欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6): 1893-1900.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201606.013

• 目次 • 上一篇    下一篇

公益林保护区生态补偿标准与补偿方式

王雅敬1,2, 谢炳庚1*, 李晓青1, 廖洪英3, 王金艳2   

  1. 1湖南师范大学资源与环境科学学院, 长沙 410080;
    2铜仁市国土资源局, 贵州铜仁 554300;
    3铜仁市林业局, 贵州铜仁 554300
  • 收稿日期:2015-11-18 发布日期:2016-06-18
  • 通讯作者: xbgyb1961@163.com
  • 作者简介:王雅敬, 男, 1984年生, 博士研究生. 主要从事景观生态与土地利用相关研究. E-mail: hexiwangyajing@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    本文由教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目(14JJD74006)和湖南师范大学生态文明研究院开放基金项目资助

Ecological compensation standards and compensation methods of public welfare forest protected area.

WANG Ya-jing1,2, XIE Bing-geng1*, LI Xiao-qing1, LIAO Hong-ying3, WANG Jin-yan2   

  1. 1Department of Resources and Environmental Science, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410080, China;
    2Tongren Municipal Bureau of Land and Resources, Tongren 554300, Guizhou, China;
    3Tongren Forestry Administration, Tongren 554300, Guizhou, China
  • Received:2015-11-18 Published:2016-06-18

摘要: 采用问卷调查及条件价值评估法,以贵州省江口县地方重点生态公益林保护区为例,对地方重点公益林保护区生态补偿的标准及方式进行研究.结果表明: 当地林农每年愿意接受的最低补偿金额为314.14~365.15元·hm-2,其发展的机会成本为9750元×被划入保护区林地的面积(hm2);健康状况、受教育程度、民族及聚居地所在乡镇均不同程度地影响受偿意愿;林农期待的补偿方式呈多样化,主要以现金补偿及技术补偿为主.从制度完善、提高补偿标准、加强宣传、寻求多元化补偿方式等方面提出了政策建议.

关键词: 公益林, 生态补偿, 补偿方式, 补偿标准

Abstract: With a special focus on Jiangkou County in Guizhou Province, this paper explored the ecological compensation standards and compensation methods of local key public welfare forest protected area by using questionnaire and contingent valuation method. The results showed that the minimum compensation which the local foresters could accept was 314.14-365.15 yuan·hm-2 per year, and the opportunity cost was 9750 yuan multiplied by the protected forest area. The willingness to accept of foresters was affected by many factors, such as health status, education level, ethnicity and local township. The compensation methods local foresters expected were various, but mainly were cash and technology compensation. Finally, this paper put forward some policy suggestions on improving system, increasing compensation standards, strengthening propaganda, and enriching compensation methods.

Key words: public welfare forest, compensation standard, ecological compensation, compensation method.