欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 1191-1198.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202205.010

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同林分类型林缘华北落叶松细胞特征

汪椿凯, 黄选瑞, 李雪, 姜雨, 王小雪, 张先亮*   

  1. 河北农业大学林学院, 河北保定 071000
  • 收稿日期:2021-09-22 接受日期:2022-02-21 出版日期:2022-05-15 发布日期:2022-11-15
  • 通讯作者: * E-mail: zhxianliang85@gmail.com
  • 作者简介:汪椿凯, 男, 1995年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事树木年轮研究。E-mail: wangck0803@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    河北省教育厅青年拔尖人才项目(BJ2020025)、亚太森林组织(APFNet) 项目(2021P2-CHN)、国家自然科学基金项目(41601045)和河北农业大学引进人才项目(YJ201918)资助。

Cell characteristics of Larix principis-rupprechtii on the edge of different stand types

WANG Chun-kai, HUANG Xuan-rui, LI Xue, Jiang-yu, WANG Xiao-xue, ZHANG Xian-liang*   

  1. College of Forestry, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071000, Hebei, China
  • Received:2021-09-22 Accepted:2022-02-21 Online:2022-05-15 Published:2022-11-15

摘要: 以塞罕坝机械林场华北落叶松纯林及华北落叶松-白桦混交林为对象,研究林地边缘华北落叶松边界木与林内木径向生长、年轮细胞大小及数量的差异,分析林缘对不同林分类型华北落叶松径向生长及细胞特征的影响。结果表明: 纯林中边界木的径向生长显著快于林内木,年轮总宽、早材和晚材总生长量在边界木较林内木分别增加48.9%、58.9%和29.6%,而混交林边界木与林内木的径向生长差距并不明显。纯林边界木早材细胞总数、早材大细胞和小细胞数量较林内木分别增加63.3%、55.6%和70.0%,晚材细胞总数、晚材大细胞和小细胞数量边界木较林内木分别增加35.4%、37.5%和28.5%,而早晚材细胞大小在边界木与林内木间无显著差异。混交林边界木早晚材细胞数量与林内木无显著差异,但边界木早材细胞大小较林内木增大50.0%,边界木早材最大细胞、最小细胞、大细胞及小细胞的大小较林内木分别增大28.6%、33.3%、16.6%和25.0%。通过混交的方式营造混交林可以有效地缓解林缘导致的纯林中边界木生长过快而林内木生长较慢的现象。

关键词: 华北落叶松, 林缘, 年轮细胞, 纯林, 混交林

Abstract: To analyze the effects of forest edge on radial growth and cell characteristics in different stand types of Larix principis-rupprechtii, we investigated the differences on radial growth, cell size and numbers between edge trees and inner trees of L. principis-rupprechtii in pure L. principis-rupprechtii forests and mixed forests of L. principis-rupprechtii and Betula platyphylla in Saihanba mechanical forest farm, China. The results showed that radial growth of the edge trees was significantly faster than that of the inner trees in pure forests, with the total ring width, earlywood width and latewood width of edge trees being 48.9%, 58.9% and 29.6% higher than those of inner trees, respectively. However, there was no difference in radial growth between edge trees and inner trees in mixed forest. The total number of earlywood cells, the number of large cells and small cells in earlywood of edge trees were increased by 63.3%, 55.6% and 70.0%, while the total number of latewood cells, the number of large cells and small cells in latewood of edge trees were increased by 35.4%, 37.5% and 28.5% compared with those of inner trees. There was no significant difference in the cell sizes between edge trees and inner trees. The cell numbers of earlywood and latewood of edge trees were not significantly different from those of inner trees in mixed forest, but the cell size in the earlywood of edge trees was 50.0% larger than those of inner trees in mixed forest. The sizes of the largest cells, the smallest cells, the large cells and the small cells in the earlywood of edge trees were increased by 28.6%, 33.3%, 16.6% and 25.0% compared with those of inner trees, respectively. The fast growth of edge trees and slow growth of inner trees in the pure forests could be effectively alleviated by cultivating mixed forests.

Key words: Larix pricipis-rupprechtii, forest edge, tree cell, pure forest, mixed forest