基于SVAT模型的冬小麦光合作用和蒸散过程研究

应用生态学报 ›› 2002, Vol. ›› Issue (11): 1394-1398.

基于SVAT模型的冬小麦光合作用和蒸散过程研究

莫兴国, 刘苏峡, 林忠辉

中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 北京, 100101

收稿日期:2001-01-15 修回日期:2001-05-08 出版日期:2002-11-15
通讯作者: 莫兴国,男,1966年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事生态系统物质和能量交换过程的模拟与试验研究.E-mail:moxg@igsnrr.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重大项目(49890330);中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所创新资助项目(CXIOGC000501).

MO Xingguo, LIU Suxia, LIN Zhonghui

Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101

Received:2001-01-15 Revised:2001-05-08 Online:2002-11-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在已建立的土壤植被大气传输(SVAT)模型中,冠层光合作用/气孔导度耦合子模型可区分遮荫叶和受光叶光合作用强度的差异;作物生长子模型考虑了作物生长呼吸和维持呼吸.模拟与实测结果对比发现,日总蒸散量实测和模拟的根均方差(RMSD)为0.65mm,平均绝对差(MAPD)为14%;对冠层上部净光合作用率日变化过程而言,实测和模拟结果具有较好的一致性.利用模型模拟了冬小麦全生育期净光合作用率和蒸散的演变过程.最后,分析了冬小麦蒸散和水分利用效率对不同最大叶面积指数、大气CO₂浓度和叶片N含量的响应.

关键词: 光合作用, 蒸散, 水分利用效率

Abstract: Two submodels were added to the developed soil vegetation atmosphere transfer model. Of the two sub models, one was the canopy photosynthesis/stomatal coupled sub model distinguishing the sun light and shaded leaves, and the second was the simplified growth sub model considering growth respiration and maintenance respiration. The comparison of measured and simulated daily evapotranspiration showed that the RMSD (root mean standard deviation) of model prediction to observation was 0.65 mm, and MAPD (mean absolute percent difference) was 14%. The daily course of the simulated and measured photosynthesis rates at the top of canopy were in good consistency. With the high resolution meteorological data, the canopy net photosynthesis and evapotranspiration were simulated over the whole growing season.The sensitivities of maximum leaf area index, environmental CO₂ concentration and leaf nitrogen content to evapotranspiration and water use efficiency were also analyzed.

中图分类号:

Q945.11

莫兴国, 刘苏峡, 林忠辉. 基于SVAT模型的冬小麦光合作用和蒸散过程研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 2002, (11): 1394-1398.

MO Xingguo, LIU Suxia, LIN Zhonghui. [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2002, (11): 1394-1398.

参考文献

[1] Choudhury BJ.2000. A sensitivity analysis of the radiation use efficiency for gross photosynthesis and net carbon accumulation by wheat.Agric For Meteor,101:217～234
[2] Collatz GJ, Ball JT, Berry JA.1991. Physiological and environmental regulation of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration:A model that includes the laminar boundary layer.Agric For Meteor, 54:107～136
[3] Farquhar GD, Caemmerer SV, Berry JA.1980. A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO₂ assimilation in leaves of C3 species.Planta, 149:78～90
[4] Grant RF, Kimball BA, Pinter PJ.1995. Carbon dioxide effects on crop energy balance: Testing ecosystem with a free-air CO₂ enrichment(FACE) experiment.Agron J,87:446～457
[5] Leuning R, Kelliher FM, De Pury DGG.1995.Leaf nitrogen, photosynthesis, conductances and transpiration:Scaling from leaves to canopies.Plant Cell Environ,18:1183～1200
[6] Mo X-G(莫兴国).1998. Modeling and validating water and energy transfer in soil-vegetation-atmosphere system.Acta Meteor Sin(气象学报),56(3):323～332 (in Chinese)
[7] Mynebi RB, Ganapol BD.1992. Remote sensing of vegetation canopy photosynthetic and stomatal conductance efficiencies. Remote Sen Environ, 42:217～238
[8] Norman J.1985. Modeling the complete crop canopy. In:Baarfield B, Gerber J eds. Modification of the Aerial Environment of Crops. America Society of Agricultural Engineering Monograph No.2, ASAE, St Joseph, Michigan. 249～277
[9] Sellers PJ, Randall DA,Collatz GJ.1996. A revised land surface parameterization (SiB2) for atmospheric GCMs I. Model description.J Climate, 9:676～705
[10] Spitter CJT.1986.Separating the diffuse and direct component of global radiation and its implications for modeling canopy photosynthesis II. Calculation of canopy photosynthesis. Agric For Meteor,38:231～242
[11] Wang YP, Leuning R.1998. A two-leaf model for canopy conductance, photosynthesis and partitioning of available energy I.Model description. Agric For Meteor,91:89～111
[12] Zhou Y-H(周允华), Xiang Y-Q(项月琴), Li J(李俊),et al.1997. Simulation of winter wheat and summer maize production under optimum conditions. Chin J Appl Ecol(应用生态学报),8(3):257～262(in Chinese)

[1]	甘菲菲, 招礼军, 霍灿灿, 王晟. 光照和水分对四季米仔兰幼苗生长的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(2): 439-446.
[2]	王复标, 杨小龙, 康华靖, 叶子飘. 不同环境条件下光合作用对光响应模型的研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1995-2005.
[3]	蓝浩宸, 刘琰琰, 张玉芳, 康杨. 基于标准化降水蒸散指数的川西高原干旱时空变化 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1533-1540.
[4]	张慧玉, 岳丹斐, 潘晓娇, 郝露露, 刘伟成, 郑春芳. 5-羟色胺在红树植物秋茄幼苗抗寒中的作用 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(5): 1263-1271.
[5]	张鸿志, 张文娥, 樊卫国, 欧阳章维, 蔡虎, 郝振坤, 王瑞璞, 潘学军. 核桃/刺梨复合种植对刺梨生长、果实产量、品质和土壤性质的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(3): 699-707.
[6]	王筱迪, 张杰铭, 姜姜, 刘自强. 杉木水分利用效率对混交和气象因子的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(12): 3232-3238.
[7]	胡晓创, 高婉婷, 孙守家, 张劲松, 孟平, 蔡金峰. 刺槐生长和内在水分利用效率对气候因子的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10): 2610-2618.
[8]	李民青, 周乐, 王喜勇, 康晓珊, 李从娟, 刘冉. 7种荒漠木本植物枝干与叶片光合特征及其影响因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10): 2637-2643.
[9]	赵雷, 靳海笛, 曹晓云, 邓文辉, 杜灵娟. 六个东方铁筷子品种对干旱胁迫的生理响应及抗旱性评价 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10): 2644-2654.
[10]	时一平, 宋彦涛, 那木汗, 彭擎天, 吕林有, 申悦, 倩娜, 乌云娜. 羊草和紫花苜蓿人工草地光合特性 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10): 2655-2662.
[11]	高福洁, 崔鸿娇, 韩丙芳, 贺彦玲, 彭文栋, 刘定鑫, 伏兵哲, 马红彬. 亏缺灌溉对干旱区两种乡土植物种子生产性能及其水分利用效率的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(9): 2379-2387.
[12]	黄辉, 郑昌玲, 张劲松, 孟平. 1980—2019年南太行地区气候变化趋势 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(8): 2139-2145.
[13]	邴龙飞, 王娇月, 尹岩, 郗凤明, 张文凤, 马铭靖, 牛乐. 地市尺度气候调节服务评估——以福州市为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1966-1974.
[14]	张永娥, 赵阳, 路伟伟, 余新晓, 张晓明, 王昭艳, 刘冰, 辛艳. CO₂浓度和土壤含水量对植物个体尺度短期水分利用效率的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(6): 1505-1510.
[15]	崔茜琳, 何云玲, 李宗善. 青藏高原植被水分利用效率时空变化及与气候因子的关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(6): 1525-1532.