨燕, 吕慎金. 塑化剂对母性行为干扰效应及其潜在机制的研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(11): 3157-3168.
[8]	管凝, 程金花, 侯芳, 曾合州, 沈子雅, 赵梦圆, 秦建淼. 西南喀斯特地区典型林分土壤优先流特征及影响因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(1): 31-38.
[9]	潘卫涛, 岳邦瑞, 姚龙杰, 薛建锋, 李军峰. 耦合风险与服务的市域生态安全格局构建——以陕西省咸阳市为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(1): 178-186.
[10]	季飞龙, 李雪华, 李晓兰, 贾美玉, 赵志勇. 退化草地物种种内和种间功能性状变异对放牧的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(9): 2371-2378.
[11]	韩安霞, 邱婧, 何春梅, 尹秋龙, 贾仕宏, 罗颖, 李晨璐, 郝占庆. 秦岭皇冠优势灌木苦糖果的空间分布格局及种内种间关联 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(8): 2027-2034.
[12]	邱婧, 韩安霞, 何春梅, 尹秋龙, 贾仕宏, 罗颖, 李晨璐, 郝占庆. 秦岭优势乔木锐齿槲栎的空间分布格局及种内关联 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(8): 2035-2042.
[13]	侯星辰, 鲁绍伟, 向昌林, 李少宁, 赵娜, 徐晓天. 不同母质温带草地植物群落多样性对人为干扰的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(8): 2153-2160.
[14]	唐蛟, 殷金忠, 潘飞飞, 李俊娜, 赵云飞, 吴大付. 生态恢复中灌丛保育效应研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(8): 2279-2285.
[15]	杨文松, 容丽, 叶天木, 王梦洁, 李璇, 王琪, 李婷婷, 曾珍. 黔中喀斯特次生林优势物种空间分布格局及关联性 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(5): 1215-1222.