火电厂生态工业园的能值评估

应用生态学报 ›› 2004, Vol. ›› Issue (6): 1047-1050.

火电厂生态工业园的能值评估

王灵梅, 张金屯

山西大学, 太原 030006

收稿日期:2003-11-05 修回日期:2004-02-04 出版日期:2004-06-15
通讯作者: 王灵梅
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(30070140)

Emergy evaluation of power plant eco-industrial park

WANG Lingmei, ZHANG Jintun

Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China

Received:2003-11-05 Revised:2004-02-04 Online:2004-06-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 提出了反映火电厂生态工业园特点的能值评价指标:能值产出率PEYR和能值投资率PEIR考虑了园区各成员的共同贡献,即PEYR= =1(Fi+Ri+Ni)/ Fi和PEIR= Fi/ Fi/ (Ni+Ri);环境负荷率PELR和能值可持续指标PESI考虑了火电厂生态工业园节省的不可再生能源、可再生能源、投入能值和减少的环境负荷,即PELR= Fi/F'和PESI=PEYR/PELR.以朔州火电厂生态工业园为案例进行了能值分析,结果表明,该能值评价指标能全面度量火电厂生态工业园及其可持续性.

关键词: 生态工业园, 火电厂, 能值, 可持续性

Abstract: In this paper,new emergy indices for the material circulation utilization and energy cascade utilization were presented to evaluate the emergy of power plant eco industrial park.The common contribution of the members in power plant eco industrial park should be accounted for emergy yield ratio (PEYR) and emergy investment ratio (PEIR),namely, PEYR= (Fi+Ri+Ni)/ Fi and PEIR= Fi/ (Ni+Ri).Saved renewable and nonrenewable resources and purchased resources and decreased environmental load should be accounted for environmental loading ratio (PELR) and index of sustainability (PESI),namely, PELR= Fi/F' and PESI=PEYR/PELR.Case analysis on the Shuozhou power plant eco industrial park showed that new emergy indices were practical in evaluating the power plant eco-industrial park.

Key words: Eco-industrial park, Power plant, Emergy, Sustainability

中图分类号:

X171.4

王灵梅, 张金屯. 火电厂生态工业园的能值评估[J]. 应用生态学报, 2004, (6): 1047-1050.

WANG Lingmei, ZHANG Jintun. Emergy evaluation of power plant eco-industrial park[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2004, (6): 1047-1050.

参考文献

[1] Boirklund J,Geber U,Rydberg T.2001.Emergy analysis of municipal wastewater treatment and generation of electricity by digestion of sewage sludge.Resour Conserv Recycl,31(2):293～316
[2] Brown MT,Ulgiati S.1997.Emergy-based indices and ratios to evaluate sustainability:Monitoring economies and technology toward environmentally sound innovation.Ecol Eng,9(1):51～69
[3] Brown MT,Ulgiati S.2002.Emergy evaluations and environmental loading of electricity production systems.J Clean Prod,10(2):321～334
[4] Brown MT,Buranakarn V.2003.Emergy indices and ratios for sustainable material cycles and recycle options.Resour Conserv Recycl,38(1):1～22
[5] Caruso C,Catenacci G,Marchettini N,et al.2001.Emergy based analysis of Italian electricity production system.J Therm Ana Calort,66(2):265～272
[6] Deng N-S(邓南圣),Wu F(吴峰).2002.Theory and Application of Industrial Ecology.Beijing:Chemical Industrial Press.179～201(in Chinese)
[7] Lan S-F(蓝盛芳),Qin P(钦佩),Lu H-F(陆宏芳).2002.Emergy Evaluation of Eco-economic System.Beijing:Chemical Industrial Press.167～193(in Chinese)
[8] Li S-C(李双成),Fu X-F(傅小锋),Zheng D(郑度).2001.Emergy analysis for evaluation sustainability of Chinese economics.J Nat Resour(自然资源学报),16(3):297～304(in Chinese)
[9] Lu H-F(陆宏芳),Lang S-F(蓝盛芳),Peng S-L(彭少麟).2003.Extending study on emergyindices for sustainability development.Environ Sci(环境科学),22(4):380～384(in Chinese)
[10] Ulgiati S,Brown MT.2002.Quantifying the environmental support for dilution and abatement of process emissions-The case of electricity production.J Clean Prod,10(2):335～348
[11] Yang H,Li YR,Shen JZ,et al.2003.Evaluating waste treatment,recycle and reuse industrial system:An application of the emergy approach.Ecol Model,160(1):13～21

[1]	赵宇豪, 罗宇航, 易腾云, 王振宇, 王娜, 吴健生. 基于生态系统服务供需匹配的深圳市生态安全格局构建 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(9): 2475-2484.
[2]	马文静, 刘娟. 基于能值分析的中国生态经济系统可持续发展评估 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(6): 2029-2038.
[3]	李洋, 孙志刚, 张旭博, 杨景晁, 杭胜, 李仕冀, 朱婉雪, 吕云, 欧阳竹. 种养系统可持续发展指数的空间格局及其演变趋势——以山东省为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(7): 2371-2383.
[4]	周兵兵,马群,邬建国,胡国华,毛德华,曾小箕,郭杰,房学宁,刘宇鹏,吕立刚. 再论可持续性科学: 新形势与新机遇 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(1): 325-336.
[5]	邹志刚, 张浩, 曾昭霞, 张建云, 赵杰军, 包松莲, 曾馥平. 云南断陷盆地喀斯特4种典型种植模式的能值分析 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(8): 2641-2650.
[6]	殷文, 柴强, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 赵财, 于爱忠. 绿洲灌区典型种植模式的水热利用与碳排放和能值分析 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(11): 3658-3668.
[7]	杨青, 刘耕源. 森林生态系统服务价值非货币量核算:以京津冀城市群为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(11): 3747-3759.
[8]	李晓州, 郝明德, 赵晶, 王哲, 付威, 刘增照. 不同降水年型下长期施肥的小麦产量效应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(10): 3237-3244.
[9]	刘彦伶, 李渝, 张雅蓉, 黄兴成, 张文安, 蒋太明. 长期氮磷钾肥配施对贵州黄壤玉米产量和土壤养分可持续性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(11): 3581-3588.
[10]	李婧, 黄璐, 严力蛟. 中国“三大经济模式”的可持续发展——以真实发展指标对6个典型城市的可持续性评估为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(6): 1785-1794.
[11]	邓健, 赵发珠, 韩新辉, 冯永忠, 杨改河. 黄土高原典型流域种植业发展模式的能值分析 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(5): 1576-1584.
[12]	杨青, 逯承鹏, 周锋, 耿涌, 景红双, 任婉侠, 薛冰. 基于能值-生态足迹模型的东北老工业基地生态安全评价——以辽宁省为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(5): 1594-1602.
[13]	李春发,曹莹莹**,杨建超,杨琪琪. 基于能值及系统动力学的中新天津生态城可持续发展模式情景分析 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(8): 2455-2465.
[14]	李缙荣1,张小洪1**,张航宾2,潘恒宇1,刘强1. 污水处理综合系统环境经济效益评估 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(8): 2482-2492.
[15]	秦传新1,2,3,陈丕茂1,2,3**,张安凯1,袁华荣1,2,3,李国迎1,2,3,舒黎明1,2,3,周艳波1,2,3,黎小国1,2,3. 珠海万山海域生态系统服务价值与能值评估 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(6): 1847-1853.