太行山区水资源供需关系的垂直梯度特征

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.201902.008

应用生态学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2): 472-480.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201902.008

• 中国生态学学会2018年学术年会会议专栏 • 上一篇下一篇

太行山区水资源供需关系的垂直梯度特征

朱建佳¹,刘金铜^2*,梁红柱^2,3,高会²,刘鹏⁴

¹河北科技师范学院园艺科技学院, 河北秦皇岛 066004;
²中国科学院遗传与发育生物学研究所农业资源研究中心, 石家庄 050022;
³河北师范大学生命科学学院, 石家庄 050024;
⁴北京沃尔德防灾绿化技术有限公司, 北京 100048

收稿日期:2018-04-08 修回日期:2018-12-11 出版日期:2019-02-20 发布日期:2019-02-20
通讯作者: E-mail:jtliu@sjziam.ac.cn
作者简介:朱建佳,女,1987年,博士.主要从事生态系统服务权衡机制研究.E-mail:zhujj.13b@igsnrr.ac.cn
基金资助:
本文由国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(2015CB452705)和河北科技师范学院科学研究基金项目(2018YB022)资助

Vertical gradients of water supply and demand in Taihang Mountains, China.

ZHU Jian-jia¹, LIU Jin-tong^2*, LIANG Hong-zhu^2,3, GAO Hui², LIU Peng⁴

¹College of Horticulture Science and Technology, Hebei Normal University of Science & Technology, Qinhuangdao 066004, Hebei, China;
²Center for Agricultural Resources Research, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050022, China;
³College of Life Science, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050024, China;
⁴Beijing World Hazard Preventing Tech Co. Ltd, Beijing 100048, China

Received:2018-04-08 Revised:2018-12-11 Online:2019-02-20 Published:2019-02-20
Supported by:
This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2015CB452705) and the Science Research Foundation of Hebei Normal University of Science & Technology (2018YB022).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 太行山区具有水少土薄的生态劣势,却承担着华北平原水源供应的重要作用.开展太行山区水资源供需关系垂直特征研究,有助于指导山区生态系统的可持续管理.本研究基于遥感数据以及InVEST模型,定量评估太行山区产水量,并根据不同地区人均综合用水指标计算耗水量,通过不同海拔的水资源产耗比科学划定太行山区水资源的供给区和受益区.结果表明: 2005—2014年,太行山区年均产水总量为65.94亿m³,耗水总量为45.32亿m³,水资源盈余20.62亿m³;从县域和集水区尺度看,太行山区边缘低海拔地区存在一定程度的水资源短缺问题,整个太行山区的产耗比为1.53;根据产耗比随海拔的变化,可将太行山区划分为3个垂直带,0～300 m为水资源补给区,建议发展为农林复合型过渡带,300～950 m为水资源过渡平衡区,建议维持当前自产自耗的现状,950 m以上为水资源外溢区,建议划为水源涵养保护区,严禁一切开发破坏行为.

关键词: 耗水量, 垂直梯度, 太行山, 产水量, InVEST模型

Abstract: Taihang Mountains plays a key role in water supply for the North China Plain, even though it has the ecological disadvantages of less water and soil. Research on the vertical characteri-stics of water supply and demand in Taihang Mountains is beneficial for the sustainable management of the mountain ecosystem. Here, we quantitatively evaluated water provision in the Taihang Mountains using remote sensing data and InVEST model. Water consumption was calculated according to the index of per capita comprehensive water use in different areas. The supply and benefit areas were scientifically demarcated based on water supply to demand ratios at different altitudes. The results showed that, from 2005 to 2014, the average volume of water yield and water consumption were 65.94×10⁸ and 45.32×10⁸ m³, respectively, with a surplus water volume of 20.62×10⁸ m³. On the county and catchment scales, there were water shortages in the low-altitude peripheral areas of the Taihang Mountains. However, the water shortage problem was inconspicuous for the overall mountain area, with a water supply to demand ratio of 1.53. Based on the variations in the water supply to demand ratio with respect to altitude, Taihang Mountains could be divided into three vertical bands. Areas with the altitude range of 0-300 m were water recharge areas, which were recommended for development as a complex agroforestry transition zone. Areas with the 300-950 m altitude range were water transfer balance areas, which were suggested as a maintenance zone retaining current levels of water production and consumption. Areas with altitudes greater than 950 m were water spillover areas, which should be designated for water conservation reserves with strict prohibitions regarding destruction.

Key words: InVEST model, Taihang Mountains, water consumption, vertical gradient, water yield

朱建佳,刘金铜,梁红柱,高会,刘鹏. 太行山区水资源供需关系的垂直梯度特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(2): 472-480.

ZHU Jian-jia, LIU Jin-tong, LIANG Hong-zhu, GAO Hui, LIU Peng. Vertical gradients of water supply and demand in Taihang Mountains, China.[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(2): 472-480.

参考文献

[1] Chen G-J (陈国阶). Development Report of Chinese Mountains in 2003. Beijing: Commercial Press, 2004 (in Chinese)
[2] Deng W (邓伟). Discussion on mountain area resource and environment carrying capacity. Geographi-cal Research (地理研究), 2010, 29(6): 959-969 (in Chinese)
[3] Li M-D (李梦娣), Fan J-T (范俊韬), Kong W-J (孔维静), et al. Assessment of aquatic ecological security for mountainous rivers: A case study in the Taizi River Basin, Northeast China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 2018, 29(8): 2685-2694 (in Chinese)
[4] Li S-C (李双成), Ma C (马程), Wang Y (王阳), et al. The Ecosystem Services of Geography. Beijing: Science Press, 2014 (in Chinese)
[5] Groot R, Wilson MA, Boumans R, et al. A typology for the classification description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and service. Ecological Economics, 2002, 41: 393-408
[6] Madin L, Bowers S, Schildhauer M, et al. An ontology for describing and synthesizing ecological observation data. Ecological Informatics, 2007, 2: 279-296
[7] Wendland KJ, Honzak M, Portela R, et al. Targeting and implementing payments for ecosystem services: Opportunities for bundling biodiversity conservation with carbon and water services in Madagascar. Ecological Economics, 2010, 69: 2093-2107
[8] Fang J-Y (方精云), Shen Z-H (沈泽昊), Cui H-T (崔海亭). Ecological characteristics of mountains and research issues of mountain ecology. Biodiversity Science (生物多样性), 2004, 12(1):10-19 (in Chinese)
[9] Chen Y (陈勇), Chen G-J (陈国阶), Wang Y-Q (王益谦). A preliminary study on the interactive relationship between population and environment in mountains. Scientia Geographica Sinica (地理科学), 2002, 22(3): 282-287 (in Chinese)
[10] Niu Y-J (牛钰杰), Zhou J-W (周建伟), Ynag S-W (杨思维), et al. Quantitative apportionment of slope aspect and altitude to soil moisture and temperature and plant distribution on alpine meadow. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报) 2017, 28(5): 1489-1497 (in Chinese)
[11] Liu Q (刘倩), Wang S-L (王书丽), Deng B-L (邓邦良), Carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus contents and their ecological stoichiometry in litters and soils on meadow of Wugong Mountain, Jiangxi, China at diffe-rent altitudes. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 2018, 29(5): 1535-1541 (in Chinese)
[12] Xu J-Y (许杰玉), Wang P-T (王鹏腾), Wang Z-S (汪自书), et al. Study on supply-demand analysis and sustainable development plan of water resources in Hefei. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering (水资源与水工程学报), 2015, 26(1): 96-101 (in Chinese)
[13] Liu Z-H (刘忠华), Yu H (于华), Yang F-T (杨方廷), et al. Study on water resources allocation in Shanxi in conditions of uncertainty. Journal of Hydro-electric Engineering (水力发电学报), 2016, 35(3): 36-46 (in Chinese)
[14] Sun D-Y (孙栋元), Li Y-H (李元红), Hu X-Q (胡想全), et al. Study on balance and configuiation of water resources supply and demand in Heihe river basin. Research of Soil and Water Conservation (水土保持研究), 2014, 21(3): 217-221 (in Chinese)
[15] Li J-Z (李静芝), Zhu X (朱翔), Li J-B (李景保). Research on the dynamics analysis and optimization decision-making of water resources supply and demand system in Dongting Lake District. Journal of Natural Resources (自然资源学报), 2013, 28(2): 199-210 (in Chinese)
[16] Shi Q-F (石清峰). Mainly Plants of Soil and Water Conservation and the Cultivation in Taihang Mountains. Beijing: China Forestry Press, 1994 (in Chinese)
[17] Zhou Z-F (周泽福), Zhang G-C (张光灿), Lin F-R (林富荣). The Study of Water Conservation Forest in Taihang Mountains. Beijing: China Forestry Press, 2006 (in Chinese)
[18] Budyko MI. Evaporation Under Natural Conditions. Leningrad: Gidrometeoizdat, 1948
[19] Fu B-P (傅抱璞). On the calculation of the evaporation from land surface. Scientia Atmospherica Sinica (大气科学), 1981, 5(1): 23-31 (in Chinese)
[20] Zhang L, Hickel K, Dawes W, et al. A rational function approach for estimating mean annual evapotranspiration. Water Resources Research, 2004, 40: 1-14
[21] Bureau of Hydrology, Ministry of Water Resources, People’s Republic of China (中华人民共和国水利部水文局). Annual Hydrological Report, People’s Republic of China: Hydrological Data of Yellow River Basin. Zhengzhou: Digital Typography Center of Henan Yellow River Hydrological Survey and Design Institute, 2005-2014 (in Chinese)
[22] Bureau of Hydrology, Ministry of Water Resources, People’s Republic of China (中华人民共和国水利部水文局). Annual Hydrological Report, People’s Republic of China: Hydrological Data of Haihe River Basin. Zhengzhou: Digital Typography Center of Henan Yellow River Hydrological Survey and Design Institute, 2005-2014 (in Chinese)
[23] Sharp R, Tallis HT, Ricketts T, et al. InVEST User’s Guide [EB/OL]. (2015-06-01) [2018-12-05]. http://data.naturalcapital-project.org/nightly-build/release_default/release_default/documentation/
[24] Farley KA, Jobbgy EG, Jackson RB. Effects of affore-station on water yield: A global synthesis with implications for policy. Global Change Biology, 2005, 11: 1565-1576
[25] Boithias L, Acua V, Vergoós L, et al. Assessment of the water supply: Demand ratios in a Mediterranean basin under different global change scenarios and mitigation alternatives. Science of the Total Environment, 2014, 470: 567-577
[26] Yuan Y-X (袁玉欣), Li Y-K (李元坤). Water resource crisis and the way overcoming it in Northern China. Eco-agriculture Research (生态农业研究), 2000, 8(3): 92-94 (in Chinese)
[27] Xia J (夏军), Liu M-Y (刘孟雨), Jia S-F (贾绍凤), et al. Water security problem and research perspective in North China. Journal of Natural Resources (自然资源学报), 2004, 19(5): 550-560 (in Chinese)
[28] Shi P-L (石培礼), Wu B (吴波), Cheng G-W (程根伟), et al. Water retention capacity evaluaiton of main forest vegetation types in the upper Yangtze basin. Journal of Natural Resources (自然资源学报), 2004, 19(3): 351-360 (in Chinese)
[29] Chen D-L (陈东立), Yu X-X (余新晓), Liao B-H (廖邦洪). Analysis on the function of conservation water of the Chinese forest ecosystem. World Forestry Research (世界林业研究), 2005, 18(1): 49-54 (in Chinese)
[30] Green MB, Bailey AS, Bailey SW, et al. Decreased water flowing from a forest amended with calcium silicate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013, 110: 5999-6003
[31] Shi Y-F (施雅风). Rational Exploitation and Use of Water Resources in North China. Beijing: China Water Resources and Hydropower Press, 1990 (in Chinese)

太行山区水资源供需关系的垂直梯度特征

Vertical gradients of water supply and demand in Taihang Mountains, China.

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	路昌, 蔡雪芹, 郝灿书, 刘玉珍, 王之语, 马亚男. 黄河三角洲高效生态经济区生态系统服务权衡协同关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(2): 457-468.
[2]	徐彩瑶, 任燕, 孔凡斌. 浙江省土地利用变化对生态系统固碳服务的影响及其预测 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1610-1620.
[3]	张达, 曾坚, 艾合麦提·那麦提. 高强度开发地区鸟类自然保护地保护空缺识别——以天津市为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1621-1629.
[4]	王想, 王春雨, 吕飞南, 陈水灵, 宇振荣. 基于PLUS-InVEST模型的区县碳储量时空格局变化与碳汇提升策略——以延庆区为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(12): 3373-3384.
[5]	郝嘉元, 智烈慧, 李晓文, 董世魁, 李巍. 青藏高原土地利用格局和生态系统服务的时空演变特征及关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(11): 3053-3063.
[6]	吴可欣, 税伟, 薛成旨, 黄云慧, 江聪. 珠江源区生境质量对土地利用变化的时空响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(1): 169-177.
[7]	高福洁, 崔鸿娇, 韩丙芳, 贺彦玲, 彭文栋, 刘定鑫, 伏兵哲, 马红彬. 亏缺灌溉对干旱区两种乡土植物种子生产性能及其水分利用效率的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(9): 2379-2387.
[8]	雷金睿, 陈毅青, 陈宗铸, 陈小花, 吴庭天, 李苑菱. 基于InVEST模型的海南岛三大流域生境质量时空演变 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(9): 2511-2520.
[9]	黄欣, 彭双云, 王哲, 黄帮梅, 柳璟. 基于地理探测器的云南省生态系统产水服务的空间异质性及驱动因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(10): 2813-2821.
[10]	沈钦炜, 林美玲, 莫惠萍, 黄宇斌, 胡欣雨, 魏凌伟, 郑郁善, 陆东芳. 佛山市生态网络构建及优化 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(9): 3288-3298.
[11]	张志华, 张锦豪, 桑玉强, 杨喜田, 王德彩, 郭加伟, 毕会涛. 太行山南麓坡面土壤碳氮空间变异性及其影响因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(8): 2829-2838.
[12]	姚远, 刘瑞轩, 张胜, 韩清泉. 林木蒸腾耗水量测算方法的比较与应用 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(8): 2989-2998.
[13]	李涛, 巩雅博, 戈健宅, 齐增湘, 谢水波. 基于电路理论的城市景观生态安全格局构建——以湖南省衡阳市为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(7): 2555-2564.
[14]	王文翔, 孙敏, 林文, 任爱霞, 薛建福, 余少波, 张蓉蓉, 高志强. 不同降雨年型磷肥对旱地小麦根系特征、磷素吸收利用和产量的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(3): 895-905.
[15]	杨文仙, 李石华, 彭双云, 李应鑫, 赵寿露, 邱利丹. 顾及地形起伏的InVEST模型的生物多样性重要区识别——以云南省为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(12): 4339-4348.