
Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (7): 1941-1951.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202507.019
Special Issue: 专家见解
• Academician’s Viewpoint • Previous Articles Next Articles
HE Nianpeng1,2,4*, YAN Pu1,2, GUO Hongbo3,4
Received:2025-02-10
Accepted:2025-06-25
Online:2025-07-18
Published:2026-01-18
HE Nianpeng, YAN Pu, GUO Hongbo. Predicting ecosystem primary productivity on plant community traits: Theoretical basis and research progress[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2025, 36(7): 1941-1951.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.cjae.net/EN/10.13287/j.1001-9332.202507.019
| [1] Violle C, Navas M, Vile D, et al. Let the concept of trait be functional. Oikos, 2007, 116: 882-892 [2] 何念鹏, 刘聪聪, 徐丽, 等. 生态系统性状对宏生态研究的启示与挑战. 生态学报, 2020, 40(8): 2507-2522 [3] Shipley B, De Bello F, Cornelissen JHC, et al. Reinforcing loose foundation stones in trait-based plant ecology. Oecologia, 2016, 180: 923-931 [4] Webb CT, Hoeting JA, Ames GM, et al. A structured and dynamic framework to advance traits-based theory and prediction in ecology. Ecology Letters, 2010, 13: 267-283 [5] Funk JL, Larson JE, Ames GM, et al. Revisiting the Holy Grail: Using plant functional traits to understand ecological processes. Biological Reviews, 2017, 92: 1156-1173 [6] He NP, Liu CC, Piao SL, et al. Ecosystem traits lin-king functional traits to macroecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2019, 34: 200-210 [7] He NP, Yan P, Liu CC, et al. Predicting ecosystem productivity based on plant community traits. Trends in Plant Science, 2023, 28: 43-53 [8] Kattge J, Knorr W, Raddatz T, et al. Quantifying photosynthetic capacity and its relationship to leaf nitrogen content for global-scale terrestrial biosphere models. Global Change Biology, 2009, 15: 976-991 [9] Farquhar GD. Models of integrated photosynthesis of cells and leaves. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 1989, 323: 357-367 [10] Luo XZ, Chen JM, Liu J, et al. Comparison of big-leaf, two-big-leaf, and two-leaf upscaling schemes for evapotranspiration estimation using coupled carbon-water modeling. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 2018, 123: 207-225 [11] McGill BJ. The what, how and why of doing macroecology. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2019, 28: 6-17 [12] Huang MT, Piao SL, Ciais P, et al. Air temperature optima of vegetation productivity across global biomes. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2019, 3: 772-779 [13] Zhang JH, Hedin LO, Li MX, et al. Leaf N:P ratio does not predict productivity trends across natural terrestrial ecosystems. Ecology, 2022, 103: e3789 [14] Malhi Y, Girardin CAJ, Goldsmith GR, et al. The variation of productivity and its allocation along a tropical elevation gradient: A whole carbon budget perspective. New Phytologist, 2017, 214: 1019-1032 [15] McGill BJ. Matters of scale. Science, 2010, 328: 575-576 [16] Liu CC, Li Y, Yan P, et al. How to improve the predictions of plant functional traits on ecosystem functioning? Frontiers in Plant Science, 2021, 12: 622260 [17] Muscarella R, Uriarte M. Do community-weighted mean functional traits reflect optimal strategies? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2016, 283: 20152434 [18] Reich PB, Walters MB, Ellsworth DS. From tropics to tundra: Global convergence in plant functioning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1997, 94: 13730-13734 [19] Garnier E, Cortez J, Billes G, et al. Plant functional markers capture ecosystem properties during secondary succession. Ecology, 2004, 85: 2630-2637 [20] Yang J, Cao M, Swenson NG. Why functional traits do not predict tree demographic rates. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2018, 33: 326-336 [21] Lieth H. Modeling the primary productivity of the world//Lieth H, Whittaker RH, eds. Primary Productivity of the Biosphere. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1975: 237-263 [22] Boysen-Jensen P. The substance production of plants. Jena: Verlag von Gustav Fischer, 1932 [23] Watson DJ. The physiological basis of variation in yield. Advances in Agronomy, 1952, 4: 101-145 [24] Monsi M, Saeki T. On the light factor in plant communities and its importance for substance production. Japanese Journal of Botany, 1953, 14: 22-52 [25] 方精云, 柯金虎, 唐志尧, 等. 生物生产力的“4P”概念、估算及其相互关系. 植物生态学报, 2001, 25(4): 414-419 [26] Beer C, Reichstein M, Tomelleri E, et al. Terrestrial gross carbon dioxide uptake: Global distribution and covariation with climate. Science, 2010, 329: 834-838 [27] Falge E, Baldocchi D, Tenhunen J, et al. Seasonality of ecosystem respiration and gross primary production as derived from FLUXNET measurements. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2002, 113: 53-74 [28] Monteith J. Solar radiation and productivity in tropical ecosystems. Journal of Applied Ecology, 1972, 9: 747-766 [29] Running SW, Nemani RR, Heinsch FA, et al. A continuous satellite-derived measure of global terrestrial primary production. Bioscience, 2004, 54: 547-560 [30] Gu L, Post WM, Baldocchi DD, et al. Characterizing the seasonal dynamics of plant community photosynthesis across a range of vegetation types//Noormets A, ed. Phenology of Ecosystem Processes. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2009: 35-58 [31] Rosenzweig ML. Net primary productivity of terrestrial communities: Prediction from climatological data. The American Naturalist, 1968, 102: 67-74 [32] Lieth H, Whittaker RH. Primary Productivity of the Biosphere. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1975 [33] Uchijima Z, Seino H. Agroclimatic evaluation of net primary productivity of natural vegetations (1) Chikugo model for evaluating net primary productivity. Journal of Agricultural Meteorology, 1985, 40: 343-352 [34] Clark DA, Brown S, Kicklighter DW, et al. Net primary production in tropical forests: An evaluation and synthesis of existing field data. Ecological Applications, 2001, 11: 371-384 [35] Brovkin V, Bendtsen J, Claussen M, et al. Carbon cycle, vegetation, and climate dynamics in the Holocene: Experiments with the CLIMBER-2 model. Global Biogeo-chemical Cycles, 2002, 16: 1-20 [36] Sánchez-Azofeifa GA, Castro K, Wright SJ, et al. Differences in leaf traits, leaf internal structure, and spectral reflectance between two communities of lianas and trees: Implications for remote sensing in tropical environments. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2009, 113: 2076-2088 [37] Zhao MS, Heinsch FA, Nemani RR, et al. Improvements of the MODIS terrestrial gross and net primary production global data set. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2005, 95: 164-176 [38] Jenkins J, Richardson AD, Braswell B, et al. Refining light-use efficiency calculations for a deciduous forest canopy using simultaneous tower-based carbon flux and radiometric measurements. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2007, 143: 64-79 [39] Ruimy A, Kergoat L, Bondeau A, et al. Comparing global models of terrestrial net primary productivity (NPP): Analysis of differences in light absorption and light-use efficiency. Global Change Biology, 1999, 5: 56-64 [40] Pei YY, Dong JW, Zhang Y, et al. Evolution of light use efficiency models: Improvement, uncertainties, and implications. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2022, 317: 108905 [41] Farquhar GD, von Caemmerer S, Berry JA. A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta, 1980, 149: 78-90 [42] Cramer W, Bondeau A, Woodward FI, et al. Global response of terrestrial ecosystem structure and function to CO2 and climate change: Results from six dynamic glo-bal vegetation models. Global Change Biology, 2001, 7: 357-373 [43] Smith B, Warlind D, Arneth A, et al. Implications of incorporating N cycling and N limitations on primary production in an individual-based dynamic vegetation model. Biogeosciences, 2014, 11: 2027-2054 [44] Fisher RA, Muszala S, Verteinstein M, et al. Taking off the training wheels: The properties of a dynamic vegetation model without climate envelopes. Geoscientific Model Development, 2015, 8: 3293-3357 [45] Thonicke K, Spessa A, Prentice IC, et al. The influence of vegetation, fire spread and fire behaviour on biomass burning and trace gas emissions: Results from a process-based model. Biogeosciences, 2010, 7: 1991-2011 [46] Wieder WR, Cleveland CC, Lawrence DM, et al. Effects of model structural uncertainty on carbon cycle projections: Biological nitrogen fixation as a case study. Environmental Research Letters, 2015, 10: 044016 [47] Reich PB. Key canopy traits drive forest productivity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2012, 279: 2128-2134 [48] Peng YK, Bloomfield KJ, Prentice IC. A theory of plant function helps to explain leaf-trait and productivity responses to elevation. New Phytologist, 2020, 226: 1274-1284 [49] Fyllas NM, Bentley LP, Shenkin A, et al. Solar radiation and functional traits explain the decline of forest primary productivity along a tropical elevation gradient. Ecology Letters, 2017, 20: 730-740 [50] Bahar NHA, Ishida FY, Weerasinghe LK, et al. Leaf-level photosynthetic capacity in lowland Amazonian and high-elevation Andean tropical moist forests of Peru. New Phytologist, 2017, 214: 1002-1018 [51] Wang H, Prentice IC, Davis TW, et al. Photosynthetic responses to altitude: An explanation based on optimality principles. New Phytologist, 2017, 213: 976-982 [52] Wang H, Prentice IC, Keenan TF, et al. Towards a universal model for carbon dioxide uptake by plants. Nature Plants, 2017, 3: 734-741 [53] He NP, Liu CC, Tian M, et al. Variation in leaf anatomical traits from tropical to cold-temperate forests and linkage to ecosystem functions. Functional Ecology, 2018, 32: 10-19 [54] Barry KE, Pinter GA, Strini JW, et al. A graphical null model for scaling biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships. Journal of Ecology, 2021, 109: 1549-1560 [55] Šímová I, Storch D. The enigma of terrestrial primary productivity: Measurements, models, scales and the diversity-productivity relationship. Ecography, 2017, 40: 239-252 [56] Zhang Y, He NP, Li MX, et al. Community chlorophyll quantity determines the spatial variation of grassland productivity. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 801: 149567 [57] Yan P, Li MX, Yu GR, et al. Plant community traits associated with nitrogen can predict spatial variability in productivity. Ecological Indicators, 2022, 140: 109001 [58] Jackson RB, Sperry JS, Dawson TE. Root water uptake and transport: Using physiological processes in global predictions. Trends in Plant Science, 2000, 5: 482-488 [59] Croft H, Chen JM, Luo XZ, et al. Leaf chlorophyll content as a proxy for leaf photosynthetic capacity. Global Change Biology, 2017, 23: 3513-3524 [60] LeBauer DS, Treseder KK. Nitrogen limitation of net primary productivity in terrestrial ecosystems is globally distributed. Ecology, 2008, 89: 371-379 [61] Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, et al. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature, 2004, 428: 821-827 [62] He JS, Wang ZH, Wang X, et al. A test of the generality of leaf trait relationships on the Tibetan Plateau. New Phytologist, 2006, 170: 835-848 [63] Moore S, Adu-Bredu S, Duah-Gyamfi A, et al. Forest biomass, productivity and carbon cycling along a rainfall gradient in West Africa. Global Change Biology, 2018, 24: 496-510 [64] 李颖, 何念鹏, 刘聪聪. 植物功能性状网络: 概念体系发展与应用进展. 生态学报, 2024, 44(18): 7944-7961 [65] Yan P, He NP, Yu KL, et al. Integrating multiple plant functional traits to predict ecosystem productivity. Communications Biology, 2023, 6: 239 [66] van der Plas F, Schröder-Georgi T, Weigelt A, et al. Plant traits alone are poor predictors of ecosystem pro-perties and long-term ecosystem functioning. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2020, 4: 1602-1611 [67] Hagan JG, Henn JJ, Osterman WH. Plant traits alone are good predictors of ecosystem properties when used carefully. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2023, 7: 332-334 [68] 何念鹏, 刘聪聪, 张佳慧, 等. 植物性状研究的机遇与挑战: 从器官到群落. 生态学报, 2018, 38(19): 6787-6796 [69] Li Y, He NP. Innovations and prospectives of multidimensional trait integration. New Phytologist, 2024, 244: 337-340 [70] Jing X, Muys B, Bruelheide H, et al. Above- and belowground complementarity rather than selection drives tree diversity-productivity relationships in European forests. Functional Ecology, 2021, 35: 1756-1767 [71] Anderegg WR. Spatial and temporal variation in plant hydraulic traits and their relevance for climate change impacts on vegetation. New Phytologist, 2015, 205: 1008-1014 [72] Bruelheide H, Dengler J, Purschke O, et al. Global trait-environment relationships of plant communities. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2018, 2: 1906-1917 [73] Moreno-Martínez Á, Camps-Valls G, Kattge J, et al. A methodology to derive global maps of leaf traits using remote sensing and climate data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2018, 218: 69-88 [74] Šímová I, Violle C, Kraft NJ, et al. Shifts in trait means and variances in North American tree assemblages: Species richness patterns are loosely related to the functional space. Ecography, 2015, 38: 649-658 [75] 于贵瑞, 于福波, 于宗绪, 等. 宏观生态系统科学研究的思维维度和认知尺度及多学科坐标体系. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(2): 327-340 [76] Su YJ, Guo QH, Jin SC, et al. The development and evaluation of a backpack LiDAR system for accurate and efficient forest inventory. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2020, 18: 1660-1664 [77] Yan ZB, Guo ZF, Serbin SP, et al. Spectroscopy outperforms leaf trait relationships for predicting photosynthetic capacity across different forest types. New Phyto-logist, 2021, 232: 134-147 [78] Ma HZ, Mo LD, Crowther TW, et al. The global distribution and environmental drivers of aboveground versus belowground plant biomass. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2021, 5: 1110-1122 |
| [1] | LI Xiangyu, SU Menglin, YAN Ke, WANG Weifeng. Carbon flux simulation of southern poplar plantation based on Biome-BGC model [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2026, 37(8): 2684-2692. |
| [2] | DENG Guangyao, HAN Fuxiao. Spatial correlation network characteristics and influencing factors of urban ecological vulnerability in the Yellow River Basin, China [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2026, 37(8): 2741-2752. |
| [3] | WANG Tianhao, KONG Fanhua, HU Hong, ZHAO Huimin. Spatial correlation network characteristics and influencing factors of urban ecological vulnerability in the Yellow River Basin, China [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2026, 37(8): 2771-2781. |
| [4] | LU Juncheng, QIU Yue, HAN Dongyan, LIU Zhiwei, MA Qiuyun. Spatial correlation network characteristics and influencing factors of urban ecological vulnerability in the Yellow River Basin, China [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2026, 37(8): 2803-2812. |
| [5] | LIU Yamei, WU Rongjun, GUO Huan, ZHAO Jiacheng, FENG Zhaozhong. Applicability of a SIF-based mechanistic light-response model for estimating gross primary productivity and yield of winter wheat in the North China Plain [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2026, 37(7): 2233-2244. |
| [6] | MA Ting, YANG Guanglei, WANG Zijuan. Distribution pattern shift and identification of priority conservation areas for three Cyatheaceae species in China under climate change [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2026, 37(7): 2257-2270. |
| [7] | ZHAGN Jiaming, LIU Zedong. Coupling zoning and multi-scenario simulation of landscape ecological risk and ecosystem services in the Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2026, 37(7): 2305-2316. |
| [8] | Zaimila AIHEMAITI, Asadilla YUSUP, Ümüt HALIK, Alfidar ARKIN, HU Xiaomei, QING Xiandong, JIANG Jinfeng. Branch architectural features of Populus euphratica in the lower reaches of the Tarim River using terrestrial laser scanning [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2026, 37(6): 1739-1747. |
| [9] | LIN Jinhuang, ZANG Yuanrui, LIU Wanyi, HUANG Jixing, LI Guoqing, HUANG Yan, DAI Yongwu, YAN Xiaoyan, OUYANG Youquan. Multi-scale trade-off and synergy relationship and influencing factors of ecosystem services in the Yangtze River Basin [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2026, 37(6): 1748-1762. |
| [10] | BI Xu, SHI Kailong, FU Yongyong, ZHAO Ruoning, LI Jian, NAN Bo, LI Bo. Spatiotemporal variations and driving mechanisms of carbon storage in the mountain-basin systems of arid regions: A case study of Fuyun County, Xinjiang, China [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2026, 37(6): 1763-1774. |
| [11] | WEI Jiangyue, LI Shuyun, XIONG Yu, GUO Xiaowei, WANG Yuan, LIU Mu. Ecological zoning in the area surrounding the Wuyi Mountain National Park from the perspective of the coupling of landscape ecological risk and ecosystem services [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2026, 37(6): 1785-1798. |
| [12] | WANG Zongxing, SHEN Weixia, YUAN Caiyan, XU Jianxiu, XIE Hongtao. Change of land use regime and water conservation function in the Qiantang River Basin during 2000-2020 [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2026, 37(6): 1799-1807. |
| [13] | YIN Shengnan, MA Qingcai, LI Yumeng, ZHANG Zhidong. Construction of individual tree crown width model for Larix principis-rupprechtii and Betula platyphylla mixed forest based on mixed effects model [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2026, 37(6): 1808-1818. |
| [14] | OUYANG Wenfeng, GAO Liqian, ZHAO Yunge, SUN Hui, WANG Peng. Quantitative study of the multilayer complex structure of shrub-herbage-biocrusts based on structural equation model [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2026, 37(6): 1897-1906. |
| [15] | CHEN Zhuxin, SONG Yingjie, LI Jianuo, ZHANG Bo, HUANG Ziyan, GUO Meng. Variation of active layer thickness and the driving factors in the permafrost region of the Daxing’anling Mountains, Northeast China [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2026, 37(6): 1924-1932. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||