地下水生态补偿标准核算模型

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202109.015

应用生态学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (9): 3267-3276.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202109.015

地下水生态补偿标准核算模型

赵文仪^1,2, 何理^1,2*, 陈白雪^1,2, 叶威^1,2

¹天津大学水利工程仿真与安全国家重点实验室, 天津 300350;
²天津大学建筑工程学院, 天津 300350

收稿日期:2021-03-17 接受日期:2021-06-04 出版日期:2021-09-15 发布日期:2022-03-15
通讯作者: * E-mail: helix111@tju.edu.cn
作者简介:赵文仪, 女, 1997年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事地下水资源开发与利用研究。E-mail: zhaowy@tju.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(52079088)、中国科学院创新交叉团队项目(JCTD-2019-04)和汾河流域地下水严重超采区水生态补偿机制研究项目(HSZB-ZC-FW-2019003)资助

A model for the evaluation of groundwater ecological compensation budget

ZHAO Wen-yi^1,2, HE Li^1,2*, CHEN Bai-xue^1,2, YE Wei^1,2

¹State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China;
²School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China

Received:2021-03-17 Accepted:2021-06-04 Online:2021-09-15 Published:2022-03-15
Contact: * E-mail: helix111@tju.edu.cn
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (52079088), the Interdisciplinary Innovation Team (JCTD-2019-04) and the Research Project of the Mechanism of Water Ecological Compensation in the Groundwater Overexploit Area of the Fenhe River Basin (HSZB-ZC-FW-2019003).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 地下水是水资源的重要组成部分,在维持生产生活、推动社会经济发展方面具有重要作用。地下水生态补偿有助于促进地下水资源合理开发利用,但是国内外关于此方面尤其是补偿标准的研究非常缺乏。本研究提出由基础、奖惩、科技和风险补偿构成的地下水生态补偿标准核算模型,综合考虑气候条件和经济水平,明确补偿优先等级,并将模型应用于山西省11个市,核算其地下水生态补偿标准。结果表明: 基础补偿在总补偿中占比最大,且非市场价值占比在60%以上,说明地下水具有较高的调节服务价值;2008—2017年,各市发展系数有明显提高,说明区域经济水平提升,补偿能力有所增强;补偿优先等级受地下水非市场价值及区域经济水平的影响,各地补偿优先等级差异明显,需要尽快落实各地的地下水生态补偿工作。同时,建议尽快完善地下水风险补偿制度,设立地下水生态科技补偿专项资金,建立长期有效的地下水生态补偿机制。

关键词: 地下水, 生态补偿, 生态系统服务价值, 补偿标准, 风险

Abstract: Groundwater, one of the important water resources, plays an important role in maintaining sustainable social and economic development. The ecological compensation of groundwater is a beneficial tool for guaranteeing reasonable exploitation and utilization of groundwater resources. However, there is a lack of associated studies, especially compensation budget. We proposed an integrated groundwater compensation standard model, which consisted of four components: base, stimulus and punishment, research and development, and potential risk. The priority level of compensation was estimated by considering regional climate and economic conditions comprehensively. The model was applied to a total of 11 cities in Shanxi Province to calculate the groundwater ecolo-gical compensation standard. The results showed that the base compensation accounted for the largest proportion in the total compensation, with the non-market value contributing more than 60%. Our results indicated that groundwater had a high regulated service value. From 2008 to 2017, the development coefficient of each city had significantly increased, suggesting the improved regional economic level and enhanced compensation capacity. Compensation priority was affected by the non-market value of groundwater and economic level, and obvious difference in the compensation priority existed in all the cities, implying the requirement for the implement of groundwater ecological compensation. Meanwhile, we suggested that groundwater risk compensation system should be improved, special funds should be set up for supporting research projects on groundwater ecological compensation, and long-term effective compensation mechanisms should be established.

Key words: groundwater, ecological compensation, ecosystem service value, compensation stan-dard, risk

赵文仪, 何理, 陈白雪, 叶威. 地下水生态补偿标准核算模型[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(9): 3267-3276.

ZHAO Wen-yi, HE Li, CHEN Bai-xue, YE Wei. A model for the evaluation of groundwater ecological compensation budget[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(9): 3267-3276.

参考文献

[1] 何理, 赵文仪, 侯保俊, 等. 地下水生态补偿机制的回顾与探索. 水资源与水工程学报, 2020, 31(5): 1-6 [He L, Zhao W-Y, Hou B-J, et al. Review and exploration on groundwater eco-compensation mechanism. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering, 2020, 31(5): 1-6]
[2] 刘思妤, 倪红珍. 地下水保护的生态补偿机制研究进展. 中国水利水电科学研究院学报, 2016, 14(5): 367-373 [Liu S-Y, Ni H-Z. Analysis of vegetation dynamic variations and response to climatic factor in Yangtze River Basin in recent decades. Journal of China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, 2016, 14(5): 367-373]
[3] 吴乐, 孔德帅, 李颖, 等. 地下水超采区农业生态补偿政策节水效果分析. 干旱区资源与环境, 2017, 31(3): 38-44 [Wu L, Kong D-S, Li Y, et al. Analysis on the water-saving effect of agro-ecology compensation policy in groundwater overdraft areas. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2017, 31(3): 38-44]
[4] 柳荻, 胡振通, 靳乐山. 基于农户受偿意愿的地下水超采区休耕补偿标准研究. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2019, 29(8): 130-139 [Liu D, Hu Z-T, Jin L-S. Study on compensation rate for fallow program in groundwater over-exploited area based on rural households' willingness to accept. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2019, 29(8): 130-139]
[5] 谢花林, 程玲娟. 地下水漏斗区农户冬小麦休耕意愿的影响因素及其生态补偿标准研究——以河北衡水为例. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(12): 2012-2022 [Xie H-L, Cheng L-J. Influence factors and ecological compensation standard of winter wheat-fallow in the groundwater funnel area. Journal of Natural Resources, 2017, 32(12): 2012-2022]
[6] 杨兰, 胡淑恒. 基于动态测算模型的跨界生态补偿标准——以新安江流域为例. 生态学报, 2020, 40(17): 5957-5967 [Yang L, Hu S-H. Cross-border ecological compensation standard based on dynamic measurement model: Taking Xin'an River Basin as an example. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(17): 5957-5967]
[7] 孟雅丽, 苏志珠, 马杰, 等. 基于生态系统服务价值的汾河流域生态补偿研究. 干旱区资源与环境, 2017, 31(8): 76-81 [Meng Y-L, Su Z-Z, Ma J, et al. Ecological compensation of Fenhe River watershed based on ecosystem service value. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2017, 31(8): 76-81]
[8] 游旭, 何东进, 肖燚, 等. 县域生态资产核算研究——以云南省屏边县为例. 生态学报, 2020, 40(15): 5220-5229 [You X, He D-J, Xiao Y, et al. Assessment of eco-assets in a county area: A case of Pingbian County. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(15): 5220-5229]
[9] 周宏, 赵文智. 荒漠区包气带土壤物理特征及其对地下水毛管上升影响的模拟. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(9): 2999-3009 [Zhou H, Zhao W-Z. Soil physical characteristics of shallow vadose zone and modeling its effects on upward capillary rise of groundwater in an arid-desert area. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(9): 2999-3009]
[10] 刘博. 集中式地下水水源地环境风险评价方法研究及应用. 人民长江, 2020, 51(4): 42-48 [Liu B. Research and application of environmental risk evaluation method for centralized groundwater drinking water source area. Yangtze River, 2020, 51(4): 42-48]
[11] 郑渊茂, 王翠平, 王豪伟, 等. 厦门市地面沉降的影响分析与风险评价研究. 生态学报, 2021, 41(1): 388-400 [Zheng Y-M, Wang C-P, Wang H-W, et al. Impact analysis and risk assessment of urban land subsidence in Xiamen City. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(1):388-400]
[12] 李山梅. 地下水生态系统价值评估方法研究. 生态经济, 2016, 32(11): 27-31 [Li S-M. Study on assessment method of groundwater ecosystem value. Ecological Economy, 2016, 32(11): 27-31]
[13] 马本, 孙艺丹, 刘海江, 等. 国家重点生态功能区转移支付的政策演进、激励约束与效果分析. 环境与可持续发展, 2020, 45(4): 42-50 [Ma B, Sun Y-D, Liu H-J, et al. The policy evolution, incentive-constraint mechanism and effect analysis of transfer payment for National Key Ecosystem Function Conservation Areas. Environment and Sustainable Development, 2020, 45(4): 42-50]
[14] 李军龙, 邓祥征, 张帆, 等. 激励相容理论视角下生态公益林补偿对农户的增收效应——以福建三明为例. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(12): 2942-2955 [Li J-L, Deng X-Z, Zhang F, et al. The effects of ecological forest compensation on farmers' income from the perspective of incentive compatibility theory: An empirical study in Sanming, Fujian. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(12): 2942-2955]
[15] 徐瑞璠, 刘文新, 倪琪, 等. 风险感知、政府信任与城镇居民生态补偿支付水平——基于渭河流域572户的微观实证. 干旱区资源与环境, 2021, 35(4): 10-16 [Xu R-F, Liu W-X, Ni Q, et al. Risk perception, government trust and urban residents' ecological compensation payment level in Weihe River basin. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2021, 35(4): 10-16]
[16] Liu Y, Liao Y. Risk assessment of groundwater depletion induced land subsidence: A case study in Taiyuan basin, China. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2020, 38: 985-994
[17] Shao ZF, Enamul HM, Cai B, et al. Integrated remote sensing and GIS approach using Fuzzy-AHP to delineate and identify groundwater potential zones in semi-arid Shanxi Province, China. Environmental Modelling and Software, 2020, 134, 104868
[18] 王志恒, 梁永平, 唐春雷, 等. 北方断流岩溶大泉复流的生态修复模式与复流措施效果的定量评价——以太原晋祠泉为例. 中国地质, 2020, 47(6): 1726-1738 [Wang Z-H, Liang Y-P, Tang C-L, et al. Ecologi-cal restoration pattern and quantitative evaluation of recirculation measures for northern discontinuous karst spring: A case study of Jinci Spring in Taiyuan City, Shanxi Province. Geology in China, 2020, 47(6): 1726-1738]
[19] 山西省统计局. 山西统计年鉴 [EB/OL]. (2018-03-27) [2021-02-19]. http://tjj.shanxi.gov.cn/tjsj/tjnj/nj2018/html/njcx.htm [Shanxi Provincial Bureau of Statistics. Shanxi Statistical Yearbook [EB/OL]. (2018-03-27) [2021-02-19]. http://tjj.shanxi.gov.cn/tjsj/tjnj/nj2018/html/njcx.htm]
[20] 山西省水利厅. 山西省水资源公报 [EB/OL]. (2020-03-10) [2021-02-19]. http://slt.shanxi.gov.cn/zncs/szyc/szygb/ [Shanxi Provincial Department of Water Resources. 2008 Shanxi Water Resources Bulletin [EB/OL]. (2020-03-10) [2021-02-19]. http://slt.shanxi.gov.cn/zncs/szyc/szygb/]
[21] 山西省水利厅. 山西省地下水超采区评价工作方案[EB/OL]. (2011-10-19) [2021-02-19]. https://www.renrendoc.com/paper/123590825.html [Shanxi Provincial Department of Water Resources. Evaluation Program of Groundwater Overexploitation Area in Shanxi Province [EB/OL] (2011-10-19) [2021-02-19]. https://www.renrendoc.com/paper/123590825.html]
[22] 闫丹丹, 沙金霞, 刘彬, 等. 地下水生态系统服务价值评估. 水电能源科学, 2019, 37(2): 59-62 [Yan D-D, Sha J-X, Liu B, et al. Value assessment of groundwater ecosystem services. Water Resources and Power, 2019, 37(2): 59-62]
[23] 原晓慧, 王萍, 张娜. 天津滨海新区生态系统服务价值与生态补偿研究. 北京测绘, 2019, 33(8): 944-948 [Yuan X-H, Wang P, Zhang N. The research of ecosystem services value and ecological compensation: A case in Tianjin Binhai New Area. Beijing Surveying and Mapping, 2019, 33(8): 944-948]
[24] 李金昌. 价值核算是环境核算的关键. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2002, 12(3): 13-19 [Li J-C. Value assessment is the key of environmental assessment. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2002, 12(3): 13-19]
[25] 张宗祜, 施德鸿, 沈照理, 等. 人类活动影响下华北平原地下水环境的演化与发展. 地球学报, 1997, 18(4): 2-9 [Zhang Z-H, Shi D-H, Shen Z-L, et al. Evolution and development of groundwater environment in North China Plain under human activities. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 1997, 18(4): 2-9]
[26] 刘东明, 纪瑞鹏, 陈鹏狮, 等. 蒸发需求干旱指数(EDDI)在辽宁省干旱识别中的应用. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(10): 3480-3488 [Liu D-M, Ji R-P, Chen P-S, et al. Application of evaporative demand drought index (EDDI) in drought identification of Liao-ning Province, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Eco-logy, 2020, 31(10): 3480-3488]
[27] Wang WJ, Guo B, Zhang YQ, et al. The sensitivity of the SPEI to potential evapotranspiration and precipitation at multiple timescales on the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain, China. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2020,143: 87-99
[28] Augustsson AT, Derberg US, Fr Berg M, et al. Failure of generic risk assessment model framework to predict groundwater pollution risk at hundreds of metal contaminated sites: Implications for research needs. Environmental Research, 2020, 185, 109252
[29] Li X, Wu H, Qian H. Groundwater contamination risk assessment using intrinsic vulnerability, pollution loading and groundwater value: A case study in Yinchuan plain, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2020, 27: 45591-45604
[30] 郭荣中, 申海建, 杨敏华. 澧水流域生态系统服务价值与生态补偿策略. 环境科学研究, 2016, 29(5): 774-782 [Guo R-Z, Shen H-J, Yang M-H. Studies on ecosystem service value and ecological compensation strategy in Lishui River basin. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2016, 29(5): 774-782]
[31] Lv C, Ling M, Wu Z, et al. Quantitative assessment of ecological compensation for groundwater overexploitation based on emergy theory. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 2020, 42: 733-744
[32] 王学, 李秀彬, 辛良杰, 等. 华北地下水超采区冬小麦退耕的生态补偿问题探讨. 地理学报, 2016, 71(5): 829-839 [Wang X, Li X-B, Xin L-J, et al. Ecological compensation for winter wheat abandonment in groundwater over-exploited areas in the North China Plain. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(5): 829-839]
[33] 徐庆勇, 林健, 江岳, 等. “双源”分布区地下水质量及生态价值评估. 水资源与水工程学报, 2019, 30(4): 63-70 [Xu Q-Y, Lin J, Jiang Y, et al. Assessment of groundwater quality and ecological value in “Double source” distribution area. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering, 2019, 30(4): 63-70]
[34] 任以胜, 陆林, 虞虎, 等. 尺度政治视角下的新安江流域生态补偿政府主体博弈. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8): 1667-1679 [Ren Y-S, Lu L, Yu H, et al. Game of government subjects of eco-compensation in the Xin'an river basin based on the politics of scale. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(8): 1667-1679]
[35] Viguier B, Jourde H, Leonardi V, et al. Water table variations in the hyperarid Atacama Desert: Role of the increasing groundwater extraction in the Pampa Del Tamarugal (Northern Chile). Journal of Arid Environments, 2018, 168: 9-16
[36] Cuthbert MO, Acworth RI, Andersen MS, et al. Understanding and quantifying focused, indirect groundwater recharge from ephemeral streams using water table fluctuations. Water Resources Research, 2016, 52: 827-840

地下水生态补偿标准核算模型

A model for the evaluation of groundwater ecological compensation budget

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	梁仕豪, 李文, 高宇, 刘保住. 吉林省生态系统服务价值与景观生态风险关联性及其空间分异 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(3): 769-779.
[2]	欧阳逸云, 苏漳文, 李春辉, 曾爱聪, 郭福涛. 基于模糊逻辑和网络层次分析法的森林火险区划 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(2): 354-362.
[3]	郝梦媛, 刘殿锋. 基于兴趣点识别生境风险的生态网络构建——以武汉城市圈为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2471-2480.
[4]	于海霞, 王禹骁. 东江流域生态系统服务价值的时空演变及空间分异机制 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2498-2506.
[5]	祁育汀, 张平, 刘雷, 马雪楠, 王欢, 赵娟. 关中平原城市群土地利用结构多情景优化和生态系统服务价值预测 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2507-2517.
[6]	朱振闯, 孙仕军, 朱淼淼, 李咚祎, 王哲, 谌入瑄, 陈伟. 地下水埋深对东北平原地下水补给及大豆生长动态的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1871-1882.
[7]	巴晓博, 隋鑫, 刘鸣达, 解宏图, 梁超, 鲍雪莲. 东北黑土区覆盖作物-玉米间作保护性耕作的生态系统服务价值 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1883-1891.
[8]	王庆莉, 张利平, 韩璐, 王明田, 唐明先, 陈慧, 冉王群, 李正蓉. 川西高原羊肚菌低温冷害特征及风险评估 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1541-1546.
[9]	肖圣, 多玲花, 邹自力. 基于“风险-连通性-潜力”的南昌市生态韧性评估 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(3): 733-741.
[10]	焦蒙蒙, 何理, 王喻宣. 基于水资源格局和保险增益的区域横向生态补偿及生态系统服务价值 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(3): 751-760.
[11]	陈森森, 任文杰, 滕应. 农田土壤氟磺胺草醚残留特征、生态风险与消减研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(3): 815-824.
[12]	李林云, 段宇婧, 侯捷. 饮用水中新污染物的来源、风险评估和防控治理的研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(12): 3447-3456.
[13]	谈旭, 王承武. 伊犁河谷生态系统服务价值时空演变及其驱动因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10): 2747-2756.
[14]	张峻铭, 孙永玉, 周姗, 邱昕腾, 孙仕仙, 欧朝蓉. 2000—2020年金沙江干热河谷景观生态风险的时空变化 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10): 2767-2776.
[15]	谭昭昭, 陈毓遒, 丁憬枫, 刘梦迪, 王浩, 王江. 浙江东部沿海城市土地利用模拟及生态系统服务价值评估 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10): 2777-2787.