利益相关者视角下的濒危物种价值评估与生态补偿——以翅果油树为例

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202007.011

应用生态学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (7): 2323-2331.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202007.011

利益相关者视角下的濒危物种价值评估与生态补偿——以翅果油树为例

张殷波^1*, 牛杨杨², 王文智³, 秦浩⁴, 刘莹立², 李俊生⁵

¹山西财经大学资源环境学院, 太原 030006;
²山西大学环境与资源学院, 太原 030006;
³山西大学经济与管理学院, 太原 030006;
⁴山西财经大学统计学院, 太原 030006;
⁵中国环境科学研究院, 国家环境保护区域生态过程与功能评估重点实验室, 北京 100012

收稿日期:2020-03-24 接受日期:2020-04-16 出版日期:2020-07-15 发布日期:2021-01-15
通讯作者: E-mail: zhangyinbo@sxu.edu.cn
作者简介:张殷波,女,1979年生,博士,副教授。主要从事生物多样性及其保护等研究。E-mail: zhangyinbo@sxu.edu.cn
基金资助:
山西省软科学研究项目(2018041036-5)、山西省回国留学人员科研项目(2017-022)和环保部生物多样性保护专项(2096001006)资助

Value evaluation and ecological compensation of endangered species from the perspective of stakeholders: A cases study with Elaeagnus mollise

ZHANG Yin-bo^1*, NIU Yang-yang², WANG Wen-zhi³, QIN Hao⁴, LIU Ying-li², LI Jun-sheng⁵

¹School of Resources and Environment, Shanxi University of Finance & Economics, Taiyuan 030006, China;
²College of Environmental and Resource Science, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China;
³College of Economic and Management, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China;
⁴School of Statistics, Shanxi University of Finance & Economics, Taiyuan 030006, China;
⁵State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Regional Eco-Process and Function Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China

Received:2020-03-24 Accepted:2020-04-16 Online:2020-07-15 Published:2021-01-15
Contact: E-mail: zhangyinbo@sxu.edu.cn
Supported by:
This work was supported by the Soft Science Research of Shanxi Province (2018041036-5), the Research Project of Returned Overseas in Shanxi Pro-vince (2017-022), and the Biodiversity Protection Project of Ministry of Environmental Protection, China (2096001006).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 濒危物种价值评估可为生物多样性保护提供重要的政策支撑。本文以国家二级重点保护植物翅果油树为例,从利益相关者视角作为切入点,基于选择实验法评价其偏好和支付意愿(WTP),进而探讨生态补偿机制。基于管理部门、企业和农户三方利益相关者的利益诉求,分析确定了5个翅果油树的物种属性,即种植面积、产品分类、树苗品种、保护投入和农户收益。运用随机参数Logit模型分析了利益相关者对不同物种属性变量的偏好和支付意愿。结果表明: 受访者对“保护增加投入”偏好最强和支付意愿最高,每户为331.00 yuan·a^-1;对产品开发的“高低端产品同时开发”和“高端产品开发为主”变量偏好次之,WTP分别为每户242.71和227.57 yuan·a^-1;对“农户收益”、“保护投入不变”、“树苗品种”和“种植面积”由强到弱依次表现出一定的偏好及支付意愿;而对“保护不投入”和“低端产品开发为主”偏好最弱且WTP为负值。通过直接和间接补偿方式对补偿客体(翅果油树及其生境)实施生态补偿,得到的补偿剩余价值为每户每年285.62元。

关键词: 物种价值评估, 保护偏好, 选择实验法, 支付意愿, 生态补偿

Abstract: The value evaluation of endangered species can provide important supports for policy-making in biodiversity conservation. We evaluated the stakeholders' preference and willingness to pay (WTP) from the perspective of stakeholders by the choice experiment method (CEM) and discussed the ecological compensation mechanism, with Elaeagnus mollis, a national secondary key protected plant as an example. Based on the interest demands analysis of three stakeholders, the management departments, enterprises and farmers, we measured five species attributes of E. mollis, including planting area, product classification, seedling varieties, protection investment, and far-mers' income. Furthermore, the preference of stakeholders and WTP for different attribute variables were analyzed using random parameter model (RPL). The results showed that the preference of respondents for the variable of “increase investment in protection” was the strongest and WTP was the highest (331.00 yuan·a^-1·household^-1). The stakeholders had stronger preference for the variables of “simultaneous development of high and low-end products” and “development of high-end products”, with WTP being 242.71 and 227.57 yuan·a^-1·household^-1, respectively. For the variables of “farmers' income”, “unchanged investment in protection”, “seedling varieties” and “planting area”, stakeholders showed certain preference and WTP from strong to weak. The prefe-rence for “no investment in protection” and “development of low-end products” was weaker and the WTP was negative. Through direct and indirect approaches of compensation, ecological compensation could be implemented for the objects of ecological compensation (E. mollis and associated habitat). The value of compensating surplus (CS) calculated was 285.62 yuan·a^-1·household^-1.

Key words: species value evaluation, protection preference, choice experiments method, willingness to pay, ecological compensation

张殷波, 牛杨杨, 王文智, 秦浩, 刘莹立, 李俊生. 利益相关者视角下的濒危物种价值评估与生态补偿——以翅果油树为例[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(7): 2323-2331.

ZHANG Yin-bo, NIU Yang-yang, WANG Wen-zhi, QIN Hao, LIU Ying-li, LI Jun-sheng. Value evaluation and ecological compensation of endangered species from the perspective of stakeholders: A cases study with Elaeagnus mollise[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(7): 2323-2331.

参考文献

[1] Laurila-Pant M, Lehikoinen A, Uusitalo L, et al. How to value biodiversity in environmental management? Ecological Indicators, 2015, 55: 1-11
[2] Hooper DU, Chapin FS, Ewel JJ, et al. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: A consensus of current knowledge. Ecological Monographs, 2005, 75: 3-35
[3] Ring I, Hansjürgens B, Elmqvist T, et al. Challenges in framing the economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: The TEEB initiative. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2010, 2: 15-26
[4] Capmourteres V, Anand M. “Conservation value”: A review of the concept and its quantification. Ecosphere, 2016, 7: e01476
[5] 叶有华, 付岚, 李鑫, 等. 珍稀濒危动植物资源资产价值核算体系研究. 生态环境学报, 2017, 26(5): 808-815 [Ye Y-H, Fu L, Li X, et al. Preliminary study on the rare and endangered plant and animal resources accounting system. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2017, 26(5): 808-815]
[6] 顾垒, 闻丞, 罗玫, 等. 中国最受关注濒危物种保护现状快速评价的新方法探讨. 生物多样性, 2015, 23(5): 583-590 [Gu L, Wen C, Luo M, et al. A rapid approach for assessing the conservation effectiveness of the most concerned endangered species in China. Biodiversity Science, 2015, 23(5): 583-590]
[7] Wilson HB, Joseph LN, Moore AL, et al. When should we save the most endangered species? Ecology Letters, 2011, 14: 886-890
[8] 马国勇, 陈红. 基于利益相关者理论的生态补偿机制研究. 生态经济, 2014, 30(4): 33-36 [Ma G-Y, Chen H. Study on ecological compensation mechanism based on stakeholders. Ecological Economy, 2014, 30(4): 33-36]
[9] 张风春, 刘文慧. 生物多样性保护多方利益相关者参与现状与机制构建研究. 环境保护, 2015, 43(5): 29-33 [Zhang F-C, Liu W-H. Multi-stakeholder engaging mechanism for biodiversity conservation in China. Environmental Protection, 2015, 43(5): 29-33]
[10] Christie M, Hanley N, Warren J, et al. Valuing the diversity of biodiversity. Ecological Economics, 2006, 58: 304-317
[11] Hanley N, Wright RE, Adamowicz V. Using choice experiments to value the environment. Environmental and Resource Economics, 1998, 11: 413-428
[12] 龚亚珍, 韩炜, Bennett M, 等. 基于选择实验法的湿地保护区生态补偿政策研究. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(2): 241-251 [Gong Y-Z, Han W, Bennett M, et al. Study on eo-compensation policy design for wetland: A choice experiment approach. Journal of Natural Resources, 2016, 31(2): 241-251]
[13] 张小红, 张政. 选择实验法评估湘江流域重金属污染治理价值实证研究. 资源开发与市场, 2014, 30(4): 409-412 [Zhang X-H, Zhang Z. Value research on heavy metals pollution treatment of Xiangjiang River through experimental method. Resource Development &Market, 2014, 30(4): 409-412]
[14] 王乙, 高忠燕, 田国双. 选择实验法在野生动物生态游憩价值评价中的应用——以扎龙国家级自然保护区丹顶鹤为例. 东北林业大学学报, 2018, 46(4): 92-96 [Wang Y, Gao Z-Y, Tian G-S. Choice expe-rience in the evaluation research of the wildlife ecological recreation value: Take Grus japonensis in Zhalong National Nature Reserve as an example. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2018, 46(4): 92-96]
[15] 马爱慧, 张安录. 选择实验法视角的耕地生态补偿意愿实证研究——基于湖北武汉市问卷调查.资源科学, 2013, 35(10): 2061-2066 [Ma A-H, Zhang A-L. Cultivated land ecological compensation willingness based on choice experiments. Resources Science, 2013, 35(10): 2061-2066]
[16] 樊辉, 赵敏娟, 史恒通. 选择实验法视角的生态补偿意愿差异研究——以石羊河流域为例. 干旱区资源与环境, 2016, 30(10): 65-69 [Fan H, Zhao M-J, Shi H-T. Difference of willingness to pay for ecological compensation based on the choice experiments method: A case study of Shiyang River basin. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2016, 30(10): 65-69]
[17] 覃海宁, 杨永, 董仕勇. 中国高等植物受威胁物种名录. 生物多样性, 2017, 25(7): 696-744 [Qin H-N, Yang Y, Dong S-Y. Threatened species list of China's higher plants. Biodiversity Science, 2017, 25(7): 696-744]
[18] 张殷波, 刘彦岚, 秦浩, 等. 气候变化条件下山西翅果油树适宜分布区的空间迁移预测. 应用生态学报,2019, 30(2): 496-502 [Zhang Y-B, Liu Y-L, Qin H, et al. Prediction on spatial migration of suitable distribution of Elaeagnus mollis under climate change conditions in Shanxi Province, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(2): 496-502]
[19] 董志, 张飞云, 闫桂琴. 濒危植物翅果油树的研究进展及其开发前景. 首都师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2005, 26(3): 65-67 [Dong Z, Zhang F-Y, Yan G-Q. Advances in research on the endemic and endangered plant of Elaeagnus mollis and its exploitation prospects. Journal of Capital Normal University: Natural Science, 2005, 26(3): 65-67]
[20] Johnston RJ. Choice experiments, site similarity and benefits transfer. Environmental Resource Economics, 2007, 38: 331-351
[21] Johnston RJ, Rosenberger RS. Methods, trends and controversies in contemporary benefit transfer. Journal of Economic Surveys, 2010, 24: 479-510
[22] 刘莹立. 基于选择实验法的物种价值评估与保护研究——以翅果油树为例. 硕士论文. 太原: 山西大学, 2018 [Liu Y-L. Study on Assessment of Species Value and Protection Countermeasures based on Choice Experiments: A Case Study on Elaeagnus mollis. Master Thesis. Taiyuan: Shanxi University, 2018]
[23] Boxall PC, Adamowicz WL, Swait J, et al. A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation. Ecological Economics, 1996, 18: 243-253
[24] Train KE. Recreation demand models with taste diffe-rences over people. Land Economics, 1998, 74: 230-239
[25] 李荣, 陈莉, 王平鲜. 过度离散型数据的统计模拟与分析. 经济数学, 2016, 33(1): 72-75 [Li R, Chen L, Wang P-X. Simulation study and analysis of overdispersion data. Journal of Quantitative Economics, 2016, 33(1): 72-75]
[26] Morrison M, Bennett J, Blamey R, et al. Choice modeling and tests of benefit transfer. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2002, 84: 161-170
[27] Hanemann WM. Discrete/continuous models of consumer demand. Econometrica, 1984, 52: 541-561
[28] 杜乐山, 李俊生, 刘高慧, 等. 生态系统与生物多样性经济学(TEEB)研究进展. 生物多样性, 2016, 24(6): 686-693 [Du L-S, Li J-S, Liu G-H, et al. Progress in the researches on the economics of ecosystems and biodiversity (TEEB). Biodiversity Science, 2016, 24(6): 686-693]
[29] Chen H, He L, Li P, et al. Relationship of stakeholders in protected areas and tourism ecological compensation: A case study of Sanya coral reef national nature reserve in China. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2018, 9: 164-173
[30] Veisten K. Contingent valuation controversies: Philosophic debates about economic theory. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 2007, 36: 204-232
[31] 张殷波, 刘莹立, 杜乐山, 等. 褐马鸡非使用价值评估及影响因素. 生态学报, 2018, 38(7): 2579-2587 [Zhang Y-B, Liu Y-L, Du L-S, et al. Evaluation of non-use value and analysis of influence factors affecting Crossoptilon mantchuricum in China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(7): 2579-2587]
[32] 郝林华, 陈尚, 王二涛, 等. 基于条件价值法评估三亚海域生态系统多样性及物种多样性的维持服务价值. 生态学报, 2018, 38(18): 6432-6441 [Hao L-H, Chen S, Wang E-T, et al. Evaluation of the maintenance service values of the ecosystem diversity of marine protected areas and the diversity of important marine species in Sanya coastal waters based on the contingent valuation method. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(18): 6432-6441]
[33] 谢世林, 史雪威, 彭文佳, 等. 我国重点保护动植物物种价值评估. 生态学报, 2018, 38(21): 7565-7571 [Xie S-L, Shi X-W, Peng W-J, et al. Economic evaluation of key protected fauna and flora species in China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(21): 7565-7571]
[34] 王尔大, 李莉, 韦健华. 基于选择实验法的国家森林公园资源和管理属性经济价值评价. 资源科学, 2015, 37(1): 193-200 [Wang E-D, Li L, Wei J-H. Economic value evaluation of resources and management attributes for forest parks using choice experiments. Resources Science, 2015, 37(1): 193-200]
[35] Brown MA, Clarkson BD, Barton BJ, et al. Implementing ecological compensation in New Zealand: Stakeholder perspectives and a way forward. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 2014, 44: 34-47
[36] 苏婷婷, 陈吉利. 论我国国家公园生态补偿机制的构建. 中南林业科技大学学报:社会科学版, 2019, 13(4): 8-13 [Su T-T, Chen J-L. On the construction of ecological compensation mechanism of national parks in China. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology: Social Science, 2019, 13(4): 8-13]
[37] 赵雪雁, 董霞. 最小数据方法在生态补偿中的应用——以甘南黄河水源补给区为例. 地理科学, 2010, 30(5): 748-754 [Zhao X-Y, Dong X. Application of minimum-data approach in ecological compensation: A case of Huanghe River water supply area of Gannan. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2010, 30(5): 748-754]

利益相关者视角下的濒危物种价值评估与生态补偿——以翅果油树为例

Value evaluation and ecological compensation of endangered species from the perspective of stakeholders: A cases study with Elaeagnus mollise

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	焦蒙蒙, 何理, 王喻宣. 基于水资源格局和保险增益的区域横向生态补偿及生态系统服务价值 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(3): 751-760.
[2]	邓元杰, 侯孟阳, 贾磊, 汪亚琴, 张晓, 姚顺波. 基于生态系统服务价值评估的长征沿线革命老区生态补偿策略 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(1): 159-168.
[3]	赵文仪, 何理, 陈白雪, 叶威. 地下水生态补偿标准核算模型 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(9): 3267-3276.
[4]	牛乐,王娇月,郗凤明,尹岩,邴龙飞,马铭婧,张文凤. 基于生态系统服务付费模型的福州市区域生态补偿额度核算 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(11): 3805-3814.
[5]	莫伟均, 何贞俊, 杨聿, 刘超, 王斌, 王建平. 基于鳗鱼道诱鱼技术研究花鳗鲡幼鱼光色趋向性 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(6): 2109-2115.
[6]	董天, 郑华, 肖燚, 欧阳志云. 旅游资源使用价值评估的ZTCM和TCIA方法比较——以北京奥林匹克森林公园为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(8): 2605-2610.
[7]	缪建群, 王志强, 杨文亭, 孙松, 黄国勤. 崇义客家梯田生态系统服务功能 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(5): 1642-1652.
[8]	范紫娟, 敖长林, 毛碧琦, 陈红光, 王旭东. 基于陈述性偏好法的三江平原湿地生态保护价值比较 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(2): 500-508.
[9]	胡小飞, 邹妍, 傅春. 基于碳足迹的江西生态补偿标准时空格局 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(2): 493-499.
[10]	王雅敬, 谢炳庚, 李晓青, 廖洪英, 王金艳. 公益林保护区生态补偿标准与补偿方式 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(6): 1893-1900.
[11]	侯春放,程全国**,李晔. 基于水环境容量的寇河流域生态补偿标准 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(8): 2466-2472.
[12]	余亮亮,蔡银莺**. 基于农户受偿意愿的农田生态补偿——以湖北省京山县为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(1): 215-223.
[13]	陈红光,王秋丹,李晨洋**. 支付意愿引导技术:支付卡式、单边界二分式和双边界二分式的比较——以三江平原生态旅游水资源的非使用价值为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(9): 2709-2715.
[14]	毛德华1**,胡光伟1,刘慧杰1,李正最2,李志龙1,谭子芳1. 基于能值分析的洞庭湖区退田还湖生态补偿标准 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(2): 525-532.
[15]	张翼飞1**,王丹2. 应用意愿价值评估法评价河流生态恢复的时间稳定性——以上海城市内河为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(4): 927-934.