Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (7): 1941-1951.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202507.019
• Academician’s Viewpoint • Previous Articles Next Articles
HE Nianpeng1,2,4*, YAN Pu1,2, GUO Hongbo3,4
Received:
2025-02-10
Accepted:
2025-06-25
Online:
2025-07-18
Published:
2026-01-18
HE Nianpeng, YAN Pu, GUO Hongbo. Predicting ecosystem primary productivity on plant community traits: Theoretical basis and research progress[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2025, 36(7): 1941-1951.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.cjae.net/EN/10.13287/j.1001-9332.202507.019
[1] Violle C, Navas M, Vile D, et al. Let the concept of trait be functional. Oikos, 2007, 116: 882-892 [2] 何念鹏, 刘聪聪, 徐丽, 等. 生态系统性状对宏生态研究的启示与挑战. 生态学报, 2020, 40(8): 2507-2522 [3] Shipley B, De Bello F, Cornelissen JHC, et al. Reinforcing loose foundation stones in trait-based plant ecology. Oecologia, 2016, 180: 923-931 [4] Webb CT, Hoeting JA, Ames GM, et al. A structured and dynamic framework to advance traits-based theory and prediction in ecology. Ecology Letters, 2010, 13: 267-283 [5] Funk JL, Larson JE, Ames GM, et al. Revisiting the Holy Grail: Using plant functional traits to understand ecological processes. Biological Reviews, 2017, 92: 1156-1173 [6] He NP, Liu CC, Piao SL, et al. Ecosystem traits lin-king functional traits to macroecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2019, 34: 200-210 [7] He NP, Yan P, Liu CC, et al. Predicting ecosystem productivity based on plant community traits. Trends in Plant Science, 2023, 28: 43-53 [8] Kattge J, Knorr W, Raddatz T, et al. Quantifying photosynthetic capacity and its relationship to leaf nitrogen content for global-scale terrestrial biosphere models. Global Change Biology, 2009, 15: 976-991 [9] Farquhar GD. Models of integrated photosynthesis of cells and leaves. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 1989, 323: 357-367 [10] Luo XZ, Chen JM, Liu J, et al. Comparison of big-leaf, two-big-leaf, and two-leaf upscaling schemes for evapotranspiration estimation using coupled carbon-water modeling. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 2018, 123: 207-225 [11] McGill BJ. The what, how and why of doing macroecology. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2019, 28: 6-17 [12] Huang MT, Piao SL, Ciais P, et al. Air temperature optima of vegetation productivity across global biomes. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2019, 3: 772-779 [13] Zhang JH, Hedin LO, Li MX, et al. Leaf N:P ratio does not predict productivity trends across natural terrestrial ecosystems. Ecology, 2022, 103: e3789 [14] Malhi Y, Girardin CAJ, Goldsmith GR, et al. The variation of productivity and its allocation along a tropical elevation gradient: A whole carbon budget perspective. New Phytologist, 2017, 214: 1019-1032 [15] McGill BJ. Matters of scale. Science, 2010, 328: 575-576 [16] Liu CC, Li Y, Yan P, et al. How to improve the predictions of plant functional traits on ecosystem functioning? Frontiers in Plant Science, 2021, 12: 622260 [17] Muscarella R, Uriarte M. Do community-weighted mean functional traits reflect optimal strategies? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2016, 283: 20152434 [18] Reich PB, Walters MB, Ellsworth DS. From tropics to tundra: Global convergence in plant functioning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1997, 94: 13730-13734 [19] Garnier E, Cortez J, Billes G, et al. Plant functional markers capture ecosystem properties during secondary succession. Ecology, 2004, 85: 2630-2637 [20] Yang J, Cao M, Swenson NG. Why functional traits do not predict tree demographic rates. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2018, 33: 326-336 [21] Lieth H. Modeling the primary productivity of the world//Lieth H, Whittaker RH, eds. Primary Productivity of the Biosphere. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1975: 237-263 [22] Boysen-Jensen P. The substance production of plants. Jena: Verlag von Gustav Fischer, 1932 [23] Watson DJ. The physiological basis of variation in yield. Advances in Agronomy, 1952, 4: 101-145 [24] Monsi M, Saeki T. On the light factor in plant communities and its importance for substance production. Japanese Journal of Botany, 1953, 14: 22-52 [25] 方精云, 柯金虎, 唐志尧, 等. 生物生产力的“4P”概念、估算及其相互关系. 植物生态学报, 2001, 25(4): 414-419 [26] Beer C, Reichstein M, Tomelleri E, et al. Terrestrial gross carbon dioxide uptake: Global distribution and covariation with climate. Science, 2010, 329: 834-838 [27] Falge E, Baldocchi D, Tenhunen J, et al. Seasonality of ecosystem respiration and gross primary production as derived from FLUXNET measurements. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2002, 113: 53-74 [28] Monteith J. Solar radiation and productivity in tropical ecosystems. Journal of Applied Ecology, 1972, 9: 747-766 [29] Running SW, Nemani RR, Heinsch FA, et al. A continuous satellite-derived measure of global terrestrial primary production. Bioscience, 2004, 54: 547-560 [30] Gu L, Post WM, Baldocchi DD, et al. Characterizing the seasonal dynamics of plant community photosynthesis across a range of vegetation types//Noormets A, ed. Phenology of Ecosystem Processes. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2009: 35-58 [31] Rosenzweig ML. Net primary productivity of terrestrial communities: Prediction from climatological data. The American Naturalist, 1968, 102: 67-74 [32] Lieth H, Whittaker RH. Primary Productivity of the Biosphere. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1975 [33] Uchijima Z, Seino H. Agroclimatic evaluation of net primary productivity of natural vegetations (1) Chikugo model for evaluating net primary productivity. Journal of Agricultural Meteorology, 1985, 40: 343-352 [34] Clark DA, Brown S, Kicklighter DW, et al. Net primary production in tropical forests: An evaluation and synthesis of existing field data. Ecological Applications, 2001, 11: 371-384 [35] Brovkin V, Bendtsen J, Claussen M, et al. Carbon cycle, vegetation, and climate dynamics in the Holocene: Experiments with the CLIMBER-2 model. Global Biogeo-chemical Cycles, 2002, 16: 1-20 [36] Sánchez-Azofeifa GA, Castro K, Wright SJ, et al. Differences in leaf traits, leaf internal structure, and spectral reflectance between two communities of lianas and trees: Implications for remote sensing in tropical environments. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2009, 113: 2076-2088 [37] Zhao MS, Heinsch FA, Nemani RR, et al. Improvements of the MODIS terrestrial gross and net primary production global data set. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2005, 95: 164-176 [38] Jenkins J, Richardson AD, Braswell B, et al. Refining light-use efficiency calculations for a deciduous forest canopy using simultaneous tower-based carbon flux and radiometric measurements. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2007, 143: 64-79 [39] Ruimy A, Kergoat L, Bondeau A, et al. Comparing global models of terrestrial net primary productivity (NPP): Analysis of differences in light absorption and light-use efficiency. Global Change Biology, 1999, 5: 56-64 [40] Pei YY, Dong JW, Zhang Y, et al. Evolution of light use efficiency models: Improvement, uncertainties, and implications. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2022, 317: 108905 [41] Farquhar GD, von Caemmerer S, Berry JA. A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta, 1980, 149: 78-90 [42] Cramer W, Bondeau A, Woodward FI, et al. Global response of terrestrial ecosystem structure and function to CO2 and climate change: Results from six dynamic glo-bal vegetation models. Global Change Biology, 2001, 7: 357-373 [43] Smith B, Warlind D, Arneth A, et al. Implications of incorporating N cycling and N limitations on primary production in an individual-based dynamic vegetation model. Biogeosciences, 2014, 11: 2027-2054 [44] Fisher RA, Muszala S, Verteinstein M, et al. Taking off the training wheels: The properties of a dynamic vegetation model without climate envelopes. Geoscientific Model Development, 2015, 8: 3293-3357 [45] Thonicke K, Spessa A, Prentice IC, et al. The influence of vegetation, fire spread and fire behaviour on biomass burning and trace gas emissions: Results from a process-based model. Biogeosciences, 2010, 7: 1991-2011 [46] Wieder WR, Cleveland CC, Lawrence DM, et al. Effects of model structural uncertainty on carbon cycle projections: Biological nitrogen fixation as a case study. Environmental Research Letters, 2015, 10: 044016 [47] Reich PB. Key canopy traits drive forest productivity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2012, 279: 2128-2134 [48] Peng YK, Bloomfield KJ, Prentice IC. A theory of plant function helps to explain leaf-trait and productivity responses to elevation. New Phytologist, 2020, 226: 1274-1284 [49] Fyllas NM, Bentley LP, Shenkin A, et al. Solar radiation and functional traits explain the decline of forest primary productivity along a tropical elevation gradient. Ecology Letters, 2017, 20: 730-740 [50] Bahar NHA, Ishida FY, Weerasinghe LK, et al. Leaf-level photosynthetic capacity in lowland Amazonian and high-elevation Andean tropical moist forests of Peru. New Phytologist, 2017, 214: 1002-1018 [51] Wang H, Prentice IC, Davis TW, et al. Photosynthetic responses to altitude: An explanation based on optimality principles. New Phytologist, 2017, 213: 976-982 [52] Wang H, Prentice IC, Keenan TF, et al. Towards a universal model for carbon dioxide uptake by plants. Nature Plants, 2017, 3: 734-741 [53] He NP, Liu CC, Tian M, et al. Variation in leaf anatomical traits from tropical to cold-temperate forests and linkage to ecosystem functions. Functional Ecology, 2018, 32: 10-19 [54] Barry KE, Pinter GA, Strini JW, et al. A graphical null model for scaling biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships. Journal of Ecology, 2021, 109: 1549-1560 [55] Šímová I, Storch D. The enigma of terrestrial primary productivity: Measurements, models, scales and the diversity-productivity relationship. Ecography, 2017, 40: 239-252 [56] Zhang Y, He NP, Li MX, et al. Community chlorophyll quantity determines the spatial variation of grassland productivity. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 801: 149567 [57] Yan P, Li MX, Yu GR, et al. Plant community traits associated with nitrogen can predict spatial variability in productivity. Ecological Indicators, 2022, 140: 109001 [58] Jackson RB, Sperry JS, Dawson TE. Root water uptake and transport: Using physiological processes in global predictions. Trends in Plant Science, 2000, 5: 482-488 [59] Croft H, Chen JM, Luo XZ, et al. Leaf chlorophyll content as a proxy for leaf photosynthetic capacity. Global Change Biology, 2017, 23: 3513-3524 [60] LeBauer DS, Treseder KK. Nitrogen limitation of net primary productivity in terrestrial ecosystems is globally distributed. Ecology, 2008, 89: 371-379 [61] Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, et al. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature, 2004, 428: 821-827 [62] He JS, Wang ZH, Wang X, et al. A test of the generality of leaf trait relationships on the Tibetan Plateau. New Phytologist, 2006, 170: 835-848 [63] Moore S, Adu-Bredu S, Duah-Gyamfi A, et al. Forest biomass, productivity and carbon cycling along a rainfall gradient in West Africa. Global Change Biology, 2018, 24: 496-510 [64] 李颖, 何念鹏, 刘聪聪. 植物功能性状网络: 概念体系发展与应用进展. 生态学报, 2024, 44(18): 7944-7961 [65] Yan P, He NP, Yu KL, et al. Integrating multiple plant functional traits to predict ecosystem productivity. Communications Biology, 2023, 6: 239 [66] van der Plas F, Schröder-Georgi T, Weigelt A, et al. Plant traits alone are poor predictors of ecosystem pro-perties and long-term ecosystem functioning. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2020, 4: 1602-1611 [67] Hagan JG, Henn JJ, Osterman WH. Plant traits alone are good predictors of ecosystem properties when used carefully. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2023, 7: 332-334 [68] 何念鹏, 刘聪聪, 张佳慧, 等. 植物性状研究的机遇与挑战: 从器官到群落. 生态学报, 2018, 38(19): 6787-6796 [69] Li Y, He NP. Innovations and prospectives of multidimensional trait integration. New Phytologist, 2024, 244: 337-340 [70] Jing X, Muys B, Bruelheide H, et al. Above- and belowground complementarity rather than selection drives tree diversity-productivity relationships in European forests. Functional Ecology, 2021, 35: 1756-1767 [71] Anderegg WR. Spatial and temporal variation in plant hydraulic traits and their relevance for climate change impacts on vegetation. New Phytologist, 2015, 205: 1008-1014 [72] Bruelheide H, Dengler J, Purschke O, et al. Global trait-environment relationships of plant communities. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2018, 2: 1906-1917 [73] Moreno-Martínez Á, Camps-Valls G, Kattge J, et al. A methodology to derive global maps of leaf traits using remote sensing and climate data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2018, 218: 69-88 [74] Šímová I, Violle C, Kraft NJ, et al. Shifts in trait means and variances in North American tree assemblages: Species richness patterns are loosely related to the functional space. Ecography, 2015, 38: 649-658 [75] 于贵瑞, 于福波, 于宗绪, 等. 宏观生态系统科学研究的思维维度和认知尺度及多学科坐标体系. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(2): 327-340 [76] Su YJ, Guo QH, Jin SC, et al. The development and evaluation of a backpack LiDAR system for accurate and efficient forest inventory. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2020, 18: 1660-1664 [77] Yan ZB, Guo ZF, Serbin SP, et al. Spectroscopy outperforms leaf trait relationships for predicting photosynthetic capacity across different forest types. New Phyto-logist, 2021, 232: 134-147 [78] Ma HZ, Mo LD, Crowther TW, et al. The global distribution and environmental drivers of aboveground versus belowground plant biomass. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2021, 5: 1110-1122 |
[1] | CHEN Liding, ZHANG Yanjie, MA Sike. Multi-scale characteristics and scale selection in landscape ecological studies [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2025, 36(7): 1933-1940. |
[2] | ZHOU Rui, WANG Yuqin, WANG Hongsheng, SONG Meiling. Dietary niche of Ochotona curzoniae in alpine meadows based on stable isotope analysis [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2025, 36(7): 1980-1990. |
[3] | WANG Jingru, YANG Linshan, LU Tiaoxue, XIA Honghua, ZOU Xingyi, HE Wanghan. Multi-method estimation of evapotranspiration and influencing factors of desert steppe in the shallow mountainous area of Qilian Mountains, China [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2025, 36(7): 2055-2063. |
[4] | REN Yuhang, FENG Yi, CHEN Wenkai, YU Chao, ZHANG Xinghua, WU Xiaogang, PAN Kaiwen, ZHANG Lin. Variation characteristics and driving factors of vegetation coverage in Longquan Urban Forest Park, Chengdu, China [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2025, 36(7): 2103-2113. |
[5] | FU Wenxin, GAO Chang, REN Guanyao, LIU Dianfeng. Construction of composite blue-green ecological network of Wuhan City based on complex network theory [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2025, 36(7): 2139-2149. |
[6] | WANG Yu-shang, WANG Xiaojia, ZHAN Qianwen, XIONG Yongmei, DONG Xuan, SONG Langxi, ZANG Chuanfu. Ecosystem health assessment and ecological restoration strategies for Guangzhou City, China [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2025, 36(7): 2159-2170. |
[7] | HUANG Yang, WANG Duocong, OUYANG Hanli, HAN Jianxun, ZHUANG Chunyi. Identification of driving factors for water supply service in Sichuan Province, Southwest China from a machine learning perspective [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2025, 36(7): 2171-2182. |
[8] | SUN Xiyan, QI Ruotong, LI Hongxu, ZHENG Lanxiang. Soil ammonia oxidation process and its driving factors in the riparian zone of drainage ditch in saline-alkali area of Ningxia, Northwest China [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2025, 36(7): 2201-2212. |
[9] | FAN Wenzheng, WANG Jiao, JIANG Shaoyu, CHI Jianyu, CHEN Linlin, LI Baoquan, CHEN Jing, LIU Xiaoling. Distribution characteristics and source analysis of heavy metals in surface sediments of the Yellow River estuary [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2025, 36(7): 2213-2222. |
[10] | SANGZHU Zhaxi, YANG Junyi, AN Zhengxu, WU Jiayi, LU Xiaoping, WANG Jing, GENG Shuo, ZHU Yinjiu, LI Ning, SHENG Yan, Laqiong, MENG Xiuxiang. Seasonal habitat suitability analysis of Procapra picti-caudata in the northern Tanggula region of Sanjiang-yuan National Park, China [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2025, 36(7): 2239-2245. |
[11] | YANG Keke, CHEN Wenbo, XIONG Qiulin, GAO Beijie. Influences of human activities on ecosystem services in south of Jiangxi Province, China during 2000-2020 [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2025, 36(6): 1627-1638. |
[12] | WANG Yuxin, ZHENG Ying, GAO Yong, LIU Yanping, YANG Zhenqi, ZHANG Zixuan. Spatio-temporal variations and trade-offs/synergies of typical ecosystem services in Ordos City [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2025, 36(6): 1661-1670. |
[13] | CHEN Mengyan, LIANG Ziyi, SHU Qi, NAO Zengcuo, CHEN Yan, ZENG Zhefei, LA Qiong, WANG Junwei. Predicting potential distribution and adaptability of the invasive plant Bidens pilosa in China based on the MaxEnt model [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2025, 36(6): 1749-1758. |
[14] | SUN Baodi, CHENG Daoxin, CHEN Zhaohui, YAN Yuxi, JI Hangxi, TANG Jingchao. Enhancing construction of ecological security pattern through a wetland waterbird protection approach: A case study of Yellow River Basin in Shandong Province, China [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2025, 36(6): 1837-1848. |
[15] | ZHAO Yifeng, ZHAO Tianya, WANG Peng, ZHANG Chongliang, XU Binduo, XUE Ying, JI Yupeng. Distribution of Trichiurus japonicus resources in the coastal waters of Qingdao and its relationship with environmental factors [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2025, 36(6): 1907-1914. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||